
Madras High Court lays down guidelines to prevent harassment complaints against T.N. police personnel
The Madras High Court has issued guidelines for Tamil Nadu police personnel to prevent complaints of harassment during the investigation of criminal cases.
Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan has ordered that henceforth, the police must summon any individual for inquiry only by issuing a written notice under Section 179 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
The judge ordered that the written summons/notice must specify the date and time when the individual concerned — be it a suspect or witness — must appear before the police officer concerned for inquiry.
Further, the minutes of the inquiry should be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station concerned and personnel must refrain from meting out any kind of ill-treatment to the suspect/witness, he ordered.
The judge also ordered that the police must scrupulously follow the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in 2014, in the famous Lalita Kumari's case, with respect to procedures to be followed during preliminary inquiry and registration of First Information Report (FIR).
The orders were passed while disposing of a petition filed by M. Raji to restrain an Inspector of Police attached to the Avadi Central Crime Branch from harassing the petitioner and his family members in connection with an immovable property dispute.
The petitioner's counsel M.T. Arunan told the court that the police have no authority to interfere with a civil dispute and hence, they must be restrained from harassing individuals in connection with such disputes.
Observing that numerous petitions were being filed in the High Court to restrain police personnel from harassing litigants, the judge said, courts would generally not interfere with investigations conducted by the police but it could also not turn a blind eye to complaints of harassment.
An enquiry into a non-cognisable offence or a cognisable offence falls within the unfettered powers conferred on the investigating officers, as long as the power to investigate/conduct inquiry into these offences were legitimately exercised within the framework of Chapter XIII of the BNSS, 2023.
'Though the Sanhita empowers the Judicial Magistrates to be a guardian in all the stages of the police investigation, there is no power envisaging the Magistrates to interfere with the actual investigation or the mode of investigation. It is in this background that numerous petitions complaining of harassment are being filed before this court,' the judge wrote.
He went to state that the term 'harassment' by itself had a very broad meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner may not be so for the police officer. Therefore, it was necessary to frame certain guidelines for the police personnel on this issue, the judge added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC orders protection of Bihar girl who fled abusive forced marriage
The Supreme Court on Wednesday stepped in to protect a 16-year-old girl from Bihar who alleged she was forcibly married to a man twice her age and later subjected to abuse, as it ordered protection to the girl and her friend who helped her escape the marriage and now faces a kidnapping charge. A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan directed the Director General of Police, Bihar, and the Delhi Police Commissioner to ensure the safety of both the girl and her friend. They were also asked to provide them with emergency contact numbers to be used in case of any exigency. The girl approached the court through her friend, seeking annulment of the marriage under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, and protection from any coercive action. Her petition said she had taken her Class 10 board exams when she was married off on December 9, 2024, under pressure from her family. The groom, a civil contractor aged about 33, allegedly insisted on the marriage as repayment for financial support extended to her family. The plea said she was immediately sent off with her husband after the ceremony and was not allowed to return home, despite promises that she could come back in two days. Her in-laws repeatedly told her that they wanted a child and that too much money had been spent on the wedding to reverse it. The plea said the girl, who dreams of becoming a teacher or a lawyer, was told she would not be allowed to continue her studies. The petition alleged repeated physical and emotional abuse by the husband, especially after she resisted physical intimacy. She remained in a state of distress until mid-January 2025, when her maternal uncle persuaded her in-laws to let her visit her parental home. Even there, the girl claimed, her requests to terminate the marriage and pursue her education were ignored. On March 31, 2025, she left her home and sought help from her friend. After much persuasion, he agreed to accompany her to Varanasi. The two have been on the run since, fearing for their lives. The plea said the husband has made public threats, declaring in their village that he would kill the girl and 'happily go to jail' for it. Her mother filed a kidnapping case against the friend in Patna's Piplawan Naubatpur police station, allegedly concealing the fact that her daughter had already been married. 'The petitioner fears she will be killed if apprehended or forced to return,' said the plea, urging protection from any coercive police action until the case is fully adjudicated. Taking note of the threat to the minor's safety, the Supreme Court issued its protective directions and is expected to hear the matter in July. While the police chiefs have been directed to submit status reports in the matter before the next hearing, the court also sought responses from the girl's mother and the civil contractor, who have been named as parties to her petition in the court.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Karnataka HC upholds ex-French diplomat Pascal Mazurier's acquittal in sexual assault case against daughter
The Karnataka High Court on June 5 upheld the acquittal of Pascal Mazurier, a former French diplomat, regarding charges of raping his minor daughter. The order by a Division Bench consisting of Justices Sreenivas Harish Kumar and K S Hemalekha was recently made publicly available. The matter was taken up by the Bench based on a petition moved by the child's mother, challenging the 2017 order that acquitted Mazurier. Mazurier's wife had filed a complaint alleging that her child was sexually assaulted on three occasions in 2010 and twice in 2012 with the last being on June 13, 2012. The child was just under four years old at the time. Mazurier was booked on charges of rape in June 2012 while he was the Head of Chancery in the Consulate of France, Bengaluru. In October that year, the Karnataka High Court granted bail to Mazurier, saying that there was no prima facie case against him. The trial court had acquitted Mazurier in 2017, stating that the wife had used the child as a means to prevent him from leaving the country, noting that she had begun collecting evidence before lodging the complaint and had taken help from persons connected to NGOs. The woman's counsel argued before the High Court that the act of collecting evidence before registering a complaint was natural caution and a reasonable step to clarify her doubts. The counsel also argued that the medical evidence had not been properly appreciated. The child's mother said that the delay in lodging the report was because of the accused's financial and emotional influence. Mazurier's counsel argued that the entire prosecution case was circumstantial and that if one link was broken, the case would fail. It was asserted that the marriage was on the verge of ending, and the First Information Report (FIR) was false and related to marital discord. Among other arguments, it was stated that the urinary infection which the child was suffering from was wrongly attributed as a symptom of sexual abuse. With the wife being one of the primary witnesses, the Bench stated, 'Her statement carries significant weight but must be consistent, reliable and free from major contradictions to sustain a conviction. The admission, such as the accused taking the family for outings, the victim's medical condition being diagnosed as urinary tract infection, and treatment .. raises doubt about the allegation of sexual abuse, particularly the medical records support an alternative, non-criminal explanation for the victim's symptoms'. Regarding the fact that she had approached NGOs before lodging the complaint, the court stated that though such a step was consistent with concern for child welfare,' the sequence involving repeated consultation, delayed police reporting, and referrals largely controlled by NGO-linked personnel suggests a well-orchestrated build-up rather than immediate, reactive reporting thus raising doubt about spontaneity and credibility. The fact that PW.4 (the wife) met various NGOs, doctors, and legal professionals before the alleged triggering incident on 13.06.2012 raises a serious question about the credibility of the report she filed on 14.06.2012.' Among other issues, the court also stated that the testimony of the alleged victim was inconsistent and indicated coaching. The court said, 'Her (the minor's) statements appear to be inconsistent and lacking coherence. She recalls events unrelated to the complaint and fails to recall parts of early childhood, including her school, friends, or travels. Importantly, she admitted being coached by her mother (PW.4), with promises of chocolate and a picnic in exchange for giving certain answers in court.'


Pink Villa
4 hours ago
- Pink Villa
Yoo Ah In's drug case: Hellbound actor's final Supreme Court ruling set for July 3, here's what it entails
Trigger Warning: This article contains mention of drug addiction. Yoo Ah In has been facing prolonged legal challenges due to allegations of drug abuse. Following two trials, the actor was found guilty and received a sentence that included prison time and probation. He subsequently filed an appeal, and according to recent updates to the case, its final verdict is scheduled to be delivered on July 3. This development was reported by the K-media outlet Sports Chosun on June 17. Yoo Ah In's drug abuse case's final verdict date announced Legal sources cited on June 17, that the Supreme Court's First Division, led by Chief Justice Ma Yong Ju, is set to pronounce its final judgment on Yoo Ah In 's allegations of habitual drug use and other offenses on July 3 at 10:10 AM KST (6:40 AM IST). The case was submitted to the Supreme Court on March 12 and subsequently assigned to the First Division on April 17. Since then, the division examined the legal aspects for almost 2 months.