
How to fix MasterChef
The warning signs were there. Not only in 2001 when Lloyd Grosman, Britain's answer to Paul Newman (in pasta sauce endorsement terms if not acting), flounced off the show because, so far as I understand the dispute, a revamp dictated that contestants all use the same ingredient. But also in 2018, when now disgraced judges Gregg Wallace and John Torode managed to unify the whole of Malaysia in affront. For which feat, whatever their later sins, I salute them.
It was episode 13 of series 14 and Malaysian-born contestant Zaleha Olpin presented her beloved childhood favourite chicken rendang recipe, served with a side of nasi lemak, only for Wallace to complain the chicken was not crispy enough and for Torode to call the dish a mistake. Typical Malaysian response? 'As a Malaysian, if I could, I would personally go to the show and rendang their head,' wrote Jin Wee in the Star, a Malaysian newspaper, adding superbly: 'Uncultured swine, doesn't know variety of cuisine and claims to be MasterChef?'
As anyone who does know their rendang would tell the judges, its chicken isn't meant to be crispy. A former Malaysian premier complained Wallace had confused his nation's cuisine with KFC. The only winner in the dispute was the English language which gained a new verb, though beyond a slightly sinister aura it's hard to know what 'to rendang' means.
That's the problem: everyone's a critic and everybody involved has a very thin skin, and is apt to explode at any moment. Torode made matters worse by tweeting something emollient and ending his message with a cheery 'Namaste'. Didn't he realise that namaste is not a fitting Malaysian farewell, fumed naysayers? Some 9,000 signatures supported a change.com petition calling on him to apologise. Which, unless I've lost my mind and without wanting to make 9,000 enemies, is some loony woke nonsense.
And yet the debacle points up how fraught televised cookery is and how it risks becoming a lethal cocktail of chippy keyboard warriors facing off against the kind of unexamined man babies who, insanely, have been given access to the knife drawer. That purported genius chef from The Bear who locked himself in the walk-in fridge to have a nervous breakdown on his restaurant's opening night and Ralph Fiennes poisoning anyone who ever crossed him in The Menu are the leading exemplars of the latter. And those are just kitchen fictions. As we know from Gordon Ramsay, reality TV is apt to be a yet more harrowing chip pan fire of the vanities than its fictional counterparts.
But the broader point is this: Britain is a country that, if one made a compilation of its best culinary moments, would definitely begin with King Alfred burning the cakes and might well end with Gregg Wallace telling social media that the only people outraged by his propensity to drop his trousers backstage to present onlookers with his signature dish of sorpresa all porca were middle class women with humanities degrees from Russell Group universities who don't appreciate what, looked at objectively, was just proletarian high jinks – so far as I understand his apology to the complaints of more than 50 women involved on the show.
It is a miracle that a nation so infamous for its cuisine has been such a tastemaker for so long. And yet it has: in 2017 the Guinness Book of Records officially recognised MasterChef as the most successful television cookery format. MasterChef is one of this post-industrial nation's most successful export products, filmed in 50 countries and broadcast in 200 territories, with many formats of which the Brazilian variant MasterChef: Para Tudo (MasterChef: Stop Everything) sounds most exciting.
MasterChef's origin story takes us back to 1990, when clever producers created it as the spawn of Mastermind if less cerebral, and sibling of Angela Rippon's Masterteam but less collaborative. If only Dame Angela had been recruited as host, none of this nonsense of recent weeks on MasterChef would have happened. There would have been no Wallace ascribing his sexual misconduct to autism, and no Torode preparing a defence for his sacking over alleged racist remarks, to damage the brand. Plus the former newsreader could have high-kicked her way through the longueurs of food preparation, which would have got my vote. Who wants to watch people from Daventry stir gravy on telly eyed by these two, Wallace with his grin as mirthless as de Niro's and Torode, like the Assyrian king in Delacroix's The Death of Sardanapalus, dead eyed and sated from excess of, in his case, competitively cooked cuisine? That's not jeopardy. That's telly tedium. But then I didn't understand the appeal of Friends either.
What happens next? Can MasterChef be put together again? That's not how Humpty Dumpty nor soufflés work. True, critic and occasional judge Grace Dent was astutely hired last year to replace Wallace during investigations into his misconduct. With her lovely regional accent and long association with the show, she is the right person to detox the brand.
And what of the most recent unbroadcast series? All those contestants denied their moments of prime time fame? It's possible they might have a case to sue for denial of self-publicity and loss of projected future income attendant thereon, though I'm no lawyer. Perhaps only many years hence, like Bob Dylan's the Basement Tapes or those Bruce Springsteen albums now coming to light, will the time be right to release the last series to an expectant public.
Dent would need a co-host, ideally one with culinary moves. I recommend communist Moral Maze contributor Ash Sarkar whose recipe for fish finger bhorta was championed by no less a domestic goddess than Nigella Lawson. Neither Dent nor Sarkar, I'll wager, would get caught with their trousers down in the green room or alienate whole countries. And one final change to detoxify MasterChef: the name, with all the unacceptable patriarchal connotations of its prefix, must go even if the format remains the same. My suggestion? Dinner Ladies, with Grace and Ash. You know you'd watch it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
a few seconds ago
- Metro
Gregg Wallace announces charity role after claim he 'used autism as an excuse'
Gregg Wallace is being lined up as a patron for an autism charity after it was claimed he used the disability 'as an excuse'. The MasterChef judge, 60, was first hit with misconduct allegations last autumn, which resulted in him stepping back from the cooking programme. After Grace Dent stepped in to replace him to record the final episodes, Wallace was then officially sacked after the bombshell Silkins review was published. Commissioned by MasterChef production company Banijay UK, 45 out of 83 allegations were upheld against him, including a case of 'unwelcome physical contact', but he has insisted the most serious allegations were unproven. Before the report was published Wallace said he was considering legal action against the BBC and MasterChef production team, claiming he was discriminated against due to his autism following his dismissal from the long-running series. Now, following his exit, he has caught the attention of charity boss Annie Sands, who approached him to see if Disability Advice and Welfare Network (DAWN) could help him to better understand the condition. Last year, the charity Ambitious About Autism dropped Wallace as an ambassador in the wake of the original claims made against him. A spokesman for the charity Neurodiversity in Business also told the BBC earlier this month that autism is 'not a free pass for bad behaviour'. But, speaking to the Mirror, Sands said: 'People were attacking him and saying he was using his autism as an excuse. 'I heard someone say 'autistic people don't make inappropriate remarks'. Well, that's a ridiculous thing to say. Come and work with us for a week, you'll hear a lot worse than that. Each autistic person presents differently. 'This is about what's appropriate in the workplace. It comes down to education, and the ability to make reasonable adjustments.' The boss, who was diagnosed with the condition herself later in life, went on to explain that Wallace's autism report 'screams neurodiversity'. 'We help all those who come to us, everybody deserves support. For me it's about putting Gregg Wallace the celebrity to one side and working with Gregg Wallace the autistic person. 'As an organisation we are not afraid to stick our head above the parapet – he deserves our help just as much as the next person. We hate injustice, whoever comes to us, we will never turn them away.' Speaking to the publication, Gregg said that the charity has been a 'pillar of strength at a very dark time'. 'I've learned so much about autism and my issues in the two weeks that I've been talking to Annie,' he said. 'So much of what she's told me has helped me make sense of my condition – she's made me understand that the persona I learned in Covent Garden fruit and veg market is the same one that I took into the television studios. Everybody loved that version of me. What I've learned is that I still have a lot to learn.' More Trending The former MasterChef star added that he wants to continue working with the charity and he wants to support them in the future. This comes after Wallace recently responded to singer Sir Rod Stewart, who branded him a 'tubby, bald-headed, ill mannered bully'. In an interview with The Sun, Gregg responded to the hitmaker's remarks, stating: 'I'm actually a Rod Stewart fan. 'I've been to see him twice. So that hurt me. Somebody like that carries a lot of weight. But there was no bullying and no harassing.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: BBC legend claims government banned 'shocking' TV show for 20 years MORE: Lisa Faulkner makes first public statement since John Torode's MasterChef firing MORE: David Attenborough's new BBC series reveals spectacularly tender moment with baby gorilla


Scotsman
26 minutes ago
- Scotsman
These 35 surnames could link you to the Royal Family
Could your family tree connect you to royalty? Even Queen Elizabeth I might be a distant relation – if you've got the right surname. | Canva This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on items purchased through this article, but that does not affect our editorial judgement. A-list surnames, scandalous bloodlines and a surprise link to Danny Dyer - check this list to see if your family name has royal roots Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... What if you've been royal all along… and never knew? Plenty of people across the UK have been stunned to find links to kings, queens and ancient nobility just by tracing their family tree. And in some cases, a single surname is the clue that unlocks a royal connection. That's exactly what happened to EastEnders star Danny Dyer, who famously found out on Who Do You Think You Are? that he's directly descended from King Edward III and Richard III. If it can happen to Danny, why not you? If your family name is on the list below, you could be carrying royal blood – and you don't need a castle or a crown to find out. Genealogy tools like MyHeritage DNA can help you dig into your past, build a free family tree, and connect the dots across centuries of ancestry. Search your name and start your family tree today with MyHeritage. Click here to get started. Scroll through this list of 35 surnames – all of them linked to royal or noble dynasties in the UK and Europe. Then check your family history… you might be a king or queen in the making. 1. Windsor The name of the current Royal Family. If it runs in your family, you could be closer to the throne than you think. 2. Tudor Henry VIII's lot. You know, the one with six wives. Still turning up in Welsh and English family trees. 3. Stuart Scottish royals who ruled both sides of the border. Mary Queen of Scots and Bonnie Prince Charlie were Stuarts. 4. Plantagenet The OG royal dynasty. Gave us Richard the Lionheart, Edward III and more. 5. Capet Medieval kings of France. Their descendants spread far and wide after the Norman invasion. 6. Bourbon Another French powerhouse, also ruled Spain. Think Versailles, power, and scandal. 7. Habsburg Massive European dynasty – rulers of the Holy Roman Empire and half of Europe at one point. 8. Hanover Should there be a place for you on the Royal ba;cony? | Aaron Chown/PA Wire Imported royals who ran Britain from George I through to Queen Victoria. 9. Valois French royalty from the 14th to 16th centuries – if you're part French, it's one to look out for. 10. Lancaster Famous in the Wars of the Roses. Henry IV, Henry V… a blood-soaked dynasty. 11. York The other side of the Roses war. Richard III's crew – he's the one they found under a car park. 12. Bruce Scottish legend Robert the Bruce defeated the English at Bannockburn. Enough said. 13. de Valois Elite French nobility, closely tied to the royal succession. 14. de Medici Italian rulers and Renaissance icons. If this is in your tree, you've got flair in your blood. 15. Savoy Royalty from parts of Italy and France. Played a big role in European power games. Search your name and start your family tree today with MyHeritage. Click here to get started. 16. Orange-Nassau The Dutch royal family. William of Orange became a British king. 17. Oldenburg The ruling house of Denmark and Norway – and cousins of many other royals. 18. Glucksburg A branch of Oldenburg. Modern royalty in Scandinavia comes from here. 19. Romanov Russia's last imperial dynasty. The Tsars – opulence, tragedy and all. 20. Baskerville Not just a Sherlock Holmes mystery. A real English noble family, originally Norman. 21. Darcy Medieval aristocrats in England and Ireland. Think land, power, and influence. 22. Neville Key players in the Wars of the Roses. A family of kingmakers. Search your name and start your family tree today with MyHeritage. Click here to get started. 23. Percy Northern aristocrats with castles to prove it. Big names in English history. 24. Astley Midlands landowners with links to the peerage. 25. Capell Earls of Essex. Major players in the English Civil War. 26. Howard Dukes of Norfolk. One of England's most powerful noble families. 27. Seymour Jane Seymour's family – yes, the wife Henry VIII actually liked. 28. Grey Lady Jane Grey was queen for nine days. It counts. 29. FitzAlan Former Earls of Arundel. Medieval movers and shakers. 30. Courtenay Tied to both English and French royalty. A Crusader-era power family. 31. Manners Dukes of Rutland. Still a big deal in aristocratic circles. 32. Russell Dukes of Bedford. Politicians, landowners, royal allies. 33. Cavendish Founders of Chatsworth House and the Dukes of Devonshire. 34. Talbot Earls of Shrewsbury. A stronghold name in English nobility. 35. Spencer Princess Diana's family name. And through her, connected to William and Harry. If your surname's on this list – or even in your wider family – it's well worth digging deeper. You could be sitting on a royal story just waiting to be uncovered. Start your royal search with MyHeritage today Your royal family tree might only be a few clicks away. With MyHeritage, it's free and easy to get started – just enter a few names and watch your tree grow. From birth records and marriage certificates to DNA connections and old family photos, they'll help you uncover generations of your history. You can even take a MyHeritage DNA test to uncover your origins across more than 2,100 global regions – and maybe even find distant cousins you never knew you had. Try it now: – Build your family tree in minutes – Get DNA matches and historical records – Discover connections you never imagined You don't need a crown – just curiosity.


The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Val McDermid hits out on Baillie Gifford 'virtue signalling'
Speaking ahead of the return of the Edinburgh International Book Festival, which parted company with Baillie Gifford after a 20-year partnership in the wake of protests from climate activists, McDermid said the company had been 'unfairly pilloried.' Read more: The Fife-born writer warned of the risk of festivals and the arts having to be over-reliant on public funding and the support of private philanthropists in future. McDermid was speaking two years after climate activist Greta Thunberg pulled the plug on a sold-out appearance at the Edinburgh book festival in the wake of reports of Baillie Gifford's links to the fossil fuels industry, saying she did not want to be associated with 'greenwashing.' Crime writer Val McDermid has spoken out over criticisms of Baillie Gifford's sponsorship of festivals. (Image: The University of Edinburgh) At the time, Baillie Gifford insisted it was not a 'significant fuel investor.' It claimed only two per cent of its clients' money was invested in companies with links to the fossil fuels industry, compared to five per cent it said was invested in companies developing 'clean energy solutions.' The Edinburgh International Book Festival is now staged at the Edinburgh Futures Institute. However, the campaign group Fossil Free Books stepped up action against book festivals backed by Baillie Gifford in the spring of last year. Hundreds of writers backed an open letter warning the festivals to expect escalation, including the expansion of boycotts, increased author withdrawal of labour, and increased disruption.' Organisers of Edinburgh's event announced the end of its Baillie Gifford partnership two weeks later, blaming the 'withdrawal of several authors and threats of disruption.' Organisers of the annual book festivals in Wigtown and the Borders also announced the end of their involvement with Baillie Gifford. The Edinburgh book festival, which is by far Scotland's oldest and biggest celebration of literature, which has seen its government funding more than doubled in the space of 12 months, to a record £820,000. A further £160,000 increase planned for the next financial year is expected to see the festival's government funding rise by more than £1.5m by 2027-2028 compared to the last three years of Baillie Gifford's involvement with the event, which it supported through its schools and children's programme. The government has agreed to provide £300,000 in funding for the next three years to plug the gap created by the loss of Baillie Gifford's support. McDermid is one of 641 writers due to appear across almost 700 events in the forthcoming two-week programme of events, which will run from August 9-24. She told The Herald: 'Last year was difficult for this book festival. This year hasn't been easy, but I think we can all see a light at the end of the tunnel now. 'The festival has come back with a really strong programme, with a lot of interesting themes and writers. I think people will really show up. 'It's been a tough experience for the festival to pull it back from losing its principal funder. 'I know how hard the festival director Jenny Niven has worked with her team to recover the financial position, but it's still been difficult. 'There's no question that the festival has got less to play with than it had before.' McDermid was among a group of leading Scottish authors who backed an open letter which described the targeting of book festivals as 'deeply retrograde' and 'ill thought-out' over their sponsors. Others included Alexander McCall Smith, Andrew O'Hagan, Chris Brookmyre, Denise Mina, Doug Johnston, David Greig and Liz Lochhead. Many of the writers who backed the Fossil Free Books campaign have accepted invitations to appear at this year's Edinburgh book festival, including Ali Smith, Hannah Lavery, Jess Brough, Raymond Antrobus, Chitra Ramaswamy, Andrés N Ordorica, Harry Josephine Giles and Katie Goh. McDermid, who is due to make four appearances at the festival this August, said: 'The Edinburgh book festival was pushed into a corner last year by a group of people who, I think in many cases, saw it as an opportunity to put their name in public lights. 'The level of hypocrisy among some of the people involved was quite staggering. 'A lot of people just jumped on a bandwagon without thinking about it. 'There was a lot of virtue signalling, rather than sincerely held opinions from people who had actually researched the topic and knew what they were talking about. 'No-one is saying that Baillie Gifford is white than white. But there is no such thing as a clean sponsor. 'If you dig deep, everybody who sponsors an arts event has got something in the cupboard that you would be uncomfortable with.' 'What do you do? Are we not going to have book festivals anymore? Are we not going to have the arts unless they are sponsored by rich individuals. How clean are they?' McDermid suggested there was a risk of a return to the Renaissance era, 14th to the 17th century, when 'rich patrons' were relied on to fund the arts. She added: 'The arts shouldn't be dictated to by one individual or even one political party. 'I don't think the arts should be entirely funded by state funding. That would be wholly dangerous and potentially pernicious. 'There needs to be a mix of funding sources, including ticket sales, individual philanthropists and corporate sponsors too. 'We have to be careful where we take money from, but I think Baillie Gifford was unfairly pilloried in the circumstances.' A separate campaign group, Art Workers For Palestine Scotland, has targeted a number of other arts organisations backed by Baillie Gifford in recent months, including the [[Edinburgh]] International Festival and Fringe Society, over the company's links with defence firm Babcock International. [[The Herald]] told last year how Baillie Gifford had more than £60 million worth of shares in the owner of Rosyth Dockyard in Fife, which has previously worked with state-owned Israeli arms manufacturers.