Court allows Adam Asmuni to submit new evidence in appeal
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today allowed an application by former Bersatu Youth Chief Adam Asmuni to submit new evidence, namely bank account statements, in his appeal over the forfeiture of a luxury car and goods that were seized by authorities during a drug raid.
Judge K. Muniandy made the ruling after hearing the submissions by Adam's lawyer, Amirrul (rpt: Amirrul) Jamaluddin, and Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohamad Shahrizat Amadan.
In his submission, Amirrul said the bank account statements from 2014 to 2019 of his Adam's company, Percetakan Alfa Gemilang, could be used as evidence to support his appeal against the forfeiture order issued by the Sessions Court judge on March 14, 2023 under Section 32 (2) of the Dangerous Drugs (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1988.
'The bank account statements are relevant in the appeal to show my client's strong financial status, where his income is from the Percetakan Alfa Gemilang. The company is legitimate and has obtained many tenders worth tens and millions of ringgit from the government.
'Therefore, the seized assets are also from legitimate sources,' he said.
Amirrul also told the court that the bank account statements could not be obtained earlier, but only in February 2024 and were handed over to him the following March (March).
Mohamad Shahrizhat, who objected to the application, said the bank account statements should have been submitted during the forfeiture hearing proceedings at the Sessions Court two years ago.
Judge Muniandy then set June 30 for the hearing of the appeal regarding the forfeiture case.
On March 14, 2023, Judge Nor Hasniah Ab Razak dismissed the application by Adam and his wife, Lyiana Roslee, to recover the BMW X5 and BMW 328i cars and other items including cash, cars, motorcycles, luxury watches, handbags, laptops, bracelets, necklaces, and Amanah Saham Nasional Bhd (ASNB) accounts.
Last January, Adam was sentenced to seven years in prison and 10 strokes of the cane by the Shah Alam High Court after pleading guilty to an optional charge of possessing cannabis.
Adam is currently in Kajang Prison. However, Lyiana was released and acquitted of the charges after the prosecution withdrew the charges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
12 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Ex-civil servant fined for corruption involving towing services
Abel (right) outside the court with his counsel Dominic (second left) after the proceedings on Tuesday. KOTA KINABALU (June 10): A former civil servant was fined RM700,000 by a Sessions Court here on Tuesday after pleading guilty to 15 corruption charges related to towing services. Judge Jason Juga handed down the sentence to 52-year-old Abel Ongkunik, who had earlier pleaded guilty on March 14 to 15 to alternative charges under Section 165 of the Penal Code. The section provides for a jail term of up to two years, a fine, or both upon conviction. The prosecution offered the lesser charges after considering Abel's representation letter, which was accepted by the Deputy Public Prosecutor's Office. According to the charges, Abel, while serving as the director of the Sabah Ports and Harbours Department, received between RM33,098.62 and RM59,724.30 for granting a company permission to carry out towing services within the Kimanis port limitation area in 2018. He was also charged with approving towing licenses for a company between August 28, 2017 and July 2, 2018. The payments were made by two companies and deposited into the accounts of three different companies at bank branches in Kota Kinabalu, Lido and Kota Belud. For each of the 15 charges, Abel was fined between RM38,000 and RM58,000. In default, he will serve six months in jail per charge. Previously, on March 15, 2022, Abel had claimed trial to 29 charges under Section 17(a) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, punishable under Section 24(1) of the same Act, involving a total sum of RM1,290,706.19. The court later withdrew 15 of the original charges, while the remaining 14 were taken into consideration under Section 171A of the Criminal Procedure Code during sentencing. The court also ordered the return of Abel's passport and the refund of his bail. He was represented by counsel Dominic Chew. Abel paid the fines.
![[UPDATED] Court of Appeal grants Anwar temporary stay in Yusoff Rawther case](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FHQ230325ES029_1749531969.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] Court of Appeal grants Anwar temporary stay in Yusoff Rawther case](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
12 hours ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] Court of Appeal grants Anwar temporary stay in Yusoff Rawther case
PUTRAJAYA: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has succeeded in obtaining an ad interim order (temporary stay) of trial proceedings in a sexual assault suit filed against him in 2021 by former research officer Muhammed Yusoff Rawther. This means the trial, scheduled to begin on June 16, along with all related proceedings, will be suspended until the full hearing of the stay application on July 21. A three-member Court of Appeal panel led by Datuk Supang Lian unanimously granted the ad interim order after hearing submissions from Anwar's lawyer, Alan Wong, and Yusoff's lawyer, Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali. "We are of the considered view that under Section 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act, we are empowered to make an ad interim order to preserve the integrity of the appellant's (Anwar) stay application pending the disposal of the appeal. "Accordingly, we hereby make an ad interim order to stay all proceedings, including full trial at the High Court pending the disposal of the appellant's stay application," she said in her decision today. The other judges were Datuk Faizah Jamaludin and Datuk Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin. Anwar's application to stay trial proceedings came after Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain rejected his bid to refer eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court on the immunity of a prime minister from a civil suit. Roz Mawar had also dismissed Anwar's lawyer, Datuk Seri Rajasegaran Krishnan's oral application to stay trial proceedings. Sept 2 was set for case management for the appeal against Roz Mawar's decision that rejected Anwar's referral application to the Federal Court. Earlier, Wong submitted that if a stay on trial proceedings was not allowed, the referral application to the Federal Court would be nugatory. "It is important for the Federal Court to consider the eight constitutional questions as it delves into whether constitutional safeguards are to be implied to protect the functions, institutions and the integrity of the prime minister's office," he said. He said if the trial went on, Anwar, as the sitting prime minister, would be required to divert attention and resources to the proceedings, which would disrupt the business of the government for seven days. Wong argued that there would be no prejudice and irreversible harm to Yusoff if the trial were deferred, as his claims for monetary damages could still be compensated. "But for the appellant (Anwar) and the public office he holds, which is inseparable, the consequences will be real, irreversible and constitutionally significant. "On the other hand, the prejudice to the function and office of the prime minister cannot be compensated in any way. "It cannot be redressed or addressed if the trial proceeded without an appeal being heard or even the Federal Court considering the constitutional questions," he said. In a rebuttal, Rafique argued that the trial dates were fixed a year ago and that Anwar knew very well he was due in court from then. He said the trial would not impair Anwar's capability to carry out his functions as the prime minister. "The prime minister had more than enough time to prepare for this trial, knowing very well that everyone has to submit to the court system. "The trial must proceed, and there is no reason to delay it. When the High Court declined to allow such a stay, it underscored that there is no compelling or special circumstance in this matter. "Moreover, his referral application came 23 days before the trial was supposed to start. "The application to refer to the eight constitutional questions is doomed to fail as they are rhetorical and there is no chance for success," he said. Roz Mawar, in her decision, ruled that Anwar's referral application on the eight constitutional questions was speculative and did not meet the requirements under Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act. Anwar had sought the apex court to rule whether Articles 5,8,39,40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from Yusoff's suit. He had asked the court to decide whether Yusoff's suit would impair the effective discharge of his executive duties and undermine the constitutional separation of powers. Anwar had also requested the court to consider whether the lawsuit impacts his ability to carry out executive duties and undermines the principle of separation of powers guaranteed by the constitution.
New Straits Times
15 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ex-Sabah ports director fined RM700,000 for bribery
KOTA KINABALU: A former Sabah Ports and Harbour Department director has been fined RM700,000 for 15 counts of bribery involving towing services. Sessions Court judge Jason Juga imposed the hefty fine on Abel Ongkunik, 52, when the case was brought before him today for facts and sentencing. On March 14, he pleaded guilty to all 15 alternative charges under Section 165 of the Penal Code, which provides for imprisonment of up to two years, or a fine, or both, upon conviction. The alternative charges were offered by the prosecution following the acceptance of his representation letters. The total amount involved in the 15 charges was RM632,296.03. The charges stated that, while serving as the department director, the accused received sums ranging from RM33,098.62 to RM59,724.30 from two companies connected to his official duties, between 2017 and 2018. The money was deposited into the accounts of three companies at several bank branches in Kota Kinabalu, Lido and Kota Belud. The offences were related to granting permission to a company for towing services in the Kimanis port limit area and approving towing work licences for another company. The court imposed fines ranging from RM38,000 to RM58,000 for each charge. It was learnt that the accused had paid the fines. According to the facts of the case, the accused had the authority to grant approvals for towing services provided by JPDS. He had met with the owner of the two companies and arranged for the approvals to be granted by the department for the provision of towing services. Investigations also revealed that the accused received money from the company owner, with funds transferred from the accounts of both companies into the accounts of three other companies. The accounts and financial dealings of these three companies were under the accused's control. During mitigation, counsel Dominic Chew, representing Abel, requested the court to impose a fine between RM650,000 and RM690,000 for all 15 charges. Dominic informed the court that the accused, who has three children, is the sole breadwinner of the family and that this was his first offence. "In addition, our client has expressed genuine remorse and wishes to move forward with his life through his new employment in Terengganu, while providing for his family through lawful means," he said. In reply, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) deputy public prosecutor Nurul Izzati Sapifee proposed that the fine be at least RM50,000 per charge, taking into account the facts of the case, the need to serve public interest, and to act as a deterrent to potential offenders. She said the accused, as a director at the time, held the highest position in the department. As such, he should have upheld high moral standards when dealing with businesses involving the department and in maintaining the image of the public service in the eyes of the public. "The fact that he committed such offences while holding the highest position in the department could have prevented other companies from being granted similar permits for work from it. "As a director, he should not have had personal dealings with any individual or company known to be connected to his official duties," she added. The accused was originally facing 29 charges involving over RM1.29 million in bribes under Section 17(a) of the MACC Act 2009, which is punishable under Section 24(1) of the same act. He pleaded not guilty on March 15, 2022. The 15 original charges were withdrawn, while the remaining 14 main charges were taken into consideration by the court in accordance with Section 171A of the Criminal Procedure Code.
