National Sports Bill: How it's different from National Sports Code
The Journey
The differences with Sports Code:
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
With the introduction of the National Sports Governance Bill in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, India has taken a big step towards joining powers like the USA, UK, China, and Japan which have laws in place for streamlined administrative set-ups.The bill, once it becomes an act, will complete a journey that started back in 2011 when the then Sports Minister Ajay Maken began his push for a legislation to set some benchmarks for the sports administrators.The mostly long-serving administrators were and still are often accused of indulging in power struggles, infighting, financial misappropriation and showing a distinct lack of intent to overcome any of these issues.But with the new bill, accountability will be in place through a National Sports Board , a National Sports Tribunal and the National Sports Election Panel.All of this took shape over months of dialogue that current Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya undertook with stakeholders, soon after taking charge last year.Once the bill was finalised, Mandaviya gave due credit to Maken, his political opponent from the Congress party, for "doing good work in shaping the National Sports Code , 2011" which was in operation till now."The National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 established good governance practices for sports bodies, essential for healthy development of sports in the country," stated the objectives of the new bill.Here's a look at the timeline of how the code turned into a bill with significant changes.*In 2011, the Ministry prepared Draft National Sports Development Bill and placed it before Cabinet for approval. However, it was met with vehement opposition due to strict capping of age and tenure for administrators.*In July 2013, the Ministry prepared a revised Draft National Sports Development Bill and placed it in public domain to invite suggestions and comments. However, this Bill was not pursued and a year later, the Delhi High Court upheld the Sports Code 2011.*In 2015, a Working Group was constituted for re-drafting of National Sports Development Code, 2011. But the inclusion of Indian Olympic Association top brass in this group was challenged in the Delhi High Court as a case of conflict of interest.*In 2017, a Committee was constituted under then sports secretary Injeti Srinivas, to prepare the '(Draft) National Code for Good Governance in Sports , 2017'. Olympic gold medal-winning shooter Abhinav Bindra, and other sports greats like Anju Bobby George, and Prakash Padukone, along with then then IOA head Narinder Batra were among the members in the committee.The Draft Sports Code was also challenged in the Delhi High Court, which ordered that committee's report be submitted to it in a sealed cover.*In 2019, the Ministry constituted an Expert Committee under Justice (Retd.) Mukundakam Sharma to review the Draft Sports Code 2017 and "suggest measures for making it acceptable to all the stakeholders".That same year, the Delhi High Court stayed the constitution of this committee, an order that is in effect till date.*In October 2024, the Draft National Sports Governance Bill was released to the public for comments and suggestions. There were extensive consultation sessions held with the IOA, the National Sports Federations, athletes, coaches, legal experts and even private bodies that are involved in athlete management. The bill was also shared with the International Olympic Committe and International Federations including World Athletics, FIFA, and the International Hockey Federation (FIH) among others.The ministry received "over 700 responses" as part of the feedback from various stakeholders, including general public before it finally made its way to the Parliament.*Age Cap: While the Sports Code capped the age of administrators at 70, the new bill allows an office-bearer to complete his/her tenure if they were less than 70 at the time of filing nominations. A further relaxation of another five years has been made for contesting elections if the international statutes and byelaws allow for it in the concerned sports body.*Tenure: The Sports Code allowed three terms with a cooling off period after two terms for the President and two terms for Treasurer and Secretary. The new sports bill allows office-bearers (President, Secretary General and Treasurer) to serve three consecutive terms of a maximum of 12 years and remain eligible for election to the Executive Committee after a cooling off period."This has been done to ensure continuity and also to keep competent people within the system," a sports ministry source said.*Executive Committee: The sports code had no provision for mandatory women's representation in the committee whose strength was capped at 15. The new bill mandates that at least four members of the EC must be women along with two sportspersons of outstanding merit.*Regulatory Body: The sports code had no provisions for a regulatory body to oversee NSFs, leaving the power to recognise or derecognise in the hands of the sports ministry. But the sports governance bill outlines the creation of a National Sports Board which will fulfill this role.*The National Sports Tribunal, which will adjudicate sporting disputes, the National Sports Election Panel to oversee polls in NSFs and the Ethics Commission were not a part of the Sports Code. All these bodies will have a significant role to play once the bill becomes an act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Happy Gilmore 2: Adam Sandler returns with golf legends on Netflix! Release date, plot, and full list of golf celebrity cameos revealed
Watch Happy Gilmore 2 On Netflix Today Golf Legends Join the Cast John Daly Scottie Scheffler Will Zalatoris Collin Morikawa Bryson DeChambeau Justin Thomas Rory McIlroy Brooks Koepka Keegan Bradley Rickie Fowler Jordan Spieth Xander Schauffle Corey Pavin Live Events Quick Recap on Happy Gilmore What We Know About the Plot of Happy Gilmore 2 FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Nearly 30 years after 'Happy Gilmore' was on the big screen, Adam Sandler is back in "Happy Gilmore 2", and this time, he's bringing a whole squad of golf royalty with him, as per a long-awaited sequel premieres on Friday, July 25, at 3 a.m. ET on Netflix, and it's already shaping up to be a treat for both Sandler fans and sports lovers, as they are excited to see the film, according to a USA Today report. True to Sandler's recent filmmaking style, which often includes roles for close friends and even athletes who impress him, 'Happy Gilmore 2' is stacked with cameos, especially from the golf world, as per the list of golf's biggest stars who make appearances will make fans go crazy. According to IMDb, the sequel features cameos of golfers, including:ALSO READ: Donald Trump signs executive order to reshape college athletics and ban pay-for-play deals While Sandler didn't initially plan to pack the film with this many celebrity guests, but pointed out that as more stars came to film, more parts were written to fit them in, as reported by USA Today. He said, "I don't know how it happened," and added that, "We wrote 'em, stuff. Everybody was kind enough to come. Everybody in it did a great job. Every day, someone cool would show up, and we'd hang out," as quoted in the movie also finds room for one of the sport's biggest social media personalities, former pro golfer Paige Spiranac and even Kansas City Chiefs' tight end Travis Kelce has a role as a hotel employee in the film, as reported by USA you need a quick refresher, the original 'Happy Gilmore' followed the story about Happy, a wannabe hockey player with serious anger issues who unexpectedly finds out he's got a powerful golf swing, as per report. With help from his mentor Chubbs, who lost a hand in an alligator attack, Happy starts entering golf tournaments to try and save his grandmother's home from foreclosure, as per the report. His wild behavior makes him an instant hit with fans, but it doesn't sit well with the golf establishment, especially Shooter McGavin, the top player who isn't too happy about Happy stealing the spotlight, according to READ: Awkward moment: Is tension brewing between Donald Trump and Jerome Powell over Fed renovation costs? So what's in store for the sequel? Not much has been revealed just yet, as per the report. The official teaser just says, 'Adam Sandler's short-fused legend swings for a comeback to make his kid's dream come true,' as quoted by A peek at the trailer shows Happy coming out of retirement to pay for his daughter's expensive ballet school, reported Some familiar faces are back too, including Julie Bowen, Ben Stiller, and Christopher McDonald, as per the premieres on Netflix on Friday, July 25 at 3 a.m. ET, as per the USA Today Sandler is back in his role as the hot-headed golf hero.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Sports Bill will bring transparency and reform to federations: Gagan Narang
New Delhi: Olympic medallist-turned-sports administrator Gagan Narang believes the National Sports Governance Bill will usher in much-needed transparency and reforms in the functioning of National Sports Federations (NSFs). Olympic medallist-turned-sports administrator Gagan Narang believes the National Sports Governance Bill will usher in transparency. (Getty Images) 'It's a forward-looking, futuristic bill that can significantly transform the sporting ecosystem in the country. It will help athletes perform better by allowing them to focus with the right mindset,' Narang told HT. A key feature of the Bill is the creation of a National Sports Tribunal, intended to resolve disputes involving federations. Currently, there are multiple sports-related litigations across various courts in India, which has become a major administrative bottleneck. 'The Bill will address all legal issues plaguing federations. Also, if an athlete has a dispute, there will be a resolution committee in place. That means athletes can focus on their sport without the burden of legal battles,' said Narang, the bronze medallist in 10m air rifle at the 2012 London Olympics. After a long decorated career where he won an Olympic medal, a World Championships medal (2010, Munich,) and secured multiple podium finishes at Asian Games and Commonwealth Games, Narang has switched to sports administration. He serves as vice-president of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) and is also a member of the IOA's Athletes' Commission. In addition, he is part of the Mission Olympic Cell, which approves programmes for the country's top elite athletes. Having taken on multiple roles in sports administration, Narang believes that most issues can be resolved with the right intent and perspective. With his growing experience, he is quickly developing key administrative skills. Narang emphasised that the Bill's transparency measures, including making NSFs accountable under Right to Information (RTI) Act, are a step in the right direction. 'The governance structure will be clearer and more accountable. Most importantly, disputes will no longer derail an athlete's career.' He acknowledged that implementing structural change at the federation level will be challenging, but necessary. 'The key is to establish a governance framework. Once that's in place, we can build around it. Change won't be easy, but it's crucial for the betterment of Indian sport. Implementing these reforms is a step in the right direction.' He welcomed the Bill's provisions for grievance redressal mechanisms and inclusion of athlete and women representatives in the executive councils of federations. 'Athlete representation on executive boards will ensure athlete-centric programs. Women's participation is vital too — not just athletes, but also women coaches and administrators. The grievance redressal mechanism will finally have a structured form.' 'The government is respecting the autonomy of federations while ensuring ethics, fairness, and accountability. It strikes the right balance between freedom and responsibility. Our sports minister (Mansukh Mandaviya) spent long hours with top federation officials to discuss India's sporting vision and it reflects the government's serious intent and commitment to long-term development in sports,' he added. Narang said the Bill could play a foundational role as India prepares its bid for the 2036 Olympic Games. 'This is our moment. The Bill provides a platform to build the kind of governance infrastructure needed to support our athletes and help them perform at their best on the world stage.' On the recent resolution of internal differences within the IOA, Narang expressed optimism. 'It's a very good restart. Whether it was the Asian Games, the successful conduct of two National Games, or preparation for the Paris Olympics — the IOA always presented a united front. There were never any differences when it came to sports and athlete development. Whatever minor differences existed have now been resolved.' 'A little difference of opinion is healthy in any democratic setup. Now it's time to move forward and focus on the work ahead of us.' As a member of IOA Athletes Commission, Narang is gearing up to launch various educational programmes for athletes.
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
Hockey Canada trial verdict: Judge finds all 5 former ice hockey players not guily in sexual assault case
Judge Cites Unreliable Testimony, Says Crown Failed to Prove Guilt Live Events Who Were the Accused in the Hockey Canada Case? Michael McLeod Dillon Dube Cal Foote Alex Formenton Carter Hart Sexual Assault Case Background Hockey Canada Scandal: Lawsuit, Resignations, and Lost Sponsors Key Issues at Hockey Canada Trial: Consent, Memory, and Intoxication Crown vs Defence Highlights FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In a dramatic conclusion to one of Canada's most watched trials, thewere acquitted today after being accused ofa woman in a hotel room in 2018 in London, Ontario, where they had attended a Hockey Canada gala, as reported by Maria Carroccia delivered the verdict of, ruling that the Crown had failed to prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt, according to the had reviewed all the testimony and evidence from the highly publicised eight-week trial over the course of several hours before declaring the men not guilty, as reported by described that the complainant, known as 'EM', whose evidence was not "credible or reliable," as reported by BBC. The judge highlighted inconsistencies in her testimony and conflicts between her recollections, video recordings, and witness accounts, as per the report. Carroccia said that "the Crown cannot meet its onus on any of the counts before me," as quoted by READ: Who died today? From Hulk Hogan to Chuck Mangione to Anne Burrell - world lost these stars today The five Canadian ice hockey players, who were all players with the(NHL) when the allegations surfaced are:EM, who was at that time 20 years, had initially reported the alleged assault to police in 2018, as per the report. The investigation was closed in 2019 but reopened in 2022 following reports that Hockey Canada used players' registration fees to pay an undisclosed settlement to the woman who made the accusations, as reported by READ: When will Battlefield 6 release and what can players expect? Here is what gamers need to know After the scandal led the Canadian federal government to freeze Hockey Canada's funding for 10 months, a number of major companies either paused or cancelled their sponsorships with the national governing body, as reported by Reuters. Hockey Canada has said that it would no longer use the fund financed by player registration fees to settle sexual assault claims, and the organisation's CEO and board of directors had stepped down, as reported by Carroccia acknowledged that the case rested heavily on the issue of consent and EM's memory of the night, as per the BBC report. She pointed to inconsistencies in her account, such as conflicting details about who purchased drinks, and also pointed out that EM's statements reflected an "uncertain memory" that did not line up with evidence presented in the trial, as reported by videos of the encounter were shown during the trial, one recorded without EM's knowledge, according to the report. While the judge clarified that these videos do not legally prove consent under Canadian law, she noted they did show EM "speaking normally, smiling," and that EM "did not appear to be in distress," as quoted by BBC. The judge highlighted, that undercut the Crown's argument that EM did not leave the room out of fear, according to the Crown argued that EM had no motive to fabricate the incident, pointing out that the woman's testimony was credible as "intoxication does not equal unreliability" and that any contradictions in her testimony were minor, as reported by BBC. They emphasised that she first reported the assault to police in 2018, long before the Hockey Canada lawsuit was filed and later settled for C$3.5 million ($2.5 million), according to the also highlighted that, as per text messages between the players, it allegedly showed that it was McLeod's idea to invite his teammates to the room and that the players allegedly engaged in "getting their story straight" by drafting a narrative that EM had consented to all sexual activity, as reported by defence countered that EM was a willing participant and later experienced regret, according to the report. Other players in the room who were not charged testified that she was 'vocal' and expressive about what she wanted sexually, as reported by BBC. The defence also pointed out that intoxication in this case did not equal "incapacity", submitting video evidence suggesting EM had not shown signs of extreme intoxication, as reported by McLeod, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton, and Carter Hart, all former NHL players, were acquitted today, as per the BBC Carroccia found the complainant's testimony inconsistent and unreliable. The Crown failed to meet the legal standard of proof.
