After reports that Chicago is ‘next' in Trump's militarized crackdown, mayor warns Trump to respect Constitution
Johnson derided the reported comments from a senior Trump official who vowed that 'Chicago is next, if they go too far.' The mayor said he does not believe the federal government has that power.
It was the mayor's latest response to ongoing signs from the White House that it is considering targeting Chicago with a military response after mobilizing the National Guard in Los Angeles.
'It's just another sort of example of his animus towards working people,' Johnson told reporters at a City Hall news conference. 'I think it's important that the President respects the Constitution. If you're asking me if this president is going to work with city leaders, it's clear that he's not interested in doing that.'
Johnson, a progressive first-term mayor, has been among the Trump administration's highest profile domestic targets over the last several months. The most explosive point of contention has been Chicago's sanctuary policy for immigrants, mirroring similar laws in other blue cities and states that the president's team continues to blame as an obstacle in his bid to enact the largest deportation operation in American history.
The mayor noted the federal government was not expected to give the city advance notice if it indeed deploys troops in Chicago. He did not elaborate on what the city's plans would be, beyond announcing the CTA's plans to disseminate resources from its 'Know Your Rights' immigration campaign across more than 400 digital displays and highlighting that much of this next fight would be via legal challenges.
'There's a great deal of resistance in this city around a host of things with the Trump administration. … Whether it's in the courts or whether it's in the streets or it's with public policy, we're going to continue to defend and stand up for working people,' Johnson said. 'As far as what this administration has been allowed to get away with, we have put forth lawsuits, which we've seen some success there.'
Johnson's Corporation Counsel, Mary Richardson-Lowry, added 'we think it is a violation of the Constitution to deploy troops or National Guard, absent authority under the Constitution' that is reserved by the governor, not the federal government.
Richardson-Lowry also addressed reporting from the Tribune last week that the city did comply with one subpoena from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE has subpoenaed two city departments: the clerk over its municipal ID program CityKey, and Streets and Sanitation over employment eligibility forms. The city provided some documents in the latter summons, a spokesperson for Johnson's Law Department said on Friday.
On Tuesday, Richardson-Lowry stressed that none of those records contained personal information.
'There was another administrative warrant category for Streets and San, where under federal law we had an obligation to at least provide a listing, and that information was provided without the kind of detail,' Richardson-Lowry said.
The city didn't hand over any documents with the other ICE subpoena, for CityKey records, the Johnson administration has said. On Friday evening, a week after the Tribune reported that ICE subpoenaed the clerk's office for personal information of applicants to the ID program that is often used by noncitizens, the city clerk took down the online application for CityKey.
During the first Trump administration, former Mayor Lori Lightfoot also rebuked threats by the federal government to deploy the military in the face of civil unrest over the police murder of George Floyd. Though there was still some federal troop presence in the city, it paled in comparison to the crackdown Trump was teasing then — and enacting in Los Angeles now, with thousands of federal National Guard and Marine troops deployed there.
Conservatives have long desired use of the National Guard to quell violence in liberal-leaning cities such as Chicago, with Trump leading the rhetoric. He posted to Truth Social on Sunday, 'We must expand efforts to detain and deport Illegal Aliens in America's largest Cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside.'
A hearing on California's lawsuit seeking to compel the Trump administration to return control of the National Guard to the state was scheduled Tuesday in a federal appeals court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
Minnesota joins slew of states suing TikTok for allegedly preying on young people with addictive algorithms
Minnesota on Tuesday joined a wave of states suing TikTok, alleging the social media giant preys on young people with addictive algorithms that trap them into becoming compulsive consumers of its short videos. 'This isn't about free speech. I'm sure they're gonna holler that,' Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said at a news conference. 'It's actually about deception, manipulation, misrepresentation. This is about a company knowing the dangers, and the dangerous effects of its product, but making and taking no steps to mitigate those harms or inform users of the risks.' The lawsuit, filed in state court, alleges that TikTok is violating Minnesota laws against deceptive trade practices and consumer fraud. It follows a flurry of lawsuits filed by more than a dozen states last year alleging the popular short-form video app is designed to be addictive to kids and harms their mental health. Minnesota's case brings the total to about 24 states, Ellison's office said. Advertisement 3 Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison briefs reporters in his office about the lawsuit he filed against social media giant TikTok, alleging it preys on young people with addictive algorithms. AP Many of the earlier lawsuits stemmed from a nationwide investigation into TikTok launched in 2022 by a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general from 14 states into the effects of TikTok on young users' mental health. Ellison, a Democrat, said Minnesota waited while it did its own investigation. Sean Padden, a middle-school health teacher in the Roseville Area school district, joined Ellison, saying he has witnessed a correlation between increased TikTok use and an 'irrefutable spike in student mental health issues,' including depression, anxiety, anger, lowered self-esteem and a decrease in attention spans as they seek out the quick gratification that its short videos offer. Advertisement The lawsuit comes while President Donald Trump is still trying to broker a deal to bring the social media platform, which is owned by China's ByteDance, under American ownership over concerns about the data security of its 170 million American users. While Trump campaigned on banning TikTok, he also gained more than 15 million followers on the platform since he started sharing videos on it. No matter who ultimately owns TikTok, Ellison said, it must comply with the law. 3 The lawsuit comes as Trump is trying to make a deal with TikTok to bring the platform to the U.S. AP TikTok disputed Minnesota's allegations. Advertisement 'This lawsuit is based on misleading and inaccurate claims that fail to recognize the robust safety measures TikTok has voluntarily implemented to support the well-being of our community,' company spokesperson Nathaniel Brown said in a statement. 'Teen accounts on TikTok come with 50+ features and settings designed to help young people safely express themselves, discover and learn. 3 TikTok disputed Minnesota's allegations. AP 'Through our Family Pairing tool, parents can view or customize 20+ content and privacy settings, including screen time, content filters, and our time away feature to pause a teen's access to our app,' Brown added. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Minnesota is seeking a declaration that TikTok's practices are deceptive, unfair or unconscionable under state law, a permanent injunction against those practices, and up to $25,000 for each instance in which a Minnesota child has accessed TikTok. Ellison wouldn't put a total on that but said, 'it's a lot.' He estimated that 'hundreds of thousands of Minnesota kids' have TikTok on their devices. 'We're not trying to shut them down, but we are insisting that they clean up their act,' Ellison said. 'There are legitimate uses of products like TikTok. But like all things, they have to be used properly and safely.' Minnesota is also among dozens of U.S. states that have sued Meta Platforms for allegedly building features into Instagram and Facebook that addict people. The messaging service Snapchat and the gaming platform Roblox are also facing lawsuits by some other states alleging harm to kids.
Atlantic
5 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Keeps Defending Russia
Donald Trump loves to speak extemporaneously, and usually, he makes very little sense. (Sharks? The Unabomber? What?) Trying to turn his ramblings into a coherent message is like trying, as an old European saying goes, to turn fish soup back into an aquarium. But he is the president of the United States and holds the codes to some 2,000 nuclear weapons. When he speaks, his statements are both policy and a peek into the worldview currently governing the planet's sole superpower. This morning, the commander in chief made clear that he does not understand the largest war in Europe, what started it, or why it continues. Worse, insofar as he does understand anything about Russia's attempted conquest of Ukraine, he seems to have internalized old pro-Moscow talking points that even the Kremlin doesn't bother with anymore. The setting, as it so often is when Trump piles into a car with his thoughts and then goes full Thelma & Louise off a rhetorical cliff, was Fox & Friends. The Fox hosts, although predictably fawning, did their best to keep the president from the ledge, but when Trump pushes the accelerator, everyone goes along for the ride. The subject, ostensibly, was Trump's supposed diplomatic triumph at yesterday's White House meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and seven European leaders. The Fox hosts, of course, congratulated Trump—for what, no one could say—but that is part of the drill. A Trump interview on conservative media is something like a liturgy, with its predictable chants, its call-and-response moments, and its paternosters. Trump ran through the usual items: The war was Joe Biden's fault; the 'Russia, Russia, Russia hoax'; the war never would have happened if Trump had been president. Unto ages of ages, amen. But when the hosts asked specifically about making peace, the president of America sounded a lot like the president of Russia. The war, Trump said, started because of Crimea and NATO. Considering his commitment to being a 'peace president,' Trump was oddly eager to castigate his predecessors for being weak: Crimea, he said, was handed over to Russian President Vladimir Putin by Barack Obama 'without a shot fired.' (Should Obama have fired some? No one asked.) Crimea, you see, is a beautiful piece of real estate, surrounded by water—I have been to Crimea, and I can confirm the president's evaluation here—and 'Barack Hussein Obama gave it away.' Putin, he said, got a 'great deal' from Obama, and took it 'like candy from a baby.' Trump did not explain how this putative land swindle led to Putin trying to seize all of Ukraine. But no matter; he quickly shifted to NATO, echoing the arguments of early Kremlin apologists and credulous Western intellectuals that Ukraine existed only as a 'buffer' with the West, and that Putin was acting to forestall Ukraine joining NATO. Russia was right, Trump said, not to want the Western 'enemy' on their border. This might be the first time an American president has used Russia's language to describe NATO as an enemy. Perhaps Trump was simply trying to see the other side's point of view. He then added, however, that the war was sparked not only by NATO membership—which was not on the table anytime soon—but also by Ukrainian demands to return Crimea, which Trump felt were 'very insulting' to Russia. Trump is a bit behind on his pro-Kremlin talking points. The Russians themselves long ago largely abandoned any such blather about NATO and Crimea. Putin claimed early on that Ukraine was infested with Nazis —in the case of Zelensky, apparently Jewish Nazis—and that even if it weren't for NATO and Nazis, Ukraine is organically part of Russia and belongs under Kremlin rule. For three years, Putin has been slaughtering Ukrainian civilians to make the point that his Slavic brothers and sisters need to either accept that they are part of Russia, or die. Trump then stumbled through a discussion of security guarantees, wandering off topic repeatedly while the hosts tried to shepherd him back to the safety of their questions. And then the president of the United States showed the entire world why the past few days of international diplomacy perhaps haven't been going so well, and why a delegation of European leaders had to parachute into Washington to stop him from doing something reckless. 'Look,' Trump said, 'everybody can play cute, and this and that, but Ukraine is gonna get their life back, they're gonna stop having people killed all over the place, and they're gonna get a lot of land.' Notice how the president described people getting killed as if mass death is just a natural disaster that no one has any control over. (Later, he added that he was in a hurry to get to a peace deal because thousands were dying each week—again, as if people were perishing from regularly scheduled earthquakes instead of Russian bombs.) His comment about Ukraine getting lots of land also betrays his default acceptance of Moscow's imperial demands: The land Trump is describing already belongs to Ukraine, and any deal that does not return all of it is a net loss. The American president, however, is speaking as if Kyiv should be grateful for the scraps of territory that Trump and Putin will grudgingly allow to fall from their table. And then the discussion got worse. 'Russia,' Trump ruminated, 'is a powerful military nation.' (Well, yes.) 'You know, whether people like it or not, it's a powerful nation. It's a much bigger nation,' Trump said. 'It's not a war that should have been started.' (Again, a perfectly reasonable statement.) 'You don't do that. You don't take on a nation that's 10 times your size.' Wait, what? Who doesn't take on a bigger nation? Who does Trump think began this war? Trump's answers to the uneasy Fox courtiers summarized his belief that Ukraine, not Russia, was the aggressor, merely by refusing to roll over and hand its land and people to the Kremlin. The president seems to have embraced Putin's sly use of the term root causes (an expression Putin used again in Anchorage). When the Russian dictator says 'root causes,' he means Ukraine's continued existence as an independent nation, which Russia now views as the fundamental justification for its barbarism. Trump then bumbled into several other verbal brambles, but none of them mattered as much as this revealing moment. Zelensky and Ukraine are the problem, and the rest is just an ongoing tragedy that the Ukrainians can end by being 'flexible' and by putting their president in a room with the man conducting atrocities against them. In the end, Trump even suggested that cutting through the knot of war in Ukraine could be the ticket to salvation. 'If I can get to heaven,' he said, 'this will be one of the reasons,' because he will be recognized, presumably, as one of the great peacemakers. As for Putin, Trump knows they can work together: 'There's a warmth there,' he said of his relationship with an indicted war criminal. Blessed, perhaps, are the warmongers.
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Suggests He's A War Hero: 'I Guess I Am'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump suggested on Tuesday that he's a war hero, telling the conservative media host Mark Levin, in part, "I guess I am." Trump made the comment while talking to Levin, a staunch pro-Israel advocate, about working with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to free the remaining hostages held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Trump called Netanyahu "a good man," adding that "he's in there fighting." The U.S. president went on to say that although some want Netanyahu to be prosecuted on war crimes charges, "he's a war hero." "He's a war hero because we worked together," Trump told Levin. "He's a war hero. I guess I am, too. Nobody cares. But I am, too. I mean, I sent those planes." Trump has never been deployed or fought in a war. When he told Levin on Tuesday that he "sent those planes," he was referring to ordering airstrikes in June targeting three critical uranium enrichment facilities in Iran. Donald Trump on Benjamin Netanyahu: 'I worked with your friend a war hero. I guess I am, too.' — The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) August 19, 2025 Former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger, an ardent Trump critic who served in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, expressed shock at the president's remarks, writing on X: "Trump just called himself a 'war hero.' Wow." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow. The Associated Press contributed reporting to this article.
