Singaporean finds it problematic that some Chinese restaurants don't have English on their menus and signs
On Jun 16 (Monday), a post on r/Singapore, u/Unfair-Bike wrote at the beginning of their post that they're an Indian Muslim with an interest in different cuisines, for the purpose of clarifying that the post is a personal rather than a political one.
The post author wrote that they enjoy some halal Chinese restaurants, especially Halal Lanzhou beef noodles at Tongue Tip, and they're interested in trying more Northern Chinese cuisines if there are halal options.
They also clarified that they do not mean larger restaurant chains such as Haidilao, Luckin Coffee, or CHAGEE, 'but rather the smaller restaurants you see popping up here and there, like in Bugis or Clementi,' where there's a growing number of residents from mainland China.
The problem for the post author is that these restaurants primarily use Chinese on their menus and in their marketing, with hardly any English. This exclusion affects people who don't speak Chinese, including food delivery riders who cannot read or speak the language, a problem highlighted in an AsiaOne article in 2023.
The post author added that even when restaurants do include some English, the text is often very small or only partially translated.
'In the menus, the translations can also be terrible ,' the post author wrote, adding, 'I do not know why the Chinese bosses are reluctant to put English signage. Do they think everyone speaks Chinese? Or do they only want the mainland immigrants as their clientele?'
'Even if I wouldn't patronise since they're not halal anyway, what if there's someone who doesn't speak Chinese but is interested in trying these Chinese places? Having no English makes this feel unwelcoming to some in Singapore, and don't forget about the staff who also struggle with English!' they wrote, adding in an edit an appeal for people not to make the post 'an excuse to be xenophobic.'
Many were sympathetic to the post author and agreed with the points they raised.
'As a bilingual Chinese, I honestly feel you. It's something that I'm very annoyed by, even though I can understand the language perfectly fine. To me, English is the language that's supposed to bridge the social divide between races and, hence, an important element of the social fabric in Singapore, but when businesses do not care to start using English, it feels like we're taking a step backwards in social integration, which I think is one of the fundamental reasons that we have been successful,' was the top-rated comment.
'100000%, and I say this as a non-Chinese who did Mandarin as MT. As someone who understands the language, I get that it's so automatic and easy to just take it for granted, but I see it from my family and friends' POV, and it's insane how much is coded as 'not for us' and 'you are not welcome' by having things exclusively in Mandarin. point it out and people are all 'ohhhh why so sensitive'. Worse yet in the workplace,' another chimed in.
'I wish I had awards to give this post. Thank you. You've hit the nail on the head here. It keeps boiling down to integration. As a minority, I feel it—increasingly I'm running into stores (not even Chinese restaurants) where none of the staff speak English AT ALL! I enjoy Chinese cuisine, but I feel like I'm being treated like a foreigner in my own homeland, and why? Because they opened up and didn't even bother to pick up basic English?' a third wrote.
Interestingly, one Reddit user pointed out that this doesn't just happen in Singapore.
'As a tangent, it isn't just Chinese nationals who live in Singapore who do this. I live in England, and I was in the local Chinese grocer in town. They were chatting amongst themselves and kept referring to laowai (i.e., foreigners). I piped up and said, 'Here YOU are the laowai!!'' /TISG
Read also: Chinese restaurant faces backlash for labelling cheap dishes 'kinder rates' and expensive ones 'PhD rates'—accused of educational discrimination
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
NEL, LRT disruptions: SBS Transit, LTA engineers to work overnight to restore power supply
Train operator SBS Transit says its engineers and those from the Land Transport Authority will be working overnight to restore power supply to the North East Line depot substation. This is after a power fault led to disruptions on Aug 12 across several stops along the North East Line, plus the entire Sengkang-Punggol LRT service. Earlier in the day, CNA's Rachel Teng and Muhammad Bahajjaj went out to three affected stations.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Bukit Canberra hawkers charged for using extra space permanently, not for baskets: Operator
Ms Chen Liping, who runs the stall selling noodles, also opted not to rent the space. Since she can only leave items there temporarily, she instructs delivery drivers to leave food items in her stall instead. 'Other than that, I just put this chair here so I can rest in the afternoons, then I can fold it and keep it in my stall when I don't need it,' she added. FREE MEALS In his latest post on Tuesday, Mr Seetoh reiterated that the hawkers are contractually obligated to offer 60 free, unsubsidised charity meals per month. 'It may not be enforced, but they are at the mercy and grace of the operators. It's not stated that no punishment (is) meted if they fail to do so,' he wrote. Mr Ong had earlier replied to Mr Seetoh to confirm that stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre would not be penalised for not providing free meals to low-income residents. "There are no penalties if they do not or are unable to provide the meals," he said on Monday, adding that the initiative, which was meant to encourage hawkers to "pay it forward", has yet to commence. When asked about the free meals that Mr Seetoh claimed were part of their contracts, the hawkers confirmed that these clauses were real. Those CNA spoke to also highlighted that the free food scheme has not been implemented even though some of their three-year contracts were coming to an end. Canopy Hawkers Group's Mr Tan also confirmed that the scheme has not started. 'If you're here earning money from everyone every day, shouldn't you give back to the community a bit? Two meals a day is manageable,' said Mr Ow, adding that he already gives free meals away to those who need them. Hawkers were also aware of the clauses when they signed their leases, he stressed. 'If you want to sign the contract, then you should follow it. Don't sign the contract, then complain about it.' Ms Pang agreed that many hawkers like herself are feeling the pinch from the rising prices of essentials and may worry about providing free meals. Since the scheme has not been begun, hawkers who cannot afford to give away free meals do not need to do so, she added. 'But for me, if I can do it, I will just do it. If you can't do it, I'm sure you can talk to the management and work something out,' she said, adding that she sometimes gives away free snacks to elderly, low-income customers. The number of free meals has since been revised to 100 meals over their three-year contract, hawkers said. Mr Ong also clarified this point on Monday. While she was unaware of the previous terms of 60 meals every two months, Ms Chen said that since last year, the scheme has involved providing 100 free meals over her three-year lease. 'Everyone here who signed the contract would know about it. When they signed it, they would have asked all their questions,' she added. 'If they choose you to run the stall and offer their terms, you only sign the contract if you accept the terms … It's not like halfway through your contract, your business is not good, then you suddenly complain about the terms.' The 53-year-old hawker considered 100 meals over three years a reasonable number, which is why she accepted the terms. 'Whether business is good or bad, it's our own problem.' When asked if he had a response to hawkers who said they considered the free meal terms in their contract reasonable, Mr Seetoh reiterated to CNA: 'Charity meals, if voluntary, should not be in the contract.'
Independent Singapore
4 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Man says his mum kept 10% of his earnings and made him fund his own university fees
SINGAPORE: Parents are supposed to nurture their children and prepare them for independence, but one man says his experience growing up was very different. For more than 10 years, he claims his mother's main priority was controlling every aspect of his finances rather than supporting his well-being. In a post on the r/SGexams subreddit, he wrote that, for as long as he could remember, every dollar he spent was monitored. 'I wasn't allowed to buy anything other than food and school materials all the way until I started working. Also, I was only allowed to eat food that cost less than S$5 at the food court throughout my life until I started working full-time,' he said. He further revealed that throughout his formative years and up to polytechnic, his mother would provide him with pocket money at the beginning of each week, only to reclaim any unspent amount by the week's end. 'I had totally zero dollars with me during holidays and weekends,' he added. Even during his polytechnic internship, he had no control over his income. He claimed his mother kept all his earnings, and he later discovered that she had been transferring 'S$100 each month' from his intern pay into her personal bank account without informing him. After graduating from polytechnic, he said the restrictions continued. '[My] mother made me go out to work, and all my salary goes into a joint account between me and her. Every month, she will transfer 10% of my salary into her own bank account.' Moreover, he shared that his siblings received much better treatment than him. 'My family isn't poor, my parents paid for my older siblings' uni fees and their overseas trip with their school, and let them eat whatever they want when they were young,' he wrote. In contrast, he said he was compelled to save for his own university education. 'I had to use the joint account to save up for my own uni. My mother also told me that she won't lend me any money for my uni, and if I don't have enough money, I should just drop out.' 'You are the investment child.' In the comments, one Singaporean Redditor commented, 'Your mum is controlling you, probably bordering along the lines of financial abuse, and you should probably leave your home as soon as possible because she'll probably depend on you financially for a very long time. She views you as an investment, not as an individual who's free to make choices on their own.' Another agreed with this view, writing, 'You are the 'investment child.' Sorry, Bro, but I think you should create your own bank account, move out, and adios, amigos, from your mum, and remember to keep all the (receipts) of her controlling you in case she sues you for allowance.' A third added, 'I think maybe you can check DNA to see whether if you are really her child?' A few others also encouraged him to have an open conversation with his siblings, hoping that by making them aware of the situation, they might be willing to stand by him and help address the matter together. In other news, a local took to social media to warn others about the vendor stationed near Tampines MRT station who allegedly sells overpriced ice cream. In a post on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook group, Facebook user Syukuri Apa Yang Telat Ad claimed he was charged S$8 for two ice creams—one served in a cone and the other as an ice cream sandwich. Read more: 'I paid $8 for these!': Man warns others about vendor selling overpriced ice cream with no price displayed
