
How to rebuild trust after a viral CEO controversy: Advice for leaders, employees
When the chief executive of data software company Astronomer was caught on a concert Kiss Cam this month, cuddling with the company's HR chief — who was not his wife — that viral moment led to their resignations and questions about leadership culture.
Nearly 30% of large companies experienced abrupt drops in stakeholder trust during a crisis, and almost all struggled to recover without visible, sustained leadership action, according to BCG's Trust Index.
For employees, it can raise an unsettling question: Where do we go from here?
While PR teams work to manage the external message, repairing internal trust is far more complex. Rebuilding company trust requires honest leadership, true accountability and a thorough examination of the company's values — and whether they're being lived or merely listed on the company website.
To understand how companies can move forward after a CEO controversy and how employees can gauge whether trust can be rebuilt, we asked experts what companies should do after a controversy goes viral.
What good leadership looks like after a controversy
After a controversy, leadership sets the tone for how trust can be rebuilt.
Lisa Burke, an organizational development consultant with Energage, says leaders must do more than tout company values; they need to live them.
'It's so often about leaders walking the talk,' she says. 'Values really set the standard for what our culture looks like and feels like.'
When leaders embody those values in their actions and decisions, she says, employees begin to rebuild confidence in the culture.
It's also important to reassure employees that their work still matters, despite the controversy.
'Yes, we've been through a challenge,' Burke says. 'Let's all come together and help move this organization forward and become better because of it. What lessons can we learn? And how do we get better?'
Burke notes that becoming better starts with rebuilding trust from the top down.
After a controversy, companies must begin rebuilding trust with their employees, and that starts with taking ownership of the issue.
'The first thing is to own it,' says Burke. 'People feel when it's performative. They also feel when it's authentic.'
Rather than delaying, downplaying or shirking blame, leadership should acknowledge the situation promptly, she says, even with a simple message like, 'This thing has occurred, we're handling it.'
She adds that it's essential for the company to reaffirm its core values and acknowledge that the incident may not have aligned with those values, but that they remain important.
'You should be as transparent as possible, because employees are already giving feedback. The way our brain works is we make up stories in the absence of information, and most often, we make up a negative story,' Burke says.
After a viral controversy, 'I think the biggest answer is some communication,' says Ashley Herd, who spent 20 years working in human resources before launching her own company, Manager Method. 'That's the biggest gap.'
Scandals spread quickly, but companies often hesitate to respond, waiting days while uncertainty festers. But while companies wait to finalize a polished statement, employees are often left with unanswered questions. According to Herd, a lack of transparency can allow underlying issues to simmer. If unaddressed, they can surface publicly through Glassdoor reviews, employee chatter or social media posts.
Herd emphasizes: 'What people, especially people at the company, care about most are the things that you're saying to them. Are you talking to them as a human?' she asks.
It doesn't have to be perfect. Even simple communication helps, she says. She recommends something like, 'This is really hard. I'm still trying to figure this out. I'm here to support you and the team members, and my focus is on you all as an organization.'
She also recommends holding a candid meeting, even if it feels tense, and creating space for open conversation without making it feel like an obligation.
The message should be clear, she advises: 'We want to give you the opportunity to talk honestly about this, because this isn't just a news story; this is something that impacts the trust of the organization.'
Even though it won't be fun, she says it's best to focus on the outcome.
'Having a meeting that doesn't go well is a million times better than having silence that goes worse,' she says.
Senior leaders should become more visible, Burke says, especially to help coach managers who feel uneasy addressing tough topics. One way to achieve this is through listening sessions, where groups of employees and managers share their concerns about the organization's future with leadership.
'It's a great opportunity to build trust and relationships,' Burke explains.
Another possible approach is role-playing.
'If you're nervous about sharing this with your team, is there an individual you're most nervous about?' she says. 'Let's have a role play, and I'll play that person so the mid-level manager can feel more confident.'
Burke also recommends offering open office hours for unstructured conversations. You might say, "Hey, I have open office hours on Friday from three to four," allowing for good discussions about what's going on in the organization and giving employees a chance to see where their role is headed.
Even small, informal check-ins signal that leadership is present and paying attention. By showing up consistently and creating space for honest dialogue, leaders prove that rebuilding trust isn't just a message, it's a mindset.
However, listening to employees isn't enough; leaders also need to take action.
'If I'm a senior leader and I've just had a listening session where you shared concerns as my employee, my responsibility is now to take action,' Burke explains.
That could mean scheduling a follow-up to share potential solutions or progress.
'It isn't always taking action based on what I think would be best,' Burke says, 'but listening to those who are on the front line. You might then ask them, 'What's the solution you see?''
Even small steps toward progress help reinforce that employee feedback matters and that leaders are listening with intention to act.
What to do when your company's culture starts to feel broken
When a company fails to respond transparently after a controversy, it can reveal deeper cracks in the culture. And for employees, those cracks are often easier to feel than to name.
According to Herd, a lack of genuine recognition of human values is something employees should watch out for.
Ashley Herd warns that a major red flag is when 'employees are asking for some sort of meeting, and the company just shuts them down across the board and says 'no.'
Another red flag, she adds, is if 'you have a meeting, and it's stopped right away.' In those cases, leadership may say things like, 'We're not going to talk about these things. Get back to work.'
Lisa Burke notes that poor company culture often becomes tangible to employees over time.
'You will start to feel it if you're not in a great culture,' she said. 'The worst ones are gaslighting or not sharing any information. You're just not hearing anything for a month about something.'
These patterns, Burke explains, tend to be strong signals that the culture 'may not be doing what it needs to do in order for us to achieve our mission.'
For employees facing these challenges, Burke recommends honest self-reflection. Ask yourself, 'Is this the place I really want to be working? What are my pros and cons?'
She encourages looking ahead: 'The next thing would be, let me play the movie to the end. So if I did leave, where would I go? What would that look like? Would the grass be greener or not?'
Finally, while it's important to provide honest feedback to your employer, Burke reminds employees to be mindful about maintaining professional relationships. 'Make sure you aren't also burning bridges on the way out,' she said.
Leadership that earns trust, not just headlines
In the end, rebuilding trust in the wake of a CEO controversy isn't about perfect statements; it's about communication, ownership and transparency. According to these experts, it comes down to four simple, if uncomfortable, steps:
According to experts, when companies commit to their values, employees can sense they're not just being heard, they're being led.
What is USA TODAY Top Workplaces 2025?
Does your company have your trust? Each year, USA TODAY Top Workplaces, a collaboration between Energage and USA TODAY, ranks organizations across the United States that excel at creating a positive work environment for their employees. Employee feedback determines the winners.
In 2025, over 1,500 companies earned recognition as top workplaces. Check out our overall U.S. rankings. You can also gain insights into more workplace trends and advice by checking out the links below.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Entrepreneur
2 days ago
- Entrepreneur
The Real Reason AI Isn't Working at Your Company — and the 3-Step Fix to Change That
AI works best when your team is all in. Here's how to turn adoption into real results. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're all-in on AI. Your team? Not quite there yet. You've tested the tools, seen the potential, maybe even scored a few quick wins. But turning that into confident, consistent use across your company? That's a different story. From my conversations with fellow leaders, I know this gap is common. Even with access to powerful tools, teams often hesitate - or sometimes outright resist - embracing AI in their workplace. A BCG report confirms it: most AI adoption challenges stem from people and processes, not the technology itself. Hence, the main hurdle remains the readiness of your team to use innovative tools and solutions. The good news is that this problem can be solved. A thoughtful strategy can turn AI into a natural part of your team's daily work. Below, I'll outline the most common obstacles I've seen and share practical ways to help your team build confidence around them. The real barriers to AI adoption AI is everywhere nowadays, but many teams are still unsure how to put it to work. In my experience, the majority of AI adoption challenges arise from a few recurring obstacles that stop interest from becoming action: Unclear relevance. Most employees don't see how AI applies to their daily tasks. The benefits sound promising, but without a clear link to their responsibilities, it's hard to see the point. Generic advice like "automate tasks" or "save time" only adds confusion — teams need concrete, role-based examples to know where to begin and how it adds value. Most employees don't see how AI applies to their daily tasks. The benefits sound promising, but without a clear link to their responsibilities, it's hard to see the point. Generic advice like "automate tasks" or "save time" only adds confusion — teams need concrete, role-based examples to know where to begin and how it adds value. Lack of support . Even when teams are excited about AI, they're often left on their own, without onboarding, training or shared resources. This leads to isolated experiments, inconsistent use, duplicated effort and missed chances to learn from each other. . Even when teams are excited about AI, they're often left on their own, without onboarding, training or shared resources. This leads to isolated experiments, inconsistent use, duplicated effort and missed chances to learn from each other. Fear around AI. Many employees lack confidence in using it. Unclear boundaries, fear of mistakes, especially in sensitive contexts and worries about job security often result in resistance to AI altogether. Related: How to Successfully Implement AI into Your Business — Overcoming Challenges and Building a Future-Ready Team Three proven steps to overcome AI adoption challenges However, these blockers aren't fixed. With the right strategy in place, teams can go from hesitant to confident without needing a huge overhaul. Here's how to create the kind of structure that makes AI part of the daily workflow. Provide AI training that makes sense If you want your team to embrace AI in the workplace, you need to start with training that's practical, clear and aligned with how people actually work. When choosing a training, consider: Clarifying what AI is. Skip jargon and focus on how it works in your company's context. Practical, real-world examples go a long way. Breaking myths. Misconceptions like AI being a threat to jobs or always delivering flawless results can quietly undermine adoption. Address them head-on and set realistic expectations about what AI can and can't do. Making it role-specific. Show how AI supports the specific responsibilities of each role. Demonstrate how it can help with familiar tasks, so it feels like a natural extension of their work. To make the experience more engaging, personalize it. Tailor prompt libraries to different departments — marketing, HR, operations — so teams can explore use cases that reflect their daily tasks. This makes AI easier to grasp and more exciting to try out. PwC is a great example of what this can look like in action. They launched an AI Academy that's already trained 90% of their employees in prompt design and responsible AI use. Their focus on trust, accessibility and hands-on application has helped teams adopt AI more confidently across the board. Pick an AI partner that thinks beyond technology Once your team understands AI's value, the next step is choosing a partner who can scale that vision. Start by looking at how they develop AI as a skill across teams. Are they actively investing in long-term capability? At Accedia, for example, we run internal AI trainings and initiatives like our Innovation Development Center, where team members can explore real use cases and build practical AI experience. Equally important is a partner's ability to grasp your business context. The right one invests time in understanding how your organization works, offering dedicated delivery leads who collaborate with your team, ask the right questions and tailor solutions to specific needs. Finally, the right provider helps you map out where AI will drive the most value and where it may introduce risk. They align efforts with organizational goals, highlight high-stakes decisions and ensure AI is implemented in a responsible, context-aware way. Related: AI Isn't Plug-and-Play — You Need a Strategy. Here's Your Guide to Building One. Make AI part of work culture The way your company approaches innovation directly shapes how easily AI is adopted. When it is encouraged across teams, people feel more comfortable experimenting. Here are a few ways beyond frequent communication I've tried in my team to support that mindset: Encourage cross-team collaboration. Eliminate organizational silos by bringing people together to work. Sharing knowledge and solving problems side by side leads to fostering new ideas and very often, better results. Let people follow what excites them. By supporting AI initiatives outside day-to-day tasks, you give your team space to explore what genuinely excites them, which often sparks new ideas and brings unexpected value to the business. Make innovation everyone's job. Avoid letting it live only in one team. Consider forming a small group of "innovation ambassadors" who can help spread ideas, answer questions, and inspire others to get involved. Conclusion Successfully navigating AI adoption challenges means creating an environment where employees understand how technology enhances their roles, receive training to use it confidently, and view innovation as a shared responsibility. When that happens, AI in the workplace stops being a trend and starts driving lasting progress. Don't let hesitation define your company's future. Lead the shift from resistance to results and turn your team into your biggest AI advantage. Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Gwyneth Paltrow Named Astronomer 'Temporary Spokesperson' Amid Coldplay Kiss Cam Controversy
Gwyneth Paltrow Named Astronomer 'Temporary Spokesperson' Amid Coldplay Kiss Cam Controversy originally appeared on Parade. Astronomer just made an unlikely new hire amid backlash the company is facing for its CEO's involvement in the Coldplay kiss cam scandal. Just a week after Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigned and executive Kristin Cabot followed suit, the company has hired Gwyneth Paltrow as their official "temporary spokesperson." In a hilarious move, Astronomer recruited Coldplay frontman Chris Martin's ex to speak out on behalf of the company during this turbulent time. Following the announcement, the company dropped a video with Paltrow answering commonly asked questions about the future of Astronomer. 🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬 In the parody video, Paltrow shared that she was "hired on a very temporary basis to speak on behalf of the 300-plus employees at Astronomer." "Astronomer has gotten a lot of questions over the last few days, and they wanted me to answer the most common ones," Paltrow said as the screen showcased the number one most asked question, "OMG! What the actual f—" Before the question could be finished, the camera quickly panned back to Paltrow where she responded to a very different inquiry. "Yes, Astronomer is the best place to run Apace Airflow," Paltrow answered. "We've been thrilled so many people have a newfound interest in data automation." As for the next question, "How is your social media team holding up?" Paltrow again avoided the real question in favor of something a bit more promotional. She reminded viewers that yes, there is still room at their Beyond Analytics DataOps Conference, which is taking place this September. The unexpected campaign is drawing high praise from the internet, many of whom are calling it "iconic" and a "masterclass in PR." You can hear all that Gwyneth Paltrow had to say below. Gwyneth Paltrow Named Astronomer 'Temporary Spokesperson' Amid Coldplay Kiss Cam Controversy first appeared on Parade on Jul 26, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 26, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword


Forbes
5 days ago
- Forbes
Private Credit Is Targeting Fintech Loans - Here's Why It Matters
From VC Freeze to Private-Credit Thaw In 2024, fintech founders were lamenting a venture-capital drought so severe it made the 2008 haze look balmy. Fast-forward 18 months, and the problem is almost the opposite: giant private-credit funds are lining up with term sheets so large they would have broken cap tables a year ago. A joint study from BCG and QED Investors puts the 'white-space' opportunity at US$280 billion over the next five years: capital earmarked for buying or originating fintech loans. Sizing the War Chest Private credit has grown nearly ten-fold since 2010 to roughly US$1.5 trillion of assets under management (AUM) in 2024, according to a Paul Weiss market-outlook slide deck. Consultants expect it to hit US$3.5 trillion by 2028, a compound annual growth rate north of 19 percent. Even fundraising momentum looks resilient. Data-provider With Intelligence logged US $209 billion of final closes in 2024, 5 percent above 2023, with mega-funds swallowing two-thirds of the haul. All that dry powder needs product, and fintech balance sheets: granular, digital, floating-rate, fit the bill perfectly for yield-hungry managers. Why Banks Are Happy to Step Aside Basel III 'Endgame' rules, now inching toward finalization in the United States, could raise large-bank risk-weighted assets by 20 percent on average, Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman warned last year, effectively penalizing on-balance-sheet consumer and SME lending. Rather than ditch those customers, big banks are partnering with private-credit titans to originate and distribute loans off balance sheet: The model is simple: banks keep the origination and servicing fees, funds take the credit risk, and regulators get comfort that risky assets live outside the deposit-backed system. Term-Sheet Economics: Spreads Are Compressing Private-credit exuberance has pushed unitranche pricing down. In May 2024, a Bloomberg scoop on Squarespace's direct-lending package showed pricing sliding from SOFR + 500 bps to about +475 bps as lenders competed for allocations, roughly 75 basis points tighter than January deals. Even so, funds can lever those assets 1.5-2x and still net solid returns, which makes it an attractive asset class. Fine Print for Founders Cheap it is not. Typical clauses include: Still, many CEOs prefer a 14 percent cost of capital that preserves ownership over a 35 percent down round in an unforgiving venture market. Does the Credit Actually Perform? SoFi's own numbers suggest consumer credit can: Q1 2025 filings show 90-day personal-loan delinquencies falling from 0.55% to 0.46% year-on-year. Yet macro clouds gather. Household credit-card delinquency hit 3.1% in Q1, Fed data shows, and mortgage arrears are edging up. Should consumer stress spike, those shiny forward-flow lines could test their break clauses quickly. Leverage-on-Leverage: The Regulator's Nightmare A May 2024 Reuters dispatch from the Milken Institute Global Conference captured Wall Street luminaries warning about 'leverage on leverage' inside the US $1.7 trillion private-credit complex. The Federal Reserve's FEDS note on Bank Lending to Private Credit echoed the concern, highlighting opaque funding chains and undrawn bank credit lines that could be yanked in a downturn. Meanwhile, the SEC and CFTC just postponed tougher Form PF reporting for private funds to October 2025, after fierce industry push-back—pushing transparency risk further down the road. The Venture Capital Power-Law Reset Historically, VC portfolios rely on one outsized IPO to offset dozens of write-offs. Private-credit recycling threatens that maths. Suppose a fintech can originate, sell, and service loans profitably without hoarding them. In that case, it can turn cash-flow positive earlier—prompting PE buyers or strategic acquirers to pay respectable (if not sky-high) multiples long before IPO scale. Expect more US$400–600 million exits to asset managers and insurers, fewer zeros, fewer tens, more threes. LPs may accept that trade if it means quicker distributions. Geography: Why Asia and LatAm Are in Play Private-credit dry powder is overwhelmingly dollar-denominated, but funds are aggressively scouring growth markets where banking pull-back is most acute: For cross-border lenders, dollar funding married to local-currency wallets is a tantalizing carry trade, provided FX hedges hold. What Could Go Wrong (and How to Hedge It) If U.S. unemployment climbs beyond 6 percent, consumer delinquencies could spike quickly. Lenders are protecting themselves with dynamic advance-rate grids that ratchet down funding as loss rates rise and by inserting turbo-amortisation clauses that force faster pay-downs once portfolios slip. Forward-flow facilities still rely on committed bank lines and repo markets. Should haircuts widen or banks reduce commitments, like they did during regional-bank scare in March 2023, funds could find themselves scrambling for cash. The more innovative structures include evergreen SPVs with multiple lenders and 'material adverse change' carve-outs that limit a bank's ability to walk away overnight. The SEC's postponed Form PF overhaul now lands in October 2025, and the Fed continues to signal tougher capital treatment for undrawn credit lines. A sudden leap in disclosure or capital costs could stall dry-powder deployment. Diversifying lender pools and adding trigger-based step-ups that compensate funds for extra compliance work can keep the taps open. Private-credit deals in India, Southeast Asia, and Latin America pair dollar funding with local-currency wallets. If the Fed tightens while local currencies slide, unhedged positions will hurt. Basis swaps remain the first line of defence, but many agreements now incorporate automatic FX-pass-through clauses that allow originators to re-price loans if exchange rates move beyond a preset band. In short, cheap money can vanish fast. The facilities that endure are the ones that price in volatility from day one—and give both fintechs and their lenders room to breathe when the cycle turns. The Road Ahead—Signals to Watch Bottom Line Private credit was born in the wreckage of the Global Financial Crisis. Fifteen years on, it has become a parallel banking system which is armed with US $280 billion of dry powder laser-focused on fintech. Deploy that capital responsibly, and the industry could unlock cheaper credit for consumers and SMBs while giving investors a stable, floating-rate asset class. Mis-price it, and we will have merely swapped 'move fast and break things' equity for 'lend fast and break later' debt. Either way, Sand Hill won't finance the next chapter of fintech roadshows; rather it will be syndicated in the marble-lined offices of Park Avenue, and the maturity transformation will be very, very private indeed.