Ibotta's (NYSE:IBTA) Q1 Sales Top Estimates, Stock Jumps 12.7%
Cash-back rewards platform Ibotta (NYSE:IBTA) reported revenue ahead of Wall Street's expectations in Q1 CY2025, with sales up 2.7% year on year to $84.57 million. The company expects next quarter's revenue to be around $89.5 million, close to analysts' estimates. Its non-GAAP profit of $0.36 per share was 7.8% below analysts' consensus estimates.
Is now the time to buy Ibotta? Find out in our full research report.
Revenue: $84.57 million vs analyst estimates of $82.06 million (2.7% year-on-year growth, 3.1% beat)
Adjusted EPS: $0.36 vs analyst expectations of $0.39 (7.8% miss)
Adjusted EBITDA: $14.67 million vs analyst estimates of $12.56 million (17.3% margin, 16.8% beat)
Revenue Guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $89.5 million at the midpoint, roughly in line with what analysts were expecting
EBITDA guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $19.5 million at the midpoint, in line with analyst expectations
Operating Margin: -3.3%, down from 19.3% in the same quarter last year
Free Cash Flow Margin: 17.6%, down from 20.5% in the same quarter last year
Market Capitalization: $1.47 billion
'We made significant progress in the first quarter in establishing Ibotta as the first full-service performance marketing platform for the CPG industry,' said Ibotta CEO and founder, Bryan Leach.
Originally launched as a way to make grocery shopping more rewarding for budget-conscious consumers, Ibotta (NYSE:IBTA) is a mobile shopping app that allows consumers to earn cash back on everyday purchases by completing tasks and submitting receipts.
Examining a company's long-term performance can provide clues about its quality. Any business can put up a good quarter or two, but the best consistently grow over the long haul.
With $369.5 million in revenue over the past 12 months, Ibotta is a small player in the business services space, which sometimes brings disadvantages compared to larger competitors benefiting from economies of scale and numerous distribution channels. On the bright side, it can grow faster because it has more room to expand.
As you can see below, Ibotta's 28.3% annualized revenue growth over the last two years was incredible. This is a great starting point for our analysis because it shows Ibotta's demand was higher than many business services companies.
This quarter, Ibotta reported modest year-on-year revenue growth of 2.7% but beat Wall Street's estimates by 3.1%. Company management is currently guiding for a 1.8% year-on-year increase in sales next quarter.
Looking further ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 6% over the next 12 months, a deceleration versus the last two years. Still, this projection is above average for the sector and suggests the market sees some success for its newer products and services.
Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link.
Ibotta's operating margin has been trending down over the last 12 months and averaged 4.2% over the last three years. Although this result isn't good, the company's elite historical revenue growth suggests it ramped up investments to capture market share. We'll keep a close eye to see if this strategy pays off.
This quarter, Ibotta generated an operating profit margin of negative 3.3%, down 22.6 percentage points year on year. This contraction shows it was less efficient because its expenses grew faster than its revenue.
Revenue trends explain a company's historical growth, but the change in earnings per share (EPS) points to the profitability of that growth – for example, a company could inflate its sales through excessive spending on advertising and promotions.
Ibotta's full-year EPS flipped from negative to positive over the last two years. This is a good sign and shows it's at an inflection point.
In Q1, Ibotta reported EPS at $0.36, down from $0.54 in the same quarter last year. This print missed analysts' estimates, but we care more about long-term EPS growth than short-term movements. We also like to analyze expected EPS growth based on Wall Street analysts' consensus projections, but there is insufficient data.
We enjoyed seeing Ibotta beat analysts' revenue and EBITDA expectations this quarter. On the other hand, its EPS missed. Overall, this was a mixed quarter. The stock traded up 12.7% to $56.61 immediately after reporting.
Should you buy the stock or not? The latest quarter does matter, but not nearly as much as longer-term fundamentals and valuation, when deciding if the stock is a buy. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
ATKORE INVESTIGATION INITIATED by Former Louisiana Attorney General: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates the Officers and Directors of Atkore Inc.
NEW YORK & NEW ORLEANS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq., a partner at the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC ('KSF'), announces that KSF has commenced an investigation into Atkore Inc. (NYSE: ATKR). In July 2024, the Company was named as a defendant in a number of civil antitrust lawsuits alleging that, from at least April 1, 2021, it and other U.S.-based PVC Pipe manufacturers conspired to artificially inflate the price of PVC Pipes through the exchange of competitively sensitive business information regarding PVC Pipe pricing and sales through an industry newsletter called Oil Price Information Service, LLC ('OPIS'), in violation of federal antitrust laws. Thereafter, the Company and certain of its executives were sued in a securities class action lawsuit, charging them with failing to disclose material information in violation of federal securities laws, which remains ongoing. KSF's investigation is focusing on whether Atkore's officers and/or directors breached their fiduciary duties to its shareholders or otherwise violated state or federal laws. If you have information that would assist KSF in its investigation, or have been a long-term holder of Atkore shares and would like to discuss your legal rights, you may, without obligation or cost to you, call toll-free at 1-833-938-0905 or email KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn ( or visit to learn more. About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation's premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors - in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, New Jersey, and a representative office in Luxembourg. To learn more about KSF, you may visit
Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
AI assistants still need a human touch
When I first encountered AI, it wasn't anything like the sophisticated tools we have today. In the 1990s, my introduction came in the form of a helpful, but mostly frustrating, digital paperclip. Clippy, Microsoft's infamous assistant, was designed to help, but it often got in the way, popping up at the worst moments with advice no one asked for. AI has evolved since then. Major companies like Apple are investing billions, and tools like OpenAI 's ChatGPT and DALL-E have reshaped how we interact with technology. Yet, one challenge from Clippy's era lingers—understanding and adapting to user intent. The original promise of AI was to create experiences that felt seamless, intuitive, and personal. AI was supposed to anticipate our needs and provide support that felt natural. So, why do so many systems today still feel mechanical and rigid—more Clippy than collaborator? When AI assistance is a burden When first introduced, Clippy was a bold attempt at computer-guided assistance. Its purpose was groundbreaking at the time, but it quickly became known more for interruptions than useful assistance. You'd pause when typing, and Clippy would leap into action with a pop-up: 'It looks like you're writing a letter!' Its biggest flaw wasn't just being annoying: It lacked contextual awareness. Unlike modern AI tools, Clippy's interactions were static and deterministic, triggered by fixed inputs. There was no learning from previous interactions and no understanding of the user's preferences or current tasks. Whether you were drafting a report or working on a spreadsheet, Clippy offered the same generic advice—ignoring the evolving context and failing to provide truly helpful, personalized assistance. Is AI destined to be like Clippy? Even with today's advancements, many AI assistants still feel underwhelming. Siri is a prime example. Though capable of setting reminders or answering questions, it often requires users to speak in very specific ways. Deviate from the expected phrasing, and it defaults to, 'I didn't understand that.' This is more than a UX flaw—it reveals a deeper issue. Too many AI systems still operate under a one-size-fits-all mentality, failing to accommodate the needs of individual users. With Siri, for instance, you're often required to speak in a specific, rigid format for it to process your request effectively. This creates an experience that feels less like assistance and more like a chore. Building a smarter assistant isn't just about better models. It's about retaining context, respecting privacy, and delivering personalized, meaningful experiences. That's not just technically difficult—it's essential. Helpful AI requires personalization Personalization is what will finally break us out of the Clippy cycle. When AI tools remember your preferences, learn from your behavior, and adapt accordingly, they shift from being tools to trusted partners. The key to this will be communication. Most AI today speaks in a one-dimensional tone, no matter who you are or what your emotional state is. The next leap in AI won't just be about intelligence, it'll be about emotional intelligence. But intelligence isn't only about remembering facts. It's also about how an assistant communicates. For AI to truly feel useful, it needs more than functionality. It needs personality. That doesn't mean we need overly chatty bots. It means assistants that adjust tone, remember personal context, and build continuity. That's what earns trust and keeps users engaged. While not every user may want an assistant with a personality or emotions, everyone can benefit from systems that adapt to our unique needs. The outdated one-size-fits-all approach is still common in many AI tools today and risks alienating users, much like Clippy's impersonal method back in the early days. For AI to thrive in the long term it must be designed with real humans in mind. Building Clippy 2.0 Now imagine a 'Clippy 2.0'—an assistant that doesn't interrupt but understands when to offer help. One that remembers your work habits, predicts what you need, and responds in a way that feels natural and tailored to you. It could help you schedule meetings, provide intelligent suggestions, and adapt its tone to fit the moment. Whether it has a personality or not, what matters is that it adapts to—and respects the uniqueness of every user. It might even respond with different tones or emotions depending on your reactions, creating an immersive experience. This kind of intelligent assistant would blend seamlessly into your routine, saving you time and reducing friction. Clippy may have been a trailblazer, but it lacked the technological foundation to live up to its potential. With the advances we've made today, we now have the tools to build a 'Clippy 2.0'—an AI assistant capable of transforming the way we interact with technology. Although maybe this time, it doesn't need to come in the form of a paperclip with a goofy smile.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Circle Goes Full Circle
By sheer luck, I had an opening bell media hit with NYSE TV this last Thursday, the day Circle listed as CRCL. The NYSE studio is upstairs at gallery level. I'd first visited the NYSE on the same gallery balcony as a boy with my Dad. I remember getting the impression that IBM was a huge company that represented the future. Circle staff and guests filed in at 9:15, a much larger delegation than most bell-ringings. Not only was the floor packed, but both galleries were full. As the applause started, precisely at 9:29:30, everything else stopped. This wasn't the usual opening bell tea ceremony. NYSE President Lynn Martin stood beside an air-punching Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire, and the specialists, floor brokers, and other floor inhabitants joined in the cacophony. The energy took over the whole floor in a way that felt exceptional. I asked, cheekily, to the NYSE TV folks which specialist booth would trade CRCL. No one had any idea what I was talking about. The producer decided to move our hit to the floor with a handheld microphone and change our subject from bitcoin to stablecoins on the fly. That was fine—plenty to say about stablecoins. Standing within feet of Jeremy Allaire on the floor next to the bell balcony, doing our five-minute segment, it was pure electricity. It was the feeling when you finish a marathon and a beaming volunteer places a medal around your neck. Accomplishment and validation. This was a moment enabled by a friendlier SEC and coincident with meaningful blockchain legislation, but it didn't have the vibe of MSTR rapture or youthful DeFi exuberance. It felt mature and financial--adults celebrating. USDC sprang to life in September 2018, just before a local peak in U.S. interest rates. In retrospect, it was a handy time to launch, when carry (yield from backing assets) was positive but yield expectations in crypto (whose practitioners mostly grew up in a zero interest rate world) remained low. When COVID hit, in 2020, ZIRP (Zero-Interest-Rate-Policy) returned suddenly, threatening the business model, but prompting crypto adoption and experimentalism. When the Fed aggressively raised rates in 2022 to help metabolize $5 trillion in COVID fiscal stimulus, stablecoins faced the opposite combination of supportive and threatening forces: higher carry revenues, but traumatized markets. Circle's failed SPAC attempt spanned this transition. Announced in July 2021 when 3-month yields were 0.05%, the Concord Acquisition deal was renegotiated in February 2022 (as rates began their historic climb) and ultimately terminated in December 2022—right as rates hit 4.42%. The SEC never declared the S-4 registration statement effective. The transaction "timed out" waiting for regulatory approval, just as the underlying economics of Circle's business were being boosted by soaring rates. Now, several years into a 4-5% rate environment, the model has adapted and appears to be working. USDC holders can receive "rewards" on Coinbase that are similar to risk-free yields. On-chain cash holdings and collateral can be enhanced with tokenized treasuries. The GENIUS Act on stablecoins appears in good shape for passage, opening up the market for greater stablecoin adoption and participation. The U.S. government has a new potential multi-trillion dollar customer for U.S. treasuries, providing much-needed demand for U.S. debt, which has become a chess piece in global trade. Circle (and other stablecoin issuers) are enjoying a good carry scenario, although near-term profitability has significant interest rate risk, now under the watchful scrutiny of CRCL shareholders and analysts. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
