logo
Congress MP's private member's bill on rehabilitation of Kashmir Pandits cleared for consideration by RS

Congress MP's private member's bill on rehabilitation of Kashmir Pandits cleared for consideration by RS

The Print5 days ago
Two days ago, the Rajya Sabha Secretariat wrote to Tankha that the President has recommended the consideration of the bill, clearing the decks for a discussion on it, before it is passed. To be sure, only 14 private members' bills have been passed and enacted into law so far, the last one being in 1970.
Tankha, elected to the Rajya Sabha from Madhya Pradesh, said the bill, introduced in the Upper House in February 2024, needed a recommendation from the President of India—under Article 117(3) of the Constitution—to be taken up for consideration as it carries financial implications.
New Delhi: Congress MP Vivek Tankha's private member's bill, which among other things seeks the restoration of temples connected with Kashmiri Pandits who were driven out of the Valley in 1990, can now be taken up for consideration in the Rajya Sabha with it having cleared a Constitutional requirement.
'For the first time in Parliament, a private member bill titled 'Kashmiri Pandits (Recourse, Restitution, Rehabilitation and Resettlement) Bill, 2022' has been recommended by the Hon'ble President for consideration in the house, subject to time constraint.
'If discussed and approved, this can be a turning point in the fight for justice for Kashmiri Pandits. It's a big achievement as very few bills with financial implications get recommended by the Hon'ble President under clause (3) of Article 117 of the Constitution,' Tankha wrote on X Wednesday, attaching a screenshot of the Rajya Sabha Secretariat communique.
The Kashmiri Pandits (Recourse, Restitution, Rehabilitation and Resettlement) Act, 2022 also envisages grant of minority status to Kashmiri Pandits and declaration of members of the community as victims of genocide.
When contacted, Tankha told ThePrint that he had first introduced the Bill in 2022. 'With my term ending in 2022, the Bill also lapsed. I introduced a fresh Bill again in my second term,' he said.
Upon its enactment into a law, the Bill also proposes the release of a white paper 'documenting all events in the Kashmir valley pertaining to the atrocities and plight of the Kashmiri Pandits starting from the year 1988 till the enactment of this Act.'
For the first time in Parliament, a private member bill titled "Kashmiri Pandits (Recourse, Restitution, Rehabilitation and Resettlement) Bill, 2022" has been recommeded by the Hon'ble President for consideration in the house, subject to time constraint. .1/2 pic.twitter.com/L7EosIbck7
— Vivek Tankha (@VTankha) July 23, 2025
The bill has a separate section dealing with the restoration of temples and other heritage sites in the Valley. It says a committee comprising archaeologists, historians among others shall be authorised to appoint a Special Officer who will be armed with the power to seek documents from the government for 'conducting the survey of the religious sites' and 'shall have the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1973.'
Under clause 3 of Article 11 of the Constitution, a proposed legislation that entails 'expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India shall not be passed by either House of Parliament unless the President has recommended to that House the consideration of the Bill.'
'In case the President withholds recommendation for introduction, the Bill cannot be introduced and if the recommendation is withheld under article 117(3) for consideration, the House cannot consider the Bill,' state the rules.
A former Parliament official said that just because the bill now meets the Article 117(3) requirement does not guarantee that it will be taken up for discussion anytime soon as there is a draw of lots for that purpose.
According to Parliament records, of over 2,000 private member's bills introduced since 1952, only 14 have become laws. These 14 bills include the Muslim Wakf Bill, 1952; The Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 1956; The Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Bill 1970.
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Also Read: Kashmiri Pandits are reviving old hometown temples. 'It's how we will return'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC to hear Prez reference matter from Aug 19
SC to hear Prez reference matter from Aug 19

Hans India

time6 minutes ago

  • Hans India

SC to hear Prez reference matter from Aug 19

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will commence detailed hearings in the Presidential reference matter on whether governors and the president can be judicially compelled to act within fixed timelines on state bills, scheduling the matter before a five-judge Constitution bench starting August 19. The bench, led by Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai and comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and Atul S Chandurkar, finalised a nine-day hearing calendar extending into September. The court also decided to hear preliminary objections raised by Kerala and Tamil Nadu against the maintainability of the reference at the outset before allowing the Union government and other supporting parties to present arguments. The bench accepted a request by senior advocates KK Venugopal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Kerala and Tamil Nadu, respectively, to allow them make arguments on why the reference ought to be returned and how it is an attempt to re-litigate settled law and amounts to an appeal disguised as a reference.

SC fixes Aug 19-Sep 20 hearing schedule for Presidential Reference; will hear preliminary objection of TN & Kerala on its maintainability
SC fixes Aug 19-Sep 20 hearing schedule for Presidential Reference; will hear preliminary objection of TN & Kerala on its maintainability

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

SC fixes Aug 19-Sep 20 hearing schedule for Presidential Reference; will hear preliminary objection of TN & Kerala on its maintainability

Supreme Court NEW DELHI: A five-judge constitution bench of the SC led by CJI B R Gavai on Tuesday fixed a nine-day schedule to deliberate on a Presidential Reference that has questioned the SC's power to fix timelines for the President and Governors on granting, refusing and withholding assent to Bills passed by Assemblies. The bench of CJI Gavai, and Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar said the hearing would commence from Aug 19, when it will first hear senior advocates K K Venugopal and A M Singhvi on behalf of Kerala and Tamil Nadu, respectively, on the states' preliminary objections to maintainability of the Reference. It said those opposing the reference, represented by Kapil Sibal, Rakesh Dwivedi, Gopal Subramaniam, would be given four days – Aug 19, 20, 21 and 26 - to complete their arguments. Those supporting the Reference – attorney general R Venkataramani and solicitor general Tushar Mehta – would place their response to maintainability plea as well as the constitutional issues warranting the Reference on Aug 28, Sep 2, 3 and 9. It reserved Sep 10 for rejoinders by parties and clarified that under no circumstance would the schedule be breached and told lawyers to arrange time-schedule for their arguments through prior consultation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like So Many Surprising Uses – Baking Soda Might Be The Only Thing You Need Read More Undo It appointed advocate Aman Mehta as the nodal counsel for those supporting Reference and Misha Rohatgi as one for opposers. 'The nodal counsel in consultation with lawyers shall arrange the timetable for the arguing counsel so that the hearing could be completed on Sep 10. The timetable will be followed scrupulously,' the CJI-led bench forewarned. TOI was first to report on May 15 about the President sending a Reference to the SC for its opinion on the contentious issue of judiciary stepping into the domain of the executive, especially when the Constitution gave no power to the SC to grant deemed assent on behalf of the Governor to Bills. Critical of the SC's Apr 8 judgment and use of its Article 142 powers to rule that the 10 Bills pending with the TN governor to be deemed to have been assented to, the President had said, 'The concept of a deemed assent of the President and the Governor is alien to the constitutional scheme and fundamentally circumscribes the powers of the President and the Governor'. The Reference had said Articles 200 and 201, applicable to Governors and the President respectively, 'does not stipulate any time frame or procedure' to be followed by them while considering grant or refusal of assent to a Bill passed by an Assembly. The Reference has sought the SC's opinion on 14 questions. Without any express provision in the Constitution, A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan on Apr 8 had set a three-month deadline for the Governor to either grant or return the Bill to the House. If the Bill is re-passed by the House and resent to him, then the governor must grant assent within a month, the SC had ruled. It had also fixed a three-month deadline for the President to decide whether to grant or refuse assent to a Bill.

Kharge tells govt to fix accountability
Kharge tells govt to fix accountability

Hans India

time36 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Kharge tells govt to fix accountability

New Delhi: Launching a volley of attacks on the Centre during the debate on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha, Congress president Kharge on Tuesday said "factories of lies" have been set up and demanded that accountability be fixed for repeated intelligence failures. Extending his condolences to the families of those killed in the Pahalgam attack on April 22, the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha said members of the treasury benches, in their speeches, have tried to deflect attention from the issues at hand. "Our history is a long one. The history of the Congress is a long one. Our contribution to nation-building has been immense. There is not one Public Sector Unit that you have set up. You have only set up factories of lies. Then you talk about HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited) and other PSUs that we have created," Kharge said in Hindi. Pointing to the 2016 Uri and Pathankot terrorist attacks, the Pulwama attack in 2019 and Pahalgam this year, Kharge alleged that the government has to admit there have been repeated intelligence failures. "I want to ask the Home Minister, who is responsible for this? If he is responsible, accountability should be fixed... There have been five attacks in Pahalgam alone since the BJP government came to power.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store