
Kremlin official Sergei Kiriyenko is the quiet technocrat who enacts Vladimir Putin's agenda
He has also recently gained new power inside the Kremlin, taking over much of the portfolio of another Putin aide who disagreed with the invasion of Ukraine.
Despite his modest title of first deputy chief of staff to Putin, Kiriyenko represents an underappreciated aspect of how the Russian President exercises power, forming part of a cadre of skilled, loyal, and opportunistic managers who direct the sprawling apparatus of the Russian state.
For more than three years, Putin has leaned on Kiriyenko, 63, to manage the political aspects of the Ukraine war.
Cracking down on domestic opposition. Expanding the Kremlin's control of the internet. Pushing Putin's narrative into Russian schools and culture. Shaping propaganda and governance in occupied Ukraine. Attempting to legitimise Russia's land grab.
Just in the past few months, Kiriyenko's reach has extended to efforts to reintegrate Ukraine war veterans into civilian life and to push Russians onto a state-affiliated messaging app instead of Western ones.
If Putin makes a deal with United States President Donald Trump at their planned summit in Alaska on Friday to end the fighting in Ukraine, it is likely to be Kiriyenko's job to sell any compromise to Russians as a victory.
In interviews, more than a dozen former colleagues and other Russians who know Kiriyenko described him as a man whose proficiency in the minutiae of control and influence have greased the machinery of Putin's autocracy.
Many of the people, including three close to the Kremlin, spoke to the New York Times on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.
The Kremlin declined to make Kiriyenko available for an interview and did not respond to a request for comment.
One of his former aides, Boris Nadezhdin, said that he noticed Kiriyenko's skill at managing personnel and at staying in his bosses' good graces three decades ago, when Kiriyenko was a deputy energy minister.
The two men would collide in 2024, when the Kremlin blocked Nadezhdin's attempt to run for president against Putin.
Nadezhdin noted in an interview that Russia's era of independent politicians had passed. He said that the Putin era belonged to those like Kiriyenko — 'a person who does not try to implement any of his own plans, ideas, and so on, but simply, clearly carries out tasks'.
Ukrainian soldiers during fighting with Russian Forces in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Sergei Kiriyenko, a first deputy chief of staff to President Vladimir Putin, has turned himself into a key engineer of the Russian leader's autocratic machine, even though he was once known as a Western-oriented reformer. Photo / Tyler Hicks, The New York Times
'Without rules'
Kiriyenko casts himself as a student of the cold calculus of power.
He is a sixth-rank black belt in aikido, a Japanese martial art focused on harnessing an opponent's energy and turning it against them.
He professes an interest in Methodology, a Soviet-era school of philosophy in which society can be engineered, managed, and transformed from above.
In the tumult of modern Russian politics, that focus on power has translated for Kiriyenko into shifting alliances and repeated reinvention.
'In a game without rules,' he once told an interviewer, 'the one who makes the rules wins.'
Kiriyenko was just 35 in 1998 when he briefly became Russia's prime minister. His youthful image and meteoric rise — he'd been a regional oil refinery manager a few years before — earned him the nickname Kinder Surprise, a play on the name of a European children's candy.
After losing his post when Russia defaulted on its debt, Kiriyenko co-founded a party pushing Western-style economic overhauls.
He took a crash course in literature to appeal to the urban middle class, reading five books a week in the midst of his 1999 election campaigns for Moscow mayor and for the Russian parliament, according to Marat Guelman, then his campaign manager.
'He was quick to perceive, quick to change,' said Guelman, who later turned against Putin and now lives in Berlin.
After Putin won the presidency in 2000, Kiriyenko pivoted again and quit parliament to work for the Kremlin.
A few years on, Guelman asked for help for an associate who had run afoul of authorities, describing him to Kiriyenko as 'a person of our convictions'.
Kiriyenko, Guelman recalled, shot back: 'I don't have convictions now — I'm a soldier of Putin'.
Alfred Kokh, a 1990s-era deputy prime minister of Russia who also left the country, described a similar exchange.
He complained to Kiriyenko in 2003 about improprieties in that year's parliamentary election campaign.
'Are we going to la-la,' Kiriyenko replied, 'or are we going to talk business?'
Students in a new school subject called 'Fundamentals of Security and Protection of the Motherland' learn first aid skills at a school in Kursk, Russia, a city not far from Ukraine's border. Photo / Nanna Heitmann, The New York Times
Powerful friends
Already ensconced in the Kremlin machinery, Kiriyenko ran one of the government's biggest businesses from 2005 to 2016: Rosatom, the state nuclear energy conglomerate.
During those years, Kiriyenko deepened a bond with a banking and media magnate, Yuri Kovalchuk, according to Western officials and several of the Kiriyenko associates who spoke to the New York Times. A physicist by training, Kovalchuk is widely seen as one of Putin's closest friends.
He persuaded Putin to bring Kiriyenko back to the Kremlin, some of those people said.
Kiriyenko had proven himself at Rosatom, modernising the company with Japanese management principles and extending Russian influence by striking deals around the globe.
In his new Kremlin job, Kiriyenko was entrusted with orchestrating Putin's version of democracy, an exercise in cementing the president's legitimacy and keeping control of a far-flung nation.
As the first deputy chief of staff overseeing domestic politics, Kiriyenko planned the selection of the Kremlin's preferred candidate for governor in each of Russia's more than 80 regions, the elections to fill the more than 600 seats in parliament, and the stage management of Putin's own re-election in 2018 and in 2024.
'He's the technical implementer,' said Grigory Yavlinsky, a liberal politician in Moscow who ran for president, with the Kremlin's approval, in 2018. 'It's a huge amount of work.'
Kiriyenko also held contests to identify the next generations of technocrats, featuring online aptitude tests and role-playing leadership games.
Just this year, finalists of his 'Leaders of Russia' competition have been named to government roles such as auditing construction projects in occupied Ukraine, managing bus transit in suburban Moscow and running the health ministry in Khabarovsk in Russia's Far East.
He has broadened his portfolio further by taking on Russia's last bastion of free speech: the internet.
In 2021, Kiriyenko wrested control of the country's most popular social network, VK, from an oligarch. Kovalchuk put up much of the money. Kiriyenko's son became chief executive. Kovalchuk's grandnephew took another senior role.
The power of that alliance was on display in a blitz that many analysts saw as a prelude to a potential ban on WhatsApp.
In March, VK unveiled its own messaging app.
In June, Russia's communications minister praised the company for releasing a 'fully Russian messenger' in a televised meeting with Putin.
Days later, Russian lawmakers passed a bill mandating that a Russian-made messaging app should come preinstalled on all smartphones. In July, the Government announced that this app would be the one developed by VK.
'For us, the government is always a partner and a senior comrade,' Kiriyenko's son and the head of VK, Vladimir Kiriyenko, said in April.
Russian music producer Iosif Prigozhin, who said that the Kremlin gave 'a blank cheque' after the invasion of Ukraine to musicians who were 'more focused on national interests', at a hotel in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Photo / Katarina Premfors, The New York Times
Backing the invasion
As Putin massed troops and plotted his 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the President's political aides were largely in the dark, Kiriyenko's associates said.
The three people close to the Kremlin said they were convinced that Kiriyenko didn't share the fixation on Ukraine's pro-Western turn that drove Putin to attack the country.
After the war started, Kiriyenko soon refashioned himself once again. Trading his suit for olive-green shirts, he started travelling to occupied Ukraine amid the fighting, touring hospitals and schools.
He worked on planning a public 'war crimes' trial of Ukrainians to show Putin fulfilling his promise to 'denazify' the country, one of his associates told the New York Times in June 2022.
The trial never materialised as Russian forces struggled on the battlefield, but Kiriyenko said at a conference in 2023 that the war 'must end with trials of Ukrainian criminals'.
He did succeed in putting on a different show — the sham referendums in which Moscow claimed Ukrainians under Russian occupation had voted overwhelmingly to become part of Russia.
Inside Russia, Kiriyenko used the levers of his office to try to engineer popular support for Putin's invasion.
The Public Projects Directorate, a unit focused on patriotic initiatives that Kiriyenko oversees, developed propaganda lessons for Russian schoolchildren.
His staff also pressured midlevel officials to serve stints as administrators in occupied Ukraine, said Sergei Markov, a pro-Putin analyst in Moscow who has worked with the Kremlin.
'Sure, those who don't want to can refuse,' Markov said. 'But in that case they understand that they'll face serious limits on their careers.'
Kiriyenko's portfolio also includes the arts.
He has ramped up government support for pro-war entertainers who backed the war while blackballing those critical of it, according to Russian media reports.
Iosif Prigozhin, a major music producer, said in an interview with the New York Times that the Kremlin gave 'a blank cheque' after the invasion to musicians who were 'more focused on national interests'.
Prigozhin's wife, the pop star Valeria, has performed at patriotic concerts in Red Square. He called Kiriyenko 'positive, decent, sensitive and precise.'. When Kiriyenko's office seeks performers for events, 'the approach is not demanding, but suggestive', Prigozhin said.
Kiriyenko's policies are also backed up by the full force of the Russian state.
Thousands of anti-war Russians have been prosecuted or forced into exile in an effort that many analysts, opposition figures, and the former colleagues of Kiriyenko say they believe was largely co-ordinated by him as the Kremlin official who oversees domestic politics.
Ilya Yashin, a Russian opposition leader, had just been arrested and interrogated in July 2022 when he said he chatted with a security service agent in the grim corridor of a law enforcement agency in Moscow while waiting for his prisoner transport to arrive.
The agent told him that his arrest was a 'political decision', dropping hints about a 'Sergei' in the Kremlin who was a 'buddy' of Boris Nemtsov, the politician who brought Kiriyenko into government in the 1990s.
The suggestion was that Kiriyenko was responsible for his fate, Yashin recalled in an interview after his release in a prisoner exchange last year, though he noted he couldn't be certain of Kiriyenko's role, if any.
To Yashin, the irony was remarkable. Both he and Kiriyenko were allies, at different times, of Nemtsov, a Russian opposition leader assassinated in 2015.
'Now Nemtsov is dead, and one of his friends put another one in prison,' Yashin wrote from jail in 2022.
An anti-war protester is detained by police in central Moscow on February 25, 2022. Photo / Sergey Ponomarev, The New York Times
'Absolutely opportunistic'
In February of this year, Russian state news outlets reported that Kiriyenko was managing public unrest in Abkhazia, a Russian-backed breakaway region of Georgia.
To help show the benefits of being on the Kremlin's side, Kiriyenko offered a gift of 20 Russian school buses and organised a version of his trademark leadership competitions.
Kiriyenko's remit has been increasingly expanding outside Russia's borders.
A different Kremlin deputy chief of staff, Dmitry Kozak, oversaw relations with Abkhazia as recently as last year. But Kozak has lost influence in Moscow amid his criticism of the invasion of Ukraine, according to the three people close to the Kremlin, a US official and a Western contact.
In the past few months, they said, Kozak presented Putin with a proposal to immediately stop the fighting in Ukraine, start peace negotiations and reduce the power of Russia's security services.
The Russian President has kept Kozak, who has been at Putin's side since the 1990s, in his senior post. But he has shifted much of Kozak's portfolio to Kiriyenko, including managing Kremlin relations with Moldova and with the two breakaway regions of Georgia, the people said.
The expansion of Kiriyenko's influence shows how his star continues to rise at the Kremlin as he embraces and executes Putin's wartime policies.
Kiriyenko is 'effective' and 'absolutely opportunistic', Yashin said.
If Putin or a future Russian leader pivots back toward the West someday, Yashin said, 'Kiriyenko will find the words for it'.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Anton Troianovski
Photographs by: Getty Images, Tyler Hicks, Nanna Heitmann, Katarina Premfors, Sergey Ponomarev
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Ukrainians confront prospect of losing Donbas in Trump-Putin talks
Precisely what will be discussed in Alaska remains to be seen. A small group of protesters has urged Trump not to sell out Ukraine at talks between him and Putin towards ending Russia's war in Ukraine scheduled for tomorrow in Alaska. Photo / Getty Images Two conflicting emotions are paramount among Ukrainians: exhaustion from the war, now in its fourth blood-soaked year, and revulsion at the idea of rewarding Russia in any way for its unprovoked invasion. Many Ukrainians seem unwilling to accept that all or part of the territories may be lost, even if Ukraine does not officially recognise a border change. 'No one recognises these territories as being under Russian control – just as no one recognised occupied Luhansk or Sevastopol from 2014 to 2022, even though de facto they were under Russian control,' said Oleksandr, a Ukrainian serviceman now fighting in Donetsk who spoke on the condition that he be identified only by first name because he was not authorised to speak to the media. If a peace deal is signed, Oleksandr added, it would not necessarily freeze the front line, because Moscow could regroup and launch another full-scale attack. 'No one believes it would really be a freeze,' Oleksandr said. Surrendering territory to Russia and untold numbers of Ukrainian citizens to Russian occupation would not be an easy decision, but there might be no choice, said a Ukrainian businessman with interests in Donetsk. Like some others interviewed for this article, he spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. 'Looking with cold eyes, I would say that with this situation, this is what we can get,' the businessman said. 'But if you ask me as a Ukrainian, as a citizen, of course I'm not satisfied.' However, the businessman said that despite inevitable misgivings, 'everybody will choose to stop the war. Because people are sick and tired of the war'. Economically, a swap of territory – trading occupied parts of Zaporizhzhia for unoccupied parts of Donetsk – could work, he said, as Zaporizhzhia contains key mineral deposits and mines, as well as the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Enerhodar, the largest atomic energy station in Europe. For some, any deal would be welcome, even a temporary one. 'I don't know a single person in my unit who wants to keep fighting,' said Eugene, a member of the Ukrainian National Guard who serves in Donetsk and originally comes from Luhansk. He spoke on the condition that he be identified only by first name because he was not authorised to speak to the media. 'Everyone understands what Russia is; everyone understands that it's basically a three-year truce,' he said, using the examples of Chechnya and Georgia, where Russia resumed fighting in what became long conflicts. 'It's not cool at all to see all these people with torn-off heads, legs, arms,' Eugene said, lacing his speech with obscenities. 'And I no longer understand what we're doing this for.' 'Honestly, I just want to close my eyes so all this would be over, so everyone would just [expletive] off.' Zelenskyy said that Ukrainian territory was not his 'private property' to give away. What's more, without security guarantees, Russia would use the region as a 'springboard' to invade other parts of Ukraine – Putin would have an 'open path' to the Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk and Kharkiv regions, the President said. Ultimately, any changes to Ukraine's boundaries must be enshrined in the country's constitution, Zelenskyy said – a difficult process in a fractious democracy such as Ukraine. 'I'm not going to surrender my country, because I have no right to do so,' he said. In contrast, after holding illegal sham referendums in occupied Ukraine, Putin swiftly rewrote his country's constitution to incorporate the four Ukrainian regions into the Russian Federation, including parts of those regions that Russian troops do not control. Following Ukraine's pro-European, anti-Kremlin Euromaidan revolution, Moscow set off a war in Donbas in 2014. The Kremlin directed local proxy fighters there and supplied them with arms. At times, they also sent Russian troops without markings or insignia to back them up. More than 14,000 people were killed, the United Nations said. When Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, it pushed even further into Donetsk, and in June this year occupied all of Luhansk. In recent weeks, Moscow's forces have made major advances, but the key Donetsk cities of Kramatorsk, Sloviansk and Kostiantynivka remain under Ukrainian control. But even a ceasefire leaving the front line where it currently stands would freeze Russian control over a large portion of Donetsk, all of Luhansk, and significant parts of the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. Russian control could ultimately extend beyond that, if the final agreement involves a 'land for peace' element – ceding to Russia all land that it currently occupies, or large portions after swaps with Ukraine. Recent opinion polls show growing support for a negotiated end to the war among Ukrainians, though they reject Russian demands. Last week, the US-based Gallup polling firm said that a survey in early July showed more than two-thirds of Ukrainians wanted to stop the war as soon as possible through talks – a strong reversal from 2022, when about the same percentage said Ukraine should fight to regain its territory. However, the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, in a poll conducted from the end of July through the beginning of August, found that most Ukrainians remain opposed to any plan that formally cedes Moscow the occupied territories. 'Despite the aggressive actions of the Russians on the front and the brutal air attacks on civilian cities over the past few months, Ukrainian public opinion on issues of war and peace has not fundamentally changed,' KIIS executive director Anton Hrushetskyi said in a report summarising the results. 'Ukrainians, as before, demonstrate openness to negotiations and the possibility, albeit reluctantly, of approving difficult decisions.' Whether territories that Russia occupies are recognised as officially part of Russia is the main issue, said another businessman with interests in Donetsk. 'None of these questions are easy to answer, because, firstly, is [Russia's control] de facto or de jure?' he said. 'De facto, they're already under control. If the agreement is simply that the conflict is frozen on or near the current line of contact, that's what everyone expects as a peace agreement.' 'The next point is, is [whether] those territories will, de jure, be subsumed into Russia with the agreement of the Ukrainian state?' he said. 'I think that is where the difficult discussions will take place.' Still, a significant portion of the Ukrainian population will oppose a peace deal, whatever form it takes, said a former high-ranking Ukrainian official. 'Our President is in a very difficult position right now.' If there is a ceasefire in which Russia receives territory, 'part of society will be dissatisfied', the former official said. 'If there is no ceasefire, the other part will be displeased. And to find this golden mean should be extremely difficult.' Any agreement will lead to political instability in Ukraine, which Russia can manipulate and encourage, the former official warned, adding: 'There is no good agreement for Ukraine.' Anastacia Galouchka and Siobhán O'Grady contributed to this report.


NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Southwestern Motorway jammed after motorcycle crash
Putin already seen as winner in US-Russia summit on peace in Ukraine Kiwi journalist Thomas Mutch joins us from Ukraine to take us through the latest on the frontlines, and behind the scenes.


NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Talented teen makes everyday count after cancer journey
Putin already seen as winner in US-Russia summit on peace in Ukraine Kiwi journalist Thomas Mutch joins us from Ukraine to take us through the latest on the frontlines, and behind the scenes.