Reserve Bank warns ‘periodic disruptions' to debt markets are likely amid bond glut
Reserve Bank head of domestic markets David Jacobs warned investors to prepare for 'periodic disruptions' amid ongoing uncertainty overseas.
But he said Australia's bond market — where governments and businesses borrow cash — should be strong enough and flexible enough to overcome any pressure.
Interest rates on US government debt rocketed after Mr Trump's tax hikes on trade and the squeeze was widely cited as the reason his administration swiftly back-flipped on the worst of the proposals.
While central banks like the RBA and US Fed set benchmark interest rates, there are many other factors that impact rates for borrowers across the market including businesses, banks, and ultimately, homeowners.
'Events in early April were somewhat dramatic, though brief, and illustrated how changes in the global economic system will play out quickest in capital markets,' Mr Jacobs said at the Australian Government Fixed Income Forum in Tokyo.
He said markets had quickly steadied but only after the US paused the tariffs.
'That suggests little room for complacency,' he said.
'Much as international trade may be diverted in a new economic order – so too might international capital.'
That might mean investors worry about Australia's position as a free trade nation and relationship with China in a world moving towards tariffs and protectionism.
Yet Australia may also remain an attractive place to send cash because of strong institutions and a great credit rating.
There has been a sharp increase in government borrowing in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and amid giant doses of stimulus pumped into major economies.
Australian Federal Government net debt is set to hit $620 billion by June next year, about double the level from a decade ago.
Mr Jacobs said increased borrowing and central banks stepping back pandemic-era operations meant more bonds were hitting the market — which had been labelled a 'global bond glut'.
That means governments may need to pay higher interest rates on debt, potentially pushing up borrowing costs across the economy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Kosha Gada: Labor leads Australia into oblivion with net zero's trifecta - grid insecurity, solar's hidden costs and the blight of wind farms
Few issues cut deeper into national survival or division than energy policy. In 2025, the Western world faces a stark split: the US, under President Donald Trump, has abandoned net zero to pursue fossil fuel dominance, while Canada, Europe, and Australia double down on costly climate pledges. Within minutes of taking office on January 20, Trump pulled the US from the Paris Agreement and declared a National Energy Emergency to unleash oil, gas, and coal for affordability, security and dominance. In contrast, Canada, the EU and Australia cling to net zero targets despite mounting costs. Australia's uniquely punishing burden Australia's situation is extreme. A July 2025 ACCC report warns that outdated market rules are driving grid volatility and soaring household bills. With just 27 million people and a $200 billion fossil fuel export economy, rigid net zero targets mandated by the 2022 Climate Change Act risk crushing both grid and economy. The law demands a 43 per cent emissions cut by 2030 and net zero by 2050, while the 2024 Future Made in Australia Act pledges $22.7 billion for green industries. A 2035 target of 65 to 75 per cent reduction looms. Unlike the UK, the EU, Canada and Japan, which rely on nuclear or hydro, Australia has vast coal, gas, lithium and uranium reserves yet no comparable low-carbon baseload options. Net zero requires slashing domestic fossil fuel use while still exporting them- a hypocrisy critics call 'starving while selling bread'. With a sparse population and sprawling grid, renewable intermittency hits harder than in denser nations. Failures such as Queensland's $14 billion hydrogen project collapse and soaring transmission costs expose the fragility of the plan. Ross Garnaut warns the absence of a carbon price makes the Net Zero Plan incoherent, while years-long project approvals add delays. Net zero's 'catastrophic trifecta' - grid instability, solar's hidden costs and wind's environmental damage - reveals deep flaws in the policy's economic and ecological logic. Grid on the precipice: Physics versus fantasy The National Electricity Market (NEM) is straining under the shift from coal (down 35 per cent since 2000) to 83 per cent renewables by 2030, as projected by AEMO. Intermittent solar and wind lack the synchronous inertia of coal and gas, destabilising frequency- a weakness exposed by the 2016 South Australia blackout and recent solar output cuts in North Queensland. Australia's vast, lightly populated grid cannot match the resilience of Japan's compact network or Canada's hydro-backed system. Gas 'peaking' plants and unproven long-duration storage are stopgaps, but one in four households already struggles with energy bills. A 2022 NSW price spike forced AEMO intervention, and the Productivity Commission warns of 'massive costs' to triple NEM capacity by 2030, with storage needs rising from 3 GW to 49 GW by 2050. The physics - not politics - make net zero's ambitions unattainable without destabilising supply. Solar illusion: Hidden costs and false promises Large-scale solar farms, costing over $1 billion per gigawatt, require massive public and private investment plus billions more for grid integration. Solar's daytime-only output forces reliance on backup generation. End-of-life disposal is a looming crisis: panels contain toxic materials, last only 20 to 30 years, and Australia lacks scalable recycling. Panel manufacturing depends heavily on coal-powered Chinese factories, which control 80 per cent of global supply, binding Australia to environmentally damaging and strategically risky supply chains. Land use is another issue - vast farms consume thousands of hectares, fragmenting ecosystems, and competing with agriculture. These costs undermine solar as a pillar of reliable, affordable energy. The windfarm contradiction: a renewable hellscape Wind farms scar iconic landscapes, from Tasmania's hills to Queensland's coasts, fuelling rural resentment. A 2023 CSIRO survey found widespread opposition, citing the visual blight of 200-metre turbines. Wildlife suffers: thousands of birds and bats die annually, including protected species, while offshore projects threaten marine life through underwater noise. Turbine blades, made of non-recyclable composites, are piling up in landfills. Decommissioning costs often fall to taxpayers, and vast transmission projects fragment habitats while inflating costs. For a sparsely populated country with unique wilderness, wind power's environmental toll contradicts net zero's 'green' image. Government's true duty The government's first responsibility is reliable, affordable energy, not pursuing an abstract 'luxury belief' of net zero. Cheap, stable power underpins households, farms, and industries, sustaining the $200 billion fossil fuel export economy and Australia's living standards. With one in four households in energy hardship, intermittent renewables risk further strain. Reliable energy safeguards jobs, competitiveness, and national security. Net zero, by contrast, is a distant goal disconnected from Australia's immediate needs and advantages. The debate is fundamentally about the role of government - keeping lights on and costs down versus chasing utopian ideals. The righteous fight In Canberra, opposition is hardening. Senior Liberal Andrew Hastie vows to keep fighting net zero despite electoral headwinds, citing public anger over prices. Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce has introduced a bill to repeal the target, backed by Senator Matt Canavan, who calls net zero 'crazy and insane'. Regional MPs like Garth Hamilton and Alex Antic argue it betrays Australia's resource wealth. Nationals leader David Littleproud has labelled the target 'impossible'. Moderates like Andrew Bragg and Zoe McKenzie warn that abandoning net zero risks losing urban seats to the Greens and independents. The Coalition's May 2025 election loss - Labor won a historic majority - has deepened divisions. Pro-climate independents and the Greens gained ground, while the Coalition's pro-nuclear, pro-gas platform failed to win undecided and female voters. For the Coalition, the stakes are existential: Net zero threatens regional economies and energy security, yet dropping it risks alienating urban voters. The challenge is to reframe the issue - not just about reliability and affordability, but about national pride and energy supremacy. Australia, as the 'lucky country,' could deliver abundant, cheap power, thriving industries and jobs while fuelling the world's energy needs. Selling that vision could unite rural and urban voters, dismantle net zero's hold and restore Australia's economic leadership. Kosha Gada is a tech entrepreneur and broadcast commentator on US and international current affairs, appearing live three nights a week on Sky News Australia. She is a board member of sports betting platform PointsBet
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Forget one rate cut
Real Money, a free weekly newsletter giving expert tips on how to save, invest and make the most of your money, is sent every Sunday. You're reading an excerpt − sign up to get the whole newsletter in your inbox. Finally, another rate reprieve for mortgage holders – and it could be way better than you think, too. Belatedly, on Tuesday, the Reserve Bank delivered a third interest rate cut. Not the 35 basis points that would have brought rates back to a nice neat multiple, but the regular 25 basis points despite the current irregular setting – so the official interest rate is now 3.6 per cent. The official or cash rate is good to know (take note any politicians likely to face a grilling on TV or radio!). But what matters to home loan holders is their new standard variable rate. So it's great news that lenders have largely all announced that they are, mostly, fairly swiftly, passing on the cut in full. What's the problem? The standard variable rate – on average – is currently running at about 2.5 percentage points (or 250 basis points) above the cash rate. Which gives you a good benchmark for your own new mortgage rate: the calculation is therefore 3.6 per cent (official rate) plus that usual 2.5 percentage point margin, to give 6.1 per cent.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Forget one rate cut
Real Money, a free weekly newsletter giving expert tips on how to save, invest and make the most of your money, is sent every Sunday. You're reading an excerpt − sign up to get the whole newsletter in your inbox. Finally, another rate reprieve for mortgage holders – and it could be way better than you think, too. Belatedly, on Tuesday, the Reserve Bank delivered a third interest rate cut. Not the 35 basis points that would have brought rates back to a nice neat multiple, but the regular 25 basis points despite the current irregular setting – so the official interest rate is now 3.6 per cent. The official or cash rate is good to know (take note any politicians likely to face a grilling on TV or radio!). But what matters to home loan holders is their new standard variable rate. So it's great news that lenders have largely all announced that they are, mostly, fairly swiftly, passing on the cut in full. What's the problem? The standard variable rate – on average – is currently running at about 2.5 percentage points (or 250 basis points) above the cash rate. Which gives you a good benchmark for your own new mortgage rate: the calculation is therefore 3.6 per cent (official rate) plus that usual 2.5 percentage point margin, to give 6.1 per cent.
