Kazakhstan and Russia Break Ground on Landmark Nuclear Power Project – Lessons for South Africa's Energy Future
Image: Yandex
In the quiet village of Ulken, on the shores of Lake Balkhash in Kazakhstan's Almaty Region, a drilling rig bites into the earth. It marks the start of a project set to redefine the country's energy landscape for decades to come — and one that should spark serious reflection in South Africa.
On 8 August 2025, Rosatom, Russia's state nuclear corporation, and the Kazakh Agency for Atomic Energy began the first stage of their high-capacity nuclear power plant (NPP) project. The initial focus is on precision: 50 boreholes, each up to 120 metres deep, will be drilled to gather seismic, hydrological and geological data. This painstaking work ensures the site meets the highest safety and reliability standards before any construction begins.
The plant will use Generation III+ VVER-1200 pressurised water reactors — advanced technology already in operation or under construction in Russia, Belarus, Turkey, Bangladesh, Egypt and China. Each unit will generate 1,200 megawatts of electricity with a service life of 60 years, extendable to 80. For Kazakhstan, it promises long-term energy security, a significant cut in carbon emissions, and entry into the high-tech industrial sector.
Image: Yandex
The Kazakh government has been clear about the benefits: new schools, kindergartens, modern infrastructure, and jobs in a sector that can keep skilled engineers in the country. Almasadam Satkaliyev, Chair of the Atomic Energy Agency, described it as 'the first step towards a new high-tech sector in the national economy.'
South Africa, meanwhile, has struggled to move beyond one ageing nuclear facility. Koeberg remains our sole operational plant, limping towards a life-extension while energy security falters. The political toxicity surrounding a nuclear deal with Russia during the Zuma years left the sector in limbo. That deadlock shifted slightly this week when Environment Minister Dion George granted Eskom partial environmental approval to build a new nuclear power station at Duynefontein, adjacent to Koeberg. This follows an eight-year legal battle and is only one step in a longer process, but it signals that nuclear expansion may be re-entering the national agenda.
Image: Yandex
Kazakhstan's approach offers a clear lesson. The country has not shied away from its nuclear past, which includes the Semipalatinsk test site and the BN-350 reactor in Aktau. Instead, it is building public trust through transparency and rigorous safety measures. The current survey phase — the most regulation-bound stage — ensures construction will only proceed once hard geological evidence confirms the site's suitability under both national and International Atomic Energy Agency standards.
For South Africa, nuclear energy remains a viable route to energy sovereignty. While Western-backed 'green' finance often locks developing nations into dependency on imported technology and donor approval, projects like Ulken show there are alternatives that combine local industry, long-term planning, and multipolar cooperation.
If Kazakhstan can move from agreement to full-scale geological and seismic surveys within a year, South Africa can shift from political stalemate to a tangible nuclear build programme. In a rapidly changing world, the question is whether we will power our future on our own terms or under someone else's direction.
****Gillian Greer Schutte is an award-winning South African filmmaker, writer, and critical race theorist whose work bridges media, politics, and social justice. An honorary lecturer at Wits University's Graduate School of Public and Development Management, she has produced globally used hypermedia and film case studies in collaboration with the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Widely published in academic journals and international newspapers, her work interrogates poverty, geopolitics, extractive mining, and neoliberal economics across the Global South, with documentaries and hybrid films that challenge dominant narratives and amplify marginalised voices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Online and unafraid: LGBTQIA+ Africans push back against colonial-era hate
In numerous African countries, including Ghana (above) and Zimbabwe, colonial-era anti-homosexuality laws continue to do great harm to LGBTQIA+ communities. In a push against these inherited laws and attitudes, queer Africans are utilising social media as a tool to foster greater acceptance. Image: Carl Collison Golden Moyo* is a lay preacher in rural Zimbabwe. In 2018, after decades of hiding his sexual orientation, Moyo came out to his family and friends and his parish as gay. Attitudes to sexual and gender minorities in Zimbabwe are highly conservative. Those found guilty of consensual same-sex sexual activity could face up to one years imprisonment and a fine. The southern African country's anti-homosexuality law was first introduced by the British during its colonisation of Zimbabwe. According to Human Dignity Trust, the country has noted 'consistent reports of discrimination and violence being committed against LGBTQIA+ people in recent years, including assault, sexual violence, harassment, blackmail, and the denial of basic rights and services'. Moyo's decision has not been without consequence. News of his sexuality soon 'went viral… (with) people deliberating upon it', he says. There was also a protest at the church's headquarters. Says Moyo: 'They were saying things like this is against our culture. This is against our religion. This is against our laws…They say it is strange. It is not part of us and did not originate from our own people. (That) it's a Western thing. When the noise started, (with) people protesting, you really need people who stand up to say, 'No, this thing is not Western'. It's our own thing. It has always been in our midst.' For Moyo, as with an increasing number of LGBTQIA+ persons across the country, social media is an essential tool in a continued push for a break from the narrative that homosexuality - and queerness, more broadly - is a Western import. Moyo's social media accounts on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X (formerly, Twitter) has a combined following of just under 10 000 people. He also uses Clubhouse 'for the (weekly) LGBTQIA+ fellowship'. Moyo says he first realised the power of social media during the Covid-19 pandemic. 'We could not gather as Christians, so we used to worship via social media. I realised that this is a thing that can quickly spread the message to others…I thought of it as a way that my voice can also be heard.' Tanatswa Gumbo, communications officer for the country's largest queer rights organisation, Gays and Lesbians of Zimbabwe, says LGBTQIA+ people 'definitely have become more visible on social media'. Image: Supplied Tanatswa Gumbo, communications officer for the country's largest queer rights organisation, Gays and Lesbians of Zimbabwe (GALZ), says LGBTQIA+ people 'definitely have become more visible on social media'. 'LGBTQIA+ persons, particularly activists, have really been visible and have really become more outspoken in terms of challenging conservative attitudes towards LGBTQIA+ people. Especially the claims of homosexuality being un-African; not being Christian,' says Gumbo. Research conducted by Princess Sibanda and Gibson Ncube found that, for queer Zimbabweans, online 'spaces represent a powerful act of resistance, a way for queer Zimbabweans to claim their right to exist and express themselves…. It's like they're sending love letters to the world, saying that queer love is just as important and beautiful as any other kind of love.' Zimbabwe is, of course, only one of numerous African states to have inherited homophobic laws and attitudes as a result of colonisation. The end of colonial rule has, however, seen some countries (such as Uganda, Nigeria, Kenya and Namibia) place added restrictions on the rights of LGBTQIA+ persons. Ghana is one such country. The West African state inherited its first anti-homosexuality law during British rule. Section 104 of the country's Criminal Code of 1960 - seen largely as 'an after-effect of the colonial era' - carries with it a sentence of up to three years' imprisonment for men found guilty of consensual same-sex relations. Ghana's latest anti-LGBT law, the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill (commonly known as the Anti-LGBT Bill), is particularly draconian and has been described as 'brutal, harsh, and unjust'. In 2021, Angel Maxine, Ghana's only openly transgender musician and queer rights activist, penned a song, titled Kill the Bill, in protest against the Anti-LGBT Bill. In addition to using her music as a tool for awareness-raising, Maxine also relies heavily on social media to try and effect change. 'If social media was available…during the colonial days, I'm sure a lot of people would have been educated by now, and we would (not be in) this era that we are in,' Maxine says, in reference to the increasing queerphobic rhetoric sweeping across the continent. 'Because even though some of us are on social media, we are still living in our colonial days; still carrying the colonial thinking. But there are also people who are using social media who have broken free from this colonialism. In Africa, we have made use of social media positively to educate people.' Maxine is now living in Berlin, having fled Ghana as a result of persecution based on her gender identity and her queer rights activism. The distance from her home country makes her rely on social media even more. 'Sometimes when the grounds become very hard and difficult for us to meet in person, social media is where we can meet. I am currently in Germany, but I'm communicating with people in Ghana through social media.' Alex Kofi Donkor, the executive director of LGBT Rights Ghana, says LGBTQIA+ Ghanaians are creating social media content that challenges the narrative that queerness is a Western import. Image: Supplied Alex Kofi Donkor is the founder and executive director of LGBT Rights Ghana. 'I would say most of the mobilisation and most of the engagement at the initial stages (of establishing LGBT Rights Ghana)] was through social media. Even as of now, most of the mobilisation is done via various social media platforms,' says Donkor. Aside from activists utilising social media for policy and attitude reforms, there are also individual members of Ghana's LGBTQIA+ communities who, Donkor says, are 'putting content out there that challenges the status quo and challenges so many thoughts that Ghanaians have around LGBTQIA+ issues…that it's a Western import'. As could be expected, given the repressive contexts in which this content is created, there are downsides to proudly sharing pro-LGBTQIA+ content. A recent example of this was when a queer South African undertook the social media campaign, #ShowGhanaLove. Ostensibly meant as a show of solidarity with queer Ghanaians, the campaign had the opposite effect, as anti-queer politicians used the resultant public outrage to add pressure on the Ghanaian government to expedite the passing of the Anti-LGBT Bill. Says Donkor: 'People tend to react quickly when (LGBTQIA+ content) is openly or obviously put out there. People tend to react in a very negative way.' Ghanaian human rights activist, Angel Maxine, sees social media as an integral tool in raising awareness. Image: Eemmax Experience
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Zuma and MK party file urgent court bid to challenge Ramaphosa's Mchunu decision
The application by Zuma and the MK party comes after their recent loss in the Constitutional Court. Former president Jacob Zuma and the MK party have not given up the fight and have lodged an urgent application against President Cyril Ramaphosa in the High Court in Pretoria. The application by Zuma and the MK party comes after their recent loss in the Constitutional Court. What Zuma wants In the notice of motion, Zuma and his party want the high court to declare Ramaphosa's decision to place Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu on special leave. They also want the appointment of Wits law Professor Feroz Cachalia as acting police minister and the establishment of a commission of inquiry to be declared invalid, null and void and unconstitutional and set aside. ConCourt ruling The ConCourt on 31 July 2025 ruled that the application does not engage the court's jurisdiction and refused direct access to the MK party and Zuma in its matter against Ramaphosa. Ramaphosa's lawyer Kate Hofmeyr argued that cases that can exclusively be decided by the Constitutional Court are very limited. 'This matter does not fall within this court's exclusive jurisdiction. Very few matters do, and this is not one of them. 'Any allegation that the power was exercised unlawfully falls under our constitutional scheme to the High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) to consider first. Additionally, there is no pressing need for this court, on 10 days' notice, to decide the issues in this matter as a court of first and last instance,' Hofmeyr said. This basically means that Zuma and the MK party had to approach the high court first, which they have now done. ALSO READ: Zuma and MK party case should've started in High Court, ConCourt hears [VIDEOS] The court ruling was handed down two hours after it hosted a special ceremonial sitting for retiring Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, whom Ramaphosa appointed to chair a commission to probe explosive allegations by KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) top cop Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanzi of criminal infiltration in the South African justice system. Constitutional matter In his founding affidavit to the high court, Zuma said he is bringing the application in his personal capacity, but because the application is urgent and in the 'interest of justice' he is also deposing the papers on behalf of the MK party. 'The twin purposes of this application are to re-assert the merits of the application which were left unadjudicated by the Constitutional Court on account of its findings on exclusive jurisdiction and direct access; and to raise new grounds of illegality and irrationality based on events which arose post the 30 July 2025 hearing in the Constitutional Court,' Zuma argues. Zuma said that the present application is indisputably a constitutional matter. Section 169(1)(a) of the Constitution provides that the High Court of South Africa may decide any constitutional matter except a matter that the Constitutional Court has agreed to hear by way of direct access or is assigned by legislation to another court of a status similar to the High Court. 'This is such a matter because the Constitutional Court, rightly or in my view wrongly, declined to grant direct access. That decision must be respected as a fact until or unless it is set aside,' Zuma said. ALSO READ: Zuma and MK party accuse ConCourt of ignoring 'most serious' violations by Ramaphosa Urgency In his papers, Zuma argues that in his Constitutional Court application, Ramaphosa did not contest the urgency, exclusive jurisdiction, and/or direct access. 'The president sought and was allowed to opportunistically hide behind those technicalities to escape much-needed judicial accountability for the unjustifiable multiple breaches of the rule of law. There are no more hiding places. 'The serious and unprecedented revelations of alleged criminality made by Lieutenant-General Mkhwanazi, as another highly qualified whistleblower, in the tradition of former Intelligence Chief Arthur Fraser, can no longer be ignored or swept under the carpet at the request of the president,' Zuma argued. Zuma explains that the urgency of the application is 'clearly not self-created, and it can never be reasonably asserted that relief may be obtained in due course.' 'The impugned commission has already commenced and continues to operate at huge cost to the taxpayer. In the (unlikely) event of its delivering a final report in six months' time, the matter would still not have been heard in due course.' Cachalia Zuma also argues that Cachalia has since assumed office and will be 'making decisions which affect the security of the people of South Africa' while Mchunu 'who has been illegally placed on leave of absence by the president continues to earn a salary and enjoy other expensive privileges such as bodyguards, drivers, free ministerial accommodation, air travel domestic workers and the like.' 'It is trite that the matter involves very serious and unprecedented allegations of executive and judicial capture which, if true, constitute a threat to the very democracy prevailing in South Africa. 'It is impossible to imagine a greater catastrophe than that which would transpire if the allegations are true and the matter is not heard as one of the utmost urgency. In relation to the question of urgency, the merits must be regarded as true and proven,' Zuma argues. Senzo Mchunu Zuma also argues that there is 'no express legal provision which empowers Ramaphosa to place a minister on leave of absence. 'The respondents can therefore only rely on an implied power which is said to flow from the power to dismiss. 'It will be argued that the decision does not pass the reasonable necessity test because the power to dismiss in section 91(2) must not be confused with the power to dismiss an employee,' he said. 'Financial benefit' Zuma said the appointment of Cachalia is 'totally incoherent' and false explanations given by Ramaphosa in 'respect of this decision owe to the fact that it is rooted in improper motives and bad faith'. 'Its purpose if to grant undue financial benefits to Minister Mchunu at the expense of the taxpayer and to shield him from accountability and well-deserved dismissal or removal from the Cabinet. 'In explaining this appointment, the president has performed both somersaults and backflips in a series of incompatible volte face manoeuvres, all pointing to sheer irrationality,' Zuma argued. In his papers, Zuma argued that following the swearing in of the acting police minister, both Ramaphosa and Cachalia gave media interviews, with differing accounts of his official title and status. Questions to Ramaphosa Zuma's attorneys sent a letter to Ramaphosa on 4 August 2025, posing 15 unanswered questions regarding his actions and justifications. Zuma said Ramaphosa's response was 'inadequate'. 'Given the public importance of the issues and the imminence of the 1 August date for the assumption of office by Professor Cachalia, the matter cries out for direct access.' ALSO READ: Zuma demands Ramaphosa resign by Friday, or else… Madlanga Commission Zuma also argues that there is no legal provision which is capable of endowing the president with the power to confer upon the Madlanga Commission the powers which are reserved to the Judicial Service and/or Magistrates' Commissions, to investigate allegations of misconduct on the part of members of the judiciary. 'There are specific and well-accepted policy reasons why such powers are exclusively reserved for the bodies referred to above. These include the preservation of the independence, dignity and effectiveness of the judiciary.' The matter is expected to heard on 26 August 2025. ALSO READ: Madlanga inquiry: How much probe into Mkhwanazi's allegations will cost
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘We are truly sorry': Open Chats Podcast issues apology to coloured community after backlash
This is the second apology the Open Chats Podcast issued, after the first failed to calm the storm. The Open Chats Podcast team has released an apology to the coloured community and all South Africans after intense backlash over racist remarks made during episode 128. The controversy sparked national outrage, legal action and calls for cancellation. Now, the hosts are taking public steps toward accountability and education. Backlash over episode Episode 128 of the Open Chat Podcast ignited a firestorm. Remarks made about the coloured community were widely condemned as racist, sexist and deeply offensive. The clip quickly went viral, drawing outrage across social media. This prompted the Patriotic Alliance (PA) to file charges against the hosts. The controversy escalated when old tweets from PA leader and sports minister Gayton McKenzie were shared, showing him using the K-word. This sparked renewed debate and even calls for his resignation. The fallout spread far beyond the original podcast audience. It turned into a national talking point. ALSO READ: Zuma's former fiancée LaConco makes acting debut in Mzansi Magic's 'Genesis' Previous apology rejected The podcast's initial apology failed to calm the storm. Many South Africans viewed it as insincere, with TikTok users posting videos criticising the tone and delivery. The backlash only deepened calls for cancellation and heightened demands for genuine accountability. This week, in episode 131, the hosts released a new apology. They say it is 'serious, unreserved, and from the heart'. 'We take full accountability' 'We wish to unconditionally and unreservedly apologise for the hurt and harm we caused to the coloured community and South Africa at large. Our statements in episode 128 were racist, sexist, unfortunate, irresponsible, reckless, and unAfrican. We take full accountability for our utterances,' the Open Chats team said. The team acknowledged that their words had caused 'outrage and offence' across racial lines. They recognised that their right to freedom of expression could not be exercised in ways that stripped others of their dignity. Content removed and call for calm Episode 128 has since been removed from all official platforms. However, the hosts expressed regret that clips continue to circulate independently. They urged the public to stop sharing the content to prevent further harm. They have also committed to undergoing formal education on race relations at a reputable higher-learning institution, to ensure such incidents are not repeated. Working with the Human Rights Commission While the team had initially intended to approach the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) on their own, several political parties had already taken that step. The podcast's legal team is now liaising with the SAHRC to reach a resolution. They said they will comply fully with any directives issued. In a direct appeal to political parties critical of the podcast, the hosts invited open dialogue. They suggested a recorded discussion could take place in the future. Plea for forgiveness Closing their statement, the Open Chats Podcast hosts expressed remorse. 'We are disappointed with ourselves and the blatant disregard we showed when talking about a vulnerable group of people. We remain remorseful and request the forgiveness of the coloured community of South Africa. We are truly sorry for the damage we've caused.'
