logo
Why the stock market continues to hold up in the face of uncertain trade policy

Why the stock market continues to hold up in the face of uncertain trade policy

CNBC4 days ago

It's only fair to give the stock market credit for hanging tough through the 2025 uncertainty storm. But it means the market is now taking credit in advance for a clearer and more favorable policy and economic picture developing from here. What does hanging tough look like? The S & P 500 index fought its way back to about flat after one of its worst-ever starts to a year through the first week of April. The index has also been hanging around the same patch of the field, spending all of the past two weeks and much of the last seven months in the range travelled on a single day, Nov. 6, 2024. The lines on the chart span the distance traveled in that initial one-session rally after Election Day. Since then, two quarters of much better than expected aggregate earnings have entered the books, offset by a confidence crash following the maximalist tariff proposals of April 2 and the abiding limbo state of the various overlapping pauses, deadlines and threats. Evidence that the market is implicitly assuming a fair degree of trade-war de-escalation could be seen in the market's relatively modest response both to President Trump's threat of a 50% tariff on imports from the EU just over a week ago, as well as its muted celebration when that measure was paused — or when a trade court ruled most of the global tariffs appear unlawful. Friday's flutter of reports about stalled talks with China and the countries' mutual accusations of bad faith drew a shrug from the tape, the S & P finishing flat to preserve a 1.9% weekly gain. Bespoke Investment Group on Friday reported that while the S & P 500 badly underperformed in March and April on days when trade headlines dominated the news, in May the market has largely ignored them. The reams of Wall Street strategy work attempting to handicap the trade-policy outcomes is coalescing around the 10% global baseline duties plus something higher for China and some targeted sectors, resulting in a blended rate somewhere above 15%. That's a level of transactional friction in the global economy that is multiples higher than long-prevailing rates, yet less decisively scary than the punitive plan that crashed the market and created the early-April buying opportunity, at the moment of peak uncertainty. Why the stock market is holding near record Among the reasons stocks have held within a few percent of record highs as it digested the huge relief rally the past couple of weeks is the here-and-now economic readings have mostly been reassuring: Upward leakage in continuing unemployment claims but no spike in layoffs. Generally steady if uninspiring consumer activity, with mostly benign inflation data. A badly stuck housing market, but no more so than a few months ago. Calm restored in the Treasury market, yields settling back slightly to quiet the overexcited talk about fiscal fissures. All of the numbers carry a bold-faced asterisk for being either not fully reflective of tariff effects or helped temporarily by some pull-forward of demand to get ahead of tariffs. Here again, the market is supported by steady fundamentals, while also by extension pricing in an expectation that they will persist. Corporate-credit spreads have mostly round-tripped back to unconcerning levels, non-U.S. stocks are in solid uptrends and the industrial sector has returned to its former highs. Not a market clenched in anticipation of a significant air pocket in growth. It's hard to ignore the other tailwind for the tape, the reassertion of the mega-cap growth cohort as relative leaders. Here's the Magnificent Seven relative to the equal-weighted S & P 500. Back to the July 2024 crest, not quite up to the fourth-quarter exuberance peak. Someone in the business of diagramming head-and-shoulders topping patterns might have something to offer here, but for now it's enough to say the market has again turned to the giants for support in a time of need. While the scolds who think index progress should come from the many over the few will lament this shift, the reality is the brute force of superior profit growth among the dominant digital platform companies is hard to resist. Mag 7, tech bid With Nvidia completing the reporting period for the megas, FactSet shows the group notched a 27% earnings jump from the year earlier, 11 percentage points head of forecasts, with the remainder of the S & P 500 growing a third as quickly. Even within the Mag7, it's not the cleanest story. FactSet notes that consensus is projecting annual profit-growth rates will step down toward 10% over the next few quarters. I've pointed out here recently that the biggest earners, such as Microsoft and Alphabet , are spending so heavily on AI capacity that free-cash-flow growth is on hiatus this year. And the share-price action is somewhat spotty, too. Apple is a conspicuous laggard, the stock on the verge of breaking down below a former peak from almost two years ago. AAPL 5Y mountain Apple, 5 years Nvidia, meantime, has lost its post-earnings pop, the stock back to where it closed Wednesday just before what was taken as reassuring forward guidance. Alphabet has been kept in the penalty box, its valuation now at a significant discount to the broad market, as investors fear what AI might do to its core profit stream from search. Tesla has always been an uncomfortable fit in the Mag7, there only because of its massive market value and intermittent fits of headlong stock momentum. It does not have massive profitability derived from an pervasive asset-light network platform. Its earnings are set to be lower today than three years ago and forecasts have been slashed for this year and next. But the stock is useful as a gauge of investors' collective willingness to believe in Elon Musk's promised version of the future. Well more than half of its $1.1 trillion in market capitalization is attributable not to the auto and energy-storage business that produce all Tesla revenue, but to the perpetually "almost there" robotaxi and humanoid-robot ventures that get the faithful excited. While the market credits Tesla today with hundreds of billions in value for such unproven gambits, Alphabet's $2 trillion market cap reflects very little credit for the more-advanced Waymo robotaxi division. The market likes a pure play and a good storyteller, not to say meme-spinner. For now, this current of lavishly capitalized belief is running only through narrow channels of the market, into Tesla and Palantir and CoreWeave , with tributaries into long-shot quantum-computing names with such lengthy timelines for judging success that traders choose not even to worry about it. This revival of the "transformative tech" bid — along with the resilience of hard macro data and glass-half-full take on how tariffs will interact with the economy — helps account for the tape's ability to hold up during this in-between phase for trade policy and with the Federal Reserve resolutely in wait-and-see mode. It means that two months after universal panic over maximum uncertainty created a "Close your eyes and buy" moment, it's now time to hold while keeping eyes wide open for how reality takes shape relative to fairly benign expectations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's Empire at Risk After Trump Feud Opens Multi-Front Fight
Musk's Empire at Risk After Trump Feud Opens Multi-Front Fight

Bloomberg

time16 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Musk's Empire at Risk After Trump Feud Opens Multi-Front Fight

What began as Elon Musk's embrace of right-wing populism has become a defining — and potentially harmful — chapter in his business career. By endorsing Donald Trump's MAGA movement and far-right parties in Europe, Musk alienated a big portion of his original customer base, eroding Tesla's brand, sales and market share around the globe. Then came this week's rupture: a personal and public breakup with Trump that prompted threats of retaliation from a man with control over the world's most powerful government.

Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup
Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup

If you somehow missed it, President Donald Trump and his former advisor (and bestie) Elon Musk got into a back-and-forth spat on social media yesterday. A lot was said. Trump accused Elon of backing down on his support for the president's championed "One, Big Beautiful Bill" because "he found out we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate." And Elon called said Trump was showing "such ingratitude" considering, "without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." Not one to be upstaged, Trump threatened to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." And Elon volleyed back by accusing Trump of being "in the Epstein files," despite Trump denying connections to Jeffrey Epstein. Obviously, the sitting president and the world's richest man getting into a very public feud was widely covered by news outlets, including Fox News — a conservative outlet Trump has openly admired... and also one that appears to go light on the president. Related: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral So here's how they covered the quarrell: Fox News host Sean Hannity shared footage of Trump handing Elon a ceremonial, gold-colored key during Elon's government send-off last week. "That was less than a week ago," Hannity said. "These are two very talented individuals. Frankly, they don't need each other to be successful, but I do hope they work it out and set an example for the rest of the country." Related: This Republican Lawmaker's Embarrassing Lack Of Knowledge Of The Term "Intersex" Went Viral After He Proposed An Amendment To Cut LGBTQ+ Funding Host of her own Fox show, Laura Ingraham ran a segment on the pair called "When Friendship Gets DOGE'd," where she praised Elon while suggesting Trump should "simply disengage." "Musk is his own person," Ingraham said. "The government contracts that he has stand on their own merit. They shouldn't be called into question. Threatening to pull them, that's not wise, when five minutes ago you were hailing Musks work in helping rescue the stranded Americans in space. Elon Musk is like the Thomas Edison of our time. He sacrificed for America personally and professionally, and he wanted to make the Trump presidency happen, and it did." Fox News / Twitter: @Acyn And finally, we have Jesse Watters, who insisted that, "Sometimes when you're angry, you say things you don't mean." As an odd and hopefully tongue-in-cheek example, Watters pointed to peer Greg Gutfeld, saying, "Greg mocked my hair last week, and I said he's on the Epstein list." Continuing, Watters said, "Now, I didn't mean that. I made it up." "Sometimes guys fight," Watters pressed on. "Guys will sometimes punch you in the face, and the next night you're having a beer. Sleep with your girlfriend, and you patch things up. Not your wife, your girlfriend!" "These guys are like roommates. They were living in close quarters for like, the first six months of the year. They're just blowing off steam." Well! There you have it. What are your thoughts on the coverage? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share Also in In the News: "We Don't Import Food": 31 Americans Who Are Just So, So Confused About Tariffs And US Trade

Trump administration issues rule undermining Biden car fuel efficiency rules
Trump administration issues rule undermining Biden car fuel efficiency rules

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump administration issues rule undermining Biden car fuel efficiency rules

The Trump administration on Friday took a step to undermine Biden-era rules that tightened fuel efficiency requirements for cars and trucks. The Transportation Department published an interpretive rule that says that the Biden administration improperly considered electric vehicles as a way to make vehicle fleets more efficient While this determination does not formally end the Biden-era rule, the Trump administration indicated that while the rulemaking process plays out it may not enforce the Biden-era standards. 'Pending the rulemaking process for the establishment of replacement standards, [the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration] will exercise its enforcement authority with regard to all existing… standards in accordance with the interpretation set forth in this rule,' it stated. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, in a written statement, accused the previous administration of trying to push an electric vehicle 'mandate.' 'Under President Trump's leadership, we are making vehicles more affordable and easier to manufacture in the United States,' Duffy said. 'The previous administration illegally used [Corporate Average Fuel Economy] standards as an electric vehicle mandate.' The Biden administration issued a rule requiring cars to be about 2 percent more fuel efficient each year while heavy duty pickup trucks and vans would have to be 10 percent more efficient each year from 2030 to 2032 and 8 percent more efficient in the years after. President Trump has long talked about getting rid of the Biden administration's efforts to promote electric vehicles. He has argued that these efforts harm consumers' freedom to choose what kinds of cars they want to drive and could lead to strife for autoworkers. Democrats, meanwhile, have argued that shifting toward more electric vehicles would mitigate air pollution and climate change – and put the U.S. at the forefront of an emerging market. While Trump has long lamented the previous administration's electric vehicle policy, the release of the administration's determination comes just one day after an explosive feud emerged between the president and Tesla mogul Elon Musk. The Transportation Department rules came alongside a separate, more stringent regulation for vehicle tailpipe emissions from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that in practice has a greater effect on the vehicle market's fuel efficiency and is not impacted by the Trump administration's latest maneuver. However, the department's fuel economy rules would act as a backstop if the EPA rule was to be overturned. Republicans are attempting to eliminate that rule through their 'big, beautiful bill.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store