logo
Exclusive: Two decades in, DFJ Growth raises $1.2 billion for its fifth fund and doubles down on the long game

Exclusive: Two decades in, DFJ Growth raises $1.2 billion for its fifth fund and doubles down on the long game

Yahoo13-05-2025

DFJ Growth was founded between two ends of the world.
In 2005, tech was starting to shake off the dotcom bubble burst, while global business as a whole was careening towards 2008 and the Great Financial Crisis. And somewhere in Silicon Valley, Barry Schuler and Randy Glein—along with venture capital pioneer John Fisher and industry veteran Mark Bailey—were thinking about the decades to come. Their thesis was this: To fill the gap between early-stage VC and the public markets, raise a 'growth' fund that helps companies stay private longer and mature before going public.
This is now, of course, the standard thesis for growth funds in VC as we currently understand them. But back in 2005, it was a slightly hare-brained idea. Though there was a mounting history of VCs investing in more established startups that had already achieved product-market fit, Schuler, Glein, Fisher, and Bailey believed that companies were going to stay private a lot longer than anyone had seen in the past—a funky idea at a time when Google had gone public just the year before, after raising only a Series A.
"When we went out to raise the first fund, it was really hard explaining what we were setting out to do,' said Schuler, who had been the CEO of AOL before becoming a VC. 'It would be: 'Tell me again, are you talking about growth equity? What are you talking about?''
'When we were telling our prospective investors for that first fund,' Glein added. ''We're going to find companies that will be worth $1 billion or more,' they'd start counting on their fingers: 'How many of those have there been in the last five years?''
This was eight years before Aileen Lee would coin the term 'unicorn.' Bill Goldsmith, founding and managing member of Nantucket Multi-Managers, has been an LP in DFJ Growth since 2006—across all five funds—and remembers just how curious an idea it was back then.
'If you look at a company like Microsoft—it went public in 1986—the vast, vast majority of the value creation in Microsoft has occurred after it went public,' said Goldsmith. 'And DFJ's thesis that was going to change was a very, very differentiated point of view at the time…It piqued my curiosity, and was a very prescient call I might add, since that's exactly what's happened since 2006.'
What was a curiosity became a tectonic shift, and Schuler and Glein are still working together 20 years later as cofounders and managing partners at DFJ Growth. The firm has raised its fifth fund at $1.2 billion, Fortune can exclusively report. The fund was originally set to be $800 million, the firm says, but expanded to meet demand. Though $1.2 billion is a massive step away from the firm's first fund in 2006, much remains the same. (DFJ Growth takes its name from the legendary early-stage venture firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson, from which it spun out at its founding. The firm retained the DFJ name in part to reflect its continued connection to founding partner Fisher.) For two decades, DFJ Growth has consistently raised on four-year cycles, give or take, much longer than the more common two-year cycles.
'Our first fund was $270 million, and it invested in 26 companies over four to five years,' said Glein. 'Each fund has gotten a little bit bigger than the last, but we're still only investing in 20 to 25 companies per fund over three-and a-half or four years. Some people might call that fairly concentrated.'
Currently, DFJ Growth's portfolio includes Anduril, Stripe, Scale AI, Cellares, and Formlabs, while the firm's exits span Coinbase, Twitter, Anaplan, Unity, and Ring. Jamie Siminoff, chief inventor and founder at Ring, remains grateful to DFJ Growth. As Ring hit a $500 million run rate and Amazon came calling, Glein and the firm believed that Ring had the momentum and much more room to grow. But Siminoff, 'a kid from New Jersey,' couldn't turn down a billion-dollar deal—and Glein immediately understood.
"I think DFJ would bankrupt themselves for the right thing,' said Siminoff, who recently returned to Amazon.
The firm also has invested in Elon Musk's companies for more than a decade, exiting Tesla after the 2010 IPO and right now backing SpaceX and xAI. (DFJ Growth declined to comment on Musk's political activities.) It's a range of wins, across all sorts of cycles—though DFJ Growth has sometimes sidestepped the hype.
'So, we spent most of 2021 making distributions,' said Glein. 'We thought it was the right thing to do. Markets were at all-time highs at that moment, with high multiples, much higher than today. It was hard for us to say 'it can get better than this.''
Of course, that was as good as it's gotten in recent memory. While others focused on funneling cash into sky-high unicorns thinking the numbers would keep going up—Glein and Schuler emphasized the 2021 IPOs of portfolio companies like Sumo Logic and Coinbase as opportunities to distribute to LPs over time, and leveraged secondaries where they could.
'We always look for top-of-market signals,' said Schuler. 'The term to watch out for is, 'this time it's different.' When you hear everyone saying that, you know the end is nigh. You know the party's going to stop soon, and you better have a chair to plop your butt in.'
This is why, said Schuler, contrary to popular belief, venture capital isn't necessarily a long game won with youth.
"I hate to say this, but you have an advantage with gray hair in VC,' he said. 'You've seen the cycles...Being almost an elder statesman now, and having lived through decades of tech boom and bust cycles, they're part of the way Silicon Valley works. It's how we advance.'
And that's part of why the DFJ Growth story underlines the reasons we shouldn't be freaking out right now. 'They're kind of unflappable,' said James Lu, cofounder and CEO of Helix, which DFJ Growth first backed in 2018. 'I think almost no matter what version of the world around me I tell them about, they'll say: 'We've seen that before, here's what you should do.''
It's helpful at a moment when so much feels unprecedented—AI valuations hit unspeakable highs, exits are dry, and tariffs threaten the entire global supply chain as we know it. Every time things go bad, there are the same basic principles guiding surviving and thriving, as Glein puts it: "Our philosophy, especially in times of macroeconomic uncertainty, is to 'control your own destiny.' So, to a founder on a board we're involved in: Let's get in a position where we're able to control our own destiny, based on the capital and the runway you have available."
Because if you take the long view, it's never actually the end of the world.
See you tomorrow,
Allie GarfinkleX: @agarfinksEmail: alexandra.garfinkle@fortune.comSubmit a deal for the Term Sheet newsletter here.
Nina Ajemian curated the deals section of today's newsletter. Subscribe here.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In race to attract data centers, states forfeit hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue to tech companies
In race to attract data centers, states forfeit hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue to tech companies

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

In race to attract data centers, states forfeit hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue to tech companies

In 2019, the Indiana legislature passed a bill that would offer eligible data centers significant sales tax exemptions. The legislation said facilities packed with state-of-the-art servers could avoid the state's 7% tax when purchasing equipment and power. The measure was a boon for large tech companies that have been rapidly building out data centers and was heavily backed by a trade association representing the industry. Similar tax incentives have been passed elsewhere. Today nearly all states that have sales taxes offer data centers exemptions on computers, wires, air-conditioning units and, in some cases, even the energy required to keep it all running. Demand for data center capacity was already soaring at the time of the Indiana legislation but has picked up exponentially since then due to the artificial intelligence boom sparked by the launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT in 2022. Data center investment is now projected to reach $1 trillion by 2027, according to professional services network PwC. In the race to attract large data centers, states are forfeiting hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue, according to a CNBC analysis. Among the beneficiaries of these exemptions are tech giants such as Amazon, Meta and Google, which all have market caps of over $1 trillion. Tax breaks have long been a tool states use to compete for businesses. However, watchdog groups said that for data centers the tradeoffs are iffy, because the facilities don't tend to create large numbers of jobs, while the amount of electricity required can be immense. The growing number of tax breaks has sparked a debate about whether massive corporations should be receiving these generous incentives. A CNBC analysis determined that 42 states provide full or partial sales tax exemptions to data centers or have no state sales tax at all. Of those, 37 have passed legislation specifically granting sales tax exemptions for data centers, and 16 of those states have granted nearly $6 billion in exemptions over the past five years. The other 21 states that offer similar breaks are not included in the $6 billion total because they do not publicly report how much they have awarded in tax breaks. Eight other states that have sales tax don't give exemptions to data centers. Only Illinois, Nevada, Missouri and Washington itemize how much companies are getting by recipient. For instance, CNBC found that one Microsoft data center in Illinois received more than $38 million in data center sales tax exemptions but created just 20 permanent jobs. In Washington, the tech giant secured $333 million in sales tax exemptions for its data centers between 2015 and 2023. Microsoft declined to comment on the tax incentives and job creation tied to its data centers in the two states. But other states don't publicly disclose this type of granular data. For example, Virginia has an estimated lump-sum exemption of more than $730 million for fiscal year 2024, but the state doesn't offer a detailed breakdown of how much each company received. It's also not always clear which companies are asking for tax breaks. In 2023, a limited liability company named Hatchworks applied for Indiana's sales tax exemption. After the award was granted, a state filing showed Hatchworks is a subsidiary of Google. A Google spokesperson told CNBC that using a third-party LLC until project details are finalized is standard practice in economic development projects across industries. Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First, a nonprofit research group that tracks corporate subsidies and advocates for transparency and accountability in economic development, has spent more than a decade examining the impact of exemptions nationwide. He said the clear winners are the Big Tech companies. "There was a giant transfer of wealth from taxpayers to shareholders," LeRoy told CNBC. "Some states, like Virginia, are headed toward billion-dollar annual losses." Northern Virginia, which is known as the world's data center capital, has examined the economic impact of the data center sales tax exemptions. A 2024 study by the Virginia Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee, or JLARC, showed that, on average, the state generated 48 cents in new state revenue for every dollar it did not collect in sales tax between fiscal years 2014 and 2023. Most of this revenue came from personal and corporate income taxes as well as from sales tax on nonexempt purchases, JLARC said. But that 48 cents is also better than what the state sees from other industries with sales tax exemptions intended to boost economic activity, which, on average, brought in just 17 cents per dollar, according to JLARC. One reason the data center exemption performs better is because it requires companies to create jobs and most other exemptions don't, JLARC said. The Virginia Economic Development Partnership, the state's economic development authority, declined to comment for this story, referring CNBC to the 2024 JLARC report. In that report, the state classified the exemption as a "moderate economic benefit" when compared with other incentives and said that "like most economic development incentives, the data center exemption does not pay for itself," considering the lost revenue. LeRoy calls it a losing proposition for taxpayers. "When tax breaks don't pay for themselves, only two things can happen: Either public services are reduced in quality, or everybody's taxes go up in other ways if you're going to try to keep things the same in terms of quality of public services," he said. Steve DelBianco, CEO of tech trade association NetChoice, said some tax revenue is better than none. "The state decided, let's exempt equipment purchases in order to attract more data centers," said DelBianco, whose organization has represented Big Tech companies in Indiana and lobbied on their behalf nationwide. "And when it did so, it still got half of it, the sales tax that it thought it was giving up." When lobbying on behalf of companies such as Meta, Google and Amazon for sales tax exemptions, DelBianco has said that data centers are a key driver of economic growth. Between 2021 and 2023, Northern Virginia benefited from 50,700 jobs and $7.2 billion in contributions to the economy, according to the 2024 JLARC report. During that same period, the rest of the state generated 12,100 jobs and contributed $1.3 billion to the economy, JLARC said. Between fiscal year 2014 and 2023, incentives for data centers provided more financial benefit than all other economic development incentives combined, the JLARC study said. It said most of this growth came from the construction phase of data centers. Former U.S. Rep. Barbara Comstock, R-Va., was a member of the Virginia legislature and the lead lawmaker behind its data center sales tax exemption when the legislation passed in 2012. She now serves as an advisor to NetChoice. In her 2019 Indiana state legislative testimony, Comstock said she viewed the exemptions as a crucial strategy for attracting investments, creating jobs and generating local tax revenue. In Indiana, consumer watchdog group Citizens Action Coalition said it has been monitoring the sales tax exemptions granted to data centers. Ben Inskeep, the group's program director, said Indiana offers some of the country's most generous subsidies, including a sales tax exemption on energy and equipment for up to 50 years for data centers that invest more than $750 million. Inskeep said that when the sales tax exemption was passed in 2019, lawmakers didn't anticipate that Big Tech companies would be building out large data centers, thus receiving billions of dollars in tax breaks. He said the facilities create very few permanent jobs. A 2017 report from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said it looked at financial data of "10 major enterprises and service providers that own 244 large data centers across 16 states." It found that during the construction phase, data centers on average employ 1,688 workers. But once they're up and running, they provide only 157 permanent jobs. By comparison, a 2020 study by two economics professors evaluating state and local business incentives found that aerospace and automobile manufacturers that received firm-specific exemptions between 2002 and 2017 promised more than 2,700 jobs. However, unlike the data center figures, which reflect actual employment averages, the aerospace and automobile job numbers were based on company projections tied to incentive agreements. "While we find some evidence of direct employment gains from attracting a firm, we do not find strong evidence that firm-specific tax incentives increase broader economic growth at the state and local level," the study's authors wrote. Then there's the power. The Virginia audit found the data center industry is projected to drive an "immense increase in energy demand." The study predicted that the power demand in Virginia will double in the next 10 years, mainly due to the data center industry. The report said one of Virginia's smaller data centers used the same amount of energy as 4,500 homes and that the largest new data centers use more energy than most industrial consumers. While data centers in the state are currently paying the full cost of service, the strain on resources is likely to increase the costs paid by other customers, the report said. CNBC contacted Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI and Oracle for comment. Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft all said they work with utility companies to ensure they cover the costs of growth required to meet their data center needs. Amazon, Google and Microsoft said they also invest in carbon-free and sustainable energy sources — such as wind, solar and nuclear power. An Amazon spokesperson said incentives play a key role in attracting data centers and require companies to meet strict investment and job creation benchmarks. Amazon also said it contributed $460 million in property taxes and fees for its data centers in three Virginia counties in 2023 and has invested more than $75 billion in the state since 2011. Apple, OpenAI and Oracle did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

HBO's ‘Mountainhead' Depicts Hollywood's Sinister View of Tech Titans
HBO's ‘Mountainhead' Depicts Hollywood's Sinister View of Tech Titans

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

HBO's ‘Mountainhead' Depicts Hollywood's Sinister View of Tech Titans

Welcome to Tech In Depth, our daily newsletter with reporting and analysis about the business of tech from Bloomberg's journalists around the world. Today, Ellen Huet looks at how HBO's movie Mountainhead shows the changing cultural view of tech's rich and powerful. Microsoft job cuts: The software maker is planning to eliminate thousands of jobs, particularly in sales, beginning next month. The reductions follow an earlier round of cuts announced in May that hit 6,000 employees.

Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Will Hit a $5 Trillion Market Cap by 2028
Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Will Hit a $5 Trillion Market Cap by 2028

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Will Hit a $5 Trillion Market Cap by 2028

Nvidia management is excited about the company's long-term growth potential. Data center-related capital expenditures could reach $1 trillion annually by 2028. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › There has never been a $5 trillion company. The closest companies to reaching that milestone are Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). Both companies have market capitalizations of around $3.5 trillion. Using their current growth trajectories as a guide, they could reach that $5 trillion mark in a few years. But which one will get there first? The signs point to Nvidia, based on its impressive growth and the increasing market for its products. Although Nvidia has made investors a boatload of money over the past few years, there's still plenty ahead, making it an attractive stock to own right now. Here's why Nvidia has the potential to be the first $5 trillion company by 2028. Nvidia's rise goes hand-in-hand with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and the rise of data centers that help process AI computations. AI hyperscalers (large-scale cloud service providers that offer massive computing resources, storage, and networking infrastructure) like Microsoft are racing to install as much equipment as possible to run AI workloads. That way, they can profit from the various companies running AI on their servers by charging usage fees. While multiple companies are pursuing this approach, Nvidia is the main supplier of the graphics processing units (GPUs) central to their operation. And while there are alternatives to Nvidia's products, it has a 90% or greater share in the data center GPU market, similar to Alphabet's dominance in the search engine industry (through Google). This helps put Nvidia's dominance into perspective. Even better, the demand for data centers is growing far quicker than the growth in Search. Nearly every AI hyperscaler has announced record data center capital expenditures in 2025. Planning, developing, and constructing the sites on which these centers are built takes years, so this heightened spending will persist for multiple years. A third-party estimate Nvidia cited during its 2025 GTC event said global data center spending was $400 billion in 2024, but it is expected to rise to $1 trillion by 2028. For reference, during FY 2025 (which encompasses most of 2024), Nvidia's data center division delivered $115 billion in revenue. So, for every $100 spent on data centers, about $29 went to Nvidia. What will this mean for Nvidia in the future? Let's take a conservative approach to these growth estimates. Say data center capital expenditures only rise to $800 billion, and Nvidia's share of that revenue falls from 29% to 25%. If that happens, Nvidia will still make about $160 billion in revenue from data centers alone in 2028. In FY 2025, Nvidia's non-data center divisions produced $16 billion in revenue. Assuming other divisions won't grow and combined with the projected data center revenue, we'd get $216 billion. That's a 46% gain from today's revenue levels. If Nvidia's market cap were increased by the corresponding projected revenue growth, it would be $5.03 trillion. Certain caveats to this argument exist, like what happens if Nvidia's margins slip or if its valuation decreases substantially. However, we've already built in some of that by removing some market share and lowering the total dollar figure of data center build-outs. I think Nvidia will be the first company to cross the $5 trillion threshold, and it will likely do so in the next few years. Nvidia's potential is still rising, and investors should ensure that they're invested in this top-notch AI play for the foreseeable future. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Will Hit a $5 Trillion Market Cap by 2028 was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store