Fashion's newest trend is a tech trick that is almost impossible to spot
By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy
— Jörgen Andersson, H&M Chief Creative Officer
Photographer Johnny Kangasniemi, who has worked with H&M, echoed that perspective and defended the company's experimentation with AI.
Photographer Johnny Kangasniemi, who has worked with H&M, echoed that perspective and defended the company's experimentation with AI.
— Johnny Kangasniemi, Photographer.
Still, not everyone is convinced. One Instagram user pushed back, asking Kangasniemi to explain how photographers are not being replaced if the brand no longer commissions actual photoshoots for its lookbooks and e-commerce imagery.
Still, not everyone is convinced. One Instagram user pushed back, asking Kangasniemi to explain how photographers are not being replaced if the brand no longer commissions actual photoshoots for its lookbooks and e-commerce imagery.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by H&M (@hm)
Part of the concern lies in how convincing the AI results are. Many viewers scrolling through H&M's site or social feeds may not realize the images were synthetically created. The photorealism is made possible by training AI models on large datasets consisting of many photographs taken from different angles and lighting conditions. This allows the algorithm to produce lifelike outputs that mimic the model's features with remarkable accuracy.
H&M is not alone in this shift. Spanish retailer Mango has also launched marketing campaigns featuring AI-generated models. Last year, Levi's announced plans to use AI-created figures as part of an effort to diversify its model representation.
Whether this trend continues to scale or sparks broader backlash, one thing is clear: the line between synthetic and real is becoming harder to distinguish — and that's making many in the fashion and creative industries uneasy.
Part of the concern lies in how convincing the AI results are. Many viewers scrolling through H&M's site or social feeds may not realize the images were synthetically created. The photorealism is made possible by training AI models on large datasets consisting of many photographs taken from different angles and lighting conditions. This allows the algorithm to produce lifelike outputs that mimic the model's features with remarkable accuracy.H&M is not alone in this shift. Spanish retailer Mango has also launched marketing campaigns featuring AI-generated models. Last year, Levi's announced plans to use AI-created figures as part of an effort to diversify its model representation.Whether this trend continues to scale or sparks broader backlash, one thing is clear: the line between synthetic and real is becoming harder to distinguish — and that's making many in the fashion and creative industries uneasy.
Grab Surfshark VPN now at more than 50% off and with 3 extra months for free!
Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase
Check Out The Offer
H&M has officially introduced a series of AI-generated 'digital twins' modeled after real people — a move that's prompting questions about the future of photography and the broader creative industry.As first reported by PetaPixel, the Swedish clothing retailer has now begun using these AI-generated likenesses across some of its marketing images. The rollout follows earlier reports from April that H&M had been working on digital clones for 30 of its models. Instead of being captured by a photographer, the images were generated using machine learning systems trained on extensive real-world photos of the models.While the results may appear indistinguishable from traditional fashion photography, the technology behind them is drawing both praise and skepticism. Critics argue that relying on AI imagery could ultimately replace the jobs of photographers, makeup artists, stylists, and other professionals who typically collaborate on shoots.In a recent Instagram post , H&M attempted to clarify its intentions, rejecting the idea of AI replacing people:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
9 hours ago
- Phone Arena
You won't believe what the Atari 2600 from 1977 did to ChatGPT, and Copilot while scaring Gemini
If you could place a bet on a chess match-up between the Atari 2600 and ChatGPT, which technology would you put your money on? The Atari 2600 is a game console released in 1977, 48 years ago. It features an 8-bit processor running at a clock speed of 1.19MHz. That's megahertz, folks, not gigahertz. The Atari machine carries 128 bytes of RAM. According to infrastructure architect Robert Caruso, who posted the results back in June, had you bet on ChatGPT, you would have lost. Caruso wrote that "ChatGPT got absolutely wrecked on the beginner level." He also explained how this apparent upset could take place. "Despite being given a baseline board layout to identify pieces, ChatGPT confused rooks for bishops, missed pawn forks, and repeatedly lost track of where pieces were," he stated. ChatGPT recognized that its loss was an upset and blamed it on the abstract icons used by Atari to represent chess pieces. However, even after changing to standard chess notation, the chatbot "made enough blunders to get laughed out of a 3rd grade chess club." The underpowered Atari 2600 is a chess master when playing AI opponents. | Image credit-Amazon Caruso said that during an hour and a half, he had to stop ChatGPT from making bad moves and help it understand where the pieces belonging to both sides were located. Several times per turn ChatGPT had to have its awareness of the board reset. The AI chatbot promised multiple times that its playing would improve if the game started over from the beginning. Finally, ChatGPT conceded the match. Interestingly, it was ChatGPT that suggested the contest. During a conversation about chess, ChatGPT said that it was a strong player and could easily beat Atari Video Chess, which thinks only 1-2 moves ahead. ChatGPT was curious about how fast it could win. Instead, we know it lost. At the start of this month, the Atari 2600 game console took on another modern AI powerhouse in a game of chess. Microsoft's Copilot thought that the Atari 2600 was no match for it. Even though it said that it could think 10-15 moves ahead of the Atari, Copilot said that it would stick to thinking 3-5 moves ahead because the Atari console makes "suboptimal moves. Copilot also said that, unlike ChatGPT, "I make a strong effort to remember previous moves and maintain continuity in gameplay, so our match should be much smoother." As it turned out, Caruso had to send Copilot a screenshot of the board after every move the Atari 2600 made. The Microsoft AI chatbot admitted that it had the same spatial memory gaps as ChatGPT. Despite this shortcoming, Copilot said that it could still analyze the board and make good moves. Well, apparently it couldn't as the Atari 2600 made it two straight victories against an AI opponent. Caruso then spoke with Gemini to set up a match. The Google-developed AI, like ChatGPT and Copilot, thought it had an easy victory in the bag. However, Gemini then admitted that it had hallucinated its chess-playing abilities. That left Gemini to make the only correct decision it could in light of its admission. "Canceling the match is likely the most time-efficient and sensible decision," said Gemini. While Gemini never did get a chance to take on the Atari 2600, Caruso was impressed with how the chatbot had the insight to know its own limitations. It seems incredible that a game console 48 years old using woefully underpowered technology, could beat two AI chatbots with cutting-edge tech and scare a third one into cancelling a match. But this is not really the upset that you might think it is. Senior Software Engineer Kyle Witeck wrote, " comparing language models to a chess bot that was designed to play is not intelligent and not AI. It patterns and guesses from a system designed on language. Token-driven guesses." Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.
Phone Arena
15 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Nvidia will soon resume sales of its AI chips in China
As we mentioned back in April, the U.S. might have shot itself in the foot by blocking Nvidia from selling its GPU chips, which are used as AI accelerators in China. This part of the story is easy to understand since it is well known that the U.S. seeks to prevent China from obtaining advanced chips amid concerns that they will be used to improve the country's military. But this ban resulted in Huawei receiving more orders inside China for its Ascend series of AI accelerators. Many of these sales would have gone to Nvidia except for the fact that the U.S. company, as noted, is banned from selling its GPUs in China. But in a statement released last night, Nvidia, the world's most valuable publicly traded company, says that it is filing applications with the U.S. government to resume shipping its H20 chips to China. The company expects to receive the licenses soon. The H20 chips that Nvidia hopes to sell in China are the most capable it can sell in the country. That is because of laws enacted by both President Donald Trump during his first term, and President Joe Biden. These chips are not as powerful as Nvidia's GPUs sold outside China. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is currently in Beijing and set to speak during an event being held in the city tomorrow. The company released a statement that says, "The U.S. government has assured Nvidia that licenses will be granted, and Nvidia hopes to start deliveries soon." Huang has said that Nvidia could lose its position as a global AI leader if it remains unable to sell its chips in China. A report published today says that Chinese companies are rushing to place orders for Nvidia's GPU. These orders will have to be sent to the U.S. government for approval. Among Chinese firms reportedly getting ready to submit orders are TikTok parent ByteDance and Chinese conglomerate Tencent. For the fiscal year ended January 26th, 2025, Nvidia took in $17 billion in revenue from China, equivalent to 13% of the company's global sales. Chinese tech companies still favor Nvidia's computing platform, known as CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture). CUDA allows developers to take advantage of the parallel processing used by Nvidia's GPUs. This type of processing allows multiple tasks to be handled simultaneously while using multiple cores. It is critical for AI, where billions and trillions of operations are handled at the same time. Investors are reacting to this new by pushing Nvidia's shares up 3.98% to $170.60. The company is now worth $4.16 trillion dollars. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
18 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Fashion's newest trend is a tech trick that is almost impossible to spot
Receive the latest Apps news By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy — Jörgen Andersson, H&M Chief Creative Officer Photographer Johnny Kangasniemi, who has worked with H&M, echoed that perspective and defended the company's experimentation with AI. Photographer Johnny Kangasniemi, who has worked with H&M, echoed that perspective and defended the company's experimentation with AI. — Johnny Kangasniemi, Photographer. Still, not everyone is convinced. One Instagram user pushed back, asking Kangasniemi to explain how photographers are not being replaced if the brand no longer commissions actual photoshoots for its lookbooks and e-commerce imagery. Still, not everyone is convinced. One Instagram user pushed back, asking Kangasniemi to explain how photographers are not being replaced if the brand no longer commissions actual photoshoots for its lookbooks and e-commerce imagery. View this post on Instagram A post shared by H&M (@hm) Part of the concern lies in how convincing the AI results are. Many viewers scrolling through H&M's site or social feeds may not realize the images were synthetically created. The photorealism is made possible by training AI models on large datasets consisting of many photographs taken from different angles and lighting conditions. This allows the algorithm to produce lifelike outputs that mimic the model's features with remarkable accuracy. H&M is not alone in this shift. Spanish retailer Mango has also launched marketing campaigns featuring AI-generated models. Last year, Levi's announced plans to use AI-created figures as part of an effort to diversify its model representation. Whether this trend continues to scale or sparks broader backlash, one thing is clear: the line between synthetic and real is becoming harder to distinguish — and that's making many in the fashion and creative industries uneasy. Part of the concern lies in how convincing the AI results are. Many viewers scrolling through H&M's site or social feeds may not realize the images were synthetically created. The photorealism is made possible by training AI models on large datasets consisting of many photographs taken from different angles and lighting conditions. This allows the algorithm to produce lifelike outputs that mimic the model's features with remarkable accuracy.H&M is not alone in this shift. Spanish retailer Mango has also launched marketing campaigns featuring AI-generated models. Last year, Levi's announced plans to use AI-created figures as part of an effort to diversify its model this trend continues to scale or sparks broader backlash, one thing is clear: the line between synthetic and real is becoming harder to distinguish — and that's making many in the fashion and creative industries uneasy. Grab Surfshark VPN now at more than 50% off and with 3 extra months for free! Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer H&M has officially introduced a series of AI-generated 'digital twins' modeled after real people — a move that's prompting questions about the future of photography and the broader creative first reported by PetaPixel, the Swedish clothing retailer has now begun using these AI-generated likenesses across some of its marketing images. The rollout follows earlier reports from April that H&M had been working on digital clones for 30 of its models. Instead of being captured by a photographer, the images were generated using machine learning systems trained on extensive real-world photos of the the results may appear indistinguishable from traditional fashion photography, the technology behind them is drawing both praise and skepticism. Critics argue that relying on AI imagery could ultimately replace the jobs of photographers, makeup artists, stylists, and other professionals who typically collaborate on a recent Instagram post , H&M attempted to clarify its intentions, rejecting the idea of AI replacing people:
