logo
Trial begins in Kim Kardashian's 2016 jewellery heist case in Paris

Trial begins in Kim Kardashian's 2016 jewellery heist case in Paris

Indian Express28-04-2025

A trial has begun in Paris over the 2016 robbery in which Kim Kardashian was tied up and robbed of millions of dollars' worth of jewellery during Paris Fashion Week, the Associated Press (AP) has reported.
Ten people are facing charges of robbery and kidnapping after the attack on Kardashian and the concierge at the private residence where she was staying. Two of the accused have admitted to taking part, while the others deny involvement.
Kardashian's lawyers said she would testify in person during the trial, which is expected to run until 23 May. 'Ms Kardashian is reserving her testimony for the court and jury and does not wish to elaborate further at this time,' her lawyers told AP. They added that she has 'great respect and admiration for the French justice system' and appreciated how she had been treated by the authorities.
Terrifying night recalled
Kim Kardashian has previously described her terror during the robbery, saying she feared she would be raped and killed. Speaking on David Letterman's Netflix show in 2020, Kardashian tearfully recalled thinking, 'This is the time I'm going to get raped. Are we gonna die? Just tell them I have children. I have a family.'
Kardashian was taken from her bedroom to a bathroom, placed in the bathtub, and tied up. The attackers then fled on bicycles and on foot. She managed to free herself by removing the tape from her mouth, hands, and feet before calling for help.
Although she was not physically harmed, Kardashian later told investigators she wanted to leave France immediately to reunite with her children.
Elderly Robbers on trial
The French press have called the group the 'Granddad Robbers' because many of the suspects are elderly and have long criminal histories, particularly involving bank robberies.
Twelve people were originally meant to stand trial. However, one has died and another is too ill to be tried. Five of the remaining ten are believed to have been directly involved at the scene.
Also read | Kim Kardashian 'definitely had agoraphobia' after Paris robbery, which worsened in quarantine
Aomar Aït Khedache, aged 68 and known as 'Old Omar,' is said to have been one of the robbers who entered Kardashian's apartment. His DNA was found on the tape used to gag her, AP reports. Investigators say he fled the scene on a bicycle before meeting his son at a nearby station.
Another accused, Yunice Abbas, 71, admitted acting as a lookout at the reception area but said he did not personally threaten Kardashian. Abbas, who later spent 21 months in prison, even co-wrote a book titled 'I Sequestered Kim Kardashian'.
Jewellery still missing
The robbers stole several valuable pieces of jewellery, including a ring worth over $6 million. Only one piece — a diamond cross on a platinum chain — has been recovered after being dropped during the escape.
Some of the defendants are accused of helping to sell the stolen jewellery in Antwerp, Belgium. Others allegedly gave information about Kardashian's whereabouts, helping to plan the heist.
Didier Dubreucq, 69, known as 'Blue Eyes,' denies involvement but was caught on CCTV and had regular contact with other suspects, according to the investigation cited by AP.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Milwaukee man watched creepy Netflix episode on first date, then killed teen the same way
Milwaukee man watched creepy Netflix episode on first date, then killed teen the same way

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Milwaukee man watched creepy Netflix episode on first date, then killed teen the same way

A Wisconsin man was found guilty on Saturday of killing and dismembering the body of a 19-year-old student on their first date after the two watched a Netflix documentary with an eerily similar theme. 34-year-old Maxwell Anderson killed Sade Carleena Robinson, a criminal justice student, in April 2024 murder after the two met for dinner. They went out to a restaurant and bar before Anderson invited her back to his Milwaukee home. This was the last time she was seen alive. The next day, she did not show up to work at a local pizzeria and was reported missing. The police checked her home and found no trace of her. Police found a leg that matched her DNA, along with other body parts like a foot and human flesh scattered throughout the city. Prosecutors showed bloodied photos recovered from Anderson's phone to prove he was the killer. The images, initially deleted by Anderson, showed him holding one of Robinson's chopped-off breasts. Describing it as 'his trophy', juror Melissa Blascoe told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that the pictures will be in her mind "for quite some time.' The jury was also told that Anderson turned on a Netflix animated series named 'Love, Death & Robots" the night he brought Robinson home. One of the episodes in the series showed a dismembered corpse, which was discovered on the beach. Police also discovered a 'sex dungeon' in Anderson's home with "a sex sling, restraints and handcuffs." The photos found on the phone physically affected people in the courtroom, some of whom were shaking and crying, Blascoe added. Anderson is believed to have spent months planning the murder, even preparing a space lined with plastic sheeting. According to Associated Press, surveillance video shows Anderson driving Robinson's car to a county park near Lake Michigan. It is here that he cut her body into pieces, prosecutors argued, before setting her car on fire and taking a bus back to his apartment. The 15-member jury took 45 minutes to reach a guilty verdict. Anderson has been found guilty of first-degree intentional homicide, mutilating a corpse, hiding a corpse and arson. No motive behind the killing has been revealed yet. Anderson faces a mandatory life sentence on August 15.

UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court
UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court

Mint

time3 hours ago

  • Mint

UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court

LONDON (AP) — Lawyers have cited fake cases generated by artificial intelligence in court proceedings in England, a judge has said — warning that attorneys could be prosecuted if they don't check the accuracy of their research. High Court justice Victoria Sharp said the misuse of AI has 'serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system.' In the latest example of how judicial systems around the world are grappling with how to handle the increasing presence of artificial intelligence in court, Sharp and fellow judge Jeremy Johnson chastised lawyers in two recent cases in a ruling on Friday. They were asked to rule after lower court judges raised concerns about 'suspected use by lawyers of generative artificial intelligence tools to produce written legal arguments or witness statements which are not then checked,' leading to false information being put before the court. In a ruling written by Sharp, the judges said that in a 90 million pound ($120 million) lawsuit over an alleged breach of a financing agreement involving the Qatar National Bank, a lawyer cited 18 cases that did not exist. The client in the case, Hamad Al-Haroun, apologized for unintentionally misleading the court with false information produced by publicly available AI tools, and said he was responsible, rather than his solicitor Abid Hussain. But Sharp said it was 'extraordinary that the lawyer was relying on the client for the accuracy of their legal research, rather than the other way around.' In the other incident, a lawyer cited five fake cases in a tenant's housing claim against the London Borough of Haringey. Barrister Sarah Forey denied using AI, but Sharp said she had 'not provided to the court a coherent explanation for what happened.' The judges referred the lawyers in both cases to their professional regulators, but did not take more serious action. Sharp said providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the 'most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. She said in the judgment that AI is a 'powerful technology' and a 'useful tool' for the law. 'Artificial intelligence is a tool that carries with it risks as well as opportunities,' the judge said. 'Its use must take place therefore with an appropriate degree of oversight, and within a regulatory framework that ensures compliance with well-established professional and ethical standards if public confidence in the administration of justice is to be maintained.'

This 1 hour 42 minutes suspense thriller will leave you in SHOCK, wife brutally kills her husband, father supports her daughter, then…, its name is…
This 1 hour 42 minutes suspense thriller will leave you in SHOCK, wife brutally kills her husband, father supports her daughter, then…, its name is…

India.com

time4 hours ago

  • India.com

This 1 hour 42 minutes suspense thriller will leave you in SHOCK, wife brutally kills her husband, father supports her daughter, then…, its name is…

If you enjoy watching crime, suspense, and thriller stories, we'd like to introduce you to a true murder mystery documentary that debuted on Netflix this year and will leave you with chills. Not only that, but all of the photographs, films, and audio in this series are true and date back to the occurrence. The story is so startling that you'll be left wondering how someone could do this to someone. One Of The Most Chilling Series on Netflix Here we are talking about the documentary series A Deadly American Marriage , which has been streaming for a while and chronicles the true story of Jason Corbett's murder. Jason was an Irish businessman who engaged Molly Martens as an ideal pair in 2008 to care for his children, Jack and Sarah , following the death of his first wife in 2006. Following this, their relationship began, and they married in 2011, but everything changed in 2015. Based On True Events Molly and her father, Thomas , viciously murdered Jason on August 2, 2015, with a baseball bat and a concrete block. Following Jason's murder, investigators discovered a blood-stained room, a baseball bat, and concrete block at the crime site. Molly and Thomas claimed that Jason had strangled Molly and that Thomas had rescued her. But Thomas' 911 call prompted a number of problems. Both were sentenced to 20-25 years in prison for second-degree murder in 2017, but their convictions were reversed on appeal in 2020. The Legal Battle and Custody Molly pled 'no contest' in 2023, while Thomas admitted guilt and was released in June 2024. However, following Jason's death, his children, Jack and Sarah, were moved to their aunt Tracy in Ireland. Molly fought for custody, but was not granted it. Initially, the children accused Jason of violence in favor of Molly, but they later stated that Molly had trained them. This series will leave you with a lot of unanswered questions. It has received a 6.6 rating on IMDb. If you enjoy real crime stories and are looking for something fresh to watch over the weekend, this series can be perfect one for you. It is available on Netflix in variety of languages, including Hindi.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store