
Starmer hands Trump ‘veto' on Chinese investment in UK
The two world leaders announced a long-awaited trade agreement on Thursday that will lower steel and car tariffs for British companies and boost trade.
Mr Trump said that the UK and US would have a 'better relationship than ever before' and that the agreement had been struck 'because of Brexit'.
Sir Keir said the agreement would 'protect, save and enhance jobs', especially in the luxury car industry.
Tariffs on cars will fall from 25 per cent to 10 per cent immediately, while the rate on steel and aluminium will be reduced from 25 per cent to zero.
But The Telegraph has learnt that under the terms of the deal, the US will also have the ability to object to Chinese companies investing in the UK, in a clause the Conservatives said amounted to a 'veto'.
The agreement, due to be published on Thursday night, said that both countries 'intend to co-operate on the effective use of investment security measures', which could involve blocking Chinese takeovers.
Government sources said the US would not have an outright veto, but that Washington could 'flag' concerns about Chinese companies buying up key infrastructure.
That could trigger the National Security and Investment Act, which allows ministers to intervene in takeovers on national security grounds.
A source close to the talks said the deal amounted to a 'sort of veto' for the US on 'major China investment' that had been 'extremely important to the Americans' during talks.
But Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, said allowing the US to intervene on foreign investment decisions showed Sir Keir had made too many concession s to Mr Trump.
'Keir Starmer has already given Trump a bigger UK tariff cut than Trump has given him,' she said.
'Now it looks like he's effectively handed America a veto over investment decisions in the UK. When Labour negotiates, Britain loses. The US has told Starmer to jump, and he's said 'how high?''
Thursday's agreement is not a comprehensive trade agreement, but will reduce tariffs on British cars and steel, while giving American companies some tariff-free access to UK beef and ethanol markets, with quotas.
It was announced in a joint phone call, which was televised from Washington and the West Midlands, where Sir Keir later addressed workers at a Jaguar Land Rover factory.
Mr Trump has long criticised the dominance of Chinese goods on global markets, and pledged to protect US businesses from cheap imports.
The White House has also asked the UK for assurances that steel and pharmaceutical products exported to the US do not originate in China, amid fears the deal could be used to 'circumvent' Mr Trump's punishing tariffs on Beijing.
Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, said the deal had effectively saved car manufacturers that were at risk of thousands of job losses within weeks if Mr Trump's 25 per cent tariffs remained in place.
However, Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative Party leader, said Britain had been 'shafted' by the deal. The former business secretary noted UK tariffs on the US had been 5.1 per cent on average and were now 1.8 per cent, while US tariffs on the UK were 3.4 per cent on average before Mr Trump took office and were now the universal 10 per cent applied to all countries.
The deal was announced after a phone call between Sir Keir and Mr Trump on Wednesday night, when the Prime Minister was watching Arsenal play in the Champions League semi-final.
Negotiators finalised the terms before the US president announced online that there would be a 'major' deal with a 'big and highly respected' country.
He said on Thursday that the EU had treated America 'extremely unfairly' but the UK became the first nation with a trade deal 'because of Brexit in particular'.
The agreement also commits the US and UK to future co-operation on technology. As part of the talks, a major British airline committed to buy $10 billion of aeroplanes and parts from the American firm Boeing.
A further agreement on what Mr Trump calls 'reciprocal' tariffs of 10 per cent on all goods is expected in the coming months.
Lord Mandelson, the US ambassador, said the deal was 'not the end, it's the end of just the beginning'.
The UK will also receive preferential treatment when the US next imposes tariffs on a specific sector.
Mr Trump has said he is minded to increase the rates on foreign pharmaceutical companies and film studios, both major British exports.
The US president's concern about Chinese investment in Britain comes after warnings that Beijing already has too much control over UK infrastructure, including through partnerships on batteries and offshore wind backed by Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary.
Mr Miliband has since agreed to strip solar panels made with Chinese slave labour out of supply chains used in the UK.
Speaking to reporters about the investment security rules, Mr Reynolds said the US and UK had 'shared national security priorities'.
'It's particularly appropriate to be able to agree that with the US on the 80th anniversary of VE Day,' he said. 'There's symbolism there.'
On Thursday, Mr Trump signalled that he may cut tariffs on China. He said levies on China 'can only come down'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
13 minutes ago
- BBC News
Russia oil imports "a point of irritation" in India-US ties, says Rubio
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that Delhi's relationship with Moscow remains a "point of irritation" in India-US statement comes a day after US President Donald Trump said he would impose 25% tariffs on Indian goods "plus an unspecified penalty", for buying Russian oil and an interview to Fox News Radio on Thursday, Rubio called India an "ally" and "strategic partner" but added that Delhi's purchase of Russian oil was hampering its relationship with oil made up 35% to 40% of India's oil imports in 2024 - up from 3% in 2021. India has not officially commented on Rubio's statement. Delhi has defended its purchases of Russian oil, arguing that as a major energy importer, it must buy the cheapest available crude to protect millions of poor Indians from rising ramped up its purchase of cheaper Russian crude after the Ukraine war began, triggered by sanctions from the West. Rubio acknowledged India's reasons for buying Russian oil, noting that the country had huge energy needs and that it was buying from Moscow because of its discounted prices. But he added that this was fuelling the Russian war effort in Ukraine."I think what you're seeing the President express is the very clear frustration that with so many other oil vendors available, India continues to buy so much from Russia," he added, alluding to Trump's threat of imposing penalties on Indian companies buying Russian oil and news agency reported that India's state-owned refineries like Hindustan Petroleum Corp (HPCL), Bharat Petroleum Corp (BPCL), Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd (MRPL) and Indian Oil Corp (IOCL) had stopped importing Russian crude since the past week due to lowered BBC has reached out to the companies for Global Investment Research also said there was a "significant decline" already in India's oil purchases from Russia in July. Last month, India's Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas Hardeep Singh Puri had said that the country would be able to meet its oil needs from alternative sources if Russian supplies were hit by US said India had widened its pool of oil suppliers from 27 to about 40 diversification in India's oil imports away from Russia is expected to have a minimal impact on India's current account deficit - the gap between the value of a country's exports and imports and international transfers of capital - according to CareEdge, a ratings agency. "The price differential between Russian Ural and Brent Crude has significantly narrowed to around $3 per barrel from an average of $20 per barrel in 2023," CareEdge said in a note.


Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
France's Engie posts 9.4% drop in first-half earnings
PARIS, Aug 1 - French utility Engie ( opens new tab posted a 9.4% fall in half-year earnings on Friday, as higher income from natural gas distribution failed to offset lower energy prices and hydropower production. The company reported first-half earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), excluding nuclear, of 5.1 billion euros ($5.82 billion), compared to 5.6 billion euros a year ago. "These results are solid in normalising market conditions and in an uncertain economic and geopolitical context," said CEO Catherine MacGregor. Europe's largest gas network operator said last month that a colder 2025 had resulted in a boost of 6.5 Terawatt-hours (TWh) of gas distributed and sold to clients versus the prior year. However that was tempered by a 2.1 TWh drop in French hydropower production due to less rain, and a 2.2 TWh drop in nuclear production, after Belgium permanently retired Engie's Doel 1 nuclear plant in February and took the Tihange 3 plant offline in April for life-extension upgrades. Engie has sought in recent years to exit the nuclear business, refocus on its core natural gas holdings and reinvest the profits into renewables. The company is moving ahead with three wind and solar projects in the U.S., after President Donald Trump finalised the annual budget providing clarity on energy policy, MacGregor told journalists. "The clients and U.S. market remain very promising," she said, adding that projections for data centre buildout cannot be done without a large amount of renewable energy projects. ($1 = 0.8757 euros)


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
What you need to know about Heathrow Airport's £21bn expansion plans
Heathrow Airport has submitted plans for a third runway, with the runway and airfield estimated to cost £21 billion, and the overall project £49 billion. The proposed expansion aims to significantly increase annual flight capacity to 756,000 and passenger numbers to 150 million, necessitating a new 3,500-metre runway and the tunnelling of the M25 motorway. Heathrow anticipates securing planning consent by 2029, with the new runway becoming operational within a decade of approval. Proponents, including Chancellor Rachel Reeves and easyJet, argue the expansion will boost investment, trade, create jobs, and potentially lead to lower airfares. The Mayor of London, Sir Sadiq Khan, and environmental organisations like Friends of the Earth oppose the plans, citing concerns over noise, air pollution, and the UK 's climate change commitments.