logo
A family of 5 downsized to a one-bedroom apartment to escape feeling 'house poor.' Saving money hasn't been the only benefit.

A family of 5 downsized to a one-bedroom apartment to escape feeling 'house poor.' Saving money hasn't been the only benefit.

Yahoo16-05-2025

Megan and Emmett Hawkins were raising their three kids in a five-bedroom home.
After feeling "house poor," they decided to rent out the home and move into a one-bedroom apartment.
The couple said downsizing had saved them money and brought their family closer.
Going into 2024, Emmett and Megan Hawkins were living the American dream.
Emmett, 37, and Megan, 34, owned a 2,100-square-foot, five-bedroom home in Charlotte, North Carolina. They were raising their three kids there and had ample space for them to grow.
But after months of feeling isolated and financial strain in their picture-perfect neighborhood, the Hawkinses decided to downsize to a one-bedroom apartment.
A year into the move, the couple told Business Insider they had no regrets.
By the spring of 2024, the realities of homeownership were weighing on the Hawkins family.
"We were in a development, and we just weren't happy there," Emmett said. "We didn't really have that sense of community."
Megan was also the primary caretaker of their house, and she said she felt like she was "constantly cleaning" it.
The financial strain of homeownership was also adding stress to their lives. They'd been looking for a different home to buy in a better neighborhood for more than two years, but high interest rates deterred them.
As time went on, the idea of being "house poor" in a desirable neighborhood became less and less appealing.
Then, they went to a birthday party for a friend living in a Charlotte apartment complex. The Hawkinses said they thought the complex was "gorgeous," and they loved that it had amenities such as a pool and lawn for their kids to enjoy that they didn't have to maintain.
They lived in Queens, New York, in the early years of their relationship, so they were familiar with apartment living. It seemed like it could be the solution to their problems.
In May 2024, the couple decided to rent out their home and move into a one-bedroom apartment in the complex. Their mortgage is $1,400 a month, and they rent out the home for $2,300. Their apartment costs $1,600, but with the rental income and lifestyle changes, the couple said their overall expenses had been cut nearly in half.
They donated and sold much of their furniture and kids' toys, preparing themselves to live in the 830-square-foot apartment.
They initially set up the apartment like a studio, putting their bed in the living area. But in August, Megan received a diagnosis of arteriovenous malformation, and she had to have surgery in December. They moved the kids' beds to the living area following the operation, giving her a quiet space to recover in the bedroom.
The surgery left the mom of three with partial paralysis that's slowly improving over time. Emmett had to take time off from his job as an insurance claims adjuster to care for his wife and their children while she recovered.
He ended up getting laid off, so as of May, the couple's only sources of income are the rent their tenants pay and their TikTok account, where they document their life living small.
A year after they moved into their apartment, the Hawkinses are loving their minimalist life.
They said their smaller living space had made them closer since they spend so much time together. They also love spending more time outdoors, exploring the complex and the city as a family.
"We really treat this like a crash pad for the most part," Megan said of their apartment. "We're always at the pool or at the park."
The couple has also found it easier to clean their space since it's so much smaller. For instance, they said their old home's playroom was "chaos all the time," whereas their kids' toys are now in bins that the children help keep organized.
Though they love their downsized life overall, it does come with challenges. The Hawkinses said it could be difficult to get things done around the apartment or even just watch TV together when the kids are asleep, and they wouldn't mind having more storage space.
A one-bedroom apartment won't work for them forever, but they think it's great for their family, particularly while their kids are so young. Plus, living somewhere that saved them money when health issues arose was a "relief" for the couple, they said.
"There's some relief knowing that we have a lower monthly expense, which was huge because we were spending a lot of money, meeting our deductible, and going to the hospital," Megan said.
Initially, the Hawkinses planned to stay in the apartment for just one year, but they renewed their lease in May because of the surgery's impact on their family.
By May 2026, they hope to have purchased a plot of land to build a two-bedroom home for their family. They want their new home to be about 900 square feet, and they're eager for their children to have land to run around. Whether the dream happens or not, they don't plan to live in a large house again anytime soon.
"There's no joy when I see those big giant houses," Megan said. "I just feel bad for the person cleaning it."
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

A House Ways and Means Committee hearing took an unexpected turn Wednesday when Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) accused Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of interrupting her because of her gender—prompting audible groans from the room. The exchange occurred during a tense five-minute questioning session, where Sanchez challenged Bessent on the impact of tariffs enacted under President Trump's administration. "Prices are rising on many everyday goods," Sanchez said, citing increases in clothing, shoes, canned food, toys, and household tools. She added, "On average, Trump's tariffs are estimated to cost households $3,000 more for the same goods than they would have last year," though she did not cite the source of the figure when pressed. Trump Says 'Total Reset Negotiated' With China During Tariff Talks In Geneva When Bessent attempted to interject, Sanchez quickly cut him off: "Please don't interrupt me… I know I'm a woman, but please try to limit yourself to answering my questions." That remark prompted groans from the hearing room, with one attendee audibly reacting, "Oh, come on." Sanchez responded: "No, I'm sorry, but we get talked over all the time, and I don't want that to happen at this hearing." Read On The Fox News App Bessent, who is openly gay, did not address the accusation and instead focused on defending the administration's trade policies. When Sanchez challenged him on pricing impacts and China's trade behavior, Bessent responded, "That's incorrect," and said, "They met their agreements under President Trump in 2020, and President Biden did not enforce them." Wh Slams Dems' 'Partisan Games' After Trump-foe Schiff Calls For Insider Trading Investigation Over Tariffs Sanchez repeatedly claimed that American consumers are paying more due to tariffs and described recent negotiations with China as rushed and lacking transparency. "A poorly negotiated trade deal with China is probably not worth the paper that it is written on," she said. "I was alarmed to hear this morning that Trump said the U.S.–China deal was done after just two days of talks in London." Bessent defended the agreement as an initial step. "The deal struck was for a specific goal, and it will be a much longer process," he said, adding, "China has proven an unreliable partner." The clash between Sanchez and Bessent was repeatedly moderated by Chairman Adrian Smith (R-NE), who reminded members of time limits and decorum throughout the article source: Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

Major Company Giving Employees $1,000 LEGO Allowance
Major Company Giving Employees $1,000 LEGO Allowance

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Major Company Giving Employees $1,000 LEGO Allowance

Companies will often give their employees perks and extra benefits. These can include discounts, free items and even vacations. One major company is offering a benefit to employees that has rarely been seen, but is sure to make those who work at other companies slightly jealous. Professional services firm Deloitte offers its employees an annual well-being subsidy of up to $1,000. Employees are allowed to use that subsidy on a variety of items, and recent guidelines have added "Legos and puzzles," according to Business Insider. The company has offered the subsidy for several years, and recently upped the amount from $500. It's offered to most partners and salaried workers at the company, but interns, contractors and those on a leave of absence aren't eligible. "Most of the responses are things like 'Lego?!?!? Finally!' or jokes about how they can now rationalize buying the coveted Millennium Falcon Star Wars Lego set," one employee told BI. Another employee was happy to see Legos added, and said that spending a few hours to build a set "is a great stress reliever." Many employees were reportedly happy that the company was thinking outside of the box when considering what employees could or would spend the subsidy on. The popular building bricks are just one of the new additions to the policy. Other items and categories added to the subsidy list this year include kitchenware and kitchen appliances, spa services, personal fans and ergonomic pillows. The subsidy is a great benefit for working at Deloitte, one of the biggest consulting firms in the world. The work is often demanding, with employees reporting that they work an average of 55 hours per week. "Since you are constantly changing projects and working with different leaders, achieving work-life balance is sadly always variable," one employee said while speaking to Women in Business. "Sometimes you get it, sometimes you really don't." Ernst & Young, another of the Big Four consulting and professional service firms, offers a similar subsidy that allows employees to purchase items like game consoles and mattresses. Deloitte had nearly 173,000 employees last year and generated over $33 billion in revenue. Major Company Giving Employees $1,000 LEGO Allowance first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 12, 2025

Voyager soars 82% on first day of trading as defense tech booms
Voyager soars 82% on first day of trading as defense tech booms

Business Insider

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Voyager soars 82% on first day of trading as defense tech booms

Defense tech company Voyager Technologies closed its first day of trading 82% higher than its initial public offering price. Voyager, which provides software for space and defense tech companies, priced its New York Stock Exchange debut at $31 per share on Tuesday. It offered 12.4 million shares and closed at $56.48 per share on Wednesday. Shares continued climbing after hours. Voyager plans to use the cash injection from the offering to fund investment in research and development programs and buy assets needed for growth, the company said in a statement on Tuesday. A portion of the proceeds may also be used to pursue mergers and acquisitions in Voyager's core business areas. The rest will be used for repaying debt and the business's day-to-day needs, the company said. Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan jointly led the offering. Early investors in Voyager include national security-focused venture firms Industrious Ventures, Marlinspike, and Scout Ventures. Voyager's IPO is an outlier because most venture-backed companies have preferred to stay private, especially after the pandemic. Like many tech companies that go public, Voyager is unprofitable. Founded in 2019, it's younger than peers like Palantir, which was founded in 2003 and went public in 2020, and Anduril, which was founded in 2017 and remains a private company. Voyager also relies largely on one client: the US government. The company posted $144 million in revenue last year, out of which 80% came from US government work. NASA alone made up 25% of its sales last year. Voyager reported a loss of $66 million in 2024, over double the prior year's loss, according to a regulatory filing. The IPO pop shows a renewed interest in defense and space tech companies from Silicon Valley and Washington alike. In an inaugural speech in January, President Donald Trump said that "We will pursue our manifest destiny into the stars, launching American astronauts to plant the Stars and Stripes on the planet Mars." Late last month at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has been bullish on battlefield tech, said that America's military will be equipped with the most advanced capabilities as part of the 2026 fiscal year budget. US military leaders have increasingly prioritized the development of AI capabilities in recent years, and want to build up America's arsenal in the technological arms race with China. They have argued that whichever country dominates this tech space will win future conflicts. Top VCs, including Founder's Fund and Andreessen Horowitz, have been pouring into defense tech darlings like Anduril and Shield AI. In March, Shield AI raised $240 million in a funding round, boosting its valuation to $5.3 billion. Last week, Anduril closed a new funding round of $2.5 billion, a deal that more than doubled the defense startup's valuation to $30.5 billion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store