
Iraq's oil ambitions vs. UNESCO heritage: The Hawizeh Marsh conflict
In 2016, UNESCO designated the marshes as a World Heritage Site, recognizing their ecological and cultural importance. The dispute over oil extraction in such a sensitive area raises fundamental questions about Iraq's development strategy and environmental stewardship.
Tapping Oil, Draining Life
At the heart of the dispute is Iraq's reliance on oil as its primary economic driver. The country depends on petroleum exports for over 90% of its state revenue. In February 2023, the Iraqi government signed contracts under its fifth licensing round, granting exploration rights to six oil fields, including the 17-kilometer-long, 8-kilometer-wide Hawizeh field. The contract was awarded to China's Geo-Jade Petroleum ad was framed by the government as a necessary step to bolster Iraq's economic growth by tapping into untapped oil reserves.
The Maysan region, where the Hawizeh Marsh is located, contributes significantly to Iraq's national budget, with around $14 billion annually in oil revenues. However, Maysan receives only $500 million in return, according to local lawmaker Jasim Al-Mousawi.
Al-Mousawi has voiced his concern that the economic benefits from oil exploration will disproportionately favor the central government, leaving local communities to bear the brunt of the environmental and social costs.
'The marshes are the backbone of the local economy,' Al-Mousawi explained, pointing to the livelihoods of families dependent on fishing, water buffalo herding, and the harvesting of reeds and papyrus. He has proposed alternatives to oil exploration, such as sustainable tourism and eco-friendly agriculture that would allow for both economic growth and the preservation of the region's unique ecosystem. Yet, these proposals have largely been ignored.
A Silent Exodus
Beyond the financial implications, the local population faces direct consequences from the oil exploration project. The marshes, which once covered 3,500 square kilometers, have already suffered severe environmental degradation due to upstream dam construction in Iran and Turkiye, coupled with rising temperatures linked to climate change.
Water levels in the marshlands have dropped by more than 65% since 2019, leading to a steep decline in fish populations and a 40% decrease in annual fishing yields, according to the Iraqi Fishermen's Association.
Local activists, like Murtada Al-Janoubi, believe that the government's actions have accelerated the marshes' decline. "The notion that the marshes are receiving sufficient water is false," Al-Janoubi asserts, claiming that authorities deliberately diverted water from the Hawizeh River in late 2021, worsening the ecological crisis.
The situation has forced many families to abandon their homes. "As soon as drilling operations began, waves of residents started leaving. Only a handful of families remain," Al-Janoubi warns.
Local herders have also faced significant losses, with buffalo populations decreasing by 35% in the last five years, further deepening the economic downturn in rural communities. A 2022 World Bank report on Iraq's water crisis warns that continued mismanagement of marshlands could displace at least 40,000 people by 2030, with severe repercussions for regional stability.
A Poisoned Paradise
The environmental impact of the Hawizeh field project has sparked significant concern among experts. The degradation of Iraq's wetlands not only threatens local biodiversity but also jeopardizes the country's efforts to combat climate change.
As the marshlands shrink, desertification is expected to increase by 30% over the next decade. The loss of these vital ecosystems could also release an estimated 12 million metric tons of CO2 annually, worsening the region's climate crisis.
Experts warn that drilling operations in such an ecologically sensitive area could introduce hazardous substances, further polluting the air and water. While Geo-Jade Petroleum has not yet started full-scale drilling, the risks are already becoming clear. Amer Al-Bayati, director of Maysan's Environmental Office, highlights the dangers, "Oil exploration releases hazardous substances, increases pollution, and disrupts the fragile ecosystem."
The impact on biodiversity would also have global repercussions. The Hawizeh Marsh is home to endangered species like the Basra Reed Warbler and the Persian Fallow Deer, both of which rely on the wetlands to survive. If the marshes are further harmed, Iraq could lose these species and the ecotourism opportunities they offer—an important alternative to oil extraction that could support sustainable economic growth.
On the other hand, the Ministry of Water Resources maintains that the exploration project will benefit Iraq's economy by creating jobs and developing infrastructure. Spokesperson Khalid Al-Shammari explains that "exploration areas are isolated with embankments to prevent contamination of the marsh waters" and assures that environmental regulations will be followed, with mitigation measures in place to reduce ecological damage.
Yet, Iraq's track record in oil extraction raises doubts about these promises. A 2021 study by the Ministry of Health revealed that pollution from oil operations in southern Iraq has caused a 20% rise in respiratory diseases among local populations. This only adds to the growing concerns about the public health risks posed by expanding oil exploration into such ecologically delicate
regions.
A Broken Promise
The Hawizeh Marsh is part of a vital transboundary wetland system that extends into Iran, where it is known as the Hoor Al-Azim Marsh. Recognizing its ecological and historical significance, UNESCO designated Iraq's marshlands as a World Heritage Site in 2016.
Yet, the ongoing oil exploration project threatens to undermine these international commitments. Critics argue that the project directly contradicts Iraq's obligations under agreements like the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, which aims to protect critical wetland ecosystems worldwide.
Activists are particularly concerned about the environmental impact of introducing heavy machinery into the marshes. They warn that such operations could violate these conventions, further jeopardizing Iraq's responsibility to preserve its natural heritage.
Local activist Mustafa Hashem underscores this point, stating, "These oil operations undermine efforts to preserve the marshlands and their communities under the pretext of economic growth."
Legal experts caution that Iraq could face significant penalties if it fails to uphold these agreements. Environmental advocacy groups have called on UNESCO to intervene, urging the imposition of restrictions on oil drilling in these protected areas. The stakes are high, as failure to meet conservation obligations could result in the loss of World Heritage status—a blow that would likely hinder Iraq's ability to secure international funding for essential climate adaptation projects.
Moreover, the controversy over the Hawizeh Marsh is not solely an internal matter for Iraq. The marsh is shared with Iran, which could raise diplomatic concerns if environmental damage spills across the border into its territory.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
7 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Hamas ties talks to end Gaza famine
Shafaq News – Gaza On Thursday, Hamas expressed its 'immediate readiness' to resume ceasefire negotiations, on the condition that humanitarian aid reaches its intended recipients and the famine in Gaza is brought to an end. In a statement, the Palestinian group warned that continuing talks amid what it described as a starvation policy strips the negotiations of meaning. Hamas accused Israel of withdrawing from the talks without justification while 'continuing to deprive more than two million Palestinians of food,' resulting in what the group called an unprecedented humanitarian disaster. Hamas called on the international community and relevant stakeholders to take urgent action to stop the 'massacre committed by the Israeli military against Gaza's population.' It demanded the immediate, unconditional delivery of food aid with guarantees to protect it from obstruction or targeting. The group stressed that any future negotiations must be built on ending the current crisis and ensuring basic human rights.


Shafaq News
8 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's Speaker: Anfal massacre against Barzanis is unforgivable crime
Shafaq News – Baghdad Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani condemned the mass killing of Barzanis during the Anfal campaign, describing it as one of the most horrific atrocities in Iraq's modern history. In an official statement marking the anniversary of the campaign, al-Mashhadani extended condolences to the Barzani family, Kurdish leadership, and the broader Kurdish population, calling the massacre a 'moral outrage' and 'unforgivable crime.' 'We recall with deep sorrow and pain the unjust aggression committed against innocent Barzanis during the Anfal operations,' al-Mashhadani stated, emphasizing that the campaign—which involved mass killings, forced displacement, and attempts to erase the identity of the Kurdish Barzanis—occurred at a time when human conscience was absent or silenced. He reiterated that the Iraqi parliament stands firmly committed to justice and human rights and bears a continued responsibility to support all victims and prevent such tragedies from recurring. 'The blood of the innocent will not be in vain, and history will not forgive those who stood idle in the face of such crimes. Equating victim and executioner is a betrayal of human values.'


Shafaq News
8 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Public opinion is absent from the Anfal crimes anniversary
Shafaq News Although the memory of Iraqis is burdened with disasters and bloody tragedies, they rarely express them with collective awareness or in public. Bitter experiences have taught them that reviving such memories could be exploited politically by certain parties. Every year, the anniversary of the Anfal campaigns launched by Saddam Hussein's regime against the Kurds passes without genuine engagement from Iraqi public opinion. The reason lies not in a weak collective memory but in official policies that have deliberately employed these occasions while ignoring their national and humanitarian dimensions. Successive governments, along with their media apparatuses, have adopted a political discourse stripped of moral content, causing confusion and apathy among the people. This performance has weakened trust and deepened divisions to the point that mourning for an Anfal child has become rare, and some have even gone as far as justifying the crime or praising the perpetrator. Had media policies over the past two decades been more professional and just, Iraqis of all backgrounds would today be at the forefront of those crying out against the Anfal crimes and other massacres. But the selective narrative and political exploitation have obscured the story, disappointed the public, and embarrassed state institutions. More than four decades have passed since the massacres committed by the Ba'ath regime against Kurdish villages and towns under the banner of "Anfal." Yet official stances remain lackluster, and society lacks a true moral compass. Although the Supreme Criminal Court recognized the Anfal as a crime of genocide, that recognition failed to build a firm societal awareness or prevent similar future catastrophes. Even the global public only came to grasp the gravity of what occurred much later—because we failed to tell the truth in its proper time. Sociologists understand that neglecting such memories or approaching them coldly weakens the collective conscience and causes dangerous moral dysfunction in society. True commemoration of these events does not come through official statements but through reviving awareness and involving generations in understanding what happened and why it happened. What is lost today is not merely a historical event, but a precious moral and human capital. The moral exhaustion has reached a point where society can no longer bear to look at images of the victims or comprehend the horror of the crime. This poses a serious threat to the identity and social fabric of the country. Perhaps the deliberate neglect of the anniversary of the Barzani Anfal this year is a glaring example of this absence. There are no sufficient justifications for erasing this tragedy from public awareness, because the collective memory only thrives when citizens feel that it concerns them—that it lies at the heart of their cause. Commemorating this anniversary does not mean inflating the number of victims, but pausing to understand how the Kurds reached that moment in history, and what must change to ensure it does not happen again. The loss of social trust capital has worsened today, and officials must recognize the value of these occasions as gateways to restoring national unity. The Anfal is not merely a Kurdish tragedy—it is an Iraqi catastrophe par excellence. It deserves to be embraced by all components of the Iraqi people, not as a sad memory, but as a cry of conscience against tyranny, whose echo should be heard in Basra, Al-Anbar, Nineveh, and every corner of this land—a roadmap toward a future where justice is never forgotten.