
Japan and U.S. both claim win in surprise 11th-hour tariff deal
The United States is promoting it as the deal of the century. For Japan, it was a mission-accomplished moment.
The agreement, the details of which are still being ironed out, includes a 15% "reciprocal" tariff on most Japanese goods and 12.5% on cars, with 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum remaining unchanged.
Japan has agreed to buy more rice, improve market access and invest in a $550 billion fund that will support strategic industries and technologies in the United States.
'There has never been anything like it,' U.S. President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social.
The reciprocal tariff is 10 percentage points lower than the rate that had been scheduled to kick in on Aug. 1, while the auto tariff has been cut by half from 25%. The total for autos will now be 15%, including 2.5% duty on autos charged independent of Trump tariffs.
'I firmly believe we have achieved an agreement that protects what needs to be protected, while aligning with the national interests of both Japan and the United States,' Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's chief tariff negotiator, said Tuesday in Washington.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba noted that the 15% reciprocal tariff is the best rate achieved by a trade surplus country.
The Nikkei 225 stock index rose 3.51% in trading Wednesday, with Toyota up 14.35% and Honda 11.15%. The yen traded steady in the ¥146 to the dollar range.
Washington assured Tokyo that for strategically important goods, such as semiconductors and pharmaceutical products, tariffs for Japan will always match the best rate charged to other countries, Akazawa told reporters.
He also said that Japan will increase American rice imports under the current minimum access framework, which has allowed roughly 770,000 metric tons of foreign rice to enter Japan annually tariff free.
Japan and the United States will make efforts to strengthen supply chains through Japanese investment in the U.S., with a focus on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, steel, shipbuilding, critical minerals, aerospace, energy, automobiles, artificial intelligence and quantum technology.
Japanese government-affiliated financial institutions will provide up to $550 billion in equity investments, loans and loan guarantees, Akazawa said.
He noted that defense spending targets were not included in the deal, and that Japan made no commitments to lower tariffs on U.S. products, as they are already very low.
Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato said on Wednesday that the deal does not include any agreements on the yen-dollar exchange rate.
'I'm kind of surprised," said William Chou, deputy director of Hudson Institute's Japan Chair, in discussing the auto tariffs. The fact that Japan was able to cut the rate by 12.5 percentage points is a huge accomplishment, he said.
Chou added that Japan has promised access and reforms that in the eyes of the U.S. administration "create a long-term pathway towards trade balance.'
But Ryo Sahashi, a professor at the University of Tokyo's Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, called the deal "an extremely limited win."
'What we've achieved is merely a reasonably decent result compared to the worst-case scenario,' he said. 'Japan has simply escaped the worst possible situation, nothing more.'
The U.S. president announced the deal after a 70-minute meeting at the White House with Akazawa, who arrived in Washington on Monday for an eighth round of negotiations with the Trump administration.
Prior to the meeting at the White House, Akazawa met with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for more than two hours Monday evening and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for about 30 minutes Tuesday afternoon.
'It was a tense and high-stakes negotiation,' Akazawa said of his meeting with Trump. 'Both sides were fully serious and operating at the limit.'
On X, Akazawa posted a photo in the White House with a hashtag that translates to #MissionComplete.
People react as they read a newspaper special edition reporting on the U.S.-Japan tariff deal, in Tokyo on Wednesday. |
REUTERS
Ishiba — who has come under immense pressure to resign after the ruling coalition suffered a defeat in an Upper House election and lost its majority in the chamber — took credit Wednesday morning in Tokyo, saying the deal is a result of efforts made by his administration since February.
'This is precisely about prioritizing investment over tariffs,' Ishiba said. 'Since I proposed this idea to President Trump during the summit at the White House in February, I have consistently advocated for it and strongly pushed the U.S. side, and this agreement is the result of those efforts.
'I believe this will contribute to Japan and the United States working together to create jobs and promote high-quality manufacturing, thereby fulfilling various roles on the global stage moving forward,' he told reporters.
News reports on Wednesday in Tokyo indicated Ishiba might resign by the end of August, though the prime minister denied this later in the day.
'Ironically, the Ishiba administration appears destined to be driven from office, with this tariff negotiation success potentially becoming its greatest — and final — achievement,' said Sahashi.
But even if the leadership changes, Japan is likely to stick to the deal as part of Ishiba's legacy, said Hudson Institute's Chou.
"I don't think a different leader would have necessarily been able to find a different path,' Chou said.
The surprise breakthrough comes just ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline set by Trump in which the reciprocal rate for Japan was set to rise to 25%, up from the baseline 10%.
Japan had previously eyed a meeting between Ishiba and Trump at the Group of Seven summit in June to reach a framework agreement, but auto tariffs had been a major sticking point.
In the recent weeks leading up to Tuesday's agreement, Trump had expressed frustration with Japan and the pace of negotiations with the country, at one point threatening to take the reciprocal rate as high as 35%.
'I think both sides can claim that they got parts of what they wanted,' Chou said, while adding that the question now is whether Japan can carry out the pledges it has made.
'We'll have to see how that is carried out. I'm sure the Trump administration will also be paying very close attention."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
28 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Various tactics to force Ishiba out of power emerge within the LDP
Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers — fuming over Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba staying on despite losing a majority in the Upper House election — are coming up with various tactics to force him out of his post as soon as possible. The party has been thrown into a political power game between those who want Ishiba ousted immediately and those supporting the prime minister, who denied reports Wednesday that he will resign. One of the two tactics under discussion is to hold an official decision-making meeting of party lawmakers that requires the support of a third of them or more to be held. Currently, the party is expected to hold a less formal meeting of party lawmakers on Monday to discuss the outcome of the Upper House election. If Monday's meeting becomes an official one, it could give further momentum to the anti-Ishiba camp and a petition to hold an LDP leadership race could be submitted, among other options. On Friday, LDP lawmaker Hiroyoshi Sasagawa told reporters that he was able to gather enough signatures to hold an official meeting. The anti-Ishiba camp hopes that getting at least a third of the party lawmakers on board for the official meeting will pressure Ishiba to step down. A petition to hold the meeting has reportedly been signed by former members of the now-defunct factions that were led by party heavyweights Shinzo Abe and Toshimitsu Motegi, as well as those in the existing faction led by former Prime Minister Taro Aso. Meanwhile, some LDP lawmakers are going door to door in the political center of Nagatacho, collecting their colleagues' signatures for a petition to move the date for the party's presidential election forward from September 2027, when Ishiba's three-year term ends. Often described as the "recall provision,' a presidential race can be held if more than half of the combined number of LDP lawmakers and one representative from each local chapter asks for one. The provision, however, has never been invoked since it was introduced in 2002. The key would be how widely anti-Ishiba sentiment is spread within the party across the nation. Calls for Ishiba to resign, however, are already spreading among younger LDP lawmakers. The LDP's youth bureau submitted a letter to LDP Secretary-General Hiroshi Moriyama on Friday demanding that Ishiba and the party's executive members take responsibility for the Upper House election results, effectively urging them to resign. The letter was submitted after 46 out of 47 LDP prefectural chapters participated in an online meeting with the party's youth bureau on Wednesday, in which the majority of participants agreed to submit a joint statement to party headquarters demanding the 'immediate' resignation and replacement of Ishiba and other party executives. Ishiba is set to make a decision on what to do once key events in August are over, including a commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the anniversary of the end of World War II on Aug. 15 and an international conference on African development in Yokohama from Aug. 20 to 22. On Friday, Ishiba met with ruling and opposition party leaders to update them on the tariff deal with the United States. But the meeting was overshadowed by a flood of news reports and speculation on what might happen to Ishiba. Yoshihiko Noda, leader of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, told reporters that Ishiba did not mention anything about his current standing in the Friday meeting. On Wednesday, Ishiba denied reports that he would resign at the end of August after an unusual meeting at party headquarters with three former prime ministers — Aso, Yoshihide Suga and Fumio Kishida — hours after Japan and the United States reached the surprise trade agreement . Ishiba said the party heavyweights did not discuss his resignation, but one of the former prime ministers at the meeting revealed that none of them were supportive of Ishiba's continued leadership. Information from Jiji added

an hour ago
Renesas Suffers 1st Jan-June Net Loss in 6 Years
News from Japan Technology Jul 25, 2025 19:01 (JST) Tokyo, July 25 (Jiji Press)--Renesas Electronics Corp. said Friday that the major Japanese semiconductor producer suffered a group net loss of 175.3 billion yen for the first half of the current business year through December, logging the first January-June red ink in six years. Renesas saw its bottom line swing from 139.5 billion yen in the black a year earlier due chiefly to an appraisal loss of 235 billion yen caused by the failure of its U.S. partner chipmaker Wolfspeed Inc., which last month filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Renesas had made a deposit of 2 billion dollars with Wolfspeed to procure chip substrate. Half-year consolidated sales dropped 10.7 pct to 634.3 billion yen, reflecting weaker chip demand from automakers and industrial equipment manufacturers. During an online briefing, Renesas President and CEO Hidetoshi Shibata hailed the latest Japan-U.S. tariff agreement. But he also expressed concern over the uncertain impact of the 15 pct U.S. tariff rate to be applied to Japanese imports on his firm's earnings. END [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press


The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: LDP, Japan need new politics amid PM Ishiba's inevitable resignation
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's resignation has become unavoidable. The ruling coalition has now suffered crushing defeats in both chambers of the Diet, losing its majority. Having been handed a vote of no confidence by the electorate, this outcome is only natural. Following last autumn's loss in the House of Representatives election, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and Komeito again failed to secure a majority in this month's House of Councillors race. Including the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly election in June, the Ishiba administration has now lost three major elections in a row. Yet even now, the prime minister insists, "What matters most is avoiding a paralysis of national politics," and clings to his post. Such remarks, which seem to ignore the weight of the election results, have sparked fierce backlash both inside and outside the party. LDP prefectural chapters across the country are demanding Ishiba's swift resignation. The movement to oust him has accelerated, with mid-level and younger lawmakers calling for the party leadership election to be moved up. Declaration to stay on ignores public will Ishiba, whose base within the party has always been weak, owed his past prominence in leadership races to strong support from local party members. But after repeated election defeats, even these supporters have abandoned him, leaving him politically cornered. With the resolution of Japan-U.S. negotiations over President Donald Trump's tariffs -- which Ishiba described as a "national crisis" -- now resolved, the prime minister's justification for staying on has also evaporated. Ishiba is expected to announce his resignation in response to the LDP's review of its upper house election defeat, which is to be compiled in August. Ishiba was originally chosen as prime minister in hopes of fundamentally reforming "LDP politics." For years, he had criticized the government from within the party for being out of touch with the public. But since taking office, he has appeared to be swallowed up by the LDP's old logic. He has betrayed the public's hopes for a fundamental change in the political status quo. The clearest example is the "money in politics" issue. Ishiba was reluctant to break with the LDP's money-driven culture, which came under fire in the party's factional slush fund scandal. Even after the lower house defeat, he showed little willingness to take responsibility, and sought to preserve corporate and organizational donations that could distort policy. As the nation's leader, Ishiba also failed to present a clear national vision. He kept his own views on diplomacy and national security under wraps, and even his signature regional revitalization policies amounted to little more than a rehash of past efforts. The "Ishiba touch" was never on display. When the LDP was reduced to a minority in the lower house, Ishiba called for a "deliberative Diet" in which ruling and opposition parties would scrutinize each other's proposals to produce better policies. In reality, however, he prioritized cobbling together enough votes to pass LDP legislation, repeatedly compromising in closed-door talks with some opposition parties. This was a clear case of saying one thing and doing another. The LDP has long weathered criticism by simply regularly swapping its leader. The public has seen through the Ishiba Cabinet as just another "pseudo-regime change," leading to widespread disappointment. Time to restore trust in politics The LDP has long led postwar politics as a national party that listens to a wide range of voices. The upper house election has laid bare that this foundation is dissolving. Support groups have weakened, and the old method of exchanging policy favors for "votes and money" no longer works. During the "lost 30 years" following the collapse of Japan's bubble economy in the early 1990s, the party failed to directly address the public's anxiety about their daily lives. As a result, emerging parties have siphoned off support from young people, independents and the middle class, who believe Japan's vitality has been sapped. In the increasingly multiparty upper house, both ruling and opposition parties engaged in a "battle of appeals" during the latest election, touting policies including tax cuts and tougher immigration controls with little regard for funding. But drifting toward such easy populism will prevent the LDP from fulfilling its responsibilities as a governing party. The party must also confront medium- and long-term challenges head-on, such as building a sustainable social security system for a shrinking population, restoring fiscal health, and responding to growing international tensions. Such efforts will also lead to the stabilization of people's lives for the future and the restoration of trust in politics. The real question for the LDP now is whether it can achieve true self-reform and be reborn as a new national party. Simply changing the party leader to create an illusion of renewal will not work. If the LDP does not intend to hand over power to the opposition, it must present a new, broadly supported government framework and a clear direction for the country.