Why Most Pacific Governments Stand With Israel
Amid uncertainty in the Middle East, one thing remains clear: most Pacific governments continue to align themselves with Israel. Kaya Selby, RNZ Pacific Journalist
Amid uncertainty in the Middle East, one thing remains clear: most Pacific governments continue to align themselves with Israel.
Steven Ratuva, distinguished professor of Pacific Studies at Canterbury University, told RNZ that island leaders are likely to try and keep their distance, but only officially speaking.
'They'd probably feel safer that way, rather than publicly taking sides. But I think quite a few of them would probably be siding with Israel.'
With Iran and Israel trading blows last week, Ratuva said that is translating into deeper divisions along religious and political lines in Pacific nations.
'People may not want to admit it, but it's manifesting itself in different ways.'
Pacific support for Israel runs deep
The United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution on 13 June calling for 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in the war in Gaza', passing with 142 votes, or a 73 percent majority.
Among the 12 nations that voted against the resolution, alongside Israel and the United States, were Fiji, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea and Tuvalu.
Among the regional community, only Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands voted for the resolution, while others abstained or were absent.
Last week, Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, in an interview with The Australian, defended Israel's actions in Iran as an act of survival.
'They cannot survive if there is a big threat capability within range of Israel. Whatever [Israel] are doing now can be seen as pre-emptive, knocking it out before it's fired on you.'
In February, Fiji also committed to an embassy in Jerusalem – a recognition of Israel's right to call the city their capital – mirroring Papua New Guinea in 2023.
Ratuva said that deep, longstanding, religious and political ties with the West are what ground the regions ties with Israel.
'Most of the Pacific Island states have been aligned with the US since the Cold War and beyond, so the Western sphere of influence is seen as, for many of them, the place to be.'
He noted the rise in Christian evangelism, which is aligned with Zionism and the global push for a Jewish homeland, in pockets throughout the Pacific, particularly in Fiji.
'Small religious organisations which have links with or model selves along the lines of the United States evangelical movement, which has been supportive of Trump, tend to militate towards supporting Israel for religious reasons.'
'And of course, religion and politics, when you mix them together, become very powerful in terms of one's positioning (in the world).'
Politics or religion
In Fijian society, Ratuva said that the war in Gaza has stoked tensions between the Christian majority and the Muslim minority.
According to the CIA World Factbook, roughly 64.5 percent of Fijians are Christian, compared to a Muslim population of 6.3 percent.
'It's coming out very clearly, in terms of the way in which those belonging to the fundamentalist political orientation tend to make statements which are against non-Christians' Ratuva said.
'People begin to take sides…that in some ways deepens the religious divide, particularly in Fiji which is multi-ethnic and multi-religious, and where the Islamic community is relatively significant.'
A statement from the Melanesian Spearhead Group Secretariat, released on Wednesday, said that the Pacific wishes to be an 'ocean of peace'.
'Leaders also reaffirmed their commitment to the Friends to All, Enemy to None Foreign Policy to guide the MSG Members' relationship with countries and Development Partners.'
It bookends a summit that brought together leaders from Fiji, Papua New Guinea, and other Melanesian nations, where the Middle East was discussed, according to local media.
But the Pacific region had been used in a deceptive strategy as the US prepared for the strikes on Iran. On this matter, Melanesian leaders did not respond to requests for comment.
The BBC reported on Monday that B-2 planes flew to Guam from Missouri as a decoy to distract from top-secret flights headed over the Atlantic to Iran.
This sparked outrage from civil society leaders throughout the region, including the head of the Pacific Conference of Churches, Reverend James Bhagwan.
'This use of Pacific airspace and territory for military strikes violates the spirit of the Treaty of Rarotonga, our region's declaration for being a nuclear, free peace committed zone.'
'Our region has a memory of nuclear testing, occupation and trauma… we don't forget that when we talk about these issues.'
Bhagwan told RNZ that there is no popular support for Israel's most recent actions in the Pacific.
'This is because we have international law… this includes, of course, the US strikes on Iran and perhaps, also, Israel's actions in Gaza.'
'It is not about religion, it is about people.'
Bhagwan, whose organisation represents 27 member churches across 17 Pacific nations, refused to say whether he believed there was a link between christian fundamentalism and Pacific support for Israel.
'We can say that there is a religious contingency within the Pacific that does support Israel… it does not necessarily mean it's the majority view, but it is one that is seriously considered by those in power.'
'It depends on how those (politicians) consider that support they get from those particular aspects of the community.'
Pacific Islanders in the region
For some, the religious commitment runs so deep that they venture to Israel in a kind of pilgrimage.
Ratuva told RNZ that there is a significant population of islanders in the region, many of whom may now be trapped before a ceasefire is finalised.
'There was a time when the Gaza situation began to unfold, when a number of people from Fiji, Tonga and Samoa were there for pilgrimage purposes.'
'At that time there were significant numbers, and Fiji was able to fly over there to evauate them. So this time, I'm not sure whether that might happen.'
Bhagwan said that the religious ties run deep.
'They go to Jerusalem, to Bethlehem, to the Mount of Olives, to the Golan Heights, where the transfiguration took place. Fiji also is stationed in the Golan Heights as peacekeepers.'
'So there is a correlation, particularly for Pacific or for Fijian communities, on that relationship as peacekeepers in that region.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Kremlin official Sergei Kiriyenko is the quiet technocrat who enacts Vladimir Putin's agenda
As the Russian leader wages war, Kiriyenko oversees wide-ranging government efforts to tighten Putin's grip on the country and on occupied Ukraine. He has also recently gained new power inside the Kremlin, taking over much of the portfolio of another Putin aide who disagreed with the invasion of Ukraine. Despite his modest title of first deputy chief of staff to Putin, Kiriyenko represents an underappreciated aspect of how the Russian President exercises power, forming part of a cadre of skilled, loyal, and opportunistic managers who direct the sprawling apparatus of the Russian state. For more than three years, Putin has leaned on Kiriyenko, 63, to manage the political aspects of the Ukraine war. Cracking down on domestic opposition. Expanding the Kremlin's control of the internet. Pushing Putin's narrative into Russian schools and culture. Shaping propaganda and governance in occupied Ukraine. Attempting to legitimise Russia's land grab. Just in the past few months, Kiriyenko's reach has extended to efforts to reintegrate Ukraine war veterans into civilian life and to push Russians onto a state-affiliated messaging app instead of Western ones. If Putin makes a deal with United States President Donald Trump at their planned summit in Alaska on Friday to end the fighting in Ukraine, it is likely to be Kiriyenko's job to sell any compromise to Russians as a victory. In interviews, more than a dozen former colleagues and other Russians who know Kiriyenko described him as a man whose proficiency in the minutiae of control and influence have greased the machinery of Putin's autocracy. Many of the people, including three close to the Kremlin, spoke to the New York Times on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. The Kremlin declined to make Kiriyenko available for an interview and did not respond to a request for comment. One of his former aides, Boris Nadezhdin, said that he noticed Kiriyenko's skill at managing personnel and at staying in his bosses' good graces three decades ago, when Kiriyenko was a deputy energy minister. The two men would collide in 2024, when the Kremlin blocked Nadezhdin's attempt to run for president against Putin. Nadezhdin noted in an interview that Russia's era of independent politicians had passed. He said that the Putin era belonged to those like Kiriyenko — 'a person who does not try to implement any of his own plans, ideas, and so on, but simply, clearly carries out tasks'. Ukrainian soldiers during fighting with Russian Forces in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Sergei Kiriyenko, a first deputy chief of staff to President Vladimir Putin, has turned himself into a key engineer of the Russian leader's autocratic machine, even though he was once known as a Western-oriented reformer. Photo / Tyler Hicks, The New York Times 'Without rules' Kiriyenko casts himself as a student of the cold calculus of power. He is a sixth-rank black belt in aikido, a Japanese martial art focused on harnessing an opponent's energy and turning it against them. He professes an interest in Methodology, a Soviet-era school of philosophy in which society can be engineered, managed, and transformed from above. In the tumult of modern Russian politics, that focus on power has translated for Kiriyenko into shifting alliances and repeated reinvention. 'In a game without rules,' he once told an interviewer, 'the one who makes the rules wins.' Kiriyenko was just 35 in 1998 when he briefly became Russia's prime minister. His youthful image and meteoric rise — he'd been a regional oil refinery manager a few years before — earned him the nickname Kinder Surprise, a play on the name of a European children's candy. After losing his post when Russia defaulted on its debt, Kiriyenko co-founded a party pushing Western-style economic overhauls. He took a crash course in literature to appeal to the urban middle class, reading five books a week in the midst of his 1999 election campaigns for Moscow mayor and for the Russian parliament, according to Marat Guelman, then his campaign manager. 'He was quick to perceive, quick to change,' said Guelman, who later turned against Putin and now lives in Berlin. After Putin won the presidency in 2000, Kiriyenko pivoted again and quit parliament to work for the Kremlin. A few years on, Guelman asked for help for an associate who had run afoul of authorities, describing him to Kiriyenko as 'a person of our convictions'. Kiriyenko, Guelman recalled, shot back: 'I don't have convictions now — I'm a soldier of Putin'. Alfred Kokh, a 1990s-era deputy prime minister of Russia who also left the country, described a similar exchange. He complained to Kiriyenko in 2003 about improprieties in that year's parliamentary election campaign. 'Are we going to la-la,' Kiriyenko replied, 'or are we going to talk business?' Students in a new school subject called 'Fundamentals of Security and Protection of the Motherland' learn first aid skills at a school in Kursk, Russia, a city not far from Ukraine's border. Photo / Nanna Heitmann, The New York Times Powerful friends Already ensconced in the Kremlin machinery, Kiriyenko ran one of the government's biggest businesses from 2005 to 2016: Rosatom, the state nuclear energy conglomerate. During those years, Kiriyenko deepened a bond with a banking and media magnate, Yuri Kovalchuk, according to Western officials and several of the Kiriyenko associates who spoke to the New York Times. A physicist by training, Kovalchuk is widely seen as one of Putin's closest friends. He persuaded Putin to bring Kiriyenko back to the Kremlin, some of those people said. Kiriyenko had proven himself at Rosatom, modernising the company with Japanese management principles and extending Russian influence by striking deals around the globe. In his new Kremlin job, Kiriyenko was entrusted with orchestrating Putin's version of democracy, an exercise in cementing the president's legitimacy and keeping control of a far-flung nation. As the first deputy chief of staff overseeing domestic politics, Kiriyenko planned the selection of the Kremlin's preferred candidate for governor in each of Russia's more than 80 regions, the elections to fill the more than 600 seats in parliament, and the stage management of Putin's own re-election in 2018 and in 2024. 'He's the technical implementer,' said Grigory Yavlinsky, a liberal politician in Moscow who ran for president, with the Kremlin's approval, in 2018. 'It's a huge amount of work.' Kiriyenko also held contests to identify the next generations of technocrats, featuring online aptitude tests and role-playing leadership games. Just this year, finalists of his 'Leaders of Russia' competition have been named to government roles such as auditing construction projects in occupied Ukraine, managing bus transit in suburban Moscow and running the health ministry in Khabarovsk in Russia's Far East. He has broadened his portfolio further by taking on Russia's last bastion of free speech: the internet. In 2021, Kiriyenko wrested control of the country's most popular social network, VK, from an oligarch. Kovalchuk put up much of the money. Kiriyenko's son became chief executive. Kovalchuk's grandnephew took another senior role. The power of that alliance was on display in a blitz that many analysts saw as a prelude to a potential ban on WhatsApp. In March, VK unveiled its own messaging app. In June, Russia's communications minister praised the company for releasing a 'fully Russian messenger' in a televised meeting with Putin. Days later, Russian lawmakers passed a bill mandating that a Russian-made messaging app should come preinstalled on all smartphones. In July, the Government announced that this app would be the one developed by VK. 'For us, the government is always a partner and a senior comrade,' Kiriyenko's son and the head of VK, Vladimir Kiriyenko, said in April. Russian music producer Iosif Prigozhin, who said that the Kremlin gave 'a blank cheque' after the invasion of Ukraine to musicians who were 'more focused on national interests', at a hotel in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Photo / Katarina Premfors, The New York Times Backing the invasion As Putin massed troops and plotted his 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the President's political aides were largely in the dark, Kiriyenko's associates said. The three people close to the Kremlin said they were convinced that Kiriyenko didn't share the fixation on Ukraine's pro-Western turn that drove Putin to attack the country. After the war started, Kiriyenko soon refashioned himself once again. Trading his suit for olive-green shirts, he started travelling to occupied Ukraine amid the fighting, touring hospitals and schools. He worked on planning a public 'war crimes' trial of Ukrainians to show Putin fulfilling his promise to 'denazify' the country, one of his associates told the New York Times in June 2022. The trial never materialised as Russian forces struggled on the battlefield, but Kiriyenko said at a conference in 2023 that the war 'must end with trials of Ukrainian criminals'. He did succeed in putting on a different show — the sham referendums in which Moscow claimed Ukrainians under Russian occupation had voted overwhelmingly to become part of Russia. Inside Russia, Kiriyenko used the levers of his office to try to engineer popular support for Putin's invasion. The Public Projects Directorate, a unit focused on patriotic initiatives that Kiriyenko oversees, developed propaganda lessons for Russian schoolchildren. His staff also pressured midlevel officials to serve stints as administrators in occupied Ukraine, said Sergei Markov, a pro-Putin analyst in Moscow who has worked with the Kremlin. 'Sure, those who don't want to can refuse,' Markov said. 'But in that case they understand that they'll face serious limits on their careers.' Kiriyenko's portfolio also includes the arts. He has ramped up government support for pro-war entertainers who backed the war while blackballing those critical of it, according to Russian media reports. Iosif Prigozhin, a major music producer, said in an interview with the New York Times that the Kremlin gave 'a blank cheque' after the invasion to musicians who were 'more focused on national interests'. Prigozhin's wife, the pop star Valeria, has performed at patriotic concerts in Red Square. He called Kiriyenko 'positive, decent, sensitive and precise.'. When Kiriyenko's office seeks performers for events, 'the approach is not demanding, but suggestive', Prigozhin said. Kiriyenko's policies are also backed up by the full force of the Russian state. Thousands of anti-war Russians have been prosecuted or forced into exile in an effort that many analysts, opposition figures, and the former colleagues of Kiriyenko say they believe was largely co-ordinated by him as the Kremlin official who oversees domestic politics. Ilya Yashin, a Russian opposition leader, had just been arrested and interrogated in July 2022 when he said he chatted with a security service agent in the grim corridor of a law enforcement agency in Moscow while waiting for his prisoner transport to arrive. The agent told him that his arrest was a 'political decision', dropping hints about a 'Sergei' in the Kremlin who was a 'buddy' of Boris Nemtsov, the politician who brought Kiriyenko into government in the 1990s. The suggestion was that Kiriyenko was responsible for his fate, Yashin recalled in an interview after his release in a prisoner exchange last year, though he noted he couldn't be certain of Kiriyenko's role, if any. To Yashin, the irony was remarkable. Both he and Kiriyenko were allies, at different times, of Nemtsov, a Russian opposition leader assassinated in 2015. 'Now Nemtsov is dead, and one of his friends put another one in prison,' Yashin wrote from jail in 2022. An anti-war protester is detained by police in central Moscow on February 25, 2022. Photo / Sergey Ponomarev, The New York Times 'Absolutely opportunistic' In February of this year, Russian state news outlets reported that Kiriyenko was managing public unrest in Abkhazia, a Russian-backed breakaway region of Georgia. To help show the benefits of being on the Kremlin's side, Kiriyenko offered a gift of 20 Russian school buses and organised a version of his trademark leadership competitions. Kiriyenko's remit has been increasingly expanding outside Russia's borders. A different Kremlin deputy chief of staff, Dmitry Kozak, oversaw relations with Abkhazia as recently as last year. But Kozak has lost influence in Moscow amid his criticism of the invasion of Ukraine, according to the three people close to the Kremlin, a US official and a Western contact. In the past few months, they said, Kozak presented Putin with a proposal to immediately stop the fighting in Ukraine, start peace negotiations and reduce the power of Russia's security services. The Russian President has kept Kozak, who has been at Putin's side since the 1990s, in his senior post. But he has shifted much of Kozak's portfolio to Kiriyenko, including managing Kremlin relations with Moldova and with the two breakaway regions of Georgia, the people said. The expansion of Kiriyenko's influence shows how his star continues to rise at the Kremlin as he embraces and executes Putin's wartime policies. Kiriyenko is 'effective' and 'absolutely opportunistic', Yashin said. If Putin or a future Russian leader pivots back toward the West someday, Yashin said, 'Kiriyenko will find the words for it'. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Anton Troianovski Photographs by: Getty Images, Tyler Hicks, Nanna Heitmann, Katarina Premfors, Sergey Ponomarev ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Negligible hope from Alaska summit
Sadly, there is little reason to be optimistic about the Donald Trump-Vladimir Putin summit in Alaska. Ostensibly, the meeting between the United States and Russian presidents is about ending the war in Ukraine, or at least securing a ceasefire. In reality, minimal good can be expected. Details of any potential deal remain undisclosed, though Mr Trump has said it would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". In other words, if — and it is a huge if — an agreement was reached, Russia's invasion would be rewarded. The principle that international borders cannot be changed by force would be permanently violated. This post-World War 2 consensus helps protect smaller nations such as New Zealand. Mr Trump has already blatantly disregarded it, and China would likely welcome a return to the more straightforward "might is right". One analyst has called the summit "the first more or less realistic attempt to stop the war". The emphasis should be on the "less". Mr Putin, pounding Ukraine down, seeks more than limited territorial gains. Ukraine, fighting for its life and soul, is in an impossible position. The invaded country was not even invited, although Mr Trump spoke of meeting Mr Putin "first", and now talks about the possibility of three-way talks. Mr Putin has refused several opportunities to hold direct talks with Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Mr Zelenskyy has no choice but to insist that any deal without Kyiv is a "dead decision", while continuing to avoid alienating Mr Trump. As he learned from that disastrous meeting in the White House, sycophancy towards Mr Trump is mandatory. The United States remains the key military supporter, vital for maintaining Ukraine's resistance to Russia's advances. Long term, Ukraine might have to live without Crimea, annexed by Russia in 2014, and slivers of territory in the east. That will be insufficient for Mr Putin. There are suggestions that Ukraine would have to cede the entire Donbas region. A parallel issue concerns guarantees for Ukraine against subsequent attacks, necessary for a "reliable peace", as Mr Zelenskyy's chief of staff said. Russia will not countenance what would be necessary: Western troops on the ground. Mr Putin is not to be trusted. A Hitler-Chamberlain-style "piece of paper" agreement would only play into his hands. Europe, bordering Russia and deeply entangled, has also been sidelined, even if US Vice-president JD Vance has been meeting European representatives. While Europe insists the talks must include Kyiv and Europe, Mr Trump does his own thing. The summit is already a triumph for Mr Putin. The policy of isolating him is damaged, and he has nothing to lose. Formerly characterised as an archenemy, he is accepted as meeting the US president on US soil. Instead of losing favour with Mr Trump through his obstinacy, as had begun to occur, he becomes the leader supposedly seeking peace. Whatever happens, he helps Mr Trump revel in his cherished international spotlight. Mr Putin has the chance to influence the US president one-to-one, a useful advantage given Mr Trump's susceptibility to the last person he speaks with. Remember, Mr Trump has openly expressed admiration for the powerful Mr Putin. Mr Putin can also encourage the growing division within the Western security alliance between the US and Europe. At a deeper level, Mr Trump cares little about Ukraine. Eventually, co-operation with Russia could become central to exploiting global resources, potentially drawing Russia away from China and closer to the US orbit. The summit gives Mr Putin additional prestige in the eyes of Russians, who also see little prospect of Russia having to give up anything. Given Mr Trump's comments about land swaps and his capricious nature, Ukraine must be dreading this summit as others contemplate its fate. The greatest fear, which Mr Putin will fuel, is that the demands on Ukraine will be virtually impossible to accept. If Mr Zelenskyy rejects them, the United States could withdraw its vital support. The better scenario is simply talk and bluster. Meanwhile, the killing and destruction grind on.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Clearing out the confusion over NCEA changes
Photo: 123RF It is billed as the most significant overhaul of NCEA in more than two decades, but there are questions being raised in the education industry about whether it is a bold step forward or a risky roll of the dice. The government's sweeping changes to the national qualification aim to lift standards, streamline the way students are assessed, and restore confidence. RNZ education correspondent John Gerritsen tells The Detail the bold move comes with both hope and hesitation. "There is a sort of sense that maybe this new system is trying to apply a way of working that might suit the kids in the leafy suburbs and not so much the kids in the poorer areas," he says. The changes should be in place by 2030. If you never understood NCEA, or you are unsure of what the changes involve, this is the podcast to listen to as Gerritsen takes us through what's going on. NCEA Level 1 - which typically takes place in Year 11 - will be abolished, with students being required to take English and mathematics and to sit a new 'Foundational Skills Award' test that documents achievement in literacy and numeracy. Two new qualifications will replace NCEA Level 2 and Level 3, for Year 12 and 13 students respectively. They will now qualify with the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE), respectively. Students will be required to take five subjects, and will have to pass at least four, to attain each certificate in Years 12 and 13. A to E pass-fail grades will replace the "excellent, merit, achieved, and not achieved" rankings. Supporters of the changes say this is exactly what NCEA needs. Employers have long voiced concerns that school leavers do not always have the basic skills needed for the workforce . With literacy and numeracy now the focus, that gap could start to close. And by reducing assessment overload, that means less pressure on students and more time for actual learning. Some parents also claim it should be easier for them to understand what their child is learning - and why. "On one level, you'd have to say, a qualification system that has been in place since 2002, so over 20 years, and still confuses people probably needs to be revised pretty heavily," says Gerritsen. "Some of the way the language, the way this has been described - it's been a bit obtuse, and people have struggled to understand it over the years." But for every person applauding the changes, another is sounding the alarm. Some principals and parents worry that standalone literacy and numeracy tests risk leaving behind students with learning differences or who are from non-English-speaking backgrounds. "There is a whole swathe of young people who struggle with exams," Gerritsen tells The Detail . "Some of them may have dyslexia, others may just simply have anxiety about doing exams. "There are also issues around increasing shifts to computer-based exams for students who don't have much to do with computers, so this is definitely going to become an issue." And then there is the equity question. Will all schools - urban, rural, well-resourced, or underfunded - be ready to deliver under this new scheme? Or will the gaps further widen? "When talking to principals from poorer communities, they're really worried that a system that has helped their communities achieve success is going to be got rid of and replaced with something with big question marks around it," Gerritsen says. "There are worries that young people from poorer backgrounds are going to be disadvantaged by this, and they will be less likely to leave school with some sort of qualification." The consultation process closes in less than five weeks. And when it comes to the future of every New Zealand student, there is no room for error. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
