
Antarctica's brief gain in ice mass fuels climate denial
"In a development that's leaving climate alarmists scrambling, new data shows that Antarctic ice has increased in size for the first time in decades -- reversing the long-touted trend of mass loss and environmental collapse," reads a May 28, 2025 Facebook post from The Hodgetwins, US conservative commentators whom AFP has previously fact-checked.
Image
Screenshot of a Facebook post taken on May 30, 2025
Similar narratives dismissing the impact of climate change popped up on social media after traditional media reported in early May on a study's findings about Antarctic ice sheet (archived here).
The study, from March, found that between 2021 and 2023, Antarctica's ice sheet expanded and therefore did not add to global mean sea level rise.
The gain did not, however, counter the overall rise observed over those years because of ice loss and warming elsewhere (archived here and here).
And weather conditions -- specifically unusual precipitations, including snow and some rain in east Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula -- were the primary reason the ice sheet gained mass, the study's corresponding author and other scientists told AFP.
This short-lived, partial gain does not disprove the impact of climate change on the continent, they said.
Short-lived reversal
Yunzhong Shen, the study's corresponding author, told AFP May 19 that the increase observed between 2021 and 2023 occurred on a "too short timescale" to be treated as a trend reversal -- or to deny the impacts of climate change in the region (archived here).
The gain witnessed in Antarctica's ice sheets also seems "to stop after 2024, which needs to be determined by further study," he said.
James Kirkham, a scientist with the International Cryosphere Climate Initiative scientist, concurred (archived here): "The most recent levels reported by NASA thus far in 2025 look similar to what they were back in 2020, just before the abrupt gain."
When looking at Antarctic total mass balance, NASA's dataset shows a net loss in mass since 2002.
Image
A screenshot taken on May 28, 2025 of a chart displaying Antarctica's ice mass variations since 2002, according to data gathered by NASA (NASA)
In fact, that "Antarctica would experience increased snowfall in a warmer climate is entirely expected as in a warmer climate the atmosphere can hold more moisture," Kirkham said in a May 27 email.
"This means that the likelihood of extreme weather (such as the heavy snowfall which caused the recent mass gain in east Antarctica) increases."
Brandon Daly, who studies glaciers and ice sheets, agreed (archived here).
"When climate change deniers talk about the glaciers in Antarctica, they will usually only focus on the surface of the ice sheet," he said May 28, explaining that they ignore other ice loss.
"Ice in contact with the ocean is what is melting, and it will continue to melt even if precipitation over the ice sheet increases," he said. "And it is the ocean-forced melting that is currently risking ice sheet instability and sea level rise."
Long trends observed
University of Minnesota climate scientist Peter Neff said May 27 that human climate change impacts in Antarctica are already widely seen around the Antarctic Peninsula and coastal Antarctica, but have been slower to penetrate inland (archived here).
The continent is "like a giant pancake with very steep edges that slow the north to south penetration of warmer air over the southern ocean," he said.
Almost all of Antarctica's ice losses come from glaciers, largely in west Antarctica and the peninsula (archived here and here).
Robert McKay, director of Victoria University of Wellington's Antarctic Research Centre, told AFP May 15 that scientists are mostly concerned with these sectors because they may be "near a tipping point" that could lead to greatly accelerated sea level rise (archived here).
Environmental change thus takes different forms in different regions.
Brief temporary offsets of overall losses through recent regional snowfalls, such as the one observed between 2021 and 2023, are unlikely to change the long-term trajectory of continent-wide ice losses, with continued warming.
Additionally, weather stations -- whose data network remains scarce in the continent -- have observed long-term warming and impacts on sea level rise, albeit with very large year-to-year variability given that Antarctica holds the most variable climate in the world (archived here and here).
Satellite data has recently revealed that ice sheets with enough frozen water to lift oceans some 65 metres are far more sensitive to climate change than previously suspected (archived here).
The amount of ice melting or breaking off into the ocean from Greenland and west Antarctica, now averaging about 400 billion tonnes a year, has quadrupled over the last three decades, eclipsing runoff from mountain glaciers.
Both polar oceans are warming, with the "Southern Ocean being disproportionately and increasingly important in global ocean heat increase," according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the leading international consortium of climate scientists (archived here).
AFP has debunked other claims about the Poles, including here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
7 hours ago
- France 24
Trump-Musk showdown threatens US space plans
So when President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cancel Elon Musk's federal contracts, space watchers snapped to attention. Musk, the world's richest person, shot back that he would mothball Dragon -- the capsule NASA relies on for crew flights -- before retracting the threat a few hours later. For now, experts say mutual dependence should keep a full-blown rupture at bay, but the episode exposes just how disruptive any break could be. Founded in 2002, SpaceX leapfrogged legacy contractors to become the world's dominant launch provider. Driven by Musk's ambition to make humanity multiplanetary, it is now NASA's sole means of sending astronauts to the ISS -- a symbol of post–Cold War cooperation and a testbed for deeper space missions. Space monopoly? The company has completed 10 regular crew rotations to the orbiting lab and is contracted for four more, under a deal worth nearly $5 billion. That's just part of a broader portfolio that includes $4 billion from NASA for developing Starship, the next-generation megarocket; nearly $6 billion from the Space Force for launch services; and a reported $1.8 billion for Starshield, a classified spy satellite network. Were Dragon grounded, the United States would again be forced to rely on Russian Soyuz rockets for ISS access -- as it did between 2011 and 2020, following the Space Shuttle's retirement and before Crew Dragon entered service. "Under the current geopolitical climate, that would not be optimal," space analyst Laura Forczyk told AFP. NASA had hoped Boeing's Starliner would provide redundancy, but persistent delays -- and a failed crewed test last year -- have kept it grounded. Even Northrop Grumman's cargo missions now rely on SpaceX's Falcon 9, the workhorse of its rocket fleet. The situation also casts a shadow over NASA's Artemis program. A lunar lander variant of Starship is slated for Artemis III and IV, the next US crewed Moon missions. If Starship were sidelined, rival Blue Origin could benefit -- but the timeline would almost certainly slip, giving China, which aims to land humans by 2030, a chance to get there first, Forczyk warned. "There are very few launch vehicles as capable as Falcon 9 -- it isn't feasible to walk away as easily as President Trump might assume," she said. Still, the feud could sour Trump on space altogether, she added, complicating NASA's long-term plans. SpaceX isn't entirely dependent on the US government. Starlink subscriptions and commercial launches account for a significant share of its revenue, and the company also flies private missions. The next, with partner Axiom Space, will carry astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary, funded by their respective governments. Private power, public risk But losing US government contracts would still be a major blow. "It's such a doomsday scenario for both parties that it's hard to envision how US space efforts would fill the gap," Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told AFP. "Both sides have every reason to bridge the disagreement and get back to business." Signs of a rift emerged last weekend, when the White House abruptly withdrew its nomination of e-payments billionaire Jared Isaacman -- a close Musk ally who has twice flown to space with SpaceX -- as NASA administrator. On a recent podcast, Isaacman said he believed he was dropped because "some people had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target." The broader episode could also reignite debate over Washington's reliance on commercial partners, particularly when one company holds such a dominant position. Swope noted that while the US government has long favored buying services from industry, military leaders tend to prefer owning the systems they depend on. "This is just another data point that might bolster the case for why it can be risky," he said. "I think that seed has been planted in a lot of people's minds -- that it might not be worth the trust."


Sustainability Times
14 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
'Nasa Confirms the Unthinkable': China's Giant Water Diversion Project Will Slow Earth's Rotation and Disrupt Global Timekeeping
IN A NUTSHELL 🌍 NASA confirms that human-made structures, like the Three Gorges Dam, subtly affect Earth's rotation. confirms that human-made structures, like the Three Gorges Dam, subtly affect Earth's rotation. 🏗️ The Three Gorges Dam in China is the largest hydroelectric dam, impacting both energy production and global dynamics. in China is the largest hydroelectric dam, impacting both energy production and global dynamics. 🔄 Mass movements, from natural events to infrastructure projects, can alter the planet's rotation by microseconds. ⚠️ The interplay between human activity and natural systems raises questions about unforeseen global consequences. Human-made structures have always pushed the boundaries of what's possible, affecting not just our landscapes but also, according to NASA, the very rotation of our planet. As we continue to develop massive infrastructures, we inadvertently cause minute changes in Earth's rotation. This phenomenon is compounded by climate change, which alters the distribution of the Earth's mass. The implications of these changes are not entirely understood, but they underscore the interconnectedness of our actions and the environment. Let's delve deeper into some of the most significant structures that illustrate this impact on a global scale. Ever Taller and More Massive The era of skyscrapers and colossal constructions is well upon us. Iconic structures like the Burj Khalifa, the Shanghai Tower, and The Clock Towers symbolize humanity's drive to reach new heights. However, few structures can compare to the Three Gorges Dam in China when it comes to sheer mass and impact. Situated in Hubei Province, this hydroelectric dam is the largest in the world and took nearly 18 years to complete, from 1994 to its final phase in 2012. The dam serves multiple purposes: it asserts China's newfound power, controls a dangerous river, and supports the country's energy needs. 'We'll See Gravity Like Never Before': NASA's Wild Quantum Gradiometer Will Map Earth's Invisible Forces From Orbit According to the National Center for Space Studies (CNES), the dam aims to balance territorial dynamics by emphasizing the interior over the coastal regions. This underlines a strategic goal to integrate less developed areas into the national economy. As we construct ever more massive infrastructures, we must consider their broader implications, not just their immediate benefits. 'Nuclear Breakthrough at NASA': New Space Power System Passes First Test Using Fuel That's Five Times Cheaper Than Before The Largest Hydroelectric Dam in the World China stands as the world's leading producer of hydroelectric power, both in capacity and output. Yet, despite its monumental size, the Three Gorges Dam only meets a mere 3% of China's energy demands, far less than the initially projected 10%. This discrepancy highlights the challenges of meeting national energy needs even with massive projects. However, the dam's significance extends beyond energy production; it may slow Earth's rotation. 'China Disrupts Earth's Rotation': NASA Confirms Massive Project Is Slowing the Planet With Unprecedented Global Consequences A 2005 NASA article suggests that global events involving mass movement, such as the 2004 earthquake and tsunami, can influence Earth's rotation. Dr. Benjamin Fong Chao of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center points out that all mass movements, from seasonal weather patterns to driving a car, have an effect. This theory raises intriguing questions about the cumulative impact of our constructions and activities on a planetary scale. 0.06 Microseconds To better understand these changes, consider an analogy from IFLScience: an ice skater increases their spin by bringing their arms closer to their body. Similarly, the 2004 earthquake altered Earth's seismic structure, shortening the day by 2.68 microseconds. If the Three Gorges Dam's reservoir were filled to capacity, it would hold 10 trillion gallons of water. This mass redistribution could increase the length of a day by 0.06 microseconds, making Earth slightly more oblate. While these changes may seem negligible, they exemplify the profound influence of human activity on our planet. The potential implications for timekeeping, navigation, and even climate patterns warrant further investigation. As we continue to build and expand, understanding these subtle shifts becomes increasingly important. As humanity continues to construct monumental infrastructures, the intricate relationship between our endeavors and natural systems becomes ever more apparent. While the direct impacts of such projects are often well-studied, their broader effects, like those on Earth's rotation, remain largely speculative. What other unforeseen consequences might arise as we push the boundaries of engineering and technology? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.4/5 (24)


Euronews
15 hours ago
- Euronews
Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon capsule in Trump feud
SpaceX founder Elon Musk has threatened to decommission a key space capsule used to take supplies to the International Space Station as part of his ignited feud with US President Donald Trump. Musk started the conflict by calling Trump's "Big Bold Beautiful Bill," a budget reconciliation bill, a "digusting abomination" on his social media platform X. The post ignited a series of back-and-forth blows between Trump and Musk over social media. Trump then threatened to cancel government contracts given to Musk's SpaceX and Starlink internet services, which Musk then responded to by saying he would decommission the Dragon spacecraft immediately. Musk later said he wouldn't decommission the craft in response to an account called Alaska (with no apparently relation to the US State) that called the back and forth a "shame" and asked Musk to "step back for a few days," to "cool off." The Dragon capsule, developed with the help of government contracts, is an important part of keeping the International Space Station (ISS) running. The US' space agency NASA also relies heavily on SpaceX for other programmes including launching science missions and, later this decade, returning astronauts to the surface of the Moon. SpaceX is the only US company capable right now of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. Boeing's Starliner capsule has flown astronauts only once; last year's test flight went so badly that the two NASA astronauts had to hitch a ride back to Earth via SpaceX in March, more than nine months after launching last June. SpaceX also uses a Dragon capsule for its own privately run missions. The next one of those is due to fly next week on a trip chartered by Axiom Space, a Houston company. The company has used its rockets to launch several science missions for NASA as well as military equipment. Last year, SpaceX also won a NASA contract to help bring the space station out of orbit when it is no longer usable. SpaceX's Starship mega rocket is what NASA has picked to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon for the first two landing missions. Russia's Soyuz capsules are the only other means of getting crews to the space station right now. The Soyuz capsules hold three people at a time. For now, each Soyuz launch carries two Russians and one NASA astronaut, and each SpaceX launch has one Russian on board under a barter system. That way, in an emergency requiring a capsule to return, there is always someone from the US and Russia on board. With its first crew launch for NASA in 2020 — the first orbital flight of a crew by a private company - SpaceX enabled NASA to reduce its reliance on Russia for crew transport. The Russian flights had been costing the US tens of millions of dollars per seat, for years. NASA has also used Russian spacecraft for cargo, along with US contractor Northrup Grumman. The EU published a digital strategy on Thursday to diversify and expand digital alliances with "like-minded partners" such as Japan, South Korea, Canada and India, but no mention was made of the US. This year, digital trade agreements with Singapore and South Korea were signed to facilitate data flows - despite critics warning it could pave the way for threats to personal data. The bloc also plans to structure its growing diplomatic network through the creation of a Digital Partnership Network, aimed at connecting these relationships in a more strategic and coordinated way. But while the strategy highlights a wide array of partners, the absence of references to further meeting under the EU-US Trade and Technology Council (TTC) with the United States was notable. This forum of discussion between the two blocs on trade and technology was created in 2020 to de-escalate tensions during US President Donald Trump's first mandate. Quizzed by Euronews on the future of the TTC, Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen replied that trade negotiations were currently the priority - without elaborating. While the EU's other big tech competitor, China, is also absent from the strategy – Virkkunen said that digital cooperation will be discussed during the July 2025 EU-China summit. In its immediate neighbourhood, the bloc is prioritising integration with the EU Digital Single Market notably for Ukraine, Moldova and the Western Balkans – to assist integration into the EU. These countries will benefit from support to align with EU rules on areas such as digital identity, secure infrastructure and regulatory frameworks, paving the way for potential mutual recognition of digital services. In Africa, Asia and Latin America, the strategy builds on the Global Gateway initiative, the EU's strategic response to China's Belt and Road adopted in 2021. Through this framework, the EU is co-financing the deployment of secure submarine cables, AI factories, and digital public infrastructure, while, according to Commissioner Virkkunen, promoting European tech standards and regulatory models abroad. The Commission said that they will move forward with the implementation of new digital partnerships, including preparations for agreements with countries in the Southern Neighbourhood and sub-Saharan Africa. A dedicated Tech Business Offer, a mix of private and public EU investment, will be rolled out to support digital projects in partner countries. A first meeting of the new Digital Partnership Network is also planned, involving representatives from the EU and its partner countries. Meanwhile, joint research programmes are set to be launched with Japan, Canada and South Korea, notably in quantum technologies and semiconductors.