logo
Local residents voice concerns about Anderson water rate increase

Local residents voice concerns about Anderson water rate increase

Yahoo08-03-2025
ANDERSON — Several area residents spoke against a proposed rate increase for the Anderson Water Department.
The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission conducted a public hearing Thursday on the city's proposed rate increase to finance up to $130 million in infrastructure improvements.
The city's water rates have increased twice in the past 25 years.
As proposed, the rate for a residential customer using 4,000 gallons per month would increase in five phases.
The current rate is $24.95 per month and, if approved by the state regulatory commission, would climb to $47.58 per month in 2029.
Large customers of the water utility will see an increase from $117,772 monthly to $434,171 starting in 2029.
The IURC will receive testimony from the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor on March 20; rebuttal testimony from the city is scheduled for April 16, with another hearing set for May 8.
A final decision is expected in the fall.
Residents that testified they were concerned about the amount of the rate increase and the city's plans to build a new water treatment plant in the south of Anderson and new wells.
'My water rights are being impacted,' Amy Gustin said.
Gustin said the city's water utility currently has existing debt of $12 million through 2035 and anticipates $8 million in annual debt to fund the project.
She asked the IURC to delay making a decision because of the considerable debt.
'People have wells,' Gustin said. 'Those wells will be impacted.'
Cheryl McKinney asked commission members to consider the people of Anderson, which she said is not a wealthy community.
Gary Louderback said Anderson wants to drill new wells that will impact the aquifer providing water to residential customers.
'The community is not what it used to be,' he said. 'The industry is gone and there is an aging population.'
Sonja Dalton said she objects to the drilling of new wells in southern Madison County, adding that existing wells would be compromised.
'I don't have the money to pay for a new well, like many of my neighbors,' she said. 'I would like to see a better plan for this community.'
Last year the Anderson City Council approved $130 million in bonds over the next three years.
The council has already approved $9 million in American Rescue Plan funds, and the Anderson Redevelopment Commission is providing $19 million toward the project.
All the work is scheduled to be completed by September 2029, with work on the initial phase starting later this year.
Both Anderson and the town of Pendleton have submitted applications with the IURC to increase the service areas for their respective water utilities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why So Many Childcare Centers Are Closing
Why So Many Childcare Centers Are Closing

Time​ Magazine

time11 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Why So Many Childcare Centers Are Closing

For nearly 18 years, Corrine Hendrickson has run a family daycare out of her home in rural Wisconsin, navigating the low pay and long hours because she loves the job. But at the end of August, before a new school year begins, she's shutting down Corrine's Little Explorers for good. With the disappearance of federal and state subsidies that kept her afloat for the last few years, she says, the model no longer works, and she doesn't want to have to choose between raising rates or taking a pay cut. She's not alone: in Wisconsin, other childcare centers are closing ahead of the new school year. 'We're getting to an inflection point,' she says. 'I think enough of us are going to close that they're going to have to do something.' Across the country, childcare centers are struggling as they never have before. A perfect storm of rising costs, worker shortages, and the expiration of federal and state grants makes it extremely difficult for these businesses to operate. Childcare has long been in crisis. Overhead costs like buildings and liability insurance are expensive, and to take care of young kids, centers need a lot of staff, which means they have to spend a lot on payroll. But they also can't charge too much money, or families will drop out. 'Childcare is a textbook example of a broken market,' said Janet Yellen, back in 2021 when she was Secretary of the Treasury. Read More: Why So Many Women Are Quitting the Workforce But for all the struggles of childcare providers in recent years, the pandemic provided an unlikely source of hope. The American Rescue Plan included $24 billion for a Child Care Stabilization program that helped 220,000 centers keep paying wages, benefits, rent, utilities, and other costs. Another $15 billion went to help expand access to childcare. Some of that funding expired in Sept. 2023; the rest expired one year later. And while some states were able to move around federal funds or pass temporary legislation to financially support childcare facilities, that funding is expiring in much of the country. 'It was already a non-sustainable business model, and it got even worse,' says Julie Kashen, senior fellow and director for women's economic justice at the Century Foundation, a left-leaning think tank. 'The pandemic funding really helped prop it up, but ultimately turned into a bridge to nowhere.' Indeed, Corrine Hendrickson said she was actually most solvent during the pandemic; the federal funding even allowed her to hire an extra substitute employee. But, she says, she had been thinking of getting out of the childcare business leading up to the pandemic. She only makes a profit of $20,000 a year, which is an extremely low salary for all the work she does. When it became evident that neither the federal nor state government was going to continue to support childcare providers in Wisconsin, she says, she decided to close her business. The end of funding appears to be leading to many closures. North Carolina, for example, was able to stretch its federal pandemic dollars through June 2024. But after that, 43 centers across the state closed, according to Candace Witherspoon, director of the division of child development and early education in North Carolina. The state was able to release some stopgap funding that lasted through March 2025, but when that ended, even more programs closed. The state has seen 158 programs shutter since the beginning of the year, she says. Read More: 'People Are Going to Die': Cuts Leave Domestic Violence Support Groups Reeling The federal funding allowed many centers to raise pay from $11 an hour to $14, Witherspoon says, but even the higher rate is not enough to attract and retain workers when fast-food restaurants and other businesses pay considerably more. About half of childcare providers in the state aren't able to offer health insurance for their workers, and about 43% of childcare workers in the state are on some form of public assistance like Medicaid and food stamps. Yet demand for childcare is high. 'North Carolina is in crisis because many of our parents are being forced to leave the workforce' since they can't find care for their children, Witherspoon says. In North Carolina, there's only one infant and toddler spot for every five families applying for care. When childcare centers close or parents are unable to find a spot for their children, one parent—usually the mother—often drops out of the workforce to care for the kids. Between the second quarter of 2023 and the third quarter of 2024, the number of people who reduced their hours to part-time or who left the labor force altogether due to childcare rose 43%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. One analysis of the childcare stabilization funds dispersed during the pandemic found that they helped the mothers with young children stay in the workforce. About 26% of the money spent to stabilize childcare actually ended up back in the government's coffers through tax receipts. As federal and state dollars expire, the childcare business is getting even tougher. Inflation is driving up costs like rent and insurance. Labor is becoming more expensive, and providers are facing more competition from other businesses that can pay better. And roughly 20% of the childcare workforce is made up of immigrants, which means that the Trump Administration's deportation campaign is affecting some workers. One childcare provider in Seattle, for instance, was recently detained by ICE. Read More: Positive Economic Data Is Still Hiding Bleak Reality for Many Families The cost of childcare now exceeds the price of college tuition in 38 states and Washington, according to an analysis conducted by the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank. Meanwhile, the median wage in early care and education falls below 97% of other occupations, according to the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment at the University of California, Berkeley. The median wage is $13.07 an hour, but ranges from $10.60 in Louisiana to $18.23 in Washington, D.C. For many providers, raising prices is not an option. Already, prices have grown by 29% since 2020—faster than overall inflation, according to Child Care Aware, an advocacy group. 'If I raise tuition, will I lose too many families to stay afloat? If I don't raise tuition, will I be able to stay afloat?' says Meghann Carrasco, the founder and executive director of Seedlings to Sunflowers, a nonprofit childcare provider in Maine. The center used the pandemic funding to stay open for all but two months during the pandemic, and is now struggling because its Pre-K program is under-enrolled. The center raised prices 16% this year, the most it has ever raised tuition, and lost some families who couldn't afford it, Carrasco says. Even with the tuition increase, Seedlings to Sunflowers was only able to stay open because it embarked on a fundraising campaign in its community, securing $25,000 in interest-free loans and donations. 'The amount of programs closing daily is more than we've ever seen,' Carrasco says. Read More: Why So Many Seniors Can't Afford Long-Term Care Most providers say that without federal or state funding, they do not have a long-term future. Federal funding for childcare was close to becoming a reality in 2021, when the House passed a child care solution in the Build Back Better Act, but it was stripped from the next version of the bill, which became the Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats in Congress introduced a bill in April 2025 that would increase federal spending on childcare, but it's unlikely to go anywhere, especially in a political climate where some Republicans are backing policies that encourage more mothers to stay at home. For now, says Kashen of the Century Foundation, childcare providers have to hope that their states will help them survive. This creates a patchwork system where providers in certain states—often blue states—will stay open and educate more children, while others, in red states, will close or only stay open for people who can afford it. New Mexico, for instance, passed a constitutional amendment in 2022 guaranteeing the right to early childhood education. The state devoted a portion of money from oil and gas development fees to early care and education, amounting to about $150 million a year for early childhood education programs. Vermont passed Act 76 in 2023, which will fund childcare through a 0.44% payroll tax; Massachusetts added half a billion dollars in funding for childcare providers in 2024; and Connecticut passed a bill in 2025 that creates a new endowment for early childhood education. Most states, though, passed nothing at all.

Iowa City nonprofit using $2.5M grant to build 6 affordable homes for domestic abuse survivors
Iowa City nonprofit using $2.5M grant to build 6 affordable homes for domestic abuse survivors

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Iowa City nonprofit using $2.5M grant to build 6 affordable homes for domestic abuse survivors

Iowa City is selling a vacant lot to a local nonprofit planning to build homes for individuals fleeing domestic abuse. The city-owned lot valued at $270,000 will be given to the Domestic Violence Intervention Program (DVIP) to create six new townhomes on the east side of town. DVIP was awarded nearly $2.5 million in HOME American Rescue Plan funding from the Iowa Finance Authority in 2024 to help construct the six townhomes. The grant will also cover some of the cost associated with operating the supportive housing program over the first few years. More: UI grad union 'condemns' school's DEI investigation, cites unauthorized recording policy Iowa City says nonprofit must offer affordable housing The city will create a "conditional occupancy loan" for DVIP at 0% interest. The organization must maintain affordability for tenants earning at or below 60% of the median area income. The loan will be forgiven completely if DVIP achieves affordability for 20 years. The city purchased the land in 2018 with the intention of developing affordable housing east of Scott Boulevard. Though several concepts have been considered by city staff in the years since, none came to fruition. "This action is consistent with the council's direction to use city resources strategically to expand supportive housing options," Iowa City Neighborhood and Development Services Coordinator Tracy Hightshoe told the council. What is HOME-ARP and what will the grant money cover? The HOME-American Rescue Plan was part of the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act. The Iowa Finance Authority was awarded approximately $29 million in HOME-ARP funds to help "reduce homelessness and increase housing stability." HOME-ARP funds are intended to assist people at risk of or experiencing homelessness and those fleeing "dating violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking," according to the state's website. More: From crowdfunding to ownership: How FilmScene bought its original Ped Mall location Of the $2.5 million awarded to DVIP by the Iowa Finance Authority, roughly $1.74 million will be used to cover construction. DVIP Executive Director Kristie Fortmann-Doser said the remaining $750,000 will be used for "supportive services" and other operating costs for six years. DVIP hopes to gain a local foothold with the program and build its savings to foster a success. Townhomes while expand DVIP's services Fortmann-Doser said the affordable townhomes are the second phase of DVIP's recent expansion of offerings. The organization opened its new, larger shelter for survivors of domestic violence in late 2024. Fortmann-Doser said DVIP also expects to provide affordable apartments to individuals fleeing domestic violence. She said the townhomes are geared toward families fleeing domestic violence. More: Iowa teens use demolition derby to smash civic divides through public art The final rent costs have not been finalized, but DVIP will only charge a portion of the median area market rate rent. The townhomes are not transitional housing, meaning residents may stay as long as they need. DVIP estimates construction will be completed by the spring with hopes the townhomes are occupied by 2027. Ryan Hansen covers local government and crime for the Press-Citizen. He can be reached at rhansen@ or on X, formerly known as Twitter, @ryanhansen01. This article originally appeared on Iowa City Press-Citizen: Iowa City's DVIP to build 6 homes for domestic abuse survivors

Rep. Ed Soliday's text to Portage mayor over NIPSCO rates draws sharp responses
Rep. Ed Soliday's text to Portage mayor over NIPSCO rates draws sharp responses

Chicago Tribune

time06-08-2025

  • Chicago Tribune

Rep. Ed Soliday's text to Portage mayor over NIPSCO rates draws sharp responses

Portage Mayor Austin Bonta notified City Council members Tuesday of a blistering text message from state Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso. 'I received a threat to our city's financial situation' from Soliday, chair of the House Utilities, Energy and Telecommunications Committee, Bonta said. 'He was frustrated with me on a personal note.' 'I just think I wouldn't be a responsible mayor if I didn't bring a stated threat up to you,' Bonta said. Better to alert city officials now than ignore it and find out later that Soliday's threat led to action, he said. Soliday didn't immediately respond to messages Wednesday morning. 'I want to thank you for your very enlightened comments on the IURC and rate increases!!! I am glad you took a stand against any future pay raises for NIPSCO linemen and other employees. I am additionally thankful that you took a position against meeting the inflationary costs of replacing our aging infrastructure,' Soliday wrote. 'I am most appreciative that you took a strong position to replace the nationally top rated Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission with an elected board. That way we could have any fool serve who will pander to the public noise boxes with no qualifications. BIG MISTAKE MAYOR. Maybe next time get the facts before you blow off on public policy. You and Red Stone make a heck of a pair,' he added. 'I promise I will work hard to make certain your city never gets any revenue increases!!!' Soliday concluded. Soliday's text was in response to Bonta's July 28 post on social media, using his personal account, noting that the City Council adopted a resolution opposing the full rate increase NIPSCO proposed and forwarded it to the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. Bonta said Tuesday he agrees with Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith and others that having at least two members of the IURC be elected might make the commission more responsive to the public's concerns. The mayor made clear to the council and the public that this was his personal view. 'I'm in the pothole-fixing business and police-funding business' as mayor, he said. Porter County Council Vice President Ronald 'Red' Stone, whom Soliday mentioned in his text to Bonta, spoke out at Tuesday's City Council meeting. 'It's the most distasteful thing that I've read,' he said. 'I think that was definitely wrong, and he should resign over that, quite frankly,' Stone said. 'If this is really how politics works, I don't want to be a part of this,' he said. Stone acknowledged he's outspoken. 'I fight for people, I fight for blue-collar people, and that's just how it is,' he said. 'I think sometimes you have to be able to tell people the real deal.' 'If people can't accept criticism, you're in for a rough time,' Stone said. Porter County Board of Commissioners President Jim Biggs and state Rep. Chuck Moseley, D-Portage, also attended the City Council meeting but didn't speak out. Bonta, Soliday, Stone and Biggs are all Republicans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store