logo
Nation building and social dialogue for a just transition

Nation building and social dialogue for a just transition

IOL News30-04-2025

To achieve this transition, we must engage in robust, meaningful, and inclusive social dialogue, ensuring that the transition is fair, equitable, and beneficial for all South Africans – a Just Transition.
Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers
Every year, Freedom Day enables us to reflect on and pay tribute to the day South Africa initiated an irreversible transition grounded in the principles of inclusivity, equality, and justice through the country's first democratic elections.
That momentous occasion 31 years ago elected 490 able South Africans to constitute the Constitutional Assembly and entrusted them with the responsivity of drafting our democratic Constitution which would serve as the supreme law and a blueprint for a just and equal society.
Transitions have long been a part of South Africa's journey, and now, the crucial shift toward a low-carbon future presents an extraordinary opportunity to transform our nation.
The transition is not just an environmental necessity to ward off the climate crisis; it is a pivotal moment for nation-building that we cannot afford to overlook.
To achieve this transition, we must engage in robust, meaningful, and inclusive social dialogue, ensuring that the transition is fair, equitable, and beneficial for all South Africans – a Just Transition.
The concept of nation-building has deep roots in South Africa. Emerging from a negotiated settlement that ended years of oppression and systemic exclusion, our nation appreciates the significant role of social dialogue in fostering transformation.
Our Constitution was drafted through a process characterised by transparency and inclusivity, initiating the largest public participation effort in South Africa's history.
This foundational document was developed through social dialogue, supported by combined investments from the government, the private sector, and the international community, all standing in solidarity with South Africa's journey towards becoming a sovereign democratic state.
Today, we face new challenges, and social dialogue must be leveraged to navigate the complexities of transitioning from a fossil fuel-dependent economy to one that is sustainable and climate-resilient.
The just transition presents us with an opportunity to deepen our nation-building efforts, guided by the Constitution and the Just Transition Framework.
The Just Transition Framework identifies procedural justice as one of the key principles underpinning the transition to a low-carbon future, emphasising inclusive social dialogue and ensuring that affected groups actively participate in transition decisions.
Effective nation-building through social dialogue necessitates inclusive participation. Historically disadvantaged and vulnerable communities, often marginalised in national debates, must have meaningful seats at the table.
Their voices should not merely be consulted but they must actively shape the decisions that directly impact their futures.
Such inclusive dialogue ensures co-creation and legitimacy, fosters mutual trust, and promotes collective ownership of the outcomes, creating a foundation for societal cohesion in transition.
Social dialogue extends beyond structured forums to broader societal engagements, embracing educational initiatives, public awareness campaigns, and community-level dialogues.
This expansive approach helps demystify the complexities of the just transition, making the dialogue accessible to all South Africans and fostering a widespread culture of environmental consciousness and social solidarity.
We must meet people where they are for meaningful and sustained dialogue.
Tailoring our engagements and outreach to the realities of different communities—geographically, culturally, linguistically, and digitally—so that no one is left out of the conversation.
The Presidential Climate Commission (PCC) has adopted an expansive, inclusive, and meaningful approach in their social dialogues for their work programmes and also in the development of the Just Transition Framework, which serves as the blueprint for guiding South Africa's transition to a low-carbon future.
What is impactful about this approach is that dialogue it is not a once-off engagement, but rather a considered and continuous one.
The PCC does and must continue to work collaboratively with other stakeholders such as government, business, labour, youth, and civil society in leading and promoting social dialogue for the just transition.
The private sector holds substantial responsibilities in the nation-building process.
Businesses must actively engage in dialogue, recognising that sustainable practices are no longer optional but integral to their operational resilience and long-term profitability.
Through genuine participation in social dialogue, businesses can collaborate with labour and communities to innovate sustainable solutions, invest in local economic diversification, and contribute positively to social stability.
Labour unions, integral actors in South Africa's historical social compacts, likewise play a critical role in advocating for workers' interests while engaging in dialogue aimed at shaping just transition strategies.
Labour's active involvement ensures that the transition does not exacerbate inequality but instead promote decent work, fair wages, and improved conditions, preserving dignity and economic stability for workers and their families.
Government, tasked with the stewardship of national interests, must facilitate and sustain these dialogues transparently and inclusively, ensuring that commitments translate into tangible policy actions. Transparent governance builds trust, mitigates potential conflicts, and enhances accountability.
Freedom Day is a powerful declaration.
It reminds us that it is the responsibility of every individual and sector of society to build a thriving democracy.
Imagine a South Africa where everyone reaps the rewards of freedom, has their basic needs met, and voices heard. Together, through open dialogue and decisive action, the just transition will be a powerful catalyst for nation-building, a nation where no one is left behind.
Mbali Baduza, Presidential Climate Commissioner and CEO of We the People South Africa (an initiative of Constitution Hill Trust) and Zimasa Vazi, Senior Manager: Stakeholder Engagement, PCC Secretariat.
Mbali Baduza, Presidential Climate Commissioner and CEO of We the People South Africa (an initiative of Constitution Hill Trust).
Image: Supplied.
Zimasa Vazi, Senior Manager: Stakeholder Engagement, PCC Secretariat.
Image: Supplied.
BUSINESS REPORT

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CRL chair's claims against its executive director are 'defamatory', Forsa says
CRL chair's claims against its executive director are 'defamatory', Forsa says

TimesLIVE

time6 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

CRL chair's claims against its executive director are 'defamatory', Forsa says

Freedom of Religion South Africa (Forsa) has strongly denied what it termed false and defamatory allegations made by chairperson of the CRL Rights Commission Thoko Mkhwanazi-Xaluva on Thursday. During a media briefing convened by the commission, Mkhwanazi-Xaluva alleged Forsa and its executive director Michael Swain had accused her, Cheryl Zondi and/or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation of receiving R1.5m from the National Lotteries Commission. Zondi was a witness in the rape trial of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso. Forsa said this donation was reported widely in the media. It said a press release from the National Lotteries Commission of December 13 2018 stated the Cheryl Zondi Foundation had partnered with the Izimvo 447 NPC and received R1.5m to aid their work for those exploited in sacred spaces. 'Neither Michael Swain, nor Forsa, has ever alleged financial misconduct of any kind. Such claims are false and wholly without any factual basis at all,' the organisation said in a statement. Forsa said it was disappointed that Mkhwanazi-Xaluva did not first seek clarity or engage with it before making public accusations and threatening legal action. 'Her subsequent laying of criminal charges against Michael Swain and Forsa is seen as vexatious and unfounded. It appears to be a personally motivated attack designed to intimidate and deter Forsa (or others) from opposing the chair's agenda to push again for state regulation of religion.' Forsa said it reserved all legal rights in its response to this matter and was considering appropriate legal remedies in response to these false and harmful allegations. 'These include a formal demand for retraction as well as amending its extant damages claim for defamation.' Forsa said it was not against any person or institution, including Mkhwanazi-Xaluva or the commission. 'On the contrary, Forsa supports all of its legitimate and constitutional objectives. However, our singular focus is the protection and advancement of religious freedom and related constitutional rights in South Africa.' Forsa said a letter from more than 20 senior religious leaders representing about 12-million South Africans was sent to President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2019, raising several concerns, including that Mkhwanazi-Xaluva simultaneously served as CRL chairperson and deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation. The commission was a Chapter 9 institution, created to be independent and impartial, accountable only to parliament, Forsa said. 'Thus, its chair must avoid bias, preferential treatment and dual loyalties. Arguably, this includes keeping clear boundaries when interacting with organisations, especially advocacy organisations, linked to matters before the commission.' Forsa said under Mkhwanazi-Xaluva's leadership at the time, the CRL strongly pushed for state regulation of religion. 'A wide diversity of faith communities strongly opposed the CRL's proposal. The 'conflict of interest' concern arose because the CRL chair cited the Omotoso case as a high-profile example to justify the CRL's proposed regulation model (via peer review councils, licensing of religious leaders, etc).' Her appointment as the deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation, therefore, created a strong impression of an overlap of interest and influence. 'On the one hand, the chair of the CRL is tasked with impartial interaction with faith communities, constitutional compliance, and safeguarding diverse religious rights. Acting as deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation is an advocacy-aligned — not neutral — position.' This raised legitimate concerns about a conflict of interest on the part of the chairperson, Forsa said. 'It must be stressed that this in no way raises any concern or casts any suspicion on Cheryl Zondi or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation.' Since being reappointed, Mkhwanazi-Xaluva has continued promoting proposals for state regulation of religion, including the introduction of peer review mechanisms, Forsa said. It said it had consistently opposed this course of action, repeatedly warning that state regulation of religion was unnecessary, unconstitutional, unworkable and unaffordable. 'In Forsa's public education efforts to point out the dangers to religious freedom of state regulation of religion, we gave the historical background to the current context. One part of this extensive presentation referenced the 2019 letter to the president in good faith and with full transparency.' Forsa said the 2019 letter did not accuse Mkhwanazi-Xaluva of theft or corruption of any kind and did not contain any accusations against Zondi or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation at all.

Concourt landmark rulings as it celebrates 30 years
Concourt landmark rulings as it celebrates 30 years

eNCA

time7 hours ago

  • eNCA

Concourt landmark rulings as it celebrates 30 years

JOHANNESBURG - This year marks 30 years since South Africa's highest court opened its doors not just as a courtroom and as a beacon of hope for justice, equality and Constitutional supremacy. Established after apartheid the Constitutional Court doors were first opened by former President Nelson Mandela in the land in 1995. Its first President was Justice Arthur Chaskalson under then Chief Justice Michael Corbett. Among the first justices on the bench were Richard Goldstone, Pius Langa and Ismail Mohamed. The court Chief Justice, Mandisa Maya. She takes over from Raymond Zondo, as the first woman to hold the position. According to Maya the ConCourt was entrusted with the responsibility to enforce constitutional limitations on the exercise of public power and safeguarding human rights. She was speaking at a celebratory event held in Braamfontein, Johannesburg on Friday. She says the court functions as an independent and impartial institution tasked to ensure compliance and provision of the constitution and serve as the ultimate arbiter of all constitutional matters. 📸| The 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court. The @ConCourt is the apex court in South Africa and was established following the first democratic election in 1994. #GovZAUpdates — South African Government (@GovernmentZA) June 20, 2025 And over the three decades, it has done just that, handing down landmark rulings that transformed the law, protected rights and deepened constitutional democracy. Here are some of the most influential Constitutional Court rulings that changed South Africa. S v Makwanyane (1995) Issue: The death penalty Outcome: The death penalty is a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment and it should be declared unconstitutional. It was the court's first ruling. National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs (1999) Issue - Same-sex marriage Outcome - The impact of discrimination on gays and lesbians is rendered more serious. And their vulnerability increased by the fact that they are a political minority, not able on their own to use political power to secure favourable legislation for themselves. This also led to the legalisation of same-sex marriage- the first in Africa. Government of the RSV v Grootboom (2000) Issue: Right to housing Outcomes: The state must devise and implement within its available resources a comprehensive and coordinated programme progressively to realise the right of access to adequate housing. Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign (2002) Issue - Inheritance under the African customary law of intestate succession Outcome - This ruling struck down male-only inheritance promoting gender equality. It found that the rule that male primogeniture wherein the eldest son inherits property was declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid, to the extent that it excludes women and extra-marital children from inheriting property. Bhe and Others v The Magistrate, (2004) Outcome - This ruling struck down male-only inheritance promoting gender equality. It found that the rule that male primogeniture wherein the eldest son inherits property was declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid, to the extent that it excludes women and extra-marital children from inheriting property.

Ramaphosa: The Constitution is a guardian watching over SA's legal health
Ramaphosa: The Constitution is a guardian watching over SA's legal health

Eyewitness News

time7 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Ramaphosa: The Constitution is a guardian watching over SA's legal health

JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa has described the Constitution as a guardian that has been watching over the nation's legal health. Dignitaries gathered at Constitutional Hill on Friday to mark the 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court. Ramaphosa was the chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly, which was tasked with drafting the new Constitution in 1994. On Friday, while delivering the keynote address at the 30th anniversary of the apex court, Ramaphosa recalled the steps that led towards the finalisation of the country's supreme law. "Speaking in my capacity, then, as chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly, I described this, our Constitution, as our new nation's birth certificate, reflecting the history from which we have emerged and the values of human dignity, equality, and freedom that we now cherish." He said that Friday's festivities called for more than just celebration but also reflection. A packed programme has been prepared for Friday's celebration, with dialogues expected to reflect on significant judgments by the Constitutional Court, such as State vs Makwanyane, which led to the abolition of the death penalty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store