Iranian rapper Tataloo once supported a hard-line presidential candidate. Now he faces execution
Tataloo, whose full name is Amir Hossein Maghsoudloo, faces a death sentence after being convicted on charges of 'insulting Islamic sanctities.' It's a far cry from when he once supported a hard-line Iranian presidential candidate.
Tataloo's music became popular among the Islamic Republic's youth, as it challenged Iran's theocracy at a time when opposition to the country's government was splintered and largely leaderless.
The rapper's lyrics became increasingly political after the 2022 death of Mahsa Amini and the subsequent wave of nationwide protests. He also appeared in music videos which criticized the authorities.
'When you show your face in a music video, you are saying, 'Hey, I'm here, and I don't care about your restrictions,'' said Ali Hamedani, a former BBC journalist who interviewed the rapper in 2005. 'That was brave.'
The Iranian Supreme Court last month upheld his death sentence.
'This ruling has now been confirmed and is ready for execution,' judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir told reporters at a press conference last month.
Activists have decried his looming execution and expressed concern for his safety after he reportedly tried to kill himself in prison.
Tataloo began his music career in 2003 as part of an underground genre of Iranian music that combines Western styles of rap, rhythm-and-blues and rock with Farsi lyrics. His first album, released in 2011, polarized audiences, though he never played publicly in Iran, where its Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance controls all concerts.
Tataloo appeared in a 2015 music video backing Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard and Tehran's nuclear program, which long has been targeted by the West over fears it could allow the Islamic Republic to develop an atomic bomb. While he never discussed the motivation behind this, it appeared that the rapper had hoped to win favor with the theocracy or perhaps have a travel ban against him lifted.
In the video for 'Energy Hasteei,' or 'Nuclear Energy,' Tataloo sings a power ballad in front of rifle-wielding guardsmen and later aboard the Iranian frigate Damavand in the Caspian Sea. The ship later sank during a storm in 2018.
'This is our absolute right: To have an armed Persian Gulf,' Tataloo sang.
Tataloo even issued an endorsement for hard-liner Ebrahim Raisi in 2017. That year, the two sat for a televised appearance as part of Raisi's failed presidential campaign against the relative moderate Hassan Rouhani. Raisi later won the presidency in 2021, but was killed in a helicopter crash in 2024.
Fame in Turkey, prison back in Iran
In 2018, Tataloo — who faced legal problems in Iran — was allowed to leave the country for Turkey, where many Persian singers and performers stage lucrative concerts.
Tataloo hosted live video sessions as he rose to fame on social media, where he became well-known for his tattoos covering his face and body. Among them are an Iranian flag and an image of his mother next to a key and heart.
Instagram deactivated his account in 2020 after he called for underage girls to join his 'team' for sex. He also acknowledged taking drugs.
'Despite being a controversial rapper, Tataloo has quite the fanbase in Iran, known as 'Tatalities,'' said Holly Dagres, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near-East Policy. 'Over the years, they've flooded social media with messages of solidarity for him and even campaigned for the rapper's release in the past when he was detained on separate charges.'
Tataloo's rebellious music struck a chord with disenfranchised young people in Iran as they struggled to find work, get married and start their adult lives. He also increasingly challenged Iran's theocracy in his lyrics, particularly after the death of Amini following her arrest over allegedly not wearing the hijab to the liking of authorities.
His collaboration 'Enghelab Solh' — 'Peace Revolution' in Farsi — called out Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by name.
'We don't want tear gas, because there are tears in everyone's eyes,' he rapped.
But the music stopped for Tataloo in late 2023. He was deported from Turkey after his passport had expired, and was immediately taken into custody upon arrival to Iran.
Death sentence draws protests
Tehran's Criminal Court initially handed Tataloo a five-year sentence for blasphemy. Iran's Supreme Court threw out the decision and sent his case to another court, which sentenced him to death in January. The rapper already faced ten years in prison for a string of separate convictions, including promoting prostitution and moral corruption.
'Tataloo is at serious risk of execution,' Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, the director of advocacy group Iran Human Rights, said in a statement. 'The international community, artists and the public must act to stop his execution.'
Tataloo earlier expressed remorse at a trial.
'I have certainly made mistakes, and many of my actions were wrong,' he said, according to the state-owned Jam-e Jam daily newspaper. 'I apologize for the mistakes I made.'
Tataloo married while on death row, his uncle said. Last month, Tataloo reportedly attempted to kill himself, but survived.
His death sentence comes at a politically fraught moment for Iran as the country is at it's 'most isolated,' said Abbas Milani, an Iran expert at Stanford University.
The Islamic Republic is 'desperately trying to see whether it can arrive at a deal with the U.S. on its nuclear program and have the sanctions lifted,' he said. Drawing the ire of Tataloo's fans is 'one headache they don't need,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
15 minutes ago
- Metro
Woman sexually assaulted on a plane denied compensation because of loophole
A woman who was sexually assaulted on a flight to the UK can't be compensated due to a legal loophole. Kelly – who is using a fake name for anonymity – was attacked on a Qatar Airways flight from Doha, Qatar, to Gatwick in September last year. Momade Jussab, 66, of Feltham, was sitting next to her and put his hands down her trousers. He was arrested at Gatwick and jailed in May. Kelly, who was 24 at the time of the attack, has been denied a payout under the Criminal Injuries Compensation (CIC) scheme. Officials said that because the incident happened on a plane not registered in Britain, Kelly cannot make a claim. Her lawyers have written to the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, urging her to close what they believe is a gap in the law. Kelly, a Londoner in her 20s, told the BBC that Jussab pulled a second blanket over them both as she slept. She said: 'His hands were down my trousers and I said to him, 'What are you doing?' I said, 'Stop'. He said, 'No, please'. 'And I had to force his hand out of my trousers and that just made me get up straight away. I left my phone, I left my bag, I left my passport, I left everything. I left my shoes and ran into the toilet, left the door open [and] told the flight attendant.' Kelly said she should be entitled to compensation as the incident was investigated and prosecuted by the British authorities. 'I haven't been out in almost a year – to events or summer parties with my friends. I can't do that. I'm too scared,' she added. 'I don't want to be touched or looked at. So it's never leaving me. It's literally there every single day before I sleep, I'm thinking about what happened.' The CIC scheme provides compensation for people 'physically or mentally injured because of a violent crime in England, Scotland or Wales', according to its website. Kelly applied for the payout in April, only to receive a letter from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, which processes applications, denying the claim as it did not happen in a 'relevant place'. Such a 'place' is defined by section 92 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982, which concerns 'British-controlled aircraft'. As the incident happened on a Qatari-registered plane, officials told Kelly, she was ineligible for compensation. Leigh Day says that the law was updated in 1966 to allow crimes that occur on UK-bound foreign aircraft to be prosecuted in British courts. Yet a near-identical loophole in the compensation scheme has not been closed. Solicitor Claire Powell said: 'Our client suffered a horrific sexual attack on a UK-bound flight. 'She was refused compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation scheme simply because it was a foreign flight and the rules have not been amended in line with the updates to the Civil Aviation Act. 'It is a gap that needs closing urgently and we trust the Justice Secretary will agree, particularly in light of this Government's commitment to addressing violence against women and girls.' Jussab was jailed for six and a half years as part of an extended sentence in May for one count of sexual assault by penetration and two counts of sexual assault. In-flight sexual assault incidents have been rising for years – in the US, the FBI investigated 27 sexual misconduct cases aboard aircraft in 2018. More Trending By 2022, that number had more than tripled to 90 cases. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'Our thoughts remain with this victim, and we remain resolute in our mission to halve violence against women and girls in a decade. 'The rules that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority follows, and the values of payments for injuries, are set by Parliament. 'Other routes are available for victims to receive support.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: EasyJet pilot suspended after walking 'drunk and naked' around five star hotel MORE: Airspace closure that grounded over 120 flights caused by 'software collapse' MORE: London airspace closure: Your rights if your flight is delayed or cancelled
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Signals that prove Trump forced a historic reckoning
No one knows if there will be a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. But this much is emphatically and impressively true: Donald Trump has already done something extraordinary — he has created a moment in which all parties can see two stark alternatives with sudden clarity. They can compromise and make a deal, or they can face the continuation of a grinding war with an uncertain duration and outcome. That sense of crossroads was on display at the White House on Monday in a tableau that was at once theatrical and substantive. Trump has managed, at least for now, to coax the United States, Europe, and Ukraine into a common position. That united front presents Vladimir Putin with what he has long tried to avoid: Western cohesion in the face of his aggression. The day unfolded with all the trappings of political theater. There was the banter about President Volodymyr Zelensky 's choice of wardrobe — a jacket that suggested a nod to formality rather than the olive drab sweatshirt that has become his wartime uniform. There was also a moment of personal warmth, when Zelensky handed Trump a letter from his wife to Melania Trump, written about the plight of children in the war zone. These gestures may appear minor, but in diplomacy such small signals help reinforce the larger message: unity, solidarity, and an insistence on treating each other as friends rather than supplicants or tetchy combatants. For Zelensky, a former actor who once made his living playing roles, Monday was a performance that mattered. He carried his lines with precision and his tone with care. The last time he visited Washington the chemistry soured and tensions spilled into public view. This time, the body language told a different story. Smiles, nods and a sense of easy rapport radiated from the Oval Office outward. Compared with Putin's frosty reception during his stop in Alaska on Friday — a visit the Kremlin had hoped would project strength — Monday's White House welcome stood as a vivid counterpoint. The most consequential takeaway from the day was the absence of daylight between Washington and its European allies. For years, Putin has relied on fissures within the transatlantic alliance, exploiting differences over energy, trade or the use of force. Yet on Monday, the alignment was clear: the US, Europe and Ukraine are working together to shape a peace plan. This is precisely the scenario Putin has sought to prevent, and brings the world to the essential questions now hovering over these fragile negotiations. Will Putin accept a combined European and American framework that offers Ukraine the security guarantees it needs to risk peace? And will Ukraine, whose soldiers have retaken and held swathes of territory at immense cost, truly be willing to cede land now under its control in exchange for ending the bloodshed? Neither question yields an obvious answer. For Putin, compromise has always been a synonym for weakness. For Ukraine, yielding territory risks validating aggression and betraying those who have died defending it. Yet the very posing of these questions, out loud and on equal terms, marks a shift in the conversation. The possibility of peace, however brutal, is now at least conceivable. If the answer to either or both questions is 'no,' then the burden will shift back to Trump. What will he do? Will he enforce punishing new sanctions designed to cripple the Russian economy? Will he authorize Ukraine to use American-supplied weapons to strike deeper into Russian territory? Will he risk escalation to demonstrate resolve? The options ahead are perilous, but they are his to shape. What is striking is how Trump — long painted as skeptical of NATO, dismissive of Europe and oddly solicitous of Putin — now finds himself in the role of transatlantic unifier. By engineering a moment when the allies stand shoulder to shoulder, he has created the conditions for a test: either Putin comes to the table, or he faces the combined weight of American and European pressure. This is not a neat choice between war and peace. It is instead what might be called a 'brutal peace.' Any deal will be painful, incomplete, and fraught with moral compromise. But it will still be peace. If Trump cannot deliver Putin to the table, then he must bring him to heel by other means. Either way, the calculus has changed. Diplomacy often depends on timing. Wars grind on until one side collapses or until leaders perceive that further bloodshed is more dangerous than negotiation. What Trump has done, at least for now, is force that moment of reckoning. He has made all sides look squarely at the costs of continuing the war versus the costs of ending it. It is too soon to know whether history will mark this week as a turning point. But it is fair to say that Trump, a man once derided as an opponent of Europe and a skeptic of alliances, has demonstrated a capacity to bring allies together in common cause against a murderous dictator. That alone is remarkable. It may yet be remembered as the moment when urgency became opportunity.
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jermaine Jenas makes rare public appearance following his BBC axe and marital split as he attends the GRM Gala after claiming the channel 'took away his life' amid sexting scandal
Jermaine Jenas made a rare public appearance following his axe by BBC bosses last year as he attended the glitzy GRM gala on Tuesday. The event, which is hosted by the magazine of the same name and celebrates black British culture and UK-based rap and grime artists, took place at London's Hurlingham Club. As Jermaine slowly begins to relaunch his career with a string of podcast appearances, the presenter was joined by boxer Derek Chisora at the event. The pair beamed as they posed for snaps together, joining stars including Alesha Dixon and Ella Eyre at the event. Jermaine - who was capped 21 times by his country between 2003 and 2009 - was dismissed by BBC bosses in August 2024 over allegations of workplace misconduct after sending explicit texts to two female employees. While at the time Jermaine said he and wife Ellie Penfold, who married in 2011, hoped to work through their marital troubles, the couple eventually split in March this year. The presenter later admitted the break-up wasn't his call as he grovelled for forgiveness before accepting his fate. The ex-footballer is now trying to rebuild his career with a series of podcast appearances and continues to open up on the scandal that ended a promising partnership between himself and the BBC, which cost him his £190,000 salary. He also revealed he has opened up his own production company - which has helped open new doors for his career, addressing the fact that he wasn't allowed to do certain things while employed by the BBC in what has become his previous life. But Jenas has now admitted how much he really lost through the episode, and revealed the promise he made to himself when the decision was made to let him go. Speaking to Reece Mennie on his podcast, he said: 'Having worked in the media for the last ten years, and having been through what I've been through for the last year, been a really difficult moment for myself and my family what happened which I have always held up my hand and taken full responsibility for, that's very important to do. 'You go through a lot of different emotions of anger and blame, but eventually you realise: "Take responsibility, Jermaine, and you'll be able to move forward." 'Because of their ability to take away my life, in terms of every deal I had, the jobs that I had at that particular time, I said that is never happening to me again, so I've recently set up my own production company. 'My agency that I had at the time weren't that supportive of it. 'This is not their fault, but when you're in this kind of media bubble where you work for the BBC, there are so many walls in terms of what they want you to do and what you're not allowed to do. 'Betting companies want to work with me because I'm in football; BBC hate that because of the issues to do with gambling in general, so they block all of that. 'So there were a lot of blocks on one side and football was bringing me some stuff, but the reality is that it ALL got wiped out. It all got taken away.' Penfold was left 'raging' and kicked the former Tottenham Hotspur star out of their bedroom at their £1million family home when it was revealed he had sent explicit messages to two members of staff at the BBC. Jenas confessed to lying to Penfold, who describes herself as a 'wife and mother' in her Instagram bio, during a family holiday to Spain when he sneaked off to talk to his bosses about the messages. The former England star admitted sending the texts but insists he has done nothing illegal. He denied ever sending indecent images or videos and said the messages were between consenting adults, one of whom 'made it clear she was interested'. However Jenas said he is 'ashamed' and 'deeply sorry' as he apologised for his conduct. He revealed he was fired in an excruciating video call - while he was on a family holiday in Marbella, Spain, with his wife and their three children. Jenas slammed this as 'grim', having to 'sit there and listen to what you've said' as four people on the Zoom call read out his inappropriate text messages. He said he went on to lie to his wife after being informed of the allegations to 'find a way out of this mess'. Ellie broke her silence on events at the launch of her new personal care brand Preppy in November. She said: 'My only focus has been on our children and building my brand Preppy. Now I just want to move forward. 'Naturally this has been hard for me but my only concern has been our children and that will not change.' The news of Jenas's sacking came moments before he went live on air on talkSPORT radio. He returned to punditry work last month, saying on talkSPORT his conduct was 'wildly inappropriate'. He continued: 'I made a mistake. It was a mistake that is something that me and my wife and my family have to deal with. 'I think that the big thing here is that your career is one thing. I worked 10 years post-retirement from being a footballer and I can take it as far back as I want from starting from nothing to becoming a footballer to getting myself in a very fortunate position to work on television. 'It's a lot of hard work that you put into the job, but at the same time, it can be taken away from you like that. That's one thing that I've recognised.' Speaking on the Filthy Fellas podcast of the split, meanwhile, Jenas said: 'It was her decision and one that I had to accept. If it was up to me - and I think a lot of men are like this - I'd probably be prepared to be unhappy for the rest of my life if [it meant] I had my kids in it. 'It's a man thing. If I wake up with my kids everyday, I'm quite happy to sacrifice the happiness. The reality is, we were both in a position where we like: "Are we really happy"? 'From her side of things, she's probably ran the course much more than me. But I was much more happy to go: "I'll be unhappy if I can stay in this house with you and these kids". But it wasn't to be for her and we went our separate ways. 'She has understood the scenario that we've been in as a family. Kids first is our motto. We have to be the best parents we can possibly be. So I've been spending so much time at home. 'Not loads has changed really, it's just mine and her relationship has gone into more of a friendship than a relationship. 'I do believe there is going to come a moment where I'm sat in my apartment one day and be like: "This is mad. I had my whole family around me every single day. [Now] I'm not hearing that pitter patter of feet." 'That's going to be the tough side of it. But that's part of dealing with the situation. The reality is, me and my wife didn't split up because I sent some text messages to some people at work. 'We had issues for a period of time and it all comes to a head. Eventually, you make a decision to say, as adults: "We will be better parents for our children if we remain friends". We had 16 amazing years together. She's a great woman.'
