US energy giant returns to Libya
In a statement on Monday, NOC said the deal will enable ExxonMobil to carry out detailed technical studies of four offshore blocks near Libya's northwest coast and the Sirte Basin.
'This MoU establishes a geological and geophysical study to identify the hydrocarbon resources in these blocks,' the corporation stated, adding it 'paves the way for cooperation and the resumption of the partnership between NOC and ExxonMobil, which aims to restart its activities in Libya after a decade-long hiatus.'
The US company had previously signed an Exploration and Production Sharing Agreement with Libya in 2007 to explore four offshore blocks in the Sirte Basin, covering approximately 2.5 million acres. However, in 2013, they scaled back operations, citing security risks and unreliable returns amid escalating instability. The oil-rich country has remained fractured and volatile since the NATO-backed 2011 uprising that ousted and killed longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi.
Libya holds Africa's largest proven oil reserves, with an estimated 48 billion barrels – representing 41% of the continent's total as of 2024 – according to the US Energy Information Administration.
Last month, NOC launched an energy exploration tender – its first major licensing round in nearly 18 years – in a bid to revive its oil sector, which has faced repeated disruptions from militia violence and political rivalries.
An official told Bloomberg that 37 international oil majors, including US multinational Chevron, French energy giant TotalEnergies, and Italy's Eni, were participating in the public licensing round. On Monday, NOC confirmed that ExxonMobil was among those that expressed interest in the bid, which include 22 offshore and onshore blocks for exploration.
Masoud Suleman, chairman of the NOC Board of Directors, said the terms of the latest deal with the world's largest publicly traded energy company are now 'more favorable' than in the past.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
India responds to new Trump tariff
India has sharply criticized a new US tariff linked to its oil trade with Russia, denouncing the move 'extremely unfortunate,' while pledging to protect its own national interests. The White House announced an additional 25% levy on Indian imports on Wednesday, doubling the tariff burden it recently imposed on its major trading partner to 50%. The new duties are set to take effect in 21 days – in late August – according to an order signed by US President Donald Trump. India's Foreign Ministry condemned the move, noting Washington is targeting the energy security of the world's most populous nation. India's oil 'imports from Russia are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India,' the ministry spokesperson said in a statement. 'We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' the official added, pointing out that 'several other countries' continue to trade with Russia in line with their national interests. India had exposed the double standards of the Western nations earlier this week. In a strongly worded statement on Monday, New Delhi stressed that, while the US and EU condemn India's defense and energy ties with Moscow, they both continue to trade with Russia at even higher levels. US officials have hardened their rhetoric towards New Delhi in recent weeks, criticizing India's close ties with Moscow. They have also accused the Asian country of 'effectively' financing Russia's conflict with Ukraine by purchasing large volumes of crude. India rejects the charge, insisting its energy policy is rooted in economic necessity and the welfare of its population. Since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, Russia has emerged as India's top crude supplier, while India now exports large volumes of refined fuels – much of it made from Russian oil – to EU buyers. Trump has threatened to impose 100% tariffs on countries that continue business with Russia unless Moscow agrees to a major peace deal with Ukraine. In response to such threats, Russia has said it believes 'sovereign states should have, and do have, the right to choose their own trade partners,' as well as to pursue cooperation that suits their national priorities.
Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
US sanctions on Russia could boomerang
Potential new US sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine conflict could backfire, hitting American consumers and businesses with higher costs, inflation, and energy prices, CNN reported on Tuesday, citing analysts. US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose sanctions on Russia that could include 100% tariffs and secondary sanctions targeting the country's trade partners, particularly in the oil sector, unless it makes progress towards a peace deal with Ukraine. To discuss a potential settlement, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff traveled to Moscow on Wednesday for talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. If Trump decides to impose new sanctions, the economic impact could fall heavily on the US, analysts told CNN. 'The punishment for those countries that continue to take big volumes of Russian energy… would also hurt the United States' economy in a material way,' Clayton Seigle, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said. Seigle told CNN that the proposed tariffs 'would lead to more inflation' in the US and burden American businesses with higher import costs. The tariffs would mainly apply to imports from India and China, which are among the top buyers of Russian oil – and also two of America's largest trading partners. 'Russia is too big to fail,' analyst Giovanni Staunovo told the network. 'Russia exports seven million barrels per day of crude and refined products. These are massive amounts that you cannot so easily replace.' There is also ambiguity regarding the future of the potential sanctions. CNN noted that earlier this year, Trump imposed high tariffs on Chinese goods only to reduce them later when a trade deal was reached. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov remarked that Russia is accustomed to Western sanctions, which were first introduced in 2014. Trump echoed these comments, acknowledging that he does not know whether the sanctions will 'bother' Putin. A New York Post source has said there are no guarantees Trump will move forward with the sanctions. 'The administration is pushing hard for a deal. That's always the president's preferred outcome,' the source said.
Russia Today
20 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russian oil red lines: The EU and US are about to push India too far
With American rhetoric against India becoming more openly coercive, and top officials warning New Delhi about the consequences of its energy trade with Russia, the pressure is becoming multidirectional. Recent remarks by former US President Donald Trump have further complicated this recalibration. Alongside a 25% tariff on Indian exports, imposed last week, Trump issued pointed warnings over India's sustained energy and defense trade with Russia, accusing New Delhi of indirectly supporting America's adversaries through continued oil purchases. Trump went as far as to suggest that India and Russia could 'take their dead economies down together,' framing their economic engagement as contrary to US interests. Trump's statements were not just emotional reactions – they were followed by a series of other statements from US officials. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday claimed India's purchase of Russian oil is a 'point of irritation.' 'India has huge energy needs and that includes the ability to buy oil and coal and gas and things that it needs to power its economy like every country does, and it buys it from Russia, because Russian oil is sanctioned and cheap and – meaning they have to – in many cases, they're selling it under the global price because of the sanctions,' he stated. 'And that – unfortunately that is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India – not the only point of irritation.' On Sunday, a top aide to President Donald Trump accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by buying oil from Moscow. 'What he [Trump] said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia,' said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of the US president's most influential aides. 'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact,' Miller said on Fox News. This marks a significant hardening of tone, signalling that bipartisan pressure on India's Russia policy may persist regardless of the administration in power. The Indian government issued a stern response, saying Delhi would keep purchasing oil from Moscow if it is in line with national interests. Its foreign ministry stated that country's energy purchases are guided by market dynamics and national interests. 'The government is committed to prioritizing the welfare of Indian consumers. Our energy purchases will be based on price, availability and market conditions,' the statement read. Despite Trump's claims that India had stopped buying Russian oil after his threats, the Indian government said it is not aware of any pauses in imports. People in the oil and gas industry have confirmed that the government has not issued any officials requests to refiners to stop purchasing Russian oil. As global energy flows are increasingly weaponized, India's path is becoming tougher, but also more clearly defined. This is no longer merely a question of compliance with sanctions; it is about resisting the politicization of trade and asserting agency in a fragmented global order. The message to the West at large: India's energy decisions will not be dictated by external red lines. India's response is not retreat, but recalibration, through diversification, industrial pivoting, and legal safeguards. It signals the emergence of a new energy diplomacy: one that is agile, layered, and unapologetically sovereign. EU pressure A change in US rhetoric against India came days after theEuropean Union unveiled its 18th sanctions package targeting refined fuels processed from Russian crude. By imposing curbs on the import of diesel and other fuels refined from discounted Russian oil, the EU has drawn India's biggest private refiners, Nayara Energy and Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL), into a geopolitical confrontation they had largely navigated with strategic finesse since 2022. At the core of the EU's sanctions is a new strategy of tracking the origin of crude, even after it has been transformed into refined products. In other words, Indian diesel or jet fuel produced from Russian Urals crude will now be treated as Russian in origin, regardless of where it's refined. This has immediate implications for Nayara Energy's Vadinar refinery, the second largest in India, and also forReliance, which operates the world's largest refining complex at Jamnagar and has occasionally purchased Russian barrels to take advantage of significant discounts. The EU has gone further. It has lowered the price cap on seaborne Russian crude from $60 to $47.60 per barrel, effective from September 3, 2025. In practice, this severely limits Indian refiners' ability to secure Urals crude at prices that generate high margins, formerly in the $15–20 per barrel range. This arbitrage had made Indian products highly competitive in the European market. With Europe now closed off and refiners forced to reroute cargoes to regions with lower demand and pricing power, expected margins could shrink to $8–12, with an additional $1–2 per barrel in compliance costs. India's reaction was swift and unequivocal. The Ministry of External Affairs condemned the move as 'unilateral and extraterritorial,' rejecting the notion that its energy decisions should be hostage to the EU's secondary sanctions logic. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri underlined that India's energy security remained 'non-negotiable', a principle India would not abandon merely to appease Western preferences. Even Nayara Energy, 49.13% owned by Russia's Rosneft and long seen as vulnerable, broke its usual silence to denounce the sanctions as unjustified, while considering legal remedies through international arbitration mechanisms. Targeting Nayara Energy recently saw a leadership change, with CEO Alessandro des Dorides stepping down amid the evolving impact of EU sanctions and operational uncertainty. This was not just symbolic. A BP-chartered tanker, the Talara, left Nayara's port without loading fuel after the sanctions were announced. This suggests that EU enforcement will be aggressive and, potentially, that companies with European exposure will become increasingly wary of doing business with Indian refiners tied to Russian feedstock. Nayara may not be the last to face such pressure. Reliance, despite its diverse portfolio, is already re-evaluating its sourcing strategies in anticipation of tighter scrutiny. The financial stakes are staggering. India's fuel exports to Europe, which peaked at $19.2 billion in FY24, have already dropped by 27% to $15 billion in FY25. With the EU's latest restrictions now fully operational, analysts estimate that India could lose up to $5 billion annually, depending on the rigor of enforcement and the ability of refiners to find alternate buyers in Asia or Africa. The sheer scale of these losses would not only erode refining margins but also squeeze India's current account buffers, potentially complicating its macroeconomic stability. Redrawing India's Energy Map India isn't backing down. Instead, it is executing a quiet but deliberate recalibration of its energy strategy. Leading Indian refiners are ramping up imports from Iraq, Nigeria, and Saudi Arabia, while cautiously exploring longer-term deals with US crude suppliers, despite those barrels being less competitively priced than discounted Russian Urals. The objective is strategic: to avoid overdependence on any single geopolitical supplier while safeguarding energy security on India's own terms. For Reliance Industries, the pivot is even deeper. Already investing $10–15 billion in its ambitious crude-to-chemicals (C2C) initiative, the company is insulating itself from the volatility of fuel exports by focusing on petrochemicals and specialty materials with more stable margins and global demand. This rebalancing is likely to accelerate in the wake of the EU sanctions, giving Reliance a strategic hedge against trade weaponization. While Reliance charts an innovation-led pivot, Nayara remains entangled in geopolitical Rosneft's equity stake and its exposure to sanctions, any restructuring will need careful legal engineering. The company is reportedly exploring the creation of special-purpose vehicles or divestment strategies to insulate its operations. This standoff isn't just about oil, it's about sovereignty. India, having withstood Western pressure on Russian oil since 2022, now sees the EU's sanctions as a strategic red line. The real risk lies not only in lost trade, but in legitimizing extraterritorial controls that erode the Global South's right to independent economic choices. While the EU claims it's closing loopholes, India sees clear double standards. European nations still import Russian LNG and rely on intermediaries, yet penalize India for refining crude. The era of quiet compromise is over. In its place, a more assertive India is stepping forward, redefining its energy calculus, managing geopolitical headwinds, and defending its autonomy with both pragmatism and resolve.
