logo
DuckDuckGo Is Hoping to Win Over AI-Hating Searchers

DuckDuckGo Is Hoping to Win Over AI-Hating Searchers

Gizmodoa day ago
Are you tired of AI-generated images cluttering your search results? Lucky for you, there's a way out of the slop, and it starts with forgetting about Google.
DuckDuckGo, the privacy-focused search engine and web browser, recently rolled out a new feature that allows users to hide images made with AI from their search results.
You can try it yourself right now by running a search on the DuckDuckGo search engine and going to the images tab. You'll now see a new drop-down menu option titled 'AI Images' that can be toggled to hide or show AI images.
'Our goal is to help you find what you're looking for. You should decide for yourself how much AI you want in your life – or if you want any at all,' the company said in an announcement posted on the social media site X (formerly Twitter).
The company's filter uses open-source blocklists to screen out the AI-generated images. Although it won't catch everything, it should significantly cut down the number of AI images in search results.
The news comes as AI slop has been proliferating at an exponential rate. And while it's, at the very least, an eyesore, the bigger concern is how convincingly real these images are becoming. There has even been debate whether AI images should be watermarked by default to make them easier to spot. But, some argue that if the watermarks are easy to remove, they could backfire and give some AI-generated images a false sense of authenticity.
Android Authority reported last week that OpenAI is already testing a watermark feature for images generated in the beta version of ChatGPT's Android app. Additionally, the site speculates that the ability to save images without a watermark might be granted to paid users. However, since the feature hasn't been officially announced, its final form, or whether it launches at all, could still change.
DuckDuckGo launched in 2008 and now offers web browsers on Windows, Mac, iOS, and Android. Its browsers come full with several privacy features, including blocking third-party trackers, stopping targeted ads (even on YouTube), and it doesn't track searches. The company says it makes money from private ads on its search engine.
Although the company puts an emphasis on online privacy, it is not necessarily anti-AI. In its announcement of its AI image filter, the company said its philosophy for AI features is that they should be 'private, useful, and optional.'
The company already offers several AI features, including Duck.ai, which lets users access custom versions of popular models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Mistral, while keeping their conversations anonymous and untracked.
In fact, the company announced today that users can now customize how those models respond, adjusting tone, length, and even what 'role' the model takes when replying.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla disappoints on earnings but wins on one major front
Tesla disappoints on earnings but wins on one major front

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla disappoints on earnings but wins on one major front

Tesla disappoints on earnings but wins on one major front originally appeared on TheStreet. Tesla didn't mention Bitcoin once in its second-quarter 2025 financial filing, even as investors and analysts scanned the company's balance sheet for any sign of movement in its crypto treasury. The silence isn't new. Tesla hasn't added or sold any Bitcoin for eight straight quarters, and the company's digital asset holdings remain unchanged at $184 million, according to the 10-Q form filed with the SEC on July 23. That's the same value it reported in the first quarter of 2024, with no impairment losses or gains noted this time either. Tesla had initially bought $1.5 billion worth of Bitcoin in early 2021. Since then, it's sold off the majority, with the last major sale happening in Q2 2022 when it offloaded roughly 75% of its BTC stash. Tesla holds 9,720 BTC as of its last disclosure. At today's Bitcoin price of $118,000, that stash is worth approximately $1.15 declines Beyond crypto, Tesla's earnings disappointed on several fronts. The company reported revenue of $22.5 billion — missing analyst estimates of $22.74 billion — and adjusted earnings per share of $0.40, below the expected $0.43. Automotive revenue fell 16% year-over-year, the second straight quarterly decline. In early July, Tesla had already reported a 14% drop in Q2 vehicle deliveries to 384,000 units. The stock is down roughly 18% this year, marking the worst performance among big tech names. By comparison, the Nasdaq Composite is up about 9% in 2025. Meanwhile, Tesla has delayed its affordable 'Model 2' EV, leaving the field open for rivals. Chinese EV makers are aggressively pushing cheaper, tech-laden vehicles that are eating into Tesla's global market share. Still holding the bag Despite the financial and political turbulence, Tesla appears to be holding firm on its crypto position—for now. But with mounting pressure from declining revenues and reputational hits, investors are watching closely for any future changes to the company's digital asset strategy. As of now, though, the Bitcoin line in Tesla's earnings reports remains quiet. No buys. No sells. Just HODLing. Tesla disappoints on earnings but wins on one major front first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 23, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 23, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio

Tesla says it started building initial versions of an affordable car, posts a steep sales decline
Tesla says it started building initial versions of an affordable car, posts a steep sales decline

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla says it started building initial versions of an affordable car, posts a steep sales decline

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Tesla said on Wednesday it has built initial versions of an affordable car, a move likely meant to stem the steep decline in sales the company has experienced in markets across the world. Elon Musk's electric vehicle maker posted the worst quarterly sales decline in more than a decade and profit that missed Wall Street targets, but its profit margin on making cars was better than many feared. MARKET REACTION: Tesla shares were down nearly 5% in after-hours trading. COMMENTS: JACOB BOURNE, ANALYST, EMARKETER, NEW YORK: "Tesla's disappointing results aren't surprising given the rocky road it's traveled recently. But the company maintains a strong foundation in the key growth sectors of energy storage, robotics, and AI-powered transportation. While traditional automakers like GM are gaining EV market share, we can expect that Tesla will continue pushing the needle on innovation if it can get a better handle on its current leadership distractions. Key challenges that will linger are supply chain risks related to its reliance on China and fierce competition from Chinese EV makers in that market. Tesla doesn't need to choose between cars and future tech. There are technical synergies between EVs, robotaxis, energy systems, and robotics that could accelerate innovation across all fronts. The question is whether leadership can execute on this integrated vision in this fast-moving market." ANDREW ROCCO, STOCK STRATEGIST, ZACKS INVESTMENT RESEARCH, CHICAGO: "Tesla delivered earnings Wednesday night that fell short of top-and-bottom line expectations slightly. Despite the earnings miss, Tesla shares were buoyed early by the fact that the bleeding in gross margins has seemingly come to a halt, with gross margins coming in at 17.2% versus Wall Street estimates of 16.5%. The gross margin beat is especially impressive when investors consider that Tesla has been offering generous incentives and lower prices to its consumers. Coming in to the report, Wall Street expectations were dire amid a slowing core EV business and CEO Elon Musk's reputational damage on both sides of the political aisle. Nevertheless, Tesla has limped over the low bar that was a dramatic earnings miss and delivered earnings that were better than most feared. Additionally, news broke right before the market closed that Tesla is in "early talks" with the state of Nevada to expand its robotaxi service. If Tesla can convince investors that it will scale its robotaxi service rapidly, shareholders will be more forgiving regarding the core EV business, as Musk and his team look to expand into new verticals, transitioning and diversifying the business." THOMAS MONTEIRO, SENIOR ANALYST, "Although still far from what fundamentals would suggest for a trillion-dollar company, Tesla's latest numbers do spark some optimism, indicating that the worst is likely behind it—at least in terms of the core auto business. Given the plethora of headwinds faced during the difficult Q2 - both internally and on the macro front - margin deterioration appears to have come in at the lower end of the curve. When combined with improving cyclical demand dynamics in markets like China and parts of the US, this suggests that full-year results might not be as dire as previously expected following the disastrous first half of the year. This also shows that the company has weathered the tariff storm somewhat better than initially projected, optimizing the production/delivery equation in the US. While it remains unclear how much of a hit regulatory credits will take in Q3, it's evident the company will need to continue refining its production strategy elsewhere to better navigate the second half. From this perspective, recent product announcements are aligned with those strategic needs—particularly around the highly anticipated Model 2. With Tesla entering the Indian market and working to regain ground in China, we view this as a potential game-changer for H2. All things considered—and while we're still a ways off from seeing true fundamental support for the current share price—the outlook for the core business is looking somewhat better. This could continue to support Tesla's long-term transition into a fully AI/robotics-driven company, which appears to be where Musk is placing his bets." (Compiled by Reuters NewsEditing by Matthew Lewis)

Donald Trump's Gift to AI Companies
Donald Trump's Gift to AI Companies

Atlantic

time26 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Donald Trump's Gift to AI Companies

Earlier today, Donald Trump unveiled his administration's 'AI Action Plan'—a document that details, in 23 pages, the president's 'vision of global AI dominance' and offers a road map for America to achieve it. The upshot? AI companies such as OpenAI and Nvidia must be allowed to move as fast as they can. As the White House officials Michael Kratsios, David Sacks, and Marco Rubio wrote in the plan's introduction, 'Simply put, we need to 'Build, Baby, Build!'' The action plan is the direct result of an executive order, signed by Trump in the first week of his second term, that directed the federal government to produce a plan to 'enhance America's global AI dominance.' For months, the Trump administration solicited input from AI firms, civil-society groups, and everyday citizens. OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, and Microsoft issued extensive recommendations. The White House is clearly deferring to the private sector, which has close ties to the Trump administration. On his second day in office, Trump, along with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son, announced the Stargate Project, a private venture that aims to build hundreds of billions of dollars worth of AI infrastructure in the United States. Top tech executives have made numerous visits to the White House and Mar-a-Lago, and Trump has reciprocated with praise. Kratsios, who advises the president on science and technology, used to work at Scale AI and, well before that, at Peter Thiel's investment firm. Sacks, the White House's AI and crypto czar, was an angel investor for Facebook, Palantir, and SpaceX. During today's speech about the AI Action Plan, Trump lauded several tech executives and investors, and credited the AI boom to 'the genius and creativity of Silicon Valley.' At times, the action plan itself comes across as marketing from the tech industry. It states that AI will augur 'an industrial revolution, an information revolution, and a renaissance—all at once.' And indeed, many companies were happy: 'Great work,' Kevin Weil, OpenAI's chief product officer, wrote on X of the AI Action Plan. 'Thank you President Trump,' wrote Collin McCune, the head of government affairs at the venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. 'The White House AI Action Plan gets it right on infrastructure, federal adoption, and safety coordination,' Anthropic wrote on its X account. 'It reflects many policy aims core to Anthropic.' (The Atlantic and OpenAI have a corporate partnership.) In a sense, the action plan is a bet. AI is already changing a number of industries, including software engineering, and a number of scientific disciplines. Should AI end up producing incredible prosperity and new scientific discoveries, then the AI Action Plan may well get America there faster simply by removing any roadblocks and regulations, however sensible, that would slow the companies down. But should the technology prove to be a bubble—AI products remain error-prone, extremely expensive to build, and unproven in many business applications—the Trump administration is more rapidly pushing us toward the bust. Either way, the nation is in Silicon Valley's hands. The action plan has three major 'pillars': enhancing AI innovation, developing more AI infrastructure, and promoting American AI. To accomplish these goals, the administration will seek to strip away federal and state regulations on AI development while also making it easier and more financially viable to build data centers and energy infrastructure. Trump also signed executive orders to expedite permitting for AI projects and export American AI products abroad. The White House's specific ideas for removing what it describes as 'onerous regulations' and 'bureaucratic red tape' are sweeping. For instance, the AI Action Plan recommends that the federal government review Federal Trade Commission investigations or orders from the Biden administration that 'unduly burden AI innovation,' perhaps referencing investigations into potentially monopolistic AI investments and deceptive AI advertising. The document also suggests that federal agencies reduce AI-related funding to states with regulatory environments deemed unfriendly to AI. (For instance, a state might risk losing funding if it has a law that requires AI firms to open themselves up to extensive third-party audits of their technology.) As for the possible environmental tolls of AI development—the data centers chatbots run on consume huge amounts of water and electricity —the AI Action Plan waves them away. The road map suggests streamlining or reducing a number of environmental regulations, such as standards in the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act—which would require evaluating pollution from AI infrastructure—in order to accelerate construction. Once the red tape is gone, the Trump administration wants to create a 'dynamic, 'try-first' culture for AI across American industry.' In other words, build and test out AI products first, and then determine if those products are actually helpful—or if they pose any risks. The plan outlines policies to encourage both private and public adoption of AI in a number of domains: scientific discovery, health care, agriculture, and basically any government service. In particular, the plan stresses, 'the United States must aggressively adopt AI within its Armed Forces if it is to maintain its global military preeminence'—in line with how nearly every major AI firm has begun developing military offerings over the past year. Earlier this month, the Pentagon announced contracts worth up to $200 million each with OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and xAI. All of this aligns rather neatly with the broader AI industry's goals. Companies want to build more energy infrastructure and data centers, deploy AI more widely, and fast-track innovation. Several of OpenAI's recommendations to the AI Action Plan—including 'categorical exclusions' from environmental policy for AI-infrastructure construction, limits on state regulations, widespread federal procurement of AI, and 'sandboxes' for start-ups to freely test AI—closely echo the final document. Also this week, Anthropic published a policy document titled 'Building AI in America' with very similar suggestions for building AI infrastructure, such as 'slashing red tape' and partnering with the private sector. Permitting reform and more investments in energy supply, keystones of the final plan, were also the central asks of Google and Microsoft. The regulations and safety concerns the AI Action Plan does highlight, although important, all dovetail with efforts that AI firms are already undertaking; there's nothing here that would seriously slow Silicon Valley down. Trump gestured toward other concessions to the AI industry in his speech. He specifically targeted intellectual-property laws, arguing that training AI models on copyrighted books and articles does not infringe upon copyright because the chatbots, like people, are simply learning from the content. This has been a major conflict in recent years, with more than 40 related lawsuits filed against AI companies since 2022. (The Atlantic is suing the AI company Cohere, for example.) If courts were to decide that training AI models with copyrighted material is against the law, it would be a major setback for AI companies. In their official recommendations for the AI Action Plan, OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google all requested a copyright exception, known as 'fair use,' for AI training. Based on his statements, Trump appears to strongly agree with this position, although the AI Action Plan itself does not reference copyright and AI training. Also sprinkled throughout the AI Action Plan are gestures toward some MAGA priorities. Notably, the policy states that the government will contract with only AI companies whose models are 'free from top-down ideological bias'—a reference to Sacks's crusade against 'woke' AI—and that a federal AI-risk-management framework should 'eliminate references to misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change.' Trump signed a third executive order today that, in his words, will eliminate 'woke, Marxist lunacy' from AI models. The plan also notes that the U.S. 'must prevent the premature decommissioning of critical power generation resources,' likely a subtle nod to Trump's suggestion that coal is a good way to power data centers. Looming over the White House's AI agenda is the threat of Chinese technology getting ahead. The AI Action Plan repeatedly references the importance of staying ahead of Chinese AI firms, as did the president's speech: 'We will not allow any foreign nation to beat us; our nation will not live in a planet controlled by the algorithms of the adversaries,' Trump declared. The worry is that advanced AI models could give China economic, military, and diplomatic dominance over the world—a fear that OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and several other AI firms have added to. But whatever happens on the international stage, hundreds of millions of Americans will feel more and more of generative AI's influence—on salaries and schools, air quality and electricity costs, federal services and doctor's offices. AI companies have been granted a good chunk of their wish list; if anything, the industry is being told that it's not moving fast enough. Silicon Valley has been given permission to accelerate, and we're all along for the ride.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store