Trump orders tariffs on dozens of countries
However, in a minor reprieve, the White House said the measures will take effect next Friday, a week later than expected.
The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Mr Trump says will put US exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out imports.
But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy.
And with questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals already struck - including by the European Union and Japan - the outcome of Mr Trump's plan remained uncertain.
His new measures in an executive order raised duties on dozens of economies up to a 41% rate.
Most of these new tariff hikes were first announced in April when Mr Trump put a minimum 10% levy on goods from almost every country in the world, citing unfair trade practices and US deficits.
However, Washington then postponed implementation, amid frantic series of negotiations, alongside announcements of new duties and deals with some partners.
The President yesterday announced he was delaying a tariff hike on products from the major US trading partner Mexico. The postponement by 90 days came after talks with his counterpart Claudia Sheinbaum.
The 79-year-old Republican has made tariffs core to his protectionist brand of hard-right politics.
Mr Sheinbaum claimed that the US economy had "no chance of survival or success" without tariffs.
But the latest salvo came amid legal challenges against Mr Trump's use of emergency economic powers.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard arguments in cases brought against Mr Trump's blanket tariffs targeting different countries.
And questions linger over the effectiveness of his grand plans, or even whether he will hold firm on his most drastic threats.
While Mr Trump has touted a surge in customs revenues since the start of the year, economists warn the duties could fuel inflation.
Proponents of his policy argue that their impact will be one-off, but analysts are awaiting further economic data to gauge for more persistent effects.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Data credibility fears fuelled after Trump orders firing of labour official
Sharp downward revisions to jobs data on Friday, followed by Donald Trump 's sudden order to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics , stoked investor fears about the integrity of economic data and the Fed's ability to read the true state of the US economy. News of a surprise weakening in the US labour market last month jolted investors, while revisions to job figures for the past two months raised worries the US central bank may have been flying blind in recent months and may need to play catch-up with interest rate cuts, investors said. Fed governor Adriana Kugler's early resignation from her term on Friday also potentially shakes up what was already a fractious succession process for Fed leadership amid difficult relations with Mr Trump. The US president on Friday renewed his call for Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to resign. 'Powell should resign, just like Adriana Kugler, a Biden Appointee, resigned,' Mr Trump said in a post on Truth Social. READ MORE 'Kugler's resignation allows the president to further shape the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] in his own image,' said Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 73,000 jobs in July after rising by a downwardly revised 14,000 in June, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said in its employment report on Friday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls increasing by 110,000 jobs after rising by a previously reported 147,000 in June. The report comes two days after the US central bank left unchanged its benchmark interest rate and avoided signalling imminent rate cuts, dialling back market expectations for an easing at the next policy meeting in September. That changed dramatically on Friday, with odds for a 25 basis point cut in September jumping to about 81 per cent after the data from 38 per cent on Thursday, according to CME Group data. 'The Fed's job is becoming increasingly difficult based on the deterioration of the economic data,' said Matthew Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at Manulife John Hancock Investments. 'These revisions are massive and really are a game changer to the Fed's reaction function, and so I think this Fed meeting is one that they'd like to revise.' Mr Trump on Friday said, without evidence, that numbers contained in the July jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics were rigged. 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. He ordered that the commissioner of the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics Erika McEntarfer be fired after the data release. 'It's definitely a case of shooting the messenger,' said Dean Smith, chief strategist at FolioBeyond. 'Firing the head of BLS is not going to improve data collection and dissemination ... it's going to undermine confidence in the data going forward,' he said. Revisions for May and June came in well above the norm, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said. It gave no reason for the revised data but noted that 'monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors.' May's nonfarm payroll gain was slashed by 125,000, from 144,000 to just 19,000, while June's downward revision was by 133,000. In total, employment over the two months is now 258,000 lower than initially reported. 'It is painfully obvious that the US government has an improper model for payroll calculations,' said Michael Green, portfolio manager at Simplify Asset Management. 'If you don't have reliable data, you make bad policy.' Spencer Hakimian, founder of macro hedge fund Tolou Capital Management, said lay-offs across several government departments, part of Mr Trump's plans to reduce wasteful government spending, have prompted him to rely more heavily on alternative measures of economic strength than just government data, such as credit card data, and data from Truflation, an independent inflation index alternative to official government inflation measures. Mr Powell said in a press conference on Wednesday the labour market remained strong, and that the central bank was still in the early stages of grasping how Mr Trump's overhaul of import taxes and other policy shifts would play out for inflation, employment and economic growth. 'Had those figures been the initial prints a month or two ago it would have significantly changed the labour market narrative over the entire summer,' said Adam Hetts, global head of multi-asset and portfolio manager at Janus Henderson Investors, in a note. Treasury yields, which move inversely to bond prices, dropped on Friday, with benchmark 10-year yields down by a whopping 15 basis points to 4.22 per cent – their biggest daily drop since April. Two-year yields were down by about 25 basis points to 3.69 per cent, registering their biggest daily decline since August last year. Stocks declined too, also weighed on by Mr Trump's latest tariffs salvo. The benchmark S&P 500 index lost 1.6 per cent, bringing stocks to their lowest since early July. The deterioration in the labour picture comes amid steep US tariffs on large trade partners that – while not as high as feared earlier this year – are still largely expected to worsen inflation and slow economic activity. (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
US to deploy two nuclear submarines in response to 'highly provocative' comments from Russia
LAST UPDATE | 3 hrs ago US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump has said he ordered that two nuclear submarines be deployed in response to 'highly provocative' comments by a senior Russian official. Trump did not say whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the locations, which are kept secret by the US military. The United States and Russia control the vast majority of the world's nuclear weaponry, and Washington keeps nuclear-armed submarines on patrol as part of its so-called nuclear triad of land, sea and air-launched weapons. 'Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev…, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Trump did not refer specifically to what Medvedev had said to prompt the highly unusual public display of nuclear sabre-rattling. On Monday, Medvedev harshly criticised Trump's threat of new sanctions against Russia over the continuing invasion of Ukraine. Advertisement Accusing Trump of 'playing the ultimatum game,' he posted on X that Trump 'should remember' that Russia is a formidable force. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' the Russian official said. Medvedev is currently deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council and a vocal proponent of President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine – and generally antagonistic relations with the West. He served one term as president between 2008-2012, effectively acting as a placeholder for Putin, who was able to circumvent constitutional term limits and remain in de facto power. - © AFP 2025 Want to know more about what's happening in Ukraine and why? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to finding good information online. Visit Knowledge Bank
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Mapped: The growing global support for Palestinian statehood
MOMENTUM IS BUILDING behind Palestinian statehood, as a growing number of Western powers signal their intent to formally recognise it. France, the United Kingdom and Canada have all announced plans to recognise a Palestinian state, a major policy shift for the key US allies, joining more than 140 countries that already do. Their decisions come amid worsening famine conditions in Gaza, as starvation is rampant across the territory. While recognition of Palestine is not new among nations in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, these latest developments mark a significant shift within the West, particularly among G7 and NATO countries that have historically aligned with Israel. Growing recognition mapped Recognition by these major Western powers would mark the first such move by any member of the G7, and would increase pressure on others, including Germany, Italy and the United States, to reconsider their stance. France plans to formalise recognition in September. The UK has said it will proceed unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire. Canada has tied its decision to democratic reforms by the Palestinian Authority, including elections in the West Bank that exclude Hamas. Israel and the United States have strongly opposed the announcements, arguing they 'reward Hamas' and undermine ceasefire efforts. US President Donald Trump warned Canada that its decision could threaten a future trade deal. Palestinian statehood has long been recognised by much of the Global South, as well as by key G20 members including China, India, Brazil and South Africa. In Europe, support has grown steadily over the past year. Ireland, Spain and Norway formally recognised Palestine in May 2024 in a joint move, and Slovenia, Malta and others are signalling similar intentions. Ireland is among 15 nations that have called for the world to recognise a Palestinian state and reiterated commitment for a two-state solution at the High-level International Conference which took place in New York this week. The joint foreign ministers statement expressed the call for a ceasefire, concern over the high number of civilian casualties and humanitarian situation in Gaza, and calls on countries across the world to recognise the state of Palestine. France's minister for foreign affairs, Jean-Noel Barrot, posted the letter to his X account alongside the message: 'In New York, along with 14 other countries, France is launching a collective appeal: we express our desire to recognise the State of Palestine and invite those who have not yet done so to join us.' Advertisement The statement is backed by Ireland, Andorra, Australia, Canada, Finland, France, Iceland, Luxembourg, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Slovenia, and Spain. Palestine state recognition Palestine currently holds non-member observer status at the United Nations. In 2024, a US veto at the Security Council blocked an attempt to grant full UN membership, despite 12 countries voting in favour. Proponents of recognition argue that statehood is essential for advancing a credible two-state solution. As one senior Egyptian official told the New York Times, 'The Israelis used to claim they had no partner for peace. The problem now is that there is no partner for peace in Israel.' What does recognition mean? Palestine exists, and does not. It has embassies, Olympic teams, and wide international support, but lacks the basic features of a fully functioning state: borders, sovereignty and control of its territory. The Palestinian Authority has limited authority in parts of the West Bank under Israeli occupation. In Gaza, also considered occupied, Israel is waging devastating attacks. Palestinians continue to demand East Jerusalem as their capital, while Israel maintains control across the region. In practical terms, recognising a Palestinian state changes little on the ground. But symbolically, it matters. After decades of stalled diplomacy, expanding Israeli settlements and cycles of violence, many now see recognition as a long-overdue statement, not a solution in itself, but a step towards one. If the UK and France recognise a Palestinian state, it also means that four out of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (France, the UK, Russia and China) will speak with a single voice on the issue. This would effectively isolate the US and their support for Israel, in theory. Lastly, there could be implications for the International Criminal Court (ICC), which issued warrants for the arrest of Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in November for 'crimes against humanity and war crimes' in Gaza. Netanyahu has called the charges 'outrageous' and the international court an 'enemy of humanity.' Experts say the recognition of Palestine could have legal consequences in the context of the ICC jurisdiction. However, France has said it would not arrest Netanyahu and Gallant because it would be incompatible with international legal obligations concerning immunities granted to states not party to the ICC, such as Israel. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
