‘Misleading': Election Commission Fact-Checks Kharge's Post On Bihar Voter List Revision
The ECI dubbed the Kharge's claim as "misleading" and said that there were no change in the instructions of SIR that is being carried out in Bihar ahead of the assembly elections.
The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Monday fact-checked Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge over Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voters' list in Bihar, who had claimed that the poll body has amended the process of voter verification from asking for documents to only filling a form without any documents citing a newspaper advertisement.
The ECI dubbed the Kharge's claim as 'misleading" and said that there were no change in the instructions of SIR that is being carried out in the state ahead of the assembly elections.
'The claim made in this post, that no document is required and only filling the form is sufficient, is misleading. There is no change in the instructions. SIR is being conducted as per the orders dated 24.06.2025. While submitting the filled enumeration form before 25th July 2025 is mandatory, the documents can be submitted at any time either before 25th July 2025 or during the claims and objections period," the ECI said in a post on X.
Meanwhile, the Election Commission's decision to initiate a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral roll in the run-up to the assembly elections later this year has triggered major political controversy. The opposition parties have been alleging that the BJP is trying to snatch voting rights from crores of people in Bihar.
On Sunday, the Congress President accused the BJP of conspiring to deprive the people of Bihar of their voter rights through the revision of electoral rolls and said the voters of the state would teach the saffron party a lesson for its attack on democracy and the Constitution.
He cited a new advertisement issued by the Election Commission (EC), urging the voters of Bihar to only fill a form under the SIR, and alleged that 'when people rise, BJP backtracks".
'With the support of the Election Commission, the master plan that the BJP had devised to deprive crores of people in Bihar of their voting rights now seems to be ensnaring the BJP itself," Kharge alleged in a post in Hindi on X.
भाजपा ने चुनाव आयोग के सहयोग से, बिहार में करोड़ों लोगों का वोटिंग का अधिकार छीनने का जो मास्टर प्लॉन बनाया था, उसमें अब भाजपा खुद फँसती नज़र आ रही है।पहले दिन से ही, कांग्रेस पार्टी Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls (SIR) के ख़िलाफ़ आवाज़ उठा रही है।
जो लोग… pic.twitter.com/wtfbEDZWOx
— Mallikarjun Kharge (@kharge) July 6, 2025
'Why are people who have been voting election after election being asked to show their documents for voting? 'Forcibly depriving the poor, weak, deprived, Dalits, oppressed and backward people of their voting rights is the conspiracy of the BJP-RSS," he alleged.
The Congress chief claimed that nearly eight crore people will suffer because of the SIR.
'The responsibility to correct the voter list lies with the EC, not the public.
'When the pressure from the opposition, the public and civil society increased, the Election Commission hurriedly published these advertisements today, which state that now only a form needs to be filled and showing documents is not necessary," he claimed.
'This is part of the BJP's tactic to mislead and confuse the public. The truth is that the BJP has decided it will crush democracy at all costs. But when faced with public opposition, it cleverly takes a step back," the leader of opposition in the Rajya Sabha alleged.
Meanwhile, the ECI has explained the need for the SIR across India as its constitutional mandate to protect the integrity of electoral rolls. It decided to begin with Bihar since it is the first state where the next assembly election will be held later this year.
It said that the SIR is being implemented smoothly at the ground level with the active cooperation of the electors.
The EC added that all voters are directly made aware through more than 77,000 BLOs and 4 Lakh volunteers as well as 1.5 lakh BLAs appointed by all political parties.
'In accordance with Article 326, the orders of SIR dated 24 June 2025 clearly enable all eligible electors to be included while excluding ineligible electors after verification by the concerned ERO," the EC said.
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Bihar elections Mallikarjun Kharge
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 07, 2025, 23:35 IST
News elections 'Misleading': Election Commission Fact-Checks Kharge's Post On Bihar Voter List Revision
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah rejects BJP's 'Rahul Gandhi humiliated him' claim
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Refuting BJP leader Amit Malviya 's allegation that Rahul Gandhi had 'humiliated' him by denying a meeting, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said his primary purpose in Delhi was to discuss Mysuru's Dasara Air Show with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh."My primary work in Delhi was to meet Defence Minister Shri @rajnathsingh to discuss the Air Show during Dasara in Mysuru. Shri @RahulGandhi has immense affection for the people of Karnataka," Siddaramaiah said in a post on X."He always remembers how Smt Indira Gandhi and Smt Sonia Gandhi were elected from Karnataka, and how the state has stood by the Congress at every critical juncture. The Gandhi Family, including Shri Rahul Gandhi, remain deeply indebted to the love showered by the people of Karnataka, and our AICC President Shri Mallikarjun @kharge is a proud Kannadiga," he Chief Minister accused the BJP of betraying Kannadigas by denying Central funds."While Shri Rahul Gandhi remains committed to bringing positive, transformative change in Karnataka, the @BJP4Indiahas betrayed Kannadigas by denying the funds we rightfully deserve. Even when Karnataka suffered devastating floods, the Prime Minister @narendramodi did not utter a word," he also alleged that the BJP MPs from Karnataka do not have the spine to stand up to PM Modi for the rights of Kannadigas."@BJP4KarnatakaMPs do not have the spine to stand up to Narendra Modi for the rights of Kannadigas. For Modi, Karnataka exists only during elections; for Congress, Karnataka's welfare is a daily commitment," he in a post on X, Amit Malviya accused Rahul Gandhi of humiliating Siddaramaiah by denying an appointment the latter had sought."Humiliation in Delhi for Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah! He travelled all the way to the capital, only to be denied an appointment by Rahul Gandhi--and has now returned without even a meeting," Malviya said in the post."This isn't the first time a Gandhi has insulted a senior leader from Karnataka. History remembers how Rajiv Gandhi unceremoniously sacked an ailing Veerendra Patil, triggering the Congress's downfall in the state. Now, a weakened Siddaramaiah is forced to hide behind the very man plotting against him--DK Shivakumar, who is eagerly waiting to take his chair. The Congress, and the Gandhis in particular, have always treated Kannadigas with disdain. This is just the latest example," he had dismissed speculation about a change in the state's leadership, asserting that there has been no discussion with the Congress high command about the change."How many times do I tell you, it (speculations around Karnataka CM post) was not discussed at all? This issue was not discussed at all with the high command," Siddaramaiah said on Friday.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
No Aadhaar, voter ID in Bihar poll roll revision? Why top court voiced concern
'How can you expect everyone in this document-starved country to produce all documents? Even I don't have a birth certificate,' remarked Supreme Court Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia while hearing petitions challenging the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, currently underway in Today takes a look at the documents required by the Election Commission of India (EC) and why the Supreme Court has raised documents are on the EC's list for verification?The EC's 'indicative but not exhaustive' list includes documents to establish a person's date and place of birth, as well as their place of residence. The enumeration form itself has the voter EPIC number printed on it, along with a space to add an Aadhaar number. This suggests that while the EC acknowledges the utility of Aadhaar and EPIC, it is asking people to submit additional advocates representing the petitioners argued that the demand for extra documents could disproportionately impact vulnerable populations—especially those in rural areas, migrant labourers, and individuals who may have lost personal belongings in floods or other natural disasters over the EC has consistently emphasised the need to keep electoral rolls 'untainted.' Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has stated in media comments that 'pure electoral rolls are inevitable for strengthening democracy.'Documents listed by the EC for verification:Any identity card or pension payment order issued to a regular employee/pensioner of the Central/State Government or a identity card, certificate, or document issued by the Government/local authorities/banks/post office/LIC/PSUs in India prior to certificate issued by a competent or educational certificate issued by recognized boards/ residence certificate issued by a competent state Rights or any caste certificate issued by a competent Register of Citizens (where applicable).Family register prepared by state or local land or house allotment certificate issued by the in the EC's own FAQsIronically, the EC's own FAQs on its website mention Aadhaar as a means to 'keep the electoral rolls pure' by enabling cross-verification of to the EC's website, Question 42 of the FAQs for new enrolments and updates states:Q: Is it mandatory to provide Aadhaar details in the registration forms?A: No. It is a purely voluntary field. Non-submission of Aadhaar details shall not be a ground for rejection of the application by the Electoral Registration Officer. However, applicants are expected to furnish Aadhaar voluntarily for the sake of purification of the electoral is the documents list being questioned?advertisementRisk of mass disenfranchisementExcluding widely used IDs like Aadhaar, ration cards, or even voter IDs could disproportionately affect underprivileged voters. According to data cited in a PIB press release from UIDAI, as of October 24, 2024, 138.04 crore Aadhaar numbers had been generated, covering 99% of the adult population. This makes Aadhaar the most commonly available form of identity, especially given its widespread use for accessing subsidies and welfare a summary revision of Bihar's electoral rolls was conducted just last year, questions have been raised about the need for another revision. Senior lawyers argued in court that individuals who have previously voted and appeared on the rolls should not be removed without a detailed inquiry and a fair on migrants and disaster-affected populationsElectoral rolls traditionally include individuals aged 18 and above based on their ordinary residence. However, the current exercise also takes into account place of birth, raising concerns for migrant workers and disaster-affected people. Migrants, students, and seasonal labourers often face difficulties updating their details due to frequent relocations, increasing their risk of being excluded from voter over a de facto NRCThe requirement for documents such as birth certificates or legacy data has raised suspicions of a stealth implementation of a National Register of Citizens (NRC). Critics argue this amounts to a de facto citizenship test, potentially leading to systematic exclusion of marginalized and minority the 1992 HRA Choudhury verdict, the Gauhati High Court ruled that the Election Commission cannot link electoral roll revision to citizenship verification. The court held that 'doubtful voters' could not be barred from voting or removed from rolls unless a Foreigners Tribunal reached a final decision. It also directed that Booth Level Officers (BLOs) may flag suspected individuals, but proper investigation and hearing must follow before any in the 1995 Lal Babu Hussain judgment, the Supreme Court observed: 'If any person whose citizenship is suspected is shown to have been included in the immediately preceding electoral roll, the Electoral Registration Officer or any other officer inquiring into the matter shall bear in mind that the entire process for inclusion must have been followed and adequate probative value be given to that fact before issuing notice or taking further steps.'The verdict made it clear that deletions from the voter list cannot be arbitrary. A clear and reasoned procedure, as per the Handbook for Electoral Registration Officers (HMA), must be followed, and individuals must be given reasonable time to are growing fears that the Special Intensive Revision may be applied in a discriminatory manner, thereby undermining electoral integrity and equitable representation.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Putin Transfers Jets To Iran? Russian IL-76 Military Aircraft ‘Unloads Cargo' In Tehran
Supreme Court Asks EC to Consider Aadhaar, Ration, Voter ID for Bihar Voter Roll Revision The Supreme Court has allowed the Election Commission of India to continue with its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, but not without raising serious questions about its timing and methodology. The apex court asked why such a sweeping exercise was launched just months before elections, warning that it "goes to the root of democracy and the power to vote." The Court also asked the EC to consider accepting documents like Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration cards for verifying voter eligibility, especially amid opposition fears of disenfranchisement. However, it dismissed arguments that the EC lacked the authority to conduct the revision, noting that it was last done in 2003. The next hearing is set for July 28, and the EC has until July 21 to respond. No interim order has been passed yet. Is this voter clean-up or voter suppression? The courtroom battle is far from over.#supremecourt #biharelections #voterroll #electioncommission #aadhaar #votingrights #bjpvsindia #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews 9.3K views | 1 day ago
