logo
EPP holds trump card after far right seizes control of EU climate bill

EPP holds trump card after far right seizes control of EU climate bill

Euractiv08-07-2025
Greens, socialists and liberal lawmakers are trying to outmanoeuvre nationalist Patriots for Europe group after it secured the right to steer a crucial climate bill through the European Parliament – but they can't do it without the European People's Party.
Last week, the European Commission proposed that by 2040 the bloc's net greenhouse gas emissions should be 90% lower than in 1990. The European Parliament and the Council of the EU – which represents national governments – can amend the proposal before adopting it.
Time is of the essence as a deal on the 2040 target is politically linked to the decision on the contribution to the global climate effort that Europe has to pledge before the United Nations' COP30 climate change conference opens in November.
But with the file in the hands of the climate-sceptic Patriots group, lawmakers who support the ambitious reduction in emissions fear it will be impossible to meet this deadline using the normal legislative procedure.
Patriots chair Jordan Bardella, who presides over Marine Le Pen's right-wing National Rally in France, said today that his group was 'resolutely opposed' to the plan to cut emissions by 90%.
His group would not abandon industry and ordinary citizens to the "harmful influence of the left and the ecologists', Bardella said. His group later declared that Europe's Green Deal policy needed "a complete reset" rather than "cosmetic adjustments".
The Patriots dismissed calls to rush through the legislation as a 'direct attempt to bypass parliamentary scrutiny, avoid a transparent committee process, and block any meaningful revision of the Green Transition'.
The group, which is also home to Spain's Vox and Hungarian premier Viktor Orbán's Fidesz, called on the centre-right European People's Party (EPP) to join them. Conservatives hold the key As the largest group in the European Parliament, the EPP will be decisive in any vote on whether to use the urgency procedure to accelerate the passage of the climate bill.
Green and centrist lawmakers say the EPP allowed the far-right group the to seize control of the bill by failing to outbid the Patriots in an auction-like process used to assign legislative files in the parliament.
The Greens withdrew a unilateral call for an urgent procedure so they could submit a joint request with centrist groups in the hope of securing the EPP's support, the Austrian Green Lena Schilling said. Scenarios If the bill is fast-tracked, the role of the rapporteur nominated by the nationalist group would be 'very limited', said the liberal Renew group lawmaker Pascal Canfin, a former environment committee chair.
'The Patriots can be outmanoeuvred and we will do everything we can to outmanoeuvre them because … they will just sabotage everything in order to not have climate protection,' said the green lawmaker Michael Bloss
According to him, the Environment Committee in the European Parliament could discuss the amendments to the European Commission proposal already next week.
The pro-Green alliance could then agree compromises on the Commission proposal and vote at committee level by early October.
Canfin envisaged the possibility of the Parliament's Environment Committee voting for the same position agreed by EU governments in the Council. This would clearly indicate the will of the two institutions even if final negotiations were still pending.
However, sources close to the EPP have told Euractiv that the group would vote against initiating a fast-track procedure on Wednesday – possibly reconsidering after the summer, depending on whether the Patriots do any real work on the file.
Such a delay would, at the very least. make it more difficult to secure agreement on the EU law in time for COP30. UN pledge Denmark, which chairs ministerial talks in the Council of the EU until December, recently said that it wants to agree on the 2040 climate goal well ahead of COP30, so the required 2035 pledge can be based on it.
The EU could still present its 2035 emission reduction promise to the UN without agreeing on the 2040 target.
But it would likely be less ambitious if based on the existing EU climate law, which commits the bloc to net-zero emissions by mid-century but does not set out the pathway to reach that goal.
*Eddy Wax contributed reporting
(rh, aw)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

European Parliament sues Council over €150 billion defence loan scheme
European Parliament sues Council over €150 billion defence loan scheme

Euractiv

time5 hours ago

  • Euractiv

European Parliament sues Council over €150 billion defence loan scheme

The European Parliament decided to go ahead and take the Council of the EU to court after being left out of discussions about the major SAFE loan defence scheme, its press service announced on Wednesday. In a bid to boost Europe's defence industry and incentivise EU states to rearm, the European Commission activated an emergency procedure to bypass the Parliament, dissatisfaction of its elected officials. 'The Parliament has today (20 August) lodged a request with the Court of Justice for the annulment of the SAFE regulation,' its press service told Euractiv. SAFE, a €150 billion defence loan programme, was proposed by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in March to stimulate spending as soon as possible. In May, EU ministers gave their final approval, without consulting the European Parliament. Eighteen EU countries have thus far formally expressed interest in taking out loans for bids amounting to at least €127 billion. While the Parliament stresses that the 'instrument has the full support of Parliament [...] It is about the legal basis that was chosen, which undermines democratic legitimacy.' To skip parliamentary approval, von der Leyen wielded a part of the EU treaties (Article 122 TFEU), normally reserved for emergencies such as the Covid-19 pandemic, which speeds up the legislative process by reducing Parliament's negotiation time significantly. 'The use of Article 122 for SAFE as a legal basis was, in Parliament's view, procedurally incorrect and simply unnecessary. It undermines democratic legitimacy in the eyes of the public, and there is no Parliament in the world that would accept that,' the Parliament's press service told Euractiv. 'That is why, Parliament brings a case on grounds of inadequate legal basis.' In a letter to von der Leyen, the Parliament's President Roberta Metsola warned in May that the Commission could be taken to court. Von der Leyen rejected the complaint, arguing that using the emergency clause is 'fully justified' as SAFE is 'an exceptional and temporary response to an urgent and existential challenge'. EU countries, which are counting on the loans, are still in the clear for now. In its request to the Court, the Parliament asked to maintain the effects of the regulation until a replacement is adopted. (cp)

Ukrainian attacks halt Russian oil flows to Hungary and Slovakia
Ukrainian attacks halt Russian oil flows to Hungary and Slovakia

Euractiv

timea day ago

  • Euractiv

Ukrainian attacks halt Russian oil flows to Hungary and Slovakia

Deliveries of Russian crude through the Druzhba pipeline to Slovakia and Hungary were suspended after a Ukrainian drone strike damaged infrastructure on Russian territory, Ukrainian officials confirmed on Monday. The successful drone strike hit overnight the Nikolskoye oil pumping station in the Tambov region, approximately 400 km east of the Ukrainian border, according to the Kyiv Independent, temporarily halting oil deliveries. The interruption follows another short halt in deliveries last week after a Ukrainian drone attack on a pumping station in the Bryansk region. Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó bemoaned the attack on social media, saying "this is not our war... we want to stay out of it." In Slovakia, national operator Transpetrol confirmed flows into Slovakia had also stopped, stressing the problem lay outside its territory. Slovak Economy Minister Denisa Saková said the outage was the second in a week, caused by damage to a transformer station in Russia. She insisted Slovakia's fuel supply was not at risk and expected deliveries to resume in the coming days. Slovnaft, the Slovak refinery part of Hungary's MOL group, also said production had not been halted and that it was relying on reserves. 'The supply of fuel remains secure,' said spokesperson Lucia Čorbová. Slovakia's former Economy Minister Karel Hirman, now in opposition, said: 'Only a naïve person could believe that during wartime – especially when the supplier of raw materials is attacking the transit country – supplies would not be disrupted.' Hirman pointed out that almost all of Slovakia's neighbours – Austria, Czechia, and Poland – recognised these risks and have already replaced Russian energy supplies. Hungary and Slovakia are the only two EU countries still buying Russian oil. European Commission spokesperson Eva Hrnčířová said that the executive is in touch with Slovakian and Hungarian authorities and that the suspension 'does not affect the security of supply." UPDATE: The article now includes the Commission's comment. (mm)

Hungary's opposition leader accuses Russia of election meddling
Hungary's opposition leader accuses Russia of election meddling

Euractiv

timea day ago

  • Euractiv

Hungary's opposition leader accuses Russia of election meddling

The parliamentary election set for spring 2026 is shaping up Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's toughest challenge to date Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Magnus Lund Nielsen Euractiv Aug 19, 2025 11:24 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Hungarian opposition leader Péter Magyar accuses Moscow of attempting to interfere in the country's 2026 parliamentary elections, warning that Russian operatives are using 'disinformation campaigns, cyber operations, or intimidation' to sway voters. In an open letter published Sunday, Magyar demanded 'clear assurances' that Moscow would refrain from interfering in Hungary's domestic affairs, including through cyber operations or intimidation of politicians and citizens, Reuters reports. Magyar, whose Respect and Freedom (Tisza) party is polling ahead of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Fidesz, made the remarks after Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) claimed the European Commission was plotting 'regime change in Budapest' with him as its preferred candidate. In recent polls, Orbán is trailing Magyar's opposition party by around 10%. 'The last Soviet soldier left our country in June 1991. Now their operatives are back – sometimes working undercover, sometimes openly,' Magyar said in a Facebook post, calling on Russia's ambassador to explain the SVR's comments. Orbán, who has maintained close ties with Moscow since 2010 and opposed EU military aid to Ukraine, has accused Brussels of seeking to install a 'puppet government' in Hungary himself. The parliamentary election set for next spring is shaping up to be Orbán's toughest challenge in his nearly two decades as prime minister. (vib)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store