Zuma and MKP challenge Ramaphosa's decisions in Constitutional Court over Mkhwanazi allegations
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers
Jacob Zuma and his uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) have asked the Constitutional Court to halt the implementation of President Cyril Ramaphosa's response to the bombshell allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal provincial police commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi.
The former president and the MKP on Friday filed an urgent application at the apex court to declare invalid and inconsistent with the Constitution Ramaphosa's decision to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and appoint Prof. Firoz Cachalia in an acting capacity as well as establish a commission of inquiry to be chaired by outgoing acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga.
Zuma and the MKP also want the decisions to be declared invalid and set aside with immediate effect.
They also want further and alternative appropriate, just and equitable remedies including, where necessary, interim relief maintaining the status quo ante (before) the impugned decisions, pending the judgment.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In addition, Zuma and the MKP have asked the Concourt to refer the matter back to Ramaphosa to make constitutionally compliant decisions within 15 days of its order, where applicable.
Dr. John Hlophe, MKP deputy president and leader of the opposition in the National Assembly, told the country's highest court that Zuma brought the application in his personal capacity as a voter, taxpayer and citizen as well as ex-president.
'The events dealt with in this matter involve the subversion and multiple infringements of the fundamental rights of a citizen including political and socio-economic rights,' explained Hlophe.
Zuma and the MKP approached the Concourt after the Presidency refused to accede to a letter of demand from their lawyers, T. Mpumlwana and Associates, for Ramaphosa to resign and withdraw last Sunday's public announcement of the commission, Mchunu's leave, Cachalia's appointment, effective from August 1, and that of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe as acting police minister until Cachalia occupies the position.
The Presidency was threatened with an urgent Constitutional Court application, a motion of no confidence by the MKP working with other political parties and rolling mass action and peaceful demonstrations to force Ramaphosa to step down as president.
In response, the Presidency's acting head of legal and executive services Geofrey Mphaphuli said they will not be acquiescing to the demands as the terms of reference of the commission are yet to be published in the government gazette and the appointment of Cachalia has not been finalised.
'The complaints by your clients are therefore premature, ill-informed and misplaced and any approach to the courts would similarly be so affected,' Mphaphuli stated.
Hlophe's founding affidavit explained that the application concerned the urgent matter of utmost public importance and taking it to the lower courts would serve no useful purpose as the continuing depletion of taxpayers' money is also of relevance.
According to Hlophe, placing Mchunu on leave of absence is irrational, tainted by bias, blatant inconsistency and other forms of favouritism as there is no provision for the president to take such a decision, which is a fancy phrase for suspension with pay.
He argued that Mchunu is one of Ramaphosa's closest allies in the ANC's factional battles and has presided over the classification as top secret of the report of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate's probe into the February 2020 theft of foreign currency at the president's Phala Phala farm in Limpopo.
'The inference is therefore irresistible that were it not for their political and factional affinities, Ramaphosa would have duly dismissed Mchunu as he is perfectly entitled and legally empowered to do.
"Like Caesar's wife, the political friends and allies of the president must be above suspicion,' added Hlophe.
He said Cachalia's appointment was inconsistent with the Constitution, ultra vires, irrational, in breach of the rule of law and evidence of the failure by Ramaphosa to fulfil his constitutional obligations.
On the establishment of the commission to also investigate judicial capture or the involvement of unnamed members of the judiciary in collusion with criminal syndicates as alleged by Mkhwanazi, Hlophe said this is another breach of the Constitution as the only state bodies or organs constitutionally and legally entrusted with the power to investigate judicial conduct are the Judicial Service Commission and the Magistrates Commission.
Zuma and the MKP have asked that the matter be heard on July 28 subject to Chief Justice Mandisa Maya's direction.
loyiso.sidimba@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
6 minutes ago
- The Citizen
What happens if the Appropriation Bill fails to pass today?
Some parties have vowed to vote against the bill, while a standoff between GNU partners appears to have simmered. Parliamentarians will vote on their own salaries on Wednesday as the House sits to deliberate on the Appropriation Bill. The bill is the document which authorises government spending, and without it departments cannot perform a host of basic financial actions. Some parties have vowed to vote against the bill, while a standoff between the primary government of national unity (GNU) partners appears to have simmered. Reduction to 10% of spending Chairperson of the Select Committee on Public Accounts, Dr Mmusi Maimane, explained the ramifications of not passing the bill. In attaining the necessary number of votes, Maimane explained that 201 members of parliament present would constitute a quorum. From this quorum, a simple majority would be needed to constitute the passing of the bill. If the Appropriations Bill is not passed, government spending will be reduced to 10% for all national departments. 'There is not a single national department whose salary bill is less than 10%,' Maimane told 702 on Wednesday. 'I am really appealing that the sense of national duty at the moment, such as this one, requires all of us to get this budget through.' DA end boycott The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party stated that it would not support the Appropriations Bill as it continues its push for a motion of no confidence in President Cyril Ramaphosa. However, the Bill is likely to pass given that the DA ended their boycott of budget processes on Tuesday. The DA declared a moral victory as President Cyril Ramaphosa replaced higher education and training minister Nobuhle Nkabane with one of her deputies, Buti Manamela. 'The DA will not allow compromised individuals in the executive to paralyse government or harm the people of this country,' the party stated on Tuesday. 'We will use every tool at our disposal in Parliament and in government to protect public money,' it added. Rize Mzansi stated they would support the bill despite the ultimatums given by rival parties. 'This moment in our politics calls for leadership and maturity, which is sadly lacking, even among some GNU partners who make threats of collapsing both the government and the economy,' the party stated on Wednesday. NOW READ: Here's why Zuma's MK party wants Ramaphosa removed in 'urgent' motion of no confidence
Mail & Guardian
36 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Beyond the balance sheet: Costs and benefits of broad-based BEE
Any discussion about black economic empowerment must weigh up its benefits, addressing historical injustices and the costs of not transforming the economy. Photo: File The current media debate around broad-based black economic empowerment (broad-based BEE) has brought fresh attention to the policy's effect on the economy — raising important questions about its effectiveness, costs and outcomes. As this conversation grows louder, it's worth taking a closer look at some of the arguments being made. An example from the debate is a recent study released by Solidarity and the Free Market Foundation (FMF), which arguably overlooks certain key economic implications of B-BBEE. Titled The Costs of B-BBEE Compliance, the report estimates that broad-based BEE may reduce South Africa's GDP growth by as much as 1.5 to 3% annually, potentially resulting in 96,000 to 192,000 fewer jobs each year. It further contends that the policy disproportionately benefits a narrow elite while imposing undue compliance costs on the broader economy. While such figures demand scrutiny, they also warrant a critical examination of the underlying assumptions, methodology and, crucially, the broader socio-economic context in which broad-based BEE operates. One of the most significant concerns with the report is its presentation of correlation as causation. The paper attributes specific percentages of GDP loss and job losses directly to broad-based BEE but does not demonstrate how these effects were isolated from South Africa's myriad economic problems. South Africa's macroeconomic environment remains deeply constrained by structural impediments such as: Chronic electricity and water shortages, including load shedding; Global economic headwinds; Endemic corruption; and Policy uncertainty and governance deficits. Attributing complex macroeconomic trends solely to broad-based BEE risks simplifies a nuanced reality and underestimates the multifactorial nature of South Africa's growth constraints. Equally important is the report's limited treatment of the potential benefits of broad-based BEE. Many of which manifest over the medium to long term and are difficult to quantify through conventional compliance cost frameworks alone. Equity equivalent programmes (EEPs) enable multinational corporations, constrained by global ownership structures, to achieve ownership points through local investments in enterprise development, skills transfer and innovation. Far from being passive mechanisms, EEPs represent substantial, targeted injections into the domestic economy. IBM, for example, committed R700 million over 10 years to enterprise development, research and education. This included support for 74 black-owned businesses and fully funded bursaries for dozens of students from disadvantaged backgrounds in critical fields of information and communication technology. Samsung also made a substantial commitment, launching a R280 million equity equivalent investment programme (EEIP) in May 2019, projected to contribute nearly R1 billion to the South African economy over its 10-year duration. This programme aimed for a measurable effect on job creation, specifically targeting the creation of 262 direct jobs and supporting 13 black-owned and women-owned businesses. A notable focus of Samsung's investment is on industrialisation by black people through e-Waste recycling and beneficiation research and development, including the establishment of the first black-owned and operated e-waste beneficiation plant in Africa. These company-specific statistics, alongside broader programmes such as JP Morgan's Abadali EEIP, which aims for an additional 1,000 permanent jobs and R2 billion in financing transactions, underscore the crucial role of EEPs in boosting small and medium enterprises (SMEs), particularly black-owned businesses, by providing essential funding, business support and mentorship. Furthermore, these programmes significantly advance skills development, with more than 2,500 beneficiaries receiving critical skills training, and facilitating technology transfer, aligning with South Africa's national development goals and fostering a more inclusive and skilled workforce. The YES programme directly targets South Africa's intractable youth unemployment crisis. Since its inception in 2018, YES has facilitated more than 186,000 quality work experiences for young people, injecting nearly R11 billion in salaries into the economy. About 45% of participants secure permanent employment after placement, and 17% establish their own businesses, multiplying the long-term economic benefit. The initiative also encourages private sector participation by offering measurable broad-based BEE recognition for companies that create these opportunities. Enterprise and supplier development (ESD) remains a cornerstone of the broad-based BEE framework, driving significant investment into the SMME sector. South African corporates reportedly channel R20 billion to R30 billion annually into ESD programmes, helping integrate black-owned businesses into supply chains and enabling sustainable growth. For instance, the Shoprite Group's CredX programme has provided R10 billion in working capital to suppliers, while its Next Capital initiative has invested R20 million to support new black-owned enterprises. Collectively, such interventions empower black entrepreneurs, expand the tax base and generate employment in communities historically excluded from meaningful economic participation. Why broad-based BEE still matters Perhaps the most profound omission in the Solidarity and FMF report is its decontextualised approach to broad-based BEE's rationale. Apartheid was not merely a political system; it was an economic design that systematically dispossessed black South Africans of land, capital, skills and opportunities. This entrenched economic disenfranchisement cannot be dismantled simply by repealing discriminatory laws. Broad-based BEE emerged as a policy instrument to facilitate redress, promote equitable economic participation and mitigate the persistent structural inequality that threatens social cohesion and long-term stability. Any analysis that fails to account for this historical imperative and the potential socio-economic cost of neglecting it, is incomplete. There is little doubt that broad-based BEE can and should be improved. Calls for greater transparency, genuine empowerment outcomes, and tighter controls to prevent fronting and inefficiency are well-founded. But presenting a one-sided narrative that focuses exclusively on compliance costs while disregarding significant economic and social returns undermines the opportunity for a more balanced, evidence-based debate. As South Africa grapples with the problems of inclusive growth, any meaningful conversation about the future of broad-based BEE must extend beyond a narrow cost-benefit calculus. It must weigh the policy's role in addressing historical injustices, its measurable and often intangible benefits, and the opportunity costs of not transforming the economy. A policy of this nature should not be romanticised or demonised without context. Instead, it demands honest, nuanced discussion, one that prioritises national development, social cohesion and sustainable, broad-based participation in the economy. The question should not be whether broad-based BEE has costs but rather whether we are collectively doing enough to ensure that its benefits are fully realised and that it continues to evolve to serve the South Africa we aspire to build. Safiyya Patel is a managing partner at Webber Wentzel.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
New Higher Education and Training Minister and Deputy sworn in
Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Training, Buti Manamela, was sworn in as Minister of that portfolio in Cape Town on Tuesday afternoon. During the same ceremony, former KwaZulu-Natal Premier, Dr Nomusa Dube-Ncube, was sworn in as his deputy. WATCH | Deputy Minister of Higher Education Nomusa Dube-Ncube's home TORCHED The swearing-in ceremony was held at Tuynhuys in the presence of President Cyril Ramaphosa and Deputy President Paul Mashatile. Manamela and Dube-Ncube were appointed following the removal of Dr Nobuhle Nkabane from the role of Minister and Higher Education and Training on Monday evening. Dube-Ncube was appointed in terms of Section 93 (b) of the Constitution, which allows the President to appoint no more than two Deputy Ministers from outside the National Assembly. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
