
Turn A New C-Suite Leader Into A Systems Leader: Onboarding Playbook
When a new C-suite leader walks into the organization, it's more than just a personnel change. It's a shift in energy, vision and, if handled well, organizational capability. But too often, onboarding is reduced to briefings, handshakes and PowerPoint decks.
Here's the truth: Great leaders don't succeed alone. They thrive when the system around them is aligned, when people, culture, strategy and relationships are all moving in sync. That doesn't happen by accident. It requires intentional design, and it starts with thinking systemically.
Let's talk about how to onboard a senior leader in a way that turns them into a systems leader—someone who doesn't just fit into the team but helps the whole team build coherence and alignment and perform at a higher level.
Reframing Onboarding As A Leverage Point
In systems thinking, we talk about leverage points, which are small places in a system where a change can have an outsized impact. Onboarding a new executive is one of those moments. It's a rare chance to ask: What do we want this leadership team to become together with this new piece of the puzzle now in place? If you just plug the new leader into an existing structure without pausing to recalibrate, you miss the opportunity to reset the system.
Traditional onboarding focuses on structure, such as stakeholders, workflows and KPIs. But systems leaders focus on the invisible layer. What assumptions are being made? What feedback loops are active or broken? What dynamics are quietly shaping performance? Your onboarding plan should do more than inform. It should engage, reveal and realign.
Start With Storytelling To Build Trust
To do this well, begin with a session titled 'Who Am I?' Let the new leader share their story, career highlights, values and pivotal lessons. Not a résumé. A reflection. People respond to narrative, and stories build trust quickly. Trust is the first resource any leader needs. A facilitator can be employed to do this in a conversational or fireside chat format.
Next, surface working styles across the team. Don't assume everyone knows how others operate. Use simple diagnostics or profiling tools to help the team better understand each other. This is not just about learning the new leader's style but helping the team collectively see how they interlock and collaborate. A facilitator can also use a vulnerability assessment for the leadership team so that the conversation is not just all about strengths but also what they are collectively susceptible to. I would personally use the "Fiends & Heroes" framework for such an occasion.
Align On Purpose, Vision And Strategy
Facilitate a purpose, vision and strategy alignment session. Invite leaders to articulate what they believe the team is here to do, how they define success and what strategies they are currently pursuing. Often, this process surfaces deeply held yet unspoken differences in assumptions and priorities. These conversations can be the most revealing and the most transformative.
At some point, address conflict dynamics. Every leadership team has patterns around disagreement—some productive, others not. Use a tool like the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument to help the team reflect on how they currently navigate tension and co-create new norms. This isn't just about improving conflict resolution; it's about building psychological safety and shared language for challenge.
Invite Strategic Dialogue, Not Just Vision Setting
When the new leader is ready, have them present their early observations and outline their initial vision. This should not be a one-way speech but a conversation with the team. Then co-create a short list of three to five strategic themes the team will commit to tackling together. Assign roles and define next steps. This moment turns the leader's arrival from a welcome ceremony into a moment of shared strategic recommitment.
Close the process with a 'commitment circle' where each team member shares what they've learned, what they will do differently moving forward and what they need from others to succeed. It is in these closing reflections that insight transforms into real accountability.
Sustain The Systemic Shift
Of course, one conversation or event won't create lasting change. Extend the integration through three core practices. First, coaching. Pair the new leader with an executive coach skilled in systems thinking, who can help them reflect on their leadership impact and refine their system awareness. Second, feedback sensing. Introduce pulse-check tools at 30, 60 and 90 days to track emerging tensions, perceptions and misalignments. Third, reflective dialogue. Run quarterly alignment sessions where the leadership team checks in, resets priorities and strengthens collaboration.
This approach works because it reframes onboarding as a team-wide reset, not a one-person orientation. Rather than focusing on how to help the new leader 'fit in,' the emphasis shifts to helping the entire leadership team reconfigure itself around the new dynamic. The new leader becomes a catalyst for alignment, not just a recipient of information.
Avoid The Common Pitfalls
To make this work, avoid three common pitfalls. First, don't confuse activity with alignment. Overloading the calendar with stakeholder meetings and PowerPoint briefings won't substitute for real conversations. Second, don't let legacy dynamics go unspoken. Every leadership team has a history. Naming it is the first step to moving beyond it. Third, don't delay hard conversations. Early signals of misalignment only grow stronger if ignored.
Final Thoughts
We live in a time of increasing complexity. Leaders don't just need to drive results. They need to build coherence. Systems thinking offers the mindset and methods to make onboarding a systemic act of leadership. It's not about helping the new leader survive the first 90 days. It's about using those 90 days to shape a leadership team that can thrive together. So, the next time you onboard a senior leader, don't just welcome the individual; onboard the system.
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Old Trump speech falsely linked to South Korea trade deal
Social media posts have recirculated an old video of US President Donald Trump and falsely presented it as depicting him calling South Korean leader Lee Jae Myung a "bad negotiator" after their countries agreed a trade deal. The clip in fact shows Trump criticising then president Barack Obama as he launched his presidential campaign in June 2015. "Trump mocks Lee Jae Myung as a bad negotiator," reads a Korean-language post featuring the clip on Naver Band, a South Korean forum, on July 31, 2025. "[Trump] mocked Lee as soon as the tariff negotiations finished. [Lee] has become a total pushover," it continues. The video shows Trump saying, "The people negotiating don't have a clue. Our president doesn't have a clue. He's a bad negotiator." But its Korean subtitles mistranslate "our president" as "their president". The clip was also shared in similar posts on multiple right-wing South Korean circles on Facebook, as well as on YouTube. "The way that fool Lee acted as he did, no wonder he is being mocked," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "An international embarrassment to be used like that, then mocked by the US president." Under the trade deal, the United States will impose a 15 percent tariff on South Korean imports -- down from the previously threatened 25 percent -- in exchange for $350 billion in South Korean investments in US industries and $100 billion in energy purchases (archived link). A keyword search on Google found the clip corresponds to a part of a speech Trump gave on June 16, 2015, when he announced his bid for the presidency (archived link). At around the 18:50 mark of the speech posted in full by CSPAN, Trump makes the comment: "The people negotiating don't have a clue. Our president doesn't have a clue. He's a bad negotiator." This was part of a broader tirade against the Obama administration's trade and foreign policies. Trump then references a prisoner swap involving US soldier Bowe Bergdahl to illustrate his criticism of Obama's negotiating skills. Bergdahl was a US Army sergeant who was captured by the Taliban in 2009 after walking off his post in Afghanistan and was released in 2014 in exchange for five Taliban detainees held at Guantanamo Bay (archived link). "We get Bergdahl. We get a traitor. We get a no-good traitor, and they get the five people that they wanted for years, and those people are now back on the battlefield trying to kill us. That's the negotiator we have," Trump said. A full transcript of the speech published by Time magazine also shows Trump was referring to Obama (archived link). Nowhere in the video or transcript does Trump mention South Korea or Lee Jae Myung. AFP has previously debunked similar instances of Trump remarks and social media posts being misrepresented as references to South Korea.
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Those who invested in Fiamma Holdings Berhad (KLSE:FIAMMA) five years ago are up 134%
The worst result, after buying shares in a company (assuming no leverage), would be if you lose all the money you put in. But when you pick a company that is really flourishing, you can make more than 100%. For example, the Fiamma Holdings Berhad (KLSE:FIAMMA) share price has soared 112% in the last half decade. Most would be very happy with that. With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. Over half a decade, Fiamma Holdings Berhad managed to grow its earnings per share at 15% a year. This EPS growth is reasonably close to the 16% average annual increase in the share price. That suggests that the market sentiment around the company hasn't changed much over that time. Rather, the share price has approximately tracked EPS growth. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of Fiamma Holdings Berhad's earnings, revenue and cash flow. What About The Total Shareholder Return (TSR)? We've already covered Fiamma Holdings Berhad's share price action, but we should also mention its total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Fiamma Holdings Berhad's TSR of 134% for the 5 years exceeded its share price return, because it has paid dividends. A Different Perspective While it's never nice to take a loss, Fiamma Holdings Berhad shareholders can take comfort that their trailing twelve month loss of 3.6% wasn't as bad as the market loss of around 6.1%. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 19%, each year, over five years. It could be that the business is just facing some short term problems, but shareholders should keep a close eye on the fundamentals. Before forming an opinion on Fiamma Holdings Berhad you might want to consider these 3 valuation metrics. If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Malaysian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Some May Be Optimistic About Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad's (KLSE:NESTLE) Earnings
The market was pleased with the recent earnings report from Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad (KLSE:NESTLE), despite the profit numbers being soft. However, we think the company is showing some signs that things are more promising than they seem. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Zooming In On Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad's Earnings As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'. That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future". Over the twelve months to June 2025, Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad recorded an accrual ratio of -0.20. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. In fact, it had free cash flow of RM712m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of RM400.0m. Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad's free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates. Our Take On Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad's Profit Performance As we discussed above, Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad's accrual ratio indicates strong conversion of profit to free cash flow, which is a positive for the company. Because of this, we think Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad's underlying earnings potential is as good as, or possibly even better, than the statutory profit makes it seem! Unfortunately, though, its earnings per share actually fell back over the last year. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad you should know about. This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Nestlé (Malaysia) Berhad's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data