
Najib files contempt proceedings against ex-AG over house arrest royal addendum order
KUALA LUMPUR: Former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak has filed an application to initiate contempt proceedings against a former attorney-general for allegedly failing to reveal a royal addendum order that would allow the jailed leader to serve his remaining sentence under house arrest.
In a statement on Friday (May 23), Najib's legal team said it filed the application against Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh, who is now a Federal Court judge, on Wednesday.
Najib's lawyers claim it is based on evidence that Terrirudin had knowledge of the purported addendum order issued by former king Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah, who is the Pahang ruler, but had chosen to 'mislead the High Court', reported news outlet New Straits Times.
According to the lawyers, a copy of the order, dated Jan 29, 2024, was delivered to Najib through his son Mohamad Nizar Najib and its authenticity was confirmed in writing almost a year later, on Jan 4 this year, by the Pahang Royal Council.
The document was personally addressed to Terrirudin, who allegedly instructed his officers to dismiss Najib's claims as 'a fishing expedition, speculative and based on hearsay evidence' when the issue was raised.
'As a public officer, the former AG (Attorney-General) owed the court a paramount duty of candour,' said the statement by Najib's lawyers, as quoted by Free Malaysia Today.
'A deliberate failure to do so undermines public confidence in the administration of justice, and indeed an obstruction of justice itself,' it added.
Contempt of court refers to acts that hinder the functionality of the judiciary.
Legal proceedings can be initiated to sanction such behaviour but prior approval – or leave – from the court is required.
Najib's lawyers said the application for leave is a necessary first step in holding Terrirudin accountable by giving him the opportunity to respond to the allegations, The Edge reported.
Terrirudin was appointed as a Federal Court judge in November last year and previously evaded queries from reporters on the matter of the royal addendum issued by the former king, Free Malaysia Today reported.
Najib's lawyer Shafee Abdullah told the Court of Appeal during a hearing in January that the addendum was sent by the palace to Terrirudin on Jan 29 last year.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim confirmed in January this year that the purported addendum order was received by Terrirudin but it was sent back to the Istana Negara or National Palace after current king Sultan Ibrahim was inaugurated.
Shafee voiced the intention to initiate contempt proceedings in February, and current Attorney-General Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar wrote to him to reconsider the move, The Edge reported.
ROYAL ADDENDUM SAGA STILL ROILING POLITICAL WATERS
Najib's fight to serve the remainder of his jail term for corruption related to the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal at home has roiled Malaysia's political waters.
It has sparked friction in Anwar's unity government, which comprises four coalitions, including the one headed by United Malays National Organisation (UMNO). Najib was the former president of UMNO.
Najib began serving his prison term in August 2022 and had his sentence reduced from 12 to six years by the Pardons Board in February last year. The board also reduced his RM210 million (US$49.38 million) fine to RM50 million.
Najib claimed that former king Sultan Abdullah had issued an order for him to be under house arrest during a Jan 29, 2024 meeting of the Pardons Board, one day before Sultan Abdullah ended his reign as Malaysia's monarch.
In January this year, the Court of Appeal granted Najib leave to initiate judicial review proceedings to serve house arrest. The following month, however, the Malaysian government launched a challenge to the Court of Appeal ruling.
UMNO leaders aligned with Najib have called for the current king Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar to grant the jailed politician – who is still facing other 1MDB-related corruption charges in the Malaysian courts – a full pardon.
But the unity government's other partners opposed the move, insisting that Najib had received a fair trial.
Sultan Abdullah in February had called on all parties to 'stop further discussions' regarding the royal order he had allegedly issued, stressing that the matter was before the courts and called on all parties to respect the 'legal process'.
In January, the AGC had also sought a gag order to ban public discussion of Najib's judicial review claim that the royal addendum decree existed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
10 hours ago
- CNA
CNA Explains: How will Malaysia's VEP enforcement work, and how do motorists steer clear of trouble?
SINGAPORE: Singapore-registered vehicles entering Malaysia without a valid Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) will soon face a compound fine of RM300 (US$70.65) at its land border checkpoints, the country's Transport Ministry announced on Wednesday (Jun 4). The ramped-up enforcement will take place nine months after Malaysia began requiring all foreign-registered vehicles entering the country by land from Singapore to use VEPs from Oct 1 last year. Here's what you need to know about the VEP enforcement measures and penalties, and what motorists should do to avoid them: How will Malaysia carry out VEP enforcement after Jul 1? Owners of all categories of foreign vehicles - including private and commercial ones as well as motorcycles - are required to register for a VEP before entering Malaysia. This requirement also applies to embassy and government vehicles. Drivers found without a valid VEP at Malaysia's land borders with Singapore may face a compound fine of RM300 (US$70.65), Malaysia's Transport Ministry said on Wednesday. The summons will be issued to those who have not registered or activated the VEP. And the drivers must pay the fine and apply for the permit before leaving Malaysia, its Transport Minister Anthony Loke said. Vehicles with pre-registered but unactivated VEPs will also be issued the summons, and payment must similarly be made before exiting Malaysia. The same penalties apply to private company vehicles without a valid VEP, but such vehicles with pre-registered but unactivated VEPs will be issued a reminder notice instead and be allowed to exit Malaysia. This is because drivers of such vehicles have experienced issues with registering the VEP e-wallet under a company name, Loke said. 'In terms of enforcement, it will be done outside the border (checkpoint),' Loke said. He added that enforcement checks will be done at 'various locations' within Johor Bahru for vehicles that entered without the permit, without elaborating where these would be. 'Let me assure all Singapore vehicle owners, they can still come in even if they do not have a VEP,' he said. While enforcement would not be done '24 hours', he stressed that authorities would automatically know which vehicles do not have VEP. CNA has reached out to the Road Transport Department (JPJ) for more details on the enforcement measures. @channelnewsasia Malaysia will start issuing summons of RM300 (US$70.65) to foreign vehicles without Vehicle Entry Permits (VEP) at its land borders with Singapore from Jul 1, Malaysia's Transport Ministry said on Wednesday (Jun 4). Private individual vehicles without valid VEPs must pay the fine and complete VEP registration before exiting Malaysia, while those with pre-registered but unactivated VEPs will also receive fines and have to pay them before leaving the country, said the transport ministry. #singapore #sgnews #malaysia #malaysianews #VEP ♬ original sound - CNA The enforcement will mark the end of the ongoing grace period where motorists who have yet to apply for the VEP are given warning notices. Malaysia had announced last May that all foreign-registered vehicles entering the country by land from Singapore would be required to use VEPs from October 2024. Will errant motorists' cars be towed away if they do not pay the fine? Loke gave the assurance that Malaysia will not resort to towing away vehicles if drivers refuse to pay the fine imposed, citing the country's 'very close relationship' with Singapore. 'We are not going towards that, don't frighten tourists … We welcome Singaporean tourists to come to Malaysia, especially Johor Bahru,' he said on Wednesday. Is there a stiffer penalty for repeat offenders? When asked whether repeat offenders would face a heavier penalty, Loke responded that there is 'no such thing' as a second offence. He explained that the offence of flouting the VEP rule is compoundable with a fine of RM300. The errant driver will immediately be required to register for a VEP before being allowed to leave Malaysia, so the issue of a repeat offence does not arise. 'If they do not want to pay the compound, they want to challenge it, then they can go to court but the court can give them a fine of up to RM2,000 and six months jail because it is part of the law,' he said. Before Wednesday's announcement of the fine, the Malaysia government had similarly said last year that motorists who fail to install a VEP may be fined up to RM2,000 or jailed for up to six months. How to apply for VEP? The owner of the vehicle, or a representative appointed by the owner, must register online via the JPJ's official website at After putting in your details, including a login identity and password, you will receive confirmation via email and be directed to the VEP portal at to complete the registration process. Once the account is authenticated, applicants can log into a portal to upload a vehicle log card or manually fill in information, including the vehicle's model, certificate of entitlement (COE) and chassis numbers. All VEP applicants should also have their NRIC, passport, vehicle road tax, insurance, car model and COE details ready. The vehicle log card can be retrieved from the Land Transport Authority's OneMotoring website. A representative can apply for a VEP on the driver's behalf. The VEP refers to a radio frequency identification (RFID) tag used to track foreign vehicles and note if their drivers have outstanding fines and traffic offences in Malaysia. Once an application is approved, what can drivers do? Once the application is approved, drivers will receive an email notification to choose a method of collecting the VEP RFID tag – either couriered by post to your address, or self-collection at one of the four VEP collection centres. After making the pick, drivers will need to make payment online. This can be done by credit card. The tag costs RM10 excluding delivery and service charges. There are four VEP centres in total - three are in Johor Bahru while one is in Woodlands. All four centres assist drivers with RFID tag installation but these are done by appointment only. Two centres - at Danga Bay in Johor Bahru and Woodlands in Singapore - allow drivers to make enquiries. Drivers at Danga Bay are allowed to make walk-in enquiries but in Woodlands, drivers are required to book an appointment for enquiries. The two other collection centres are at Paradigm Mall and Sunway Big Box, which provide tag collection and installation services only and do not handle inquiries regarding the VEP application. The RFID tag can be attached either to the top left corner of the windscreen or the left headlamp of the car, according to the JPJ website. For those who opt to go to the collection centres, the tags will typically be installed by TCSens representatives on the car windshields. TCSens is a vendor hired by JPJ to assist drivers with the installation of RFID stickers and also to handle in-person enquiries on VEPs in Johor Bahru.


Independent Singapore
11 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
No VEP, no exit: Full vehicle permit scheme enforcement to start July 1 — M'sia Transport Minister
MALAYSIA: Malaysia's Transport Minister, Anthony Loke, announced on Wednesday (June 4) that the country would be fully implementing the Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) scheme announced last year. This means that foreign-registered vehicles that enter Malaysia from Singapore without a registered or activated VEP would be subject to fines. At a media conference, Mr Loke said, 'We began this scheme with a soft approach through advocacy in October last year. No summonses were issued then. But beginning July 1, summonses will be issued if there is no valid VEP… Foreign vehicle owners issued with a summons for not having a valid VEP must settle the fine before exiting Malaysia.' A VEP is a passport of sorts, as it acts as an authorisation permit for drivers of foreign-registered vehicles who want to bring their cars to Malaysia. Mr Loke said in February that motorists from Singapore would be notified in advance before the scheme was enforced. Read related: Which Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) registration method is the fastest way to get you on Malaysian road? On Wednesday morning, he said that foreign vehicle owners who have failed to register for a VEP by July 1 will be issued an RM300 (S$91) summons. This means that they will have to pay the fine, as well as complete their VEP registration, before they are allowed to leave Malaysia. Those who pre-registered for the VEP will also be made to pay the fine before they leave the country. This goes as well for private company vehicles with no valid VEP. However, those with unactivated VEPs will be allowed to leave Malaysia but will be given a reminder notice. 'There are quite a lot of vehicles in this category that are still in the registration process due to incomplete documents,' said Mr Loke, adding that there is a new system that allows them to accomplish this, and that they are being given the opportunity and time to do so. The Transport Minister said that the summons will be issued physically and would need to be paid through cashless methods through the MyEG app, mobile counters, or at Road Transport Department counters. See also GE 2020: PAP beats Workers' Party at Marine Parade GRC Enforcement checks will be conducted from time to time away from the land border checkpoints between the two countries in order to avoid traffic build-ups, Mr Loke added. As of Monday (June 2), 231,018 RFID tags under the VEP scheme have been issued to private vehicles, although 36,511 have not yet been installed or activated. /TISG Read also: M'sian Transport Minister says SG motorists will be notified in advance before VEP is enforced


CNA
12 hours ago
- CNA
Couple jailed for smuggling dogs into Singapore from Malaysia for sale
SINGAPORE: A couple caught smuggling dogs into Singapore from Malaysia were jailed on Wednesday (Jun 4). Soon Boon Khong and Reina Wong Si Qi, both 28, will each serve three weeks' jail after they pleaded guilty to two charges of importing a dachshund and a pomeranian without a licence on Feb 2, 2023. Another two charges of smuggling another two dogs - a poodle and a pomeranian - the day before were taken into consideration for sentencing. The two had advertised dogs for sale online and a woman, Ms Tok Su Wen, had contacted them to buy a dachshund. Ms Tok was earlier fined S$7,000 (US$5,400) in the first prosecution against a buyer for abetting animal smuggling. On Feb 2, 2023, Soon had driven from Malaysia into Singapore at about 6pm, with Wong in the front passenger seat. The pomeranian and dachshund were hidden behind a bag underneath the front passenger seat. In mitigation, the couple's lawyer Tan Cheng Kiong said that his clients only smuggled dogs on Feb 1, and Feb 2, 2023, with no further evidence of other smuggling. He added that the dogs were not mistreated and did not have canine diseases. The lawyer urged the court to fine rather than jail the couple as they were first-time offenders. Jail would be more appropriate for repeat offenders, or in cases with mistreatment or syndicates, said Mr Tan. He pointed to the pair's young age and said they have learnt their lesson. In the alternative, Mr Tan argued for a "very short sentence" for the duo. Addressing the court, Wong said that the two had ensured that the dogs were healthy by checking that they were vaccinated. District Judge Wong Li Tein found the couple's culpability higher than Ms Tok, as Ms Tok had committed the offence for herself, but the accused couple smuggled for trade and profit. Both had advertised their trade, indicating that the offences were not opportunistic, Judge Wong said. She noted that the offences posed a public health risk that Singapore's densely populated community could not afford to take. The judge felt that a jail term was warranted.