Walmart is selling an ‘efficient' $300 cordless lawn mower for just $130, and shoppers say it ‘gets the job done'
There are a few items that every homeowner needs to make sure their lawn and outdoor space look their best. Think lawn mowers, leaf blowers, chainsaws, hedge trimmers, lawn fertilizers, and more. Now, if you don't want to splurge on these outdoor appliances and tools, Walmart is the perfect place to shop to find amazing discounts and reasonable prices.
One of our favorite finds from the retailer is the Litheli U20 Series Cordless Lawn Mower. Right now, the lawn care device is on sale for just $130, which is 57% off its original price tag.
Litheli U20 Series Cordless Lawn Mower, $130 (was $300) at Walmart
Weighing just 24 pounds, this lightweight lawn mower is perfect for shoppers of all sizes and ages. It features a 13-inch cutting width and five height settings that are powered by a 3,700RPM motor, giving your grass a versatile and efficient cut. The device also has a 30-liter grass collection bag with an optimized airflow design that increases the collection rate, so you can mow for longer periods of time without having to empty the bag.
One shopper wrote, 'This battery lawn mower is a game changer. Quiet, efficient, and easy to use. It cuts grass smoothly without the hassle of gas or cords. A must-have for maintaining a pristine lawn effortlessly.'
'I am absolutely thrilled with this electric lawn mower!' said a second reviewer. 'What really stands out is the powerful battery, which is rechargeable via a convenient USB-C port. Overall, this lawn mower is easy to use, efficient, and well-designed — definitely a five-star product!'
The lawn mower uses an IPS battery with 45W USB-C PD fast charging that removes the need for a traditional charging dock. Once fully charged, the power tool can mow up to 2,200 square feet on a single charge. With a space-saving design, this mower has a foldable handle that allows for vertical storage in your garage. Shoppers will also rest easy knowing the lawn mower comes with a 3-year warranty and a 1-year warranty for the battery and charger.
A third customer wrote, 'It was very easy to put together. The battery doubles as a charger. It's quiet and gets the job done. I really like it.'
Treat yourself to this $130 cordless lawn mower before the Walmart flash deal ends. It'll easily become a staple in your lawn maintenance routine this summer.
About the Author
Victoria Garcia View Profile
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump scores win as DOGE is allowed to look at sensitive data
Donald Trump scored a victory after a federal appeals court granted DOGE access to comb through sensitive data of millions of Americans. The agency will now have access to financial data from the Treasury Department, the Education Department and the Office of Personnel Management. Earlier this year, the American Federation of Teachers and the National Federation of Federal Employees sued to stop DOGE over alleged privacy violations. But DOGE will now have access to social security numbers and the citizenship status for tens of millions of individuals across the country. The lawsuit will continue through litigation - but for now it is a judicial victory for the Trump administration as it seeks to cut costs with DOGE. Upon taking office, Trump appointed billionaire Elon Musk to DOGE in an effort to dramatically shrink federal spending and bureaucracy in the executive branch. Under Musk's reign, the agency found itself at the center of multiple lawsuits as it sought to rapidly gain access to data across the federal government. Musk resigned from DOGE back in May after falling out of favor with the president and the White House inner circle. Judge Julius N. Richardson cited a June decision by the Supreme Court that allowed DOGE analysts access to Social Security data as reason to let DOGE staffers get their hands on the sensitive materials. Richardson, who was appointed by Trump, was joined in the majority opinion by Judge G. Steven Agee, a former President George W. Bush appointee. Meanwhile, the only dissenting opinion was written by Judge Robert B. King, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton. Previously, the Justice Department has argued throughout multiple lawsuits that DOGE needs access to large quantities of personal data on Americans to reduce wasted taxpayer money. The government has offered to make DOGE staffers undergo security training and background checks as part of their concessions to federal judges.
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Venture Global wins arbitration case against Shell over contracted LNG cargoes
HOUSTON, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Venture Global (VG.N), opens new tab has won a legal battle against Shell(SHEL.L), opens new tab over its failure to deliver liquefied natural gas under long-term contracts starting in 2023, the U.S. LNG major said on Tuesday. Firms, including Shell, BP (BP.L), opens new tab, Edison ( opens new tab and Galp ( opens new tab, filed arbitration claims starting in 2023, accusing Venture Global of profiting from the sale of LNG on the spot market while not providing them with their contracted cargoes from the Calcasieu Pass export facility in Louisiana. The companies accused Venture Global of profiteering by selling commissioning cargoes at higher spot market prices, rather than at long term contracted prices. "We are disappointed with the outcome but respect the Tribunal's decision," Shell said in a statement to Reuters. Trust in long-term contracts is the bedrock of the LNG industry and essential for continued investment and sustainable growth, the company statement said. The tribunal's determination reaffirms Venture Global has consistently honored its agreements its customers, the Arlington based company said on Tuesday. Venture Global denied the claim, saying it delayed moving to commercial operations because of a faulty electric system that did not allow the plant to operate optimally. Earlier on Tuesday, Venture Global said it estimates a penalty of up to $1.6 billion if it loses the arbitration cases, according to its second-quarter earnings report. Some of the companies involved in the arbitration were pushing for a higher penalty, the report said.
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Appeals court halts ‘shockwave' attorney-client privilege ruling
Aug 12 (Reuters) - When a major Ohio utility was ensnared in a bribery scandal in 2020, it turned to a time-honored playbook for organizations in hot water: The company and its board of directors each hired a large law firm to investigate and advise on how to respond to looming litigation and enforcement actions. What FirstEnergy didn't expect was for a federal judge in Columbus, Ohio, to rule last year that the probe findings weren't shielded by attorney-client or work-product protections. That's because the utility also made use of the advice for business purposes, U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley found. He ordered the company to turn the documents over to plaintiffs lawyers representing a class of investors suing for securities fraud in the wake of the scandal. The decision sent 'shockwaves' through corporate boardrooms and the legal industry, FirstEnergy lawyers said, and prompted more than three dozen blue chip law firms to sign an amicus brief, opens new tab urging the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to intervene. Should the decision stand, the firms said, it would 'threaten the success of countless internal investigations necessary to the good governance of companies in the United States.' (Left unsaid: their lucrative practices conducting the probes would take a hit as well.) Exhale, everyone. Last week, the appeals court ruled, opens new tab that all likelihood, Marbley got it wrong. FirstEnergy is apt to succeed on the merits of its mandamus petition, the panel held, and the investigation documents created by Jones Day and Squire Patton Boggs will indeed be shielded from discovery. 'What matters for attorney-client privilege is not what a company does with its legal advice, but simply whether a company seeks legal advice,' the unsigned August 7 order stated. 'After all, a corporation could hardly justify expending resources on legal advice that wasn't business-related.' Sullivan & Cromwell co-chair Robert Giuffra, who represents FirstEnergy in the 6th Circuit appeal and underlying securities class action, told me he was pleased that the decision 'reiterates that attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine apply fully to internal corporate investigations.' Plaintiffs' lawyer Jason Forge, a partner at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, did not respond to a request for comment. The fight over the internal investigation documents reflects what can sometimes be a tricky question: Must legal advice be the only primary purpose of a privileged communication? The U.S. Supreme Court in 2023 had the chance to offer guidance in a case involving an unnamed law firm's bid to designate such 'dual purpose' client records as privileged in a tax and cryptocurrency investigation. Rather than weigh in, though, the high court in a one-sentence order dismissed the case as improvidently granted a few weeks after oral arguments. Internal corporate investigations have been around for decades, and FirstEnergy lawyers point to a 1981 Supreme Court decision, opens new tab to argue the fruits of such probes have consistently been treated as protected communications. As chronicled by my former Reuters colleague Alison Frankel, the FirstEnergy case began in July 2020. That's when the company disclosed, opens new tab that it had received subpoenas from the U.S. Justice Department in connection with what turned out to be the biggest political corruption scandal in Ohio history. Almost overnight, FirstEnergy's share price plunged from nearly $42 to less than $23, and investors lost billions. The company went on to admit to paying a combined $64 million to entities controlled by then-Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and the chair of the state's public utility commission in exchange for favorable legislation and regulatory treatment, Reuters reported. While FirstEnergy has since resolved much of the legal fallout, including paying $230 million to the U.S. government to settle a federal criminal investigation, it's continued to fight the securities class action by investors, who are seeking $8 billion in damages. In seeking the internal investigation documents, the plaintiffs argued that FirstEnergy brought in Jones Day and Squire for two business reasons: to assuage its auditor's concerns about certifying the company's U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings and to determine if the utility should fire any of its executives. The special master and the trial judge agreed that the investigations were not sparked by litigation fears but were intended to provide business advice. The appellate panel – judges Jeffrey Sutton, Alice Batchelder and John Nalbandian, who were appointed by Republicans George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush and Donald Trump -- disagreed, writing that the lower court "gets it backwards.' Precedent requires considering 'whether a communication primarily seeks 'to render or solicit legal advice,' irrespective of a company's reason for wanting that legal advice,' they held. Moreover, the work-product doctrine, which covers documents prepared in anticipation of litigation, also likely applies. Here, the 'flood of legal and regulatory actions prompting FirstEnergy's investigations explains why,' the panel held. 'FirstEnergy, simply put, faced an onslaught of civil and criminal investigations while pursuing internal investigations.'
