Student Loan Update: How New Supreme Court Ruling May Impact Borrowers
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision allowing the Trump administration to implement widespread layoffs at the Department of Education has stirred concern among student loan borrowers and education advocates.
The high court lifted a federal injunction that had blocked the termination of approximately 1,400 employees. While the move is touted as an effort to reduce bureaucratic overhead, it's also criticized for potentially undermining support services for millions of students and borrowers.
Why It Matters
More than 40 million Americans hold student loan debt, totaling over $1.74 trillion nationwide.
With the future of the Department of Education up in the air and mass layoffs now enforced, service for borrowers, including those on income-driven repayment plans, could be disrupted.
A sign marks the entrance to the U.S. Department of Education headquarters building on June 20, 2025, in Washington, DC.
A sign marks the entrance to the U.S. Department of Education headquarters building on June 20, 2025, in Washington, DC.
J.What To Know
The Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration Monday, overturning a lower court's ban on Department of Education layoffs.
The three liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor, dissented strongly.
Justice Sotomayor wrote, "The President must take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not set out to dismantle them... the majority rewards clear defiance of that core principle with emergency relief."
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, however, hailed the decision as "a significant win for students and families," asserting, "the President... has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies."
The layoffs arrive as the Department of Education contends with a significant backlog in processing income-driven repayment plans, reportedly affecting more than 1.5 million borrowers, according to a court filing.
Reduced staffing has already led to delays and communication problems, with over 40 percent of surveyed higher education institutions reporting issues related to federal student aid, according to the National Association for Student Aid Administrators report.
"They're downsizing an agency that oversees trillions of dollars in debt. If the goal is to eventually absorb the Department into another structure, fine—there's an argument to be made for that. But just slashing staff without a clear plan creates chaos," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek.
"I would expect long hold times, miscommunication, unqualified answers, and unresolved problems. It's the perfect storm for borrower confusion."
As the administration forges ahead with the layoffs, borrowers may continue to face delayed assistance with loan management.
The Department of Education asserts it will maintain essential functions, but with less federal involvement and a pared-down workforce, the quality and timeliness of student loan servicing may suffer. Further litigation could still impact the ultimate size and authority of the agency.
"Technically, it doesn't really affect the loans themselves, which will continue to be acquired and accrue interest as usual," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek.
"However, it could change the support some borrowers receive. As borrowers have questions about federal financial aid, new loan repayment plans, and issues with existing loans, they could find support to be lacking if these layoffs have an effect on the administrative oversight of them."
What People Are Saying
Melanie Storey, NASFAA president and CEO said in a statement: "Our students and our members need clarity and reliable support for these critical [financial aid] programs. At the end of the day, the Trump administration — all administrations — must deliver on the promise and the programs that Congress passed to support students who wish to pursue postsecondary education."
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote: "The majority apparently deems it more important to free the Government from paying employees it had no right to fire than to avert these very real harms while the litigation continues. Equity does not support such an inequitable result."
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement: "The U.S. Department of Education will now deliver on its mandate to restore excellence in American education. We will carry out the reduction in force to promote efficiency and accountability and to ensure resources are directed where they matter most – to students, parents, and teachers.
"As we return education to the states, this Administration will continue to perform all statutory duties while empowering families and teachers by reducing education bureaucracy."
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Borrowers will be saddled with debt and promises of forgiveness that may never come. Many are already in limbo, unsure of their repayment schedules or why their payments have suddenly increased. They just want clarity. But with staff taking buyouts and operations grinding to a halt, that clarity is nowhere in sight."
What Happens Next
Many financial experts have already sounded the alarm on how the layoffs could impact student loan borrowers relying on the Department of Education to service their loans.
"For student loan borrowers, specifically, this will mean more delays and poorer service in a program that already has service issues," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "The end result is nothing but harm to our current students."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Voters in Taiwan reject bid to oust China-friendly MPs
Taiwanese voters rejected a bid to oust about one-fifth of their MPs, all from the opposition Nationalist Party, in a recall election, dampening hopes for the ruling party to flip the balance of power in the self-ruled island's legislature. The independence-leaning ruling Democratic Progressive Party won last year's presidential election, but the China-friendly Nationalists, also known as the KMT, and the smaller Taiwan People's Party have enough seats to form a majority bloc. Official preliminary results showed that the recall efforts failed to remove any of the two dozen KMT lawmakers. The scale of the recall elections is unprecedented, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing a similar vote on August 23. The KMT currently holds 52 seats, while the ruling DPP holds 51 seats. For the DPP to secure a legislative majority, at least six KMT MPs would need to be ousted, and the ruling party would need to win the by-elections, which must be held within three months of the announcement of results. For the recall to pass, more than a quarter of eligible voters in the electoral district must vote in favour of it, and the total number of supporters must exceed those voting against. The poll closed at 4pm local time. Taiwan's Central Election Commission will announce the official results on August 1. If next month's poll results are also unfavourable to the DPP, it would mean that the government of Taiwan President Lai Ching-te could continue to face strong resistance from within the legislature before elections expected to take place in 2028. What are #Taiwan's "Great Recall" elections, and why should Americans care? Bo Tedards shares his expert perspective in this short video! 🔗Read his full report: #GTI's #GreatRecall panel recording: — Global Taiwan Inst. (@globaltaiwan) July 24, 2025 KMT chairman Eric Chu told reporters that voters had used their ballots to prove Taiwan's democracy is mature and great, calling for an apology from Lai. "All Taiwanese people chose stability, chose that the government should focus on getting things done, rather than engaging in bitter political fighting," he said. Despite their huge effort, those backing the recall were facing an "uphill battle" in trying to unseat MPs in well-organised, strongly KMT districts, said Lev Nachman, a professor of political science at National Taiwan University. The result is going to make it even harder for Lai to push his agenda forward, especially ahead of local elections next year, said Nachman, who is an expert on Taiwan's elections. Fu Kun-chi, one of the most powerful and controversial MPs targeted, said the result left Lai with no option other than to meet with the opposition and "find a way for Taiwan to proceed in a more stable way in this chaotic world". DPP Secretary-General Lin Yu-chang said they humbly accepted the results, saying the recall should not be reduced to a victory or defeat for political parties and that it should be seen as a demonstration of civic power. He said his party has the responsibility to reflect on public sentiment more cautiously and adjust its approach to meet people's expectations. Those who support removing the 24 MPs have criticised the KMT and its allies for blocking key legislation, especially the defence budget, and passing controversial changes that are seen as diminishing the power of the executive and favouring China, which considers the island its own territory. But the KMT has accused the ruling party of resorting to political retaliation after it lost the legislative majority, saying the recalls were undermining and challenging Taiwan's democratic system. The elections have intensified tensions between those backing the status quo and those favouring improved ties with Beijing. Critics accuse China-friendly politicians of compromising Taiwan and take issue with their meetings with mainland Chinese politicians. But these Taiwanese politicians claim their connections are vital for dialogue, given Beijing's refusal to interact with the DPP. Taiwan's mainland affairs council said Wednesday that the Chinese authorities and state media had tried to blatantly interfere with the vote.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Congressional Candidate, 27, Forcibly Removed from Hearing and Arrested After Criticizing Texas Republicans: 'I'm Not Finished!'
Isaiah Martin, who spent a day in jail, later confirmed the charges were dropped and said he'd 'do it again for the people of Texas" A congressional candidate was forcibly removed from a hearing at the Texas State Capitol and arrested this week, after going over an apparent two-minute time limit to speak as he delivered a statement in opposition to Texas Republicans' redistricting efforts. Congressional District 18 candidate Isaiah Martin, 27, attended a hearing held by the Texas House Congressional Redistricting Committee on Thursday, July 24, when he offered his thoughts on the redistricting efforts in question, calling it 'illegal gerrymandering." According to Austin ABC affiliate KVUE, Gov. Greg Abbott added discussion of a proposed redrawing of congressional districts to the agenda following pressure from the Trump administration. Per The Hill, the redrawing of the state's maps could give the GOP an advantage in the 2026 midterms, as KVUE reported the state's constitution allows the maps to be redrawn at the discretion of both the governor and the Legislature — although it is rare to be done mid-decade. "Many of you that are Republicans, and I'm looking at you, you understand the game. You gotta get Trump's endorsement," Martin said at the beginning of his remarks, before his arrest. "That's the name of the game to be a Republican nowadays. And you know very clearly that Trump told every single one of you that he needs five seats." After he continued past an apparent allotted two-minute speaking time, Rep. Cody Vasut asked the sergeant-at-arms to remove Martin from the hearing. Footage from the scene, which was later shared by Martin's campaign on X, shows the candidate telling Republicans they have "no shame" as his microphone is removed from him. Martin then told the committee that "history might not remember you at all," as two men began to pull him out of the state capitol — with one man appearing to restrain Martin by lying on top of him. The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) later confirmed, per KVUE and CBS Austin, that Martin was charged with disrupting a meeting, resisting arrest and criminal trespassing. His arrest took place around 7 p.m. local time, and he was later booked in Travis County Jail. His charges were dropped, per CBS Austin and an update that was shared on Martin's social media. A DPS spokesperson told KVUE that the arrest took place after Martin "refused to obey requests from committee members and subsequent orders from DPS to leave a committee hearing at the Texas State Capitol." The DPS did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's request for confirmation on July 25. Per KVUE, Martin spent over 24 hours in jail. Martin's brother confirmed in a statement on X that "all charges" against him had been dropped, before Martin shared in a message of his own hours later that he was put in custody for a day because Republicans "were mad I had the AUDACITY to call them cowards to their faces." "They did this because I had the audacity to speak up, and you know what? I'm gonna continue to have that audacity," he said. "Because strongly worded letters won't get us out of this mess. It takes speaking truth to power no matter what the consequences are." Speaking with CBS Austin following his release, Martin reiterated that he would "do it again for the people of Texas." Read the original article on People
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
FAA to Modernize 40-Year-Old System After Fatal Washington DC Crash
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is launching a sweeping overhaul of the U.S. air traffic control system following the deadly plane crash in Washington, D.C., that killed 67 people in January. New FAA administrator Bryan Bedford called the current system "not acceptable" and announced an aggressive modernization effort at the EAA AirVenture air show in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, on Thursday. Why It Matters In late January, American Airlines Flight 5342 departing from Wichita, Kansas, collided midair with a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter while approaching Washington's Reagan National Airport. The crash killed all 67 people aboard both aircraft. Investigators confirmed the Black Hawk was flying above the 200-foot limit for its assigned route while the plane was at roughly 325 feet at the moment of impact. This overhaul comes after decades of warnings about outdated radar systems, under-resourced control towers, and chronic shortages of air traffic controllers. The January crash is one of the deadliest aviation incidents in recent U.S. history, and its location—just miles from the Capitol—brought renewed urgency to long-overdue reforms. The FAA's modernization push now has political momentum and funding, as Congress recently approved $12.5 billion over five years, and the Trump administration has proposed an additional $19 billion to fully rebuild the national airspace system. What To Know The FAA has faced growing criticism for failing to address years of safety concerns. Recent high-profile near-misses and operational mishaps have highlighted vulnerabilities in technology and staffing. Air traffic controllers are routinely working six-day weeks with mandatory overtime, and the agency is currently short about 3,500 controllers. Bedford emphasized that parts of the U.S. air traffic control system haven't been updated in 40 years. The FAA now plans to replace legacy radar and telecom systems, modernize towers and support infrastructure, and redesign how airspace is managed around major cities. Speaking at the air show, Bedford blamed former President Joe Biden's administration for a lack of engagement on aviation issues. "Nobody in the Biden administration had any interest in aviation," he said, vowing to change the agency's culture from the inside out. Bedford has promised to be transparent, going so far as to share his email address with attendees, as reported by Reuters. In response to January's crash, the FAA has imposed strict new restrictions on helicopter operations around Reagan National Airport. In addition, enhanced coordination protocols have been implemented between military and civilian aircraft near D.C. airspace. In February, Vice President JD Vance, appearing on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, told anchor Maria Bartiromo that air traffic control is short-staffed, and their software looks "like a video game." He also added that under the Trump administration "our aviation system is going to be much safer." The New York Times reported earlier this year that over 90 percent of air traffic control facilities in the U.S. are understaffed, citing data from the union representing controllers. Republic Airways President and CEO Bryan Bedford testifies during his nomination hearing to be Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on June 11 in Washington, D.C. Republic Airways President and CEO Bryan Bedford testifies during his nomination hearing to be Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on June 11 in Washington, People Are Saying FAA administrator Bryan Bedford, who was speaking at the EAA AirVenture air show on Thursday, said: "We can do a better job in leadership. We can help the FAA figure out a strategy, especially around modernization. I'd really like to see us create a culture of trust and collaboration and a little more forward-leaning." Bedford, when confirmed to his position earlier this month, said: "I'm grateful for the opportunity to join the FAA team. I have a deep respect for the important work FAA employees do to protect the safety and efficiency of our national airspace. Building trust and delivering results together will be our focus." Vice President JD Vance told Fox News in February: "The software point is really important, though, because we know if you look at these old, antiquated air traffic control systems, it really does look like a video game. It's 30 years old. We've got better software. We need a federal government that's more responsive to the technology that's out there." Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy told Fox News Sunday in February: "It [Notice to Air Mission] has to be upgraded. That's in the works. It has been in the works for years. We have to rush this new system online because, again, this is the second time in two years it's gone down." What Happens Next? The FAA is expected to roll out initial modernization plans later this year, with radar upgrades and tower improvements prioritized in high-traffic zones.
