
Tired all the time? Your home decor could be to blame - experts reveal how to fix it
There are plenty of reasons why heat can make you feel more tired than usual—but it doesn't necessarily mean you are not sleeping enough.
A poor diet packed with high-sugar, processed foods, stress and a lack of exercise are three factors often blamed for feeling tired.
But surprising objects in your home can also mess with your mood and sap your energy.
There's even a health condition attributed to it: Sick Building Syndrome—the symptoms caused by being in a particular building.
Signs of the illness, which often include tiredness, dry eyes, headaches and sore throats, worsen when people are in the building and improve when away.
While this mainly affects those in open plan offices, your home could also be contributing.
Now, experts have suggested exactly why your old furniture, choice of lighting and even your scented candles could be impacting your energy levels.
Ditch the big overhead light
The wrong lighting can have a powerful effect on how you feel, scientists say.
Overhead lights—especially cold, fluorescent ones—can be harsh on your eyes and draining over time.
Most LED bulbs emit blue light but while environmentally friendly, this kind of lighting can create sharp contrasts and shadows, which can strain your vision.
In the evening, it can signal to your body that it's still time to be alert, throwing off your natural wind-down process, contributing to physical and mental exhaustion.
According to Harvard Medical School, blue wavelengths—which are beneficial during daylight hours because they boost attention, reaction times, and mood—also seem to be the most disruptive at night.
One study by Harvard researchers compared the effects of 6.5 hours of exposure to blue light compared to green light — which has a longer wavelength.
Writing in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, they found blue light suppressed the hormone melatonin for roughly twice as long as the green light.
Melatonin is produced naturally in the body and plays a crucial role in regulating the sleep-wake cycle.
Study co-author and associate professor of medicine Steven Lockley, also said: 'When we exposed 12 healthy young men and women to the same amount of either green or blue light, their 24-hour rhythms shifted twice as much with blue than with green.'
Instead, experts suggest installing dimmer switches allowing you to control the brightness of lights, or investing in lamps.
Beware of old mattresses
An old or unsupportive mattress can quietly wreak havoc on your body.
You may think you're getting a full night's sleep, but if you're tossing and turning or waking up stiff, the body isn't able to recharge instead leaving you fatigued.
Sleep technology firm Simba said: 'Without the right support you may have trouble drifting off, and your mattress could cause pain in your back and neck.
'This won't just cause you problems at night, either, as you'll most likely wake up feeling sore, stiff and still very tired.'
The Sleep Council say people should consider changing their mattress every seven to eight years to prevent such issues.
Health professionals have long advised Brits get at least seven hours of sleep every night and to go to bed and wake up at the same times every day.
Much like a toddler's naps, sleep will be better when it's consistent.
Experts say that waking up during the night does not necessarily mean you have insomnia, which figures suggest affects up to 14million Brits.
Still, sleep deprivation takes its own toll, from irritability and reduced focus in the short term, to an increased risk of obesity, heart disease and diabetes.
According to the American Sleep Association, nearly 70 million Americans also have a sleep disorder.
Switch up your scented candles
Scented candles have long been lauded for their relaxing qualities. Yet for that same reason they could be making you tired.
Exposure to fragranced products, even at low levels, has been associated with various adverse health effects including respiratory issues and hormone disruption.
In one 2019 study involving thousands of participants from across the US, Australia, Sweden and the UK, almost a third of were reported to have a sensitivity to fragrance.
In those who are sensitive, fragrances are a risk factor for asthma and headaches, irritating the respiratory system, leading to fatigue.
In another, psychologists at Wesleyan University in Connecticut, tracked the sleep cycles of more than 30 participants who sniffed a lavender oil before bed.
Monitoring their cycles with brain scans, they found on the night they whiffed the herb, they slept more soundly.
Experts at Good Housekeeping, instead suggest sticking to mint or citrus-scented candles during the daytime and lavender as a pre-bedtime ritual.
Ditch the curtains
Your light exposure during the day could also be throwing off your body's natural rhythms triggering drowsiness.
Without it, experts say, people may feel drowsy even after a full night's rest.
For those who live in houses with limited daylight, experts have long recommended light therapy lamps as one way to help realign their circadian rhythm.
Circadian rhythm, the body's in-built clock, sets the rhythm of our lives.
NHS guidance also suggests such lights can have a positive effect — even a few minutes a day of brighter light exposure can make people feel less groggy.
Dr Victoria Revell, scientific advisor to Lumie, one well known light therapy lamp brand and expert in circadian physiology at the University of Surrey, said: 'We're mainly concerned with improving people's circadian rhythms so that you get a better duration, a better quality of sleep, but also a better transition out of that.
'We're trying to minimise what we call sleep inertia, so that groggy feeling when your alarm goes off and you're jolted awake.'
Professor Russell Foster, a neuroscientist at the University of Oxford and one of the world's most renowned experts on circadian rhythms, also told MailOnline: 'Light is critically important for setting the body clock. Morning light helps you get up earlier.'
Equally, one US study found that office workers with more exposure to natural light as opposed to overhead lighting had longer sleep duration, better sleep quality and better quality of life, compared to those who did not.
Employees with windows in the workplace received 173 percent more white light exposure during work hours and slept an average of 46 minutes more per night than those in windowless offices, scientists at Northwestern University in Illinois, said.
Cut back on home appliance overuse
From the food mixer to the tumble dryer, homes are filled with a cacophony of sounds.
But research suggests this noise could be making us ill by causing two in five people to suffer from higher stress levels.
Some of the worst offending products are our most essential such as washing machines and vacuum cleaners.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 40 per cent of Europe's population is exposed to noise levels in excess of 55dB – about the same level of a noisy office.
The average washing machine has a recorded sound level of 70dB, refrigerators average at around 50dB refrigerator while in some instances food processors can reach up to 90dB.
Stephen Stansfeld, a professor of psychiatry at London's Queen Mary University, said: 'When we're exposed to a lot of noise, our heart rate goes up, blood pressure rises and research shows it can lead to an increase in fatigue, stress, heart attacks or even stroke.'
Air it out
Most people think of exhaust fumes and smoke billowing from factory chimneys when talking about air pollution.
But, smog found inside our homes can cause extreme tiredness too, as well as headaches and shortness of breath.
Dr Prashant Kumar, of the University of Surrey, said: 'There are actually various sources of pollution that have a negative effect on air quality, many of which are found inside our homes and offices.
'From cooking residue to paints, varnishes and fungal spores the air we breathe indoors is often more polluted than that outside.'
According to Dr Marie Coggins, an expert in exposure science at the University of Galway: 'Home fragrance products can also produce several volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which can be harmful to health.'
Evidence shows this particulate matter can trigger short term health effects like fatigue and 'coughing and sneezing, and irritation of the eyes, nose, throat and lungs', she added.
Cutting these sources of pollution or increasing indoor ventilation can also slash the risk of longer term conditions like asthma, chronic bronchitis and even lung cancer.
Research in the journal Indoor Air also found that people with high indoor ventilation had 51 per cent lower odds of depression and 37 per cent lower odds of anxiety compared to those with low indoor ventilation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Harvard doctor reveals what happens to your FACE if you cut out sugar for just two weeks
A leading doctor has revealed on TikTok what happens to your body just two weeks after cutting out sugar—and the video has quickly struck a chord with viewers. Dr Saurabh Sethi, a Harvard-trained gastroenterologist who posts gut health advice to more than 500,000 followers under the handle @doctorsethimd, told his audience that giving up sugar can have surprisingly rapid effects. 'Your face will likely shift from looking rounder to a more natural shape,' he claimed in the clip, which has already racked up more than 10,000 views. 'Any puffiness or fluid retention around your eyes will also reduce. You will also see a reduction in belly fat as the fat in your liver begins to decrease.' He went on to explain that eliminating sugar can restore a healthier gut microbiome—the trillions of microorganisms that live in the digestive tract and play a key role in breaking down food and absorbing nutrients. 'Lastly, if you have acne or red spots, your skin should improve and look clearer,' he added. The advice echoes recent research. A 2019 study of more than 8,000 students in China found that high-sugar soft drinks 'significantly' increased the risk of acne. Other research has linked excess sugar to liver fat accumulation and inflammation. Dietitians have long highlighted how cutting out sugar—which can trigger drug-like cravings—can boost health, fitness and even performance at work. Dr Samantha Coogan, a lecturer at the University of Nevada, has previously described the effects of quitting the sweet stuff. Withdrawal symptoms such as headaches, stomach aches and bowel changes may last for days or even weeks, but once the body adjusts, she said people often see sharper brain function, fewer sick days and more energy for exercise. According to Dr Coogan, hair, skin and nails also improve, sleep becomes more restful and weight loss is 'inevitable' when high-calorie snacks are eliminated. Cutting sugar further reduces the risk of serious diseases, with excess intake widely linked to type 2 diabetes, heart disease and cancer. 'Sugar is an addictive substance for some people, so it really is necessary to approach it in a similar manner to drug or alcohol detoxification,' she wrote in a recent article. Experts warn that the type most people overconsume are so-called 'free sugars,' found in sweets, chocolate, fizzy drinks and many processed foods. But some naturally occurring sugars also count as 'free sugars' like those in honey, syrups, nectars, unsweetened fruit juices and smoothies. How much 'free sugars' should you consume each day? The NHS says anyone aged 11 or older shouldn't consume more than 30g of added sugar a day. But they warn children and infants should have less. They recommend the following limits per day: Children aged seven to 10 should have no more than 24g of 'free sugars'. Children aged four to six should have no more than 19g of 'free sugars'. Children aged two to three should have no more than 14g of 'free sugars'. Children aged one should have no more than 10g of 'free sugars'. While there is no guideline limit for babies under the age of one, sugars shouldn't be added to foods or drinks given to babies. Meanwhile, sugar that occurs naturally in milk, fruit and vegetables is not counted as 'free sugar,' according to the NHS. To cut down, the health service recommends simple swaps such as replacing fizzy drinks or sugary squash with water. It also warns that even unsweetened fruit juices and smoothies contain high levels of sugar, advising people to limit intake to no more than 150ml a day. For those who take sugar in hot drinks like tea or coffee, the NHS suggests gradually reducing the amount or switching to a sweetener. The advice comes amid a sharp rise in type 2 diabetes cases in the UK, a condition that places immense pressure on the NHS. Earlier this year, government figures estimated that 3.6 million people in England are now living with type 2 diabetes, based on an analysis of diagnosed and undiagnosed cases in each local authority. Helen Kirrane, head of policy and campaigns at the charity Diabetes UK, previously said: 'Without the right treatment, it can lead to dangerously high blood sugar levels and this can cause life-altering diabetes-related complications.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
We used AI to analyse three cities. It's true: we now walk more quickly and socialise less
Something is thinning in public space. Pavements are still crowded. Parks still bustle. But if you look more closely – or, better still, if you measure it – the texture of our interactions has changed. Together with colleagues at Yale, Harvard and other universities, we used AI to compare footage of public spaces from the 1970s with recent video in the same locations in New York, Boston, and Philadelphia. The findings are striking: people walk faster, linger less, and are less likely to meet up. That's no surprise in a world where phones, Netflix and AI companions are luring us away from real-world spaces and real-world friends. Yet, if technology is part of the problem, it may also be part of the solution. By using AI to study urban public spaces, we can gather data, pick out patterns and test new designs that could help us rethink, for our time, our modern versions of the agora– the market and main public gathering place of Athens. The urban playground has always drawn curious minds. Among the sharpest was William 'Holly' Whyte, who filmed plazas and parks in 1970s New York. He was fascinated by where people chose to sit, how they navigated space, and what drew them together. His findings, documented in The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces (1980), were at times beautifully simple: 'What attracts people most, it would appear, is other people.' From his footage, Whyte turned his observations into data-backed recommendations: he said seats should be 'two human backsides deep' and sung the praises of movable chairs that let people chase sun or shade. His analysis helped save New York spaces such as Bryant Park and shaped our modern approach to people-centred design. Whyte's experiments were revelatory, but hard to replicate. Why? Analysing the footage, frame by frame, took a team of assistants months. Now, finally, that challenge has been overcome, as we have invented non-human evaluators. Our team digitised Whyte's original footage and compared it with recent videos – of Bryant Park, the steps of the Met Museum in New York, Boston's Downtown Crossing, and Philadelphia's Chestnut Street – collected by sociologist Keith Hampton. Then we trained an AI model to analyse the two sets of footage. AI allows self-driving cars to recognise bikes and pedestrians; that same technology excels at analysing footage of parks and plazas, and keeping track of hundreds of people at the same time. What took Whyte months now takes minutes. So how have cities changed between 1970 and 2010? As we discuss in a recent paper in the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, walking speeds have increased by 15%. People stand still less often. Dyads – pairs meeting and then walking together – have declined. Downtown Crossing in Boston, once lively and social, has become a pass-through. Even in Manhattan's Bryant Park – improved, according to Whyte's vision – the number of social interactions has fallen. Cities have not emptied, but a part of their essence has thinned. Different forces have caused these changes. Work rhythms are accelerating and as time becomes more precious, we are less willing to spend it meandering. Perhaps people prefer Starbucks to the park. The iPhone was barely three years old in 2010, yet already we may have been pulled into our personalised data streams, abandoning the wandering gaze of the flâneur. That could be a disaster for our social fabric. Online, we drift into curated echo chambers, scrolling past discomfort and filtering out dissent. Public space, by contrast, remains gloriously unfiltered. It invites friction, messiness, surprise. A rival football fan holds the door for you. Your children play with children who speak different languages. If we spend less time in public space, we might lose tolerance for the wider public – and thus lose the habit of citizenship itself. Paradoxically, the same technologies pulling us inward might help bring us back out. Social media is addictive because algorithms are constantly testing out what we like. If we use AI to analyse outdoor public spaces, we can do the next best thing: give every park, plaza and street corner its own, personal William Whyte to test improvements there. What types of chairs and benches best promote interaction? Could adding greenery or water features create a more comfortable microclimate? Which public games might help break the ice? Temporary design interventions could be introduced, evaluated with AI, and iterated through a process of trial and error – evolving organically, much like nature itself. To this end, architects should not shy away from using new AI tools, as we argue at this year's Biennale Architettura in Venice. But how? First, with humility. Public spaces of the past were far from perfect – often excluding women, minorities, and those with access needs. We should not romanticise them. Nor should we surrender to a technology-led present. Optimising public life through data alone risks repeating the mistakes of high modernism. AI can reveal patterns. It cannot dictate what is good. Second, with curiosity. Public space is not static. It is alive. It responds to heat, light, geometry, programme. Small interventions – a bench in shade, a water fountain on a hot day, a winding path instead of a shortcut – can transform behaviour. In a recent study in Milan, we found that compliance with 30km/h speed limits had less to do with signage and more to do with street geometry. What slows us down is not instruction but design. Climate change, too, plays a growing role. As temperatures rise across southern Europe, many urban spaces remain shaped by outdated climatic expectations. Sicily can now grow mangoes, yet its squares offer little protection from heat. We might learn from cities such as Singapore, where the orchestration of vegetation, water, and shading are used to actively mitigate heat. If Europe's climate is changing then its public spaces must follow. The deeper challenge is this: for too long, as designers have worked at a remove – imagining how people should behave from studios located far from the street. Today, we have tools to observe how people actually behave. To test hypotheses. To prototype joy and proximity. Yet these tools must be used not for optimisation but for stewardship. If we can use them wisely, we can counter the hollowing of public space. The agora isn't dead. It just needs redesigning. And if we're smart about it, AI might just help us get there. It may help us hear something else too: the fragile, elusive symphony of the commons. Carlo Ratti is professor at MIT and Politecnico di Milano, and director of Venice's 2025 Biennale Architettura


Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Harvard prof says Earth-bound comet could be 'hostile' alien spacecraft sent to spy on our solar system
A Harvard professor has suggested a 'hostile' alien spaceship is hurtling its way towards Earth - and it could be an extraterrestrial spy. And if the object - known as 31/ATLAS and believed by most astronomers to be a comet - does land among us it will be 'a blind date of astronomical proportions,' Avi Loeb says. In a study paper, he and his fellow researchers suggest the object's size, trajectory and behavior - when taken together - suggest an unknown intelligence is steering it our way. NASA first spotted the object, traveling through our solar system at 37 miles a second, in early July and most experts expect it to come nowhere near Earth. But Loeb, a professor of astrophysics, and his associates – Adam Crowl and Adam Hibberd of the London-based Initiative for Interstellar Studies – advance a detailed theory about who or what this intergalactic visitor might be. They speculate that, far from being a comet, the object could instead be a sprawling mothership from a distant planet, armed with technology vastly more advanced than ours. Loeb and his associates have identified eight anomalies about 3I/ATLAS to support their outlandish theory. Each individual anomaly is statistically rare, they insist, and so taken together they strongly suggest that some as-yet-unknown intelligence is steering the object towards us. 'An encounter with an interstellar, alien technology is a blind date of astronomical proportions,' Loeb told the Daily Mail. 'You don't know what you will meet, because our imagination is limited to our experience on Earth.' He argues that the plots of science fiction films are 'pretty much tailored to fit the narrative of what we are doing here on Earth and just expanding [on it]'. That is, most of us have no conception of what a really advanced civilization might look like. Expecting present-day humans to comprehend the sort of technology aliens would have developed in order to reach us is 'like asking a caveman to imagine an iPhone,' says Loeb. He has suggested sending a message using radio waves to the object: 'Hello, welcome to our neighborhood. Peace!' However, he also acknowledged the risks of this, noting that any intelligent life might see the signal as a threat. Most of Loeb's professional peers have determined that 3I/ATLAS will turn out to be a comet. They believe it has been drifting through space for billions of years, accelerating thanks to the gravitational 'catapult effect' of the countless stars it has passed. Its current speed of 130,000mph makes it the fastest comet ever recorded, says NASA. Predictably, some of Loeb's fellow astronomers are peeved that he is, as they see it, letting the side down by venturing into science fiction. Oxford University astronomer Chris Lintott says he's spouting 'nonsense on stilts.' And Loeb, it has to be said, has been urging the world to keep an open mind about extraterrestrials for some time. An expert on black holes, he has spent years searching for signs of alien life and, in 2021, founded the international 'Galileo Project' to focus on this area. Two years later, he led an expedition to a site on the bed of the Pacific Ocean where a meteor was believed to have come to rest, claiming the remains his team discovered could have come from an extraterrestrial spacecraft. NASA, whose telescope in Chile first spotted 3I/ATLAS on July 1, says the object should remain visible to ground-based telescopes in September but will then pass behind the sun. It is expected to reappear by early December. So what are the anomalies about 3I/ATLAS that have so alarmed Professor Loeb? The first relates to its lack of 'tail.' Comets are propelled through space by gravity and solar radiation. The latter turns the comet's surface ice into gas, which – together with the dust it carries – creates a visible tail. Loeb said he was 'puzzled' that the object has undergone 'significant non-gravitational acceleration' without apparently having any such tail. He was also disturbed by its unusual 'retrograde' orbit around the sun (in other words, it's moving against the flow of the solar system). This, he argues, could be a 'defensive maneuver' by its alien pilots to make it harder for their craft to be intercepted by rockets fired from Earth. 3I/ATLAS's trajectory also means it will pass relatively close to Venus, Mars and Jupiter – again statistically unlikely but, he notes, affording it the perfect opportunity to snoop at the other planets in our solar system, like some sort of extraterrestrial spy. He points out that 3I/ATLAS will achieve 'perihelion' – reaching its closest point to the sun – on the opposite side of the sun relative to Earth. This, says Loeb, 'could be intentional to avoid detailed observations from Earth-based telescopes.' It would also, he warns, allow it to launch 'probes' or other 'gadgets' in secret to invade or infiltrate – or even change direction and visit our planet itself, arriving with little warning as early as late November. Some critics, while agreeing with him that scientists should be less dismissive of ET research, accuse Loeb of cherry-picking data to suit his argument. In the past few days, NASA has revealed an image taken by the Hubble Space Telescope which it hailed as the 'sharpest-ever picture' of 3I/ATLAS. The image remains blurred (hardly surprising given it shows something 277 million miles away) but NASA claims it suggests the object is a comet because it appears to show a 'teardrop-shaped cocoon of dust coming off its solid, icy nucleus.' But Loeb is adamant there is still no evidence the object has the tail of dust thrown off by comets. The jury's still out, he insists. So, if – and, yes, this is a big if – 3I/ATLAS does turn out to be an alien spacecraft, is there anything we could do? In the short term, Loeb and his co-authors have suggested using NASA's unmanned Juno spacecraft, currently in orbit around Jupiter, to photograph the object. But Juno may not have enough fuel left for such a mission. In the long term, Loeb argues, we should treat all interstellar objects entering the solar system as potentially the creation of aliens. He believes governments should co-ordinate through an international body. 'We talk about the existential risks from artificial intelligence, from climate change, from an asteroid impact, but there's no discussion about the risk from alien technology,' he told the Daily Mail. He'd like to see governments form 'task forces' to determine how to respond if and when alien intelligence is finally detected, and how to break the news to the public without triggering panic. Of course, the public reaction may depend on whether the visitors wish us well or ill. 'In the first case, humanity needs only to wait and welcome this interstellar messenger with open arms,' says Loeb. 'It is the second scenario that causes serious concern.' Loeb says we'll get a much better indication of what exactly 3I/ATLAS is when it can be seen – possibly as early as later this month – by the James Webb Space Telescope. The telescope, which is now a million miles from us, will be able to view the object in infra-red, allowing it to analyze the sunlight reflected from it and determine precisely what it is. It's easy to be cynical about ET hunters like Loeb and he concedes he is expecting to be wrong. But with all his expertise, one has to consider the daunting question: What if he's right?