Exclusive: Two decades in, DFJ Growth raises $1.2 billion for its fifth fund and doubles down on the long game
In 2005, tech was starting to shake off the dotcom bubble burst, while global business as a whole was careening towards 2008 and the Great Financial Crisis. And somewhere in Silicon Valley, Barry Schuler and Randy Glein—along with venture capital pioneer John Fisher and industry veteran Mark Bailey—were thinking about the decades to come. Their thesis was this: To fill the gap between early-stage VC and the public markets, raise a 'growth' fund that helps companies stay private longer and mature before going public.
This is now, of course, the standard thesis for growth funds in VC as we currently understand them. But back in 2005, it was a slightly hare-brained idea. Though there was a mounting history of VCs investing in more established startups that had already achieved product-market fit, Schuler, Glein, Fisher, and Bailey believed that companies were going to stay private a lot longer than anyone had seen in the past—a funky idea at a time when Google had gone public just the year before, after raising only a Series A.
"When we went out to raise the first fund, it was really hard explaining what we were setting out to do,' said Schuler, who had been the CEO of AOL before becoming a VC. 'It would be: 'Tell me again, are you talking about growth equity? What are you talking about?''
'When we were telling our prospective investors for that first fund,' Glein added. ''We're going to find companies that will be worth $1 billion or more,' they'd start counting on their fingers: 'How many of those have there been in the last five years?''
This was eight years before Aileen Lee would coin the term 'unicorn.' Bill Goldsmith, founding and managing member of Nantucket Multi-Managers, has been an LP in DFJ Growth since 2006—across all five funds—and remembers just how curious an idea it was back then.
'If you look at a company like Microsoft—it went public in 1986—the vast, vast majority of the value creation in Microsoft has occurred after it went public,' said Goldsmith. 'And DFJ's thesis that was going to change was a very, very differentiated point of view at the time…It piqued my curiosity, and was a very prescient call I might add, since that's exactly what's happened since 2006.'
What was a curiosity became a tectonic shift, and Schuler and Glein are still working together 20 years later as cofounders and managing partners at DFJ Growth. The firm has raised its fifth fund at $1.2 billion, Fortune can exclusively report. The fund was originally set to be $800 million, the firm says, but expanded to meet demand. Though $1.2 billion is a massive step away from the firm's first fund in 2006, much remains the same. (DFJ Growth takes its name from the legendary early-stage venture firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson, from which it spun out at its founding. The firm retained the DFJ name in part to reflect its continued connection to founding partner Fisher.) For two decades, DFJ Growth has consistently raised on four-year cycles, give or take, much longer than the more common two-year cycles.
'Our first fund was $270 million, and it invested in 26 companies over four to five years,' said Glein. 'Each fund has gotten a little bit bigger than the last, but we're still only investing in 20 to 25 companies per fund over three-and a-half or four years. Some people might call that fairly concentrated.'
Currently, DFJ Growth's portfolio includes Anduril, Stripe, Scale AI, Cellares, and Formlabs, while the firm's exits span Coinbase, Twitter, Anaplan, Unity, and Ring. Jamie Siminoff, chief inventor and founder at Ring, remains grateful to DFJ Growth. As Ring hit a $500 million run rate and Amazon came calling, Glein and the firm believed that Ring had the momentum and much more room to grow. But Siminoff, 'a kid from New Jersey,' couldn't turn down a billion-dollar deal—and Glein immediately understood.
"I think DFJ would bankrupt themselves for the right thing,' said Siminoff, who recently returned to Amazon.
The firm also has invested in Elon Musk's companies for more than a decade, exiting Tesla after the 2010 IPO and right now backing SpaceX and xAI. (DFJ Growth declined to comment on Musk's political activities.) It's a range of wins, across all sorts of cycles—though DFJ Growth has sometimes sidestepped the hype.
'So, we spent most of 2021 making distributions,' said Glein. 'We thought it was the right thing to do. Markets were at all-time highs at that moment, with high multiples, much higher than today. It was hard for us to say 'it can get better than this.''
Of course, that was as good as it's gotten in recent memory. While others focused on funneling cash into sky-high unicorns thinking the numbers would keep going up—Glein and Schuler emphasized the 2021 IPOs of portfolio companies like Sumo Logic and Coinbase as opportunities to distribute to LPs over time, and leveraged secondaries where they could.
'We always look for top-of-market signals,' said Schuler. 'The term to watch out for is, 'this time it's different.' When you hear everyone saying that, you know the end is nigh. You know the party's going to stop soon, and you better have a chair to plop your butt in.'
This is why, said Schuler, contrary to popular belief, venture capital isn't necessarily a long game won with youth.
"I hate to say this, but you have an advantage with gray hair in VC,' he said. 'You've seen the cycles...Being almost an elder statesman now, and having lived through decades of tech boom and bust cycles, they're part of the way Silicon Valley works. It's how we advance.'
And that's part of why the DFJ Growth story underlines the reasons we shouldn't be freaking out right now. 'They're kind of unflappable,' said James Lu, cofounder and CEO of Helix, which DFJ Growth first backed in 2018. 'I think almost no matter what version of the world around me I tell them about, they'll say: 'We've seen that before, here's what you should do.''
It's helpful at a moment when so much feels unprecedented—AI valuations hit unspeakable highs, exits are dry, and tariffs threaten the entire global supply chain as we know it. Every time things go bad, there are the same basic principles guiding surviving and thriving, as Glein puts it: "Our philosophy, especially in times of macroeconomic uncertainty, is to 'control your own destiny.' So, to a founder on a board we're involved in: Let's get in a position where we're able to control our own destiny, based on the capital and the runway you have available."
Because if you take the long view, it's never actually the end of the world.
See you tomorrow,
Allie GarfinkleX: @agarfinksEmail: alexandra.garfinkle@fortune.comSubmit a deal for the Term Sheet newsletter here.
Nina Ajemian curated the deals section of today's newsletter. Subscribe here.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft Partially Removes User Control Over Apps
Software updates are important. They introduce new features while also keeping security up to date. Therefore, it's advisable to perform them regularly. This also applies to updates in the Microsoft App Store, where a new change has been discovered. Updates in the Microsoft App Store No Longer Deactivatable As a reader of 'Deskmodder' has discovered, users can no longer indefinitely pause automatic updates in the Microsoft App Store. Previously, this was possible in the settings, but apparently, the Windows manufacturers have put a stop to this function. A review confirms this change. In the settings, a new option now appears that is typically used for Windows updates. This means users can only pause automatic updates in the Microsoft App Store for one to five weeks—after which they become active again. Even registry settings won't change this. Also interesting: If you manually initiate an update search, the previously set pause remains in effect. This is a difference from the systemic Windows update. Why Did Microsoft Do This? There is no official explanation from Microsoft yet. TECHBOOK has inquired with the company but has not received a response. However, the security factor is likely a plausible reason. Those who, for whatever reason, permanently disable automatic updates in the Microsoft App Store will not receive new updates for their applications. Also interesting: 240 million Windows users should no longer use their PCs This includes not only new features but also improved online security. Without regular updates, users become vulnerable to various malware and cybercriminals. In the worst case, this could compromise the entire system. Microsoft certainly wants to prevent this. The update requirement takes away some user freedom but enables quicker and more reliable solutions for potential security gaps. The post Microsoft Partially Removes User Control Over Apps appeared first on TECHBOOK.


The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
Microsoft is finally improving Windows 11's dark mode
Microsoft first introduced a dark mode option in Windows 10 in 2016, but there were still plenty of areas of the operating system that looked like a mish-mash of light and dark modes. Nearly a decade later, the latest preview build of Windows 11 now includes even more darkened UI elements. Windows watcher Phantomofearth spotted updated file operation dialogs with a dark theme. If you're copying files or deleting them, these dialogs will finally have a dark mode instead of light-themed prompt. It's clearly a work in progress though, as the buttons on these prompts still have light buttons instead of dark ones. Microsoft hasn't officially announced any improvements to its Windows 11 dark mode, but these small changes could indicate a broader overhaul is coming in time for the 25H2 update later this year. The Control Panel, Run prompt, and file properties UI are all still stuck in light mode, so hopefully Microsoft finds the time after nearly 10 years to address these, too. I'm not holding out much hope, though. It took Microsoft a few years to even add a dark mode to File Explorer in Windows 10, after the OS shipped with a mixture of light and dark modes. Apple has long had a consistent dark mode in macOS, since it shipped with macOS Mojave in 2018. A new Liquid Glass redesign is even on the way later this year, with a bigger focus on translucency. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Tom Warren Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Microsoft Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Windows


New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
Trump's Plans for A.I. Might Hit a Wall. Thank Europe.
President Trump wants to unleash American A.I. companies on the world. For the United States to win the unfolding A.I. arms race, his logic goes, tech companies should be unfettered by regulations and free to develop artificial intelligence technology as they generally see fit. He is convinced that the benefits of American supremacy in this technology outweigh the risks of ungoverned A.I., which experts warn could include heightened surveillance, disinformation or even an existential threat to humanity. This conviction is at the heart of the administration's recently unveiled A.I. Action Plan, which looks to roll back red tape and onerous regulations that it says paralyze A.I. development. But Mr. Trump can't single-handedly protect American A.I. companies from regulation. Washington may be able to eliminate the rules of the road at home, but it can't do so for the rest of the world. If American companies want to operate in international markets, they must follow the rules of those markets. That means that the European Union, an enormous market that is committed to regulating A.I., could well thwart Mr. Trump's techno-optimist vision of a world dominated by self-regulated, free-market U.S. companies. In the past, the E.U.'s digital regulations have resonated well beyond the continent, with technology companies extending those rules across their global operations in a phenomenon I have termed the Brussels Effect. Companies like Apple and Microsoft now broadly use the E.U.'s General Data Protection Regulation, which gives users more control over their data, as their global privacy standard in part because it is too costly and cumbersome for them to follow different privacy policies in each market. Other governments also often look to E.U. rules when drafting their own laws regulating the tech sector. The same phenomenon could at least partly hold for A.I. technology. Over the past decade, the E.U. has put in place a number of regulations aimed at balancing A.I. innovation, transparency and accountability. Most important is the A.I. Act, the world's first comprehensive and binding artificial intelligence law, which entered into force in August 2024. The act establishes guardrails against the possible risks of artificial intelligence, such as the loss of privacy, discrimination, disinformation and A.I. systems that could endanger human life if left unchecked. This law, for instance, restricts the use of facial recognition technology for surveillance and limits the use of potentially biased artificial intelligence for hiring or credit decisions. American developers looking to get access to the European market will have to comply with these rules and others. Some companies are already pushing back. Meta has accused the E.U. of overreach and even sought the Trump administration's help in opposing Europe's regulatory ambitions. But other companies, such as OpenAI, Google and Microsoft, are signing on to Europe's A.I. code of practice. These tech giants see an opportunity: Playing nice with the European Union could help build trust among users, pre-empt other regulatory challenges and streamline their policies around the world. Individual American states looking to govern A.I., too, could use E.U. rules as a template when writing their own bills, as California did when developing its privacy laws. By holding its ground, Europe can steer global A.I. development toward models that protect fundamental rights, ensure fairness and don't undermine democracy. Standing firm would also boost Europe's tech sector by creating fairer competition between foreign and European A.I. firms, which have to abide by E.U. laws. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.