
Private Credit Is Targeting Fintech Loans - Here's Why It Matters
In 2024, fintech founders were lamenting a venture-capital drought so severe it made the 2008 haze look balmy. Fast-forward 18 months, and the problem is almost the opposite: giant private-credit funds are lining up with term sheets so large they would have broken cap tables a year ago. A joint study from BCG and QED Investors puts the 'white-space' opportunity at US$280 billion over the next five years: capital earmarked for buying or originating fintech loans.
Sizing the War Chest
Private credit has grown nearly ten-fold since 2010 to roughly US$1.5 trillion of assets under management (AUM) in 2024, according to a Paul Weiss market-outlook slide deck. Consultants expect it to hit US$3.5 trillion by 2028, a compound annual growth rate north of 19 percent.
Even fundraising momentum looks resilient. Data-provider With Intelligence logged US $209 billion of final closes in 2024, 5 percent above 2023, with mega-funds swallowing two-thirds of the haul. All that dry powder needs product, and fintech balance sheets: granular, digital, floating-rate, fit the bill perfectly for yield-hungry managers.
Why Banks Are Happy to Step Aside
Basel III 'Endgame' rules, now inching toward finalization in the United States, could raise large-bank risk-weighted assets by 20 percent on average, Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman warned last year, effectively penalizing on-balance-sheet consumer and SME lending.
Rather than ditch those customers, big banks are partnering with private-credit titans to originate and distribute loans off balance sheet:
The model is simple: banks keep the origination and servicing fees, funds take the credit risk, and regulators get comfort that risky assets live outside the deposit-backed system.
Term-Sheet Economics: Spreads Are Compressing
Private-credit exuberance has pushed unitranche pricing down. In May 2024, a Bloomberg scoop on Squarespace's direct-lending package showed pricing sliding from SOFR + 500 bps to about +475 bps as lenders competed for allocations, roughly 75 basis points tighter than January deals.
Even so, funds can lever those assets 1.5-2x and still net solid returns, which makes it an attractive asset class.
Fine Print for Founders
Cheap it is not. Typical clauses include:
Still, many CEOs prefer a 14 percent cost of capital that preserves ownership over a 35 percent down round in an unforgiving venture market.
Does the Credit Actually Perform?
SoFi's own numbers suggest consumer credit can: Q1 2025 filings show 90-day personal-loan delinquencies falling from 0.55% to 0.46% year-on-year.
Yet macro clouds gather. Household credit-card delinquency hit 3.1% in Q1, Fed data shows, and mortgage arrears are edging up. Should consumer stress spike, those shiny forward-flow lines could test their break clauses quickly.
Leverage-on-Leverage: The Regulator's Nightmare
A May 2024 Reuters dispatch from the Milken Institute Global Conference captured Wall Street luminaries warning about 'leverage on leverage' inside the US $1.7 trillion private-credit complex.
The Federal Reserve's FEDS note on Bank Lending to Private Credit echoed the concern, highlighting opaque funding chains and undrawn bank credit lines that could be yanked in a downturn.
Meanwhile, the SEC and CFTC just postponed tougher Form PF reporting for private funds to October 2025, after fierce industry push-back—pushing transparency risk further down the road.
The Venture Capital Power-Law Reset
Historically, VC portfolios rely on one outsized IPO to offset dozens of write-offs. Private-credit recycling threatens that maths. Suppose a fintech can originate, sell, and service loans profitably without hoarding them. In that case, it can turn cash-flow positive earlier—prompting PE buyers or strategic acquirers to pay respectable (if not sky-high) multiples long before IPO scale.
Expect more US$400–600 million exits to asset managers and insurers, fewer zeros, fewer tens, more threes. LPs may accept that trade if it means quicker distributions.
Geography: Why Asia and LatAm Are in Play
Private-credit dry powder is overwhelmingly dollar-denominated, but funds are aggressively scouring growth markets where banking pull-back is most acute:
For cross-border lenders, dollar funding married to local-currency wallets is a tantalizing carry trade, provided FX hedges hold.
What Could Go Wrong (and How to Hedge It)
If U.S. unemployment climbs beyond 6 percent, consumer delinquencies could spike quickly. Lenders are protecting themselves with dynamic advance-rate grids that ratchet down funding as loss rates rise and by inserting turbo-amortisation clauses that force faster pay-downs once portfolios slip.
Forward-flow facilities still rely on committed bank lines and repo markets. Should haircuts widen or banks reduce commitments, like they did during regional-bank scare in March 2023, funds could find themselves scrambling for cash. The more innovative structures include evergreen SPVs with multiple lenders and 'material adverse change' carve-outs that limit a bank's ability to walk away overnight.
The SEC's postponed Form PF overhaul now lands in October 2025, and the Fed continues to signal tougher capital treatment for undrawn credit lines. A sudden leap in disclosure or capital costs could stall dry-powder deployment. Diversifying lender pools and adding trigger-based step-ups that compensate funds for extra compliance work can keep the taps open.
Private-credit deals in India, Southeast Asia, and Latin America pair dollar funding with local-currency wallets. If the Fed tightens while local currencies slide, unhedged positions will hurt. Basis swaps remain the first line of defence, but many agreements now incorporate automatic FX-pass-through clauses that allow originators to re-price loans if exchange rates move beyond a preset band.
In short, cheap money can vanish fast. The facilities that endure are the ones that price in volatility from day one—and give both fintechs and their lenders room to breathe when the cycle turns.
The Road Ahead—Signals to Watch
Bottom Line
Private credit was born in the wreckage of the Global Financial Crisis. Fifteen years on, it has become a parallel banking system which is armed with US $280 billion of dry powder laser-focused on fintech. Deploy that capital responsibly, and the industry could unlock cheaper credit for consumers and SMBs while giving investors a stable, floating-rate asset class. Mis-price it, and we will have merely swapped 'move fast and break things' equity for 'lend fast and break later' debt.
Either way, Sand Hill won't finance the next chapter of fintech roadshows; rather it will be syndicated in the marble-lined offices of Park Avenue, and the maturity transformation will be very, very private indeed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why ChatGPT-5 Is Taking Us One Step Closer To Agency Decay
We have one additional problem. The latest iteration of ChatGPT has arrived and it's taking us one step closer to agency decay: the subtle, but steady, erosion of our capacity, and volition, for independent thought and action. This isn't a hyperbolic claim; it's the predictable outcome of our minds interacting with increasingly sophisticated cognitive prosthetics. The Unified ChatGPT-5 Trap Previous versions of ChatGPT, such as GPT-4o and its specialized variants, required a moment of conscious choice. Users had to select the appropriate model for a given task, whether it was a quick response or a complex, multi-step problem. This slight friction, though minor, required a moment of metacognitive awareness. Users had to ask, "Is this problem simple or complex? Should I use a reasoning model or a quick-response model?" This practice, in itself, is a fundamental cognitive skill. With ChatGPT-5, that friction is gone. The new model automatically routes queries to either a fast or "deep thinking" mode, making the choice invisible. The system, not the user, decides whether to apply reasoning or pattern matching. As a result, users lose practice in the fundamental skill of classifying and framing problems. Consider the mental process involved when you approach a complex business problem. Traditionally, you would pause, recognize the complexity, break it into components, and consider multiple perspectives. This metacognitive process — thinking about thinking — is what develops cognitive muscle memory. By generating comprehensive solutions with minimal prompting, ChatGPT-5 removes the need for these mental rehearsals, creating a skill gap between competence and performance. This cognitive outsourcing is further amplified by the commercial model. OpenAI's tiered access strategy offers a $200/month Pro subscription for unlimited usage, while free users hit usage limits precisely when their dependency is at its peak. This is a form of behavioral conditioning disguised as a pricing strategy. The system creates dependency through a cycle of scarcity and relief, encouraging users to pay for unrestricted access to a cognitive shortcut. Invisible Substitution And The Paradox Of Expertise Human cognition is inherently efficient; given the choice between mental effort and mental ease, we almost always choose ease. Research suggests that AI assistants can accelerate skill decay among experts. It's a measurable phenomenon. ChatGPT-5, however, presents a more insidious form of substitution because its outputs often surpass human performance. Unlike previous AI generations that produced obviously artificial text, ChatGPT-5's responses frequently exceed what most professionals could generate independently. This leads to a "competence illusion," where you feel highly capable while your actual skills atrophy. The unified architecture makes this substitution nearly undetectable. When the AI automatically chooses between reasoning and pattern matching, users lose awareness of which cognitive processes are being outsourced. For example, a marketing professional requesting a campaign strategy no longer practices the mental work of stakeholder analysis, competitive positioning, or creative synthesis. The AI handles these processes invisibly, and the professional is left to simply review the output. This dynamic also presents an expertise paradox. Expertise relies on deliberate practice to build cognitive schemas — mental frameworks that allow for rapid pattern recognition and intuitive problem-solving. By automatically handling reasoning, ChatGPT-5 disrupts the very struggle that builds expertise. Take legal reasoning, for instance. Developing legal expertise requires repeated practice in case analysis, precedent interpretation, and argument construction. Each iteration strengthens the neural pathways associated with legal thinking. When ChatGPT-5 generates comprehensive legal briefs, attorneys shift their work from creation to evaluation. While this appears efficient and leads to faster, high-quality work, the attorney maintains professional confidence while gradually losing the ability to construct complex legal arguments from first principles. ChatGPT-5's Subscription Psychology And Metacognition OpenAI's tiered pricing model, where Pro subscribers get unlimited access while others face restrictions, is not accidental. The pricing structure exploits predictable human biases. First, loss aversion: once users experience unrestricted AI assistance, limitations feel like a loss rather than an absence of a gain. Second, present bias: the immediate pain of thinking through problems manually outweighs abstract future concerns about skill atrophy. Third, social proof: as organizations adopt Pro subscriptions to maintain a competitive edge, individual resistance to paying for the service appears irrational. This commercial model creates a form of "vendor lock-in" for cognition. Users don't just become dependent on the service; they become dependent on outsourcing the cognitive processes they once performed independently. At the core of human intelligence is metacognition — the awareness of our own thinking processes. When we encounter a problem, our conscious minds assess difficulty, allocate attention, choose strategies, and monitor progress. These metacognitive skills are what allow our intelligence to be adaptable and transferable across domains. ChatGPT-5's seamless operation bypasses metacognitive development. Users describe a problem and receive a solution without practicing the intermediate cognitive steps. The thinking happens inside the AI, invisible to human observation. This creates a metacognition gap, where users lose awareness of how complex thinking actually works. This gap has significant cascading effects. People may become poor judges of problem complexity, unrealistic about timelines, and overconfident in AI-generated solutions they cannot independently evaluate. Most concerning, they lose the ability to recognize when problems require uniquely human insights. Four Simple A's To Build Cognitive Resistance An exit from this dynamic requires conscious cognitive resistance — deliberately choosing harder paths when easier options exist. This goes against our natural efficiency-seeking behavior and requires a systematic approach. Here is a simple framework to guide this resistance: Rather than complete AI-abstinence the ambition of this logic is conscious cognitive maintenance. In an environment where machines handle increasingly complex tasks, uniquely human capabilities become more valuable, not less — that makes them twice precious, and important to preserve in a proactive way. ChatGPT-5 represents a remarkable technological achievement. Managed with care it might reveal its greatest value in amplifying human thinking rather than putting it ad acta. The challenge is to curate an active mental partnership that makes best use of all our assets – natural and artificial. The choice is still ours, but the window is closing. The question isn't whether we can afford to maintain our human skillset; it's whether we can afford to lose them..
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lacklustre conditions weigh on U.S. resale, new home markets
Mid-year housing market conditions in the United States reflect economic uncertainty resulting from the U.S. administration volatile trade policies, two new reports have suggested. TD Economics released two reports on new homes and resale market data, ending June 30, showing a slowdown in home sales and a slight uptick in new homes activity — though below historical averages. It noted that housing starts were up nearly five per cent month over month in June, mostly driven by multi-family activity, up nearly 30 per cent month over month. Single-family home starts, however, fell about five per cent. At the same time, resales declined nearly three per cent month over month, led by single-family home sales, falling three per cent. Inventory, while down almost one per cent from May, were up nearly 16 per cent year over year. Home prices saw a modest gain in June, up two per cent year over year. TD noted that activity in resales was 'tepid amid low affordability due to high mortgage rates and home prices.' Falling demand and higher inventory could help ease price pressures, but a turnaround to more favourable conditions leading to higher demand appears unlikely until mortgage rates come down, it added. Rates are currently averaging about seven per cent in the U.S. holding back home buying and refinancing. Conditions are also weighing on new home construction with starts at five-year lows. High mortgage rates are also affecting new builds for ownership, it added. As well, economic uncertainty due to trade, tariffs and inflation in the U.S. are affecting demand, confidence and rates. In turn, many prospective buyers are sitting on the sidelines. Consequently, supply of new homes for sale reached in June their highest levels since 2007.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Second Quarter Earnings Season: Waiting For NVIDIA
Following the second busiest week, the second-quarter earnings season begins to slow down this week, with just 6 S&P 500 companies scheduled to report. Notable companies scheduled to release earnings include: Deere (DE) and Applied Materials (AMAT). Earnings Season At A Glance According to FactSet, 81% of S&P 500 companies have reported earnings above consensus estimates, with 90% of companies having already reported results. Earnings Estimates Summary Companies reporting and combining actual results with consensus estimates for companies yet to report, the S&P 500's blended earnings growth rate for the quarter is at 11.8% year-over-year, well above the 4.9% expectations at the end of the quarter. Notably, the expected earnings growth rate for calendar year 2025 is 10.3%, and for 2026, the expectation is 13.3%. Market Performance Following the better earnings results, the S&P 500 came within a hair of an all-time high last week, while the Magnificent 7 reached a new peak. The Magnificent 7, comprising Microsoft (MSFT), Meta Platforms (META), (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), NVIDIA (NVDA), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Tesla (TSLA), outperformed primarily due to Apple and Tesla. Magnificent 7 Because these companies are critical drivers of earnings growth and a significant percentage of the S&P 500's market capitalization, the Magnificent 7 were the group to watch this earnings season, and they did not disappoint aside from Tesla (TSLA). Furthermore, the artificial intelligence (AI) related companies reinforced the positive narrative surrounding the technology. With earnings season nearing completion, all eyes now shift to NVIDIA (NVDA), which is scheduled to report on August 27. Earnings Insights By Sector Positive earnings surprises from the healthcare and communication services sectors were the most significant contributors to the improved earnings picture last week. Better-than-expected earnings from Pfizer (PFE), Eli Lilly (LLY), Amgen (AMGN), and Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) were the most essential contributors, according to FactSet. Revenue Results By Sector Following better-than-expected data last week, sales growth of 6.3% is ahead of the 4.2% year-over-year expectation at the end of the quarter. Better sales results in the financials and healthcare sectors were the most significant drivers of the improvement in expected revenue growth last week, according to FactSet. What To Watch Next Week Earnings season slows to a crawl beginning this week. While the individual reports are crucial for that stock, none are going to change the overall color of the season at this point. Friday's retail sales numbers will be an essential check on the US consumer. The soft monthly jobs report with massive downward revisions to start the month was worrisome for the health of the economy. Since the consumer drives the US economy, retail sales will be closely watched to see if the labor market is spilling over to spending. Consumer inflation (CPI) on Tuesday will be notable as the odds of a September short-term interest rate cut from the Federal Reserve (Fed) have risen to 90% following the weaker-than-expected jobs report. Year-over-year CPI is expected to increase to 2.8% from 2.7%, but the data will be watched for signs that the Fed needs to delay any cuts to fight inflation. There is still one more monthly jobs report before the Fed's September meeting, and barring an abnormally large inflation surge, the labor market will be the primary driver behind any rate cuts or lack thereof. In addition, markets have now fully priced in at least two rate cuts of 25 basis points (0.25%) in 2025. Newsflow about the administration's trade negotiations and new tariff announcements will remain a market mover. Berkshire Hathaway (BRK/A, BRK/B) releases its 13F filing after the close on Thursday. Warren Buffett continues to be a net seller of stocks, but this report provides the details. An analysis of Berkshire's quarterly earnings is here. The increase in worries about the economy in the wake of a shockingly poor jobs report eased this week, with the betting odds of recession falling to the lows of the year. The falling odds of recession and another week of better-than-expected earnings sent stocks to near record highs.