logo
New claim that William Tyrrell person of interest ‘took that little boy' 250km away from where he went missing

New claim that William Tyrrell person of interest ‘took that little boy' 250km away from where he went missing

News.com.au02-06-2025
A second person has come forward alleging a 'person of interest' in the William Tyrrell investigation was identified by his own brother as being involved in the three-year-old's disappearance
The woman, Donna Bulley, said she reported this to police months after William was reported missing in September 2014, but it was not followed up by detectives.
The NSW Police Force has instead focused on William's foster mother in recent years but has not charged anyone over what took place and has been described in court as having 'no forensic evidence' and 'no eyewitness'.
The person of interest, Frank Abbott, is currently in prison for child sex offences against multiple victims. Detectives investigating William's disappearance did not focus on Abbott until around 2019, years after Ms Bulley attempted to tell police about him.
Recorded prison phone calls from November 2019 reveal police suggested Abbott 'borrowed somebody's car and went down, enticed [William] out with lollies and ice cream out of the yard'.
He has privately denied any involvement, however, and news.com.au is not suggesting the new allegations about his brother are true, just that they have been made and have not been followed up by police.
Abbott was also never questioned at the inquest investigating what happened to William, with the coroner ordering her decision on whether to do so cannot be made public.
Our investigative podcast Witness: William Tyrrell spoke to dozens of people about Abbott, including two men who now live in his old house in the town of Johns River, a short drive from Kendall, where William was last seen.
Last month, we revealed the older of these men said Abbott's late brother Jeffrey – also known as Bluey – 'always said, when the stories were going around with Tyrrell, that he didn't do it.
'[But] pretty close to when he died, Bluey said to my son, 'He did do it … and he's buried up on Big Bird Mountain there, where that big tree is '.
'No one ever checked that out.'
The man's son said he did not remember the conversation, saying instead that Jeffrey Abbott 'didn't … believe Frank had anything to do with it.
'But … I think he was under the belief that Frank needed the jail time,' he continued. 'He deserved to be in jail because of things he'd done in his past.'
The new alleged witness, Ms Bulley, came forward last week, after we reported this disputed claim.
Ms Bulley said she had been working in the Royal Hotel in Kew, a small town a few kilometres from where William was reported missing and where Abbott was often seen around the time.
A regular customer 'got talking a bit and he said, 'Have you seen that bloody Frank Abbott around love?', said Ms Bulley.
'And I went, 'Actually, now that you say that, no I haven't'. He went, 'No, that's because the bastard's in jail'.
'He said, 'His brother Bluey told me that he took that little boy to Tamworth the next day',' Ms Bulley continued. 'I rang the police and I told them what he said. They rang me back … and I missed the call and then I rang them back and left a message and nobody ever got back to me.'
Ms Bulley said this conversation took place in late 2014 or early 2015. Abbott was jailed over unrelated child sex charges in April 2015 – seven months after William was reported missing.
Her account does differ from that of the first person to allege Jeffrey Abbott claimed his brother was involved. That man claimed William was said to have been buried near a local landmark known as the Bird Tree, while Ms Bulley claimed William was said to have been taken to Tamworth.
Other evidence before the inquest alleges a close friend of Abbott called Ray Porter claimed to have given 'my best mate' and William Tyrrell a lift in his car, driving them 300 kilometres north.
Tamworth is about 250km northwest of Kendall. Other evidence heard at the inquest suggests Abbott did travel to Tamworth along with 'a little boy', although this was not confirmed.
Other evidence before the inquest also said Abbott repeatedly claimed to know where William was, suggesting various places linked to other potential suspects.
Mr Porter, as well as Abbott's brother Jeffrey, have died in the years since William's disappearance, while the age of the customer identified by Ms Pulley makes it possible he too has died.
The inquest into William's disappearance has been running for almost five years, with its findings still not expected for months. The police investigation has been running for over ten years, yet no one has been charged.
The NSW Police Force, Coroner's Court of NSW and Abbott have all declined to answer questions. Abbott has claimed in court that he is no longer a person of interest to the investigation but this has not been confirmed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal Court judges question logic of Bruce Lehrmann's legal argument in appeal against defamation ruling
Federal Court judges question logic of Bruce Lehrmann's legal argument in appeal against defamation ruling

ABC News

time12 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Federal Court judges question logic of Bruce Lehrmann's legal argument in appeal against defamation ruling

Bruce Lehrmann's bid to overturn a finding that he raped his former colleague Brittany Higgins has not started smoothly, with Federal Court judges questioning the logic of his grounds of appeal. The former Liberal staffer's defamation claim against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson failed, after Justice Michael Lee found last year, on the balance of probabilities, Mr Lehrmann had raped Ms Higgins at Parliament House in Canberra in 2019. Follow our live blog for the latest updates from the courtroom. Mr Lehrmann has now returned to the Federal Court to seek to overturn that finding, represented by his solicitor, Zali Burrows. Mr Lehrmann is being represented solely by Ms Burrows, because the court heard he was unable to afford his preferred barrister, Sydney silk Guy Reynolds. "Mr Lehrmann couldn't afford Mr Reynolds, which we really wanted, so we apologise in advance," Ms Burrows told the court. Ms Burrows conceded she was "not as prepared" as the opposing council but said "I'm just going to try and do the best I can". This morning, in spelling out the first of four grounds of appeal, Ms Burrows said Mr Lehrmann was denied procedural fairness. "The primary judge found that the rape occurred in a particular way that wasn't put to Mr Lehrmann in defence," she told the court. "He was taken by surprise as to the nature of the rape … it was pleaded as a violent rape, when His Honour [Justice Lee] found it was a non-violent rape." In response, Justice Craig Colvin, one of three judges presiding over the appeal, said, "I'm not sure that that's a concept that I understand". Justice Wigney also weighed in, pointing out that Mr Lehrmann had consistently maintained his innocence and that no sexual intercourse took place. He said it would not have made sense for Mr Lehrmann to have faced questions about the nature of an act he was denying. "He would have maintained that there was no violence, because there was no sexual intercourse," Justice Wigney said. "How could he have been questioned about the particulars?" Justice Colvin voiced his confusion. Mr Lehrmann's appeal raises questions about how the court considered the meaning of rape to the ordinary, reasonable person. Ms Burrows relied on her written submissions, which urged the court to discern a difference between the seriousness of a rape that is violent with one that is non-violent. In responding, Network Ten's lawyer Dr Matthew Collins said that argument was "obviously rooted in historical misconceptions", and that there was no coherent basis for distinguishing between the rape of a woman who is "cognitively impaired" and unable to resist, and one who is conscious. He said either scenario was a "horrid violation of bodily autonomy" and that effectively "all rape is violent". Another ground of appeal is that Mr Lehrmann was entitled to more damages than the $20,000 Justice Lee had flagged, if he had been successful in the original case. Ms Burrows said her client had "pretty much become the national joke", arguing the level of damages was insufficient. "As I've previously submitted to the court, he's probably Australia's most hated man," she said. Dr Collins disputed Ms Burrows's claims that the manner of the rape was erroneously linked to the damages Mr Lehrmann should have received, if he had won. He argued, whether or not Ms Higgins verbally refused consent, Mr Lehrmann still raped a woman he knew was "seriously intoxicated" and left her alone in the office of a federal minister. Although Ms Higgins did not name her alleged rapist in the interview with The Project, Mr Lehrmann said he was identifiable, and therefore defamed. A criminal trial over the allegation collapsed in 2022 because of juror misconduct and the charge against Mr Lehrmann was later dropped.

ANU rules out further forced redundancies
ANU rules out further forced redundancies

ABC News

time12 minutes ago

  • ABC News

ANU rules out further forced redundancies

The Australian National University (ANU) says future savings in its ongoing restructure will not involve forced job cuts. But forced redundancies will still happen in areas where the university has already announced a savings plan. This includes the College of Arts and Social Sciences and the School of Music. The university says it will save $60 million through salary reductions, with $40 million to go. It is part of a broader target of saving $250 million. ANU vice-chancellor Genevieve Bell says future announcements will not feature forced job losses. "We have used the tools that were most appropriate for the circumstances we were in," she said. ACT Secretary of the National Tertiary Education Union Dr Lachlan Clohesy has described the university's announcement that it will stop forced job cuts as "vindication". "Today's announcement isn't just business as usual. It's clearly come about because of the campaigning…of ANU staff, students and the broader community." He says while stopping forced redundancies is welcome, he's concerned about possible future cuts. "ANU said no forced redundancies as part of 'Renew A-N-U'…but that's potentially ambiguous — we're calling on the Vice Chancellor to rule out forced redundancies in 20-26 in total."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store