Starmer heads to Nato summit with 5% spending pledge
The Prime Minister will pledge to boost spending on defence and security to 5% by 2035 at a Nato summit amid escalating hostilities in the Middle East.
Sir Keir Starmer and other leaders of Nato countries will meet in The Hague this week, where they are expected to formally agree the target.
It includes spending 3.5% on 'core defence' and another 1.5% on 'resilience and security'.
It represents a significant jump from the current 2% Nato target, and from the UK Government's aim of spending 2.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence from 2027 and 3% at some point after the next election.
But the figure is in line with the demands of US President Donald Trump, who has called for Nato allies to shoulder more of the burden of European defence.
Ahead of his trip to the Netherlands, Sir Keir said the increased spending target was 'an opportunity to deepen our commitment to Nato and drive greater investment in the nation's wider security and resilience'.
He said: 'We must navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest to deliver security for working people and keep them safe.'
The Government expects to spend 1.5% of GDP on resilience and security by 2027.
The details of what counts towards that target are due to be set out during this week's summit, but it is likely to include spending on energy and border security as well as intelligence agencies.
But increasing core defence spending to 3.5% will not happen until 2035, with at least two elections likely to take place before then.
Nor would Downing Street say how the increase would be paid for, with a spokesman describing the figure as 'a projected target' that allies would review in 2029 when Nato carries out its next capability assessment.
The Royal United Services Institute has estimated that increasing core defence spending to 3.5% by 2035 would cost £40 billion a year more than keeping the figure at 2.5%.
Conservative shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Tories welcomed the higher Nato target, but said the Government's commitment was 'both unfunded and a decade away, when the threat we face is real and imminent'.
He said: 'The Chancellor failed to set a path to 3% in the spending review, and this is another announcement without a plan.
'Instead of using smoke and mirrors to inflate defence spending, Labour must get to 3% this Parliament and back our country's defence with a fully funded plan.'
The Prime Minister prepared to fly to the Netherlands for the two-day Nato summit against the background of both the war in Ukraine and hostilities in the Middle East.
Late on Monday, Mr Trump claimed he had secured a ceasefire between Iran and Israel after Tehran retaliated against a US strike on its nuclear facilities.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said Sir Keir would continue to press for a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Iran crisis.
He will also urge allies to help secure a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine by showing strength and providing Kyiv with 'the support it needs to defend itself against continued Russian aggression'.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is also expected to attend the summit, but not take part in the main discussions of the North Atlantic Council.
Ahead of the summit, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte described the move to spend more on defence as a 'quantum leap' that would make the organisation 'a stronger, a fairer and a more lethal alliance'.
But it was reported on Sunday that Spain had reached a deal that would see it exempted from the 5% target.
Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that Spain would be able to keep its commitments to the 32-nation military alliance by spending 2.1% of GDP on defence needs.
Tuesday will also see the publication of the UK's national security strategy, which is expected to call for the whole of society to become more resilient and recognise national security 'means more than it used to'.
The document will tie together a series of reviews commissioned by the Government, including the recent strategic defence review, a review of the Aukus alliance with the US and Australia and an audit of relations with China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Australia Must Choose Defense or Social Spending, Rabobank Says
Australia confronts a 'guns or butter' choice between a bigger defense budget and expanding national disability insurance and other social programs, according to Rabobank, which calls for economic statecraft to navigate a risky regional security environment. For now, the government is opting for 'butter,' but it retains substantial fiscal headroom to bolster military spending when compared to peer economies, Rabobank economist Benjamin Picton said in a research note on Tuesday. The nation's debt is lower than that of counterparts as a share of its gross domestic product.
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg Daybreak Asia: Israel-Iran Ceasefire in Flux
President Donald Trump announced Israel and Iran had agreed to what he called a 'complete and total' ceasefire, easing fears that a conflict between the two adversaries might escalate. Trump, who made the surprise announcement on his Truth Social platform days after ordering airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, said the accord would begin around midnight US time and is aimed at a lasting end to the fighting. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a tweet afterward that while there is no ceasefire agreement, his country had no intention to keep responding to Israeli attacks after 4:00 a.m. Tehran time. We break down the headlines with Joe Mathieu, co-host of Bloomberg Radio and Television's Balance of Power. Oil slumped and stocks rallied after Trump announced the ceasefire, spurring optimism the worst of the Middle East conflict is over. Global benchmark Brent crude tumbled almost 5% in early Asian trading after the surprise comment. S&P 500 futures rose 0.5%, while key stock indexes advanced in Japan, Hong Kong and Australia. The news damped demand for haven assets with the dollar weakening against all its Group-of-10 peers and gold dropping. Bloomberg's Jill Disis speaks with our TV colleagues, Yvonne Man and David Ingles, in Hong Kong. Plus - we look at how all the day's news may play into the Federal Reserve's inflation outlook. We get market insights from Ross Mayfield, Investment Strategist at Baird.
New York Times
15 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Iran's State Television Announces Cease-Fire With Israel
F.B.I. and Department of Homeland Security officials held a call with state and local law enforcement officials on Sunday to warn of potential consequences of U.S. action in Iran. Federal officials are increasingly concerned about the possibility of Iran or its supporters retaliating on American soil after the bombing of nuclear sites in Iran by U.S. forces. In an internal email on Sunday, top officials at the F.B.I. cautioned that Iran and its proxies have 'historically targeted U.S. interests in response to geopolitical events, and they are likely to increase their efforts in the near term.' They urged field offices to monitor their collection platforms and stay in close contact with the Defense Department, including the National Guard, 'who may be targeted for retaliation' while 'specific attention should be paid to' U.S. military facilities connected to the strikes in Iran. In New York City, Mayor Eric Adams said that more police officers would be on duty around religious, cultural and diplomatic sites 'out of an abundance of caution,' given the situation in the Middle East. Iran, which the United States has designated as a state sponsor of terrorism, has long backed a network of militias across the Middle East in an attempt to extend its influence across the region and undermine Israel. Those militias include Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, who control parts of Yemen. Separately, the Department of Homeland Security issued a security bulletin stating that the 'ongoing Iran conflict' had elevated security concerns in the country and adding that cyberattacks by pro-Iranian hackers were likely. 'The likelihood of violent extremists in the homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the homeland,' the bulletin said. It noted that 'cyberactors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against U.S. networks.' Such advisories are typical after American forces take significant military action overseas, reflecting a worry by national security officials that people living in the United States may be angry or compelled to lash out. The relationship between Iran and the United States is particularly fraught in recent years, particularly given that U.S. officials have accused Iran of trying to assassinate American officials, as well as Iranian dissidents in the country. In a conference call on Sunday, D.H.S. and F.B.I. officials cautioned state and local law enforcement officials of the possibility of threats to U.S. communities. During the call, the nonprofit organization Secure Community Network, which provides safety consulting and training for Jewish facilities across North America, said that the level of threats was very high. 'Iran would not strike in the U.S. unless a red line was crossed,' said Michael Masters, the group's chief executive, according to a summary of the call. 'That red line was assessed to be direct military engagement, especially targeting Iran's nuclear facilities. That red line has now been crossed.' The bulletin by the Department of Homeland Security said that the Iran-Israel war 'could also motivate violent extremists and hate crime perpetrators seeking to attack targets perceived to be Jewish, pro-Israel, or linked to the US government or military in the homeland.' Former F.B.I. officials said the bureau was well versed in these situations and would ask informants to find out if there were any new threats while scrutinizing existing cases, including possible surveillance of those being investigated. In its email on Sunday, the F.B.I. said to prioritize tips potentially associated with Iran or its proxies. Carlos Fernandez, a former senior F.B.I. agent in charge of New York's counterterrorism division, said the agents had to take seriously the possibility of sleeper cells in the United States, especially since Iran has been accused of plotting to kill President Trump before the election and a human-rights activist in Brooklyn. Indeed, the bureau has also uncovered members of Hezbollah, who trained in Lebanon but then moved to the United States, where they were eventually arrested in Michigan and New York and charged with terrorism. 'It's very real,' he said. 'It's a legitimate concern.'
