Will 2026 be the year that Auckland gets its mojo back?
Have Aucklanders fallen out of love with Auckland?
While Wellington often takes the heat for New Zealand's current sense of national stagnation, Auckland is in its own deep funk. As Erin Johnson reports in Stuff, the latest Ipsos Quality of Life Survey, released in April, found nearly a third of Aucklanders felt their quality of life had worsened over the past year – the highest among all eight surveyed cities. The most common reason, by far, was financial strain, with half of all respondents calling out the cost of housing as unaffordable. Traffic congestion, lack of parking and overflowing rubbish bins topped the list of frustrations in Aucklanders' own neighbourhoods.
Small wonder, then, that Aucklanders are voting with their feet – not just crossing the Tasman in record numbers, but moving south in search of affordability and a better lifestyle. As The Press reports (paywalled), more than 10,000 Aucklanders relocated to Christchurch between 2018 and 2023. Top reasons for making the move included less stress and the ability to buy a home and still afford to live.
A city stuck in neutral
This sense of drift is captured starkly in the brand new State of the City report, which compares Auckland with cities like Brisbane, Copenhagen and Vancouver. Writing this morning in The Spinoff, Duncan Greive says the report's downbeat vibe is unmistakable. 'Across the three reports of 2023, 2024 and 2025, the city feels stagnant and decaying,' he writes. Mark Thomas, chair of the organisation that funds and commissions the report, is more specific: 'Weak economic performance, inadequate skills and innovation development, and disjointed and delayed planning are causing Auckland to lose ground, with the risk of falling further behind.'
Auckland ranks well for resilience and diversity, but falls behind on experience, prosperity and 'place' – that is, the overall livability and coherence of the city and its suburbs. 'For all its history, cultural diversity and incredible twin-harbour location, Auckland is a city which feels stuck,' Duncan writes, summing up the report's overall theme. Amid this gloom, hopes are increasingly pinned on two long-awaited infrastructure projects: the City Rail Link (CRL) and the International Convention Centre, both now scheduled to open in 2026.
A midtown miracle?
As Garth Bray and Dileepa Fonseka recently reported in BusinessDesk (paywalled), there's growing confidence that the CRL, and particularly the new midtown Te Waihorotiu station, will be a catalyst for revitalisation. The area surrounding the station – a long-underwhelming swathe of the central city – is seeing a flurry of investment, with Auckland Council economist Gary Blick identifying 18 developments worth billions within a five-minute walk. Among them is the $450 million Symphony Centre, being built directly above the new station.
Once open, Te Waihorotiu is expected to be the country's busiest train station, serving up to 50,000 passengers an hour at peak. It's not just about transport: the surrounding streetscape is being redesigned for wider footpaths, greenery and outdoor dining – a deliberate push to reshape how people experience the city centre, Bray and Fonseka write. The long construction disruption has taken a toll, but there are now tangible signs that a new phase is beginning.
Pedestrian power wins on Project K
In another hopeful development, Auckland Transport appears to have backtracked on controversial changes to Project K, the urban realm upgrade around the CRL's Karanga-a-Hape station. As Connor Sharp reports in Greater Auckland, after a fierce public backlash, AT has returned to a plan closer to its original, people-focused vision. The updated design – due to be voted on by the Waitematā Local Board today – restores pedestrian-friendly measures on Cross Street, retains a cycleway on East Street, and revives a plan to block rat-running traffic on Upper Mercury Lane.
Councillor Richard Hills says the new plan will help reinvigorate the Karangahape Road area while making the entrance to the new station both vibrant and welcoming. 'It's not perfect, but it's a good result if everyone sees it as a compromise,' he says. In a city that too often struggles to deliver on its promises, Project K is a win for the urbanists – and a reminder that Aucklanders haven't given up on the place just yet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
Gib monopoly faces heat as building-product floodgates open
The government hopes its new list of approved overseas building materials will push down construction costs across the board, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. New rules aim to break building product monopolies More than a year after it was first floated, the government is today releasing its long-awaited list of approved international building products, promising to give the construction sector faster, cheaper and more flexible options. The Building Product Specifications document will include thousands of overseas-made materials – from windows and cladding to multiple brands of plasterboard – that are automatically cleared for use in New Zealand if used as intended. Building and construction minister Chris Penk says the list marks the beginning of the end for 'costly monopolies' in key materials. Later this year, a further change will see plumbing products certified under Australia's Watermark scheme automatically permitted here. Master Builders and developers have welcomed the list, saying greater choice and streamlined approvals could ease delays, reduce costs and improve supply chain resilience. NZ's reliably high construction costs Aotearoa has long been an expensive place to build – especially recently, with research from QV showing construction costs rose 44% in the last four years. But the government is betting that more competition in building products will help reverse that trend. Penk described the current cost of construction as 'frankly outrageous', noting it is 50% more expensive to build a standalone home in New Zealand than in Australia. Builders have also warned that recent price hikes of up to 7% on key products, including plasterboard and insulation, could add tens of thousands of dollars to the price of new homes in the coming years, RNZ's Anan Zaki reports. However, experts also note that the factors behind the high prices are complex. A weak New Zealand dollar, international tariffs and geopolitical instability (particularly in Ukraine) continue to drive up costs for imported materials, on which the sector heavily depends. While the government's reforms may improve access, it could be some time before the benefits meaningfully affect the price of new-build homes. The plasterboard problem Nowhere is New Zealand's reliance on a single supplier more obvious than in the plasterboard market, where Fletcher Building's Gib brand accounts for 97% of all sales. As management consultants Everedge have observed, the power of Gib lies primarily in its suite of intangible assets, including brand familiarity so high that the name has become genericised and building consent forms regularly specify Gib products as a matter of course. As Stuff's Daniel Smith reported in his deep dive into the questionable tactics used by Gib to protect its market share, the company is also known for aggressively using rebates to encourage sales reps and merchants to promote the brand over its rivals. The 2022 Gib shortage, when builders were forced to pay 'six times the normal price' to finish the job, laid bare the risks of monopoly, Penk said yesterday. Although Fletcher Building has since opened a new factory in Tauranga to shore up supply, New Zealanders still pay 38% more for plasterboard than Australians and up to 67% more than Americans. Under the new product approval list, alternatives certified for use in Australia, the UK or the US will now be automatically accepted in New Zealand. A pause on code changes brings welcome certainty Yesterday's curtain-raising announcement was accompanied by another major regulatory shift. As Luke Malpass reported for the Sunday Star Times (paywalled), the Building Code is being frozen, at least for a while. From now on, significant updates to the code will occur on a fixed three-year cycle, aligning with Australia's system. The aim, according to Penk, is to give builders 'certainty and stability in difficult times', and avoid the confusion and cost of piecemeal updates. While the government retains the right to make urgent safety changes – as seen after the Loafers Lodge fire – Penk says this new system will allow industry and regulators to better prepare and respond. It's the latest in a wave of construction sector reforms intended to remove bottlenecks and prepare the industry for what the government hopes will be a strong recovery later this year.
1News
4 days ago
- 1News
Big, awkward, neglected: Auckland scores poorly on international report
The recent report comparing Auckland to nine international peer cities delivered an uncomfortable truth: our largest city is falling behind, hampered by car dependency, low-density housing and 'weak economic performance'. Timothy Welch reports. The Deloitte State of the City analysis was no surprise to anyone who has watched successive governments treat the city as a problem to manage, rather than an engine to fuel. The report's findings were stark: Auckland rates 82nd out of 84 cities globally for pedestrian friendliness, and its car-dependent transport system is more carbon-intensive and slower to decarbonise than peer cities. (Source: This is the direct result of decades of planning failures, including what urban researchers call the 1970s 'great down-zoning' which halved central Auckland's housing capacity. ADVERTISEMENT This isn't just Auckland's problem. When we mismanage what geographers call a 'primate city,' it reveals our fundamental misunderstanding of how modern economies work. The concept of the primate city was formalised by geographer Mark Jefferson in 1939. Such cities are defined as being 'at least twice as large as the next largest city and more than twice as significant'. Auckland fits this definition perfectly. With more than 1.7 million people, it is over four times larger than Christchurch or the greater Wellington region. The city accounts for 34% of New Zealand's population and is projected to hit 40% of the working-age population by 2048. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Hulk Hogan dies, sentencing for a New Zealander who assaulted two airline stewards, and a big accolade for Te Papa. (Source: 1News) Auckland contributes 38% of New Zealand's gross domestic product and its per-capita GDP is 15% higher than the rest of the country's. Its most productive area, the central business district, enjoys a 40% productivity premium over the national average. To economists, these numbers represent the 'agglomeration benefits' research shows primate cities generate. It is the economic effect of combining businesses, talent and infrastructure. Yet New Zealand systematically underinvests in the very place generating this outsized economic contribution. ADVERTISEMENT A pattern of infrastructure failure Auckland's infrastructure deficit follows a predictable pattern. The City Rail Link, while progressing, has grown from an initial budget of NZ$2-3 billion to $5.5 billion, with opening delayed until 2026. The first train to be tested in Auckland's City Rail Link travels through Maungawhau in February. (Source: City Rail Link) Light rail was cancelled entirely after years of planning. A second harbour crossing has been studied for decades without a shovel hitting dirt. Each represents billions in opportunity costs while congestion worsens. This goes well beyond project mismanagement. It is a deep structural problem. The Infrastructure Commission-Te Waihanga identifies a $210 billion national infrastructure shortfall, with Auckland bearing a disproportionate burden despite generating a disproportionately high level of revenue. International research by the OECD shows successful countries treat metropolitan regions as engines of national growth, not a burden. ADVERTISEMENT The 'Wellington problem' Public policy expert Ian Shirley called it the 'Wellington Problem': the way Auckland's governance became an obsession for politicians and bureaucrats based in Wellington. The tension dates to 1865 when the capital was moved from Auckland to Wellington, establishing a pattern where political power was deliberately separated from economic power. Parliament (file image). (Source: 1News) Auckland loses an estimated $415.35 million annually in GST collected on rates. This goes to Wellington and into government revenue rather than being reinvested locally. Central government properties in Auckland, worth $36.3 million in rates, are exempt from payment while still using Auckland's infrastructure. When Auckland speaks with 'one voice' through its unified council, Wellington responds with legislative overrides. The recent National Land Transport Programme, for example, cut Auckland's transport funding by $564 million. Mayor Wayne Brown said the government's transport policy 'makes zero sense for Auckland'. ADVERTISEMENT Learning from others The contrast with international approaches reveals just how counterproductive New Zealand's approach has been. London has an integrated Transport for London authority with congestion charging powers, generating £136 million annually for reinvestment. Paris is investing more than €35 billion in the Grand Paris Express transit project. Paris: city of trains (Source: Japan's 'Quality Infrastructure Investment' principles include ¥13.2 trillion in regional infrastructure investment. Australia's A$120 billion infrastructure programme explicitly recognises its largest cities contribute over 50% of GDP and require proportional investment. Research has shown excessive urban concentration in one country can create problems. But denying the primate city resources only leads to a 'deterioration in the quality of life' that drags down the entire national economy. The solution lies in making strategic investments that maximise the benefits of agglomeration while managing any negative costs to the national economy. ADVERTISEMENT Growing pains Auckland isn't a problem to be managed, it is an asset to be leveraged. Every successful developed economy has learned this lesson. Paris generates 31% of France's GDP and gets treated accordingly. Seoul produces 23% of South Korea's output and receives massive infrastructure investment. Tokyo drives Japan's economy. The international evidence is unambiguous: countries that strategically invest in their primate cities achieve higher productivity growth and maintain competitive advantages. Auckland doesn't need sympathy or special treatment. It needs what every primate city in every successful economy gets: infrastructure investment proportional to its economic contribution, governance structures that reflect its scale, and political leadership that understands agglomeration economics. The question isn't whether Auckland is too big. The question is whether New Zealand is big enough to nurture its primate city. Timothy Welch Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence.
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Final Weeks To Register Payment Preferences For 2025 Entrust Dividend
There's just two weeks left for more than 368,000 Aucklanders living in the Entrust District to update their payment preferences to receive this year's dividend. Eligible power account holders get to choose whether they want the dividend paid into their bank account, or as a credit to their power account, says Entrust Chair Denise Lee. 'Back in June we asked power account holders living in our district of central, east, and south Auckland to update their payment preferences for this year's dividend. 'The quickest way to update payment preferences is via Entrust's secure web platform. If everything is the same as last year, do nothing. 'We only want to hear from people if they want to change payment methods, update their bank account details, or if that section is blank. We need updated details from people by 5:00pm on Friday, 08 August,' says Ms Lee. The annual Entrust dividend, usually paid in late September provides a $120m+ cash injection to communities in central, east, and south Auckland. Since 1994, these communities have received more than $2 billion in dividends from Entrust that come from its majority ownership of listed energy company Vector. To be eligible for this year's dividend, you must be a power account holder connected to Vector's electricity network within the Entrust District as of the roll date. 'Entrust is pleased to be able to give back to our community through the dividend. For many people living in our district the dividend is a welcome windfall, and we're delighted to be able to make a small difference,' says Ms Lee. For those unsure about their eligibility for this payment, check out the map and list of eligibility criteria along with FAQs at or About Entrust: Entrust (formerly called the Auckland Energy Consumer Trust), is a private trust that owns the majority of Vector on behalf of its beneficiaries. Entrust owns 75.1% of shares in Vector which are held in trust for energy consumer beneficiaries in central, east, and south Auckland. These beneficiaries are paid a cash dividend each year, usually in late September. The organisation was created in 1993 to make sure power lines remained in the control of electricity consumers and was established under a trust deed on behalf of electricity consumers in the area previously served by the Auckland Electric Power Board.
