Amazon Q2 profit jumps 35% to $18.2 billion, driven by AI and AWS growth
The Seattle-based company posted net profit of $18.2 billion for the second quarter that ended June 30, compared with $13.5 billion in the same period last year.
Net sales climbed 13 percent to $167.7 billion, beating analyst expectations and signaling that the global company was surviving the impacts of the high-tariff trade policy under US President Donald Trump.
"Our conviction that AI will change every customer experience is starting to play out," said Chief Executive Andy Jassy, pointing to the company's expanded Alexa service and new AI shopping agents.
Amazon Web Services (AWS), the company's world leading cloud computing division, led the charge with sales jumping 17.5 percent to $30.9 billion.
The unit's operating profit rose to $10.2 billion from $9.3 billion a year earlier.
The strong AWS performance reflects surging demand for cloud infrastructure to power AI applications, a trend that has benefited major cloud providers as companies race to adopt generative AI technologies.
Despite the stellar results, investors seemed worried about Amazon's big cash outlays to pursue its AI ambitions, sending its share price more than three percent lower in after-hours trading.
The company's free cash flow declined sharply to $18.2 billion for the trailing 12 months, down from $53 billion in the same period last year, as Amazon ramped up capital spending on AI infrastructure and logistics.
The company spent $32.2 billion on property and equipment in the quarter, nearly double the $17.6 billion spent a year earlier, reflecting massive investments in data centers and backroom capabilities.
Amazon has pledged to spend up to $100 billion this year, largely on AI-related investments for AWS.
For the current quarter, Amazon forecast net sales between $174.0 billion and $179.5 billion, representing solid growth of 10-13 percent compared with the third quarter of 2024.
Operating profit was expected to range from $15.5 billion to $20.5 billion in the current third quarter, which was lower than some had hoped for and likely also a factor in investor disappointment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
Wall Street Banks Lose Ground in Europe as Tariffs Spook Clients
(Bloomberg) -- As US President Donald Trump has ratcheted up his rhetoric against trading partners in Europe — corporates across the continent are taking notice. As a result, some companies have begun to diversify their banking relationships away from the giants of Wall Street, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That's been a boon for Europe's leading banks, which have been actively vying to win the extra business. 'Some players are saying that it's better to go to European or French investment banks for advice on financing or mergers and acquisitions,' said Arnaud Petit, managing director of Edmond de Rothschild's corporate finance business. Deutsche Bank AG Chief Executive Officer Christian Sewing sees similar in potential clients' requests for proposals: 'It is happening every day with client wins and RFPs and new business that we put on.' So far this year, roughly half of the euro bond deals from non-US companies did not involve any of the five biggest US banks, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That's up five percentage points from a year earlier. For sterling bonds the gap has widened even further — Wall Street banks were shut out of just 47% of deals throughout all of last year. So far this year, though, they've been excluded from 64% of them. The emergence of the ability of a few European banks 'to be able to offer competitive services and advice to clients' has created a desire among clients to switch, according to UBS Group AG Chief Executive Sergio Ermotti. 'We believe we are well placed to continue to benefit from that diversification.' Even before Trump's trade war kicked off in earnest, the biggest of the US banks warned that it was starting to see an impact. By April, JPMorgan Chase & Co. had already lost 'a couple' of bond deals tied to the tariff uncertainty, with companies opting for local banks instead, Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said in an interview with Fox Business at the time. He warned that the tumult was 'causing cumulative damage including huge anger at the United States.' The latest example of a win for non-US banks came this week, when Zurich-based insurer Chubb Ltd. issued an offshore yuan-bond. It opted for Standard Chartered Plc to help take on the deal. The bank was told: 'We want to bank with the regional champions, rather than just with global banks in general,' Standard Chartered Chief Financial Officer Diego de Giorgi said. 'Because we think that you guys bring specific skills in a world that is fragmenting.' Chubb is not an exception. The effect is most pronounced in Asia, where economies are expected to be hard hit by the changing trade regimes and the re-routing of supply chains, said Ruchirangad Agarwal, head of corporate banking for Asia and the Middle East at the research firm Coalition Greenwich. 'The willingness of companies in Asia to change their transaction bank is currently at a high: a third of them plan to issue a new RFP within the next 12 months,' Agarwal said. Already, US lenders' market share in financing trade for Chinese companies has dropped in recent years - from 12% in 2017 to about 7% share now, he added. 'We expect to see heightened uncertainty and customer churn at US banks as large corporates take an active risk management stance on FX, interest rates, counterparty risk, geopolitical tensions and supply chain disruptions,' said Martin Smith, head of markets analysis at East & Partners. BNP Paribas SA, meanwhile, has gained more share than any other player in Asia, Smith said. 'There are clearly strategic opportunities in the tectonic shifts that the world has been seeing in recent months' Societe Generale SA CEO's Slawomir Krupa said of companies looking to shift toward European banking partners. 'The logic behind this form of risk diversification has become more apparent for companies.' --With assistance from Harry Wilson, Claudia Cohen and Noele Illien. More stories like this are available on
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
1.8 crore jobs at risk? THESE three sectors likely to get impacted due to AI, new-age technologies, says report
New-age technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) are set to implement a 'seismic' shift in the industries affecting the jobs of more than 1.8 crore people over three key sectors by the year 2030, reported the news agency PTI. Manufacturing, Retail, and Education are the three sectors poised to be impacted by the effects of implementing AI into operations, according to the agency report. Out of the three sectors, the Manufacturing sector is expected to witness the worst hit from the AI transition, with 80 lakh workers set to be affected, followed by the Retail sector with 76 lakh jobs, and the Education sector with 25 lakh jobs affected in the next five years, reported the news agency, citing Servicenow data. High-automation roles like Change managers and Payroll clerk job roles are expected to be redefined by the AI agents, which will take over the routine coordination. However, "high-augmentation" job roles like the Implementation consultants and System admins are working and partnering with AI instead of competing with it. India's largest IT company, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) in the end of July 2025, announced that the company will be laying off almost 2% of its workforce, or more than 12,000 employees in the financial year 2025-26. The IT firm will focus the job cuts on the middle and senior management employees as part of its broader strategy to become 'future-ready' and focus on technological investments, AI developments, market expansion, etc. Mint reported earlier that TCS's total workforce stands at 6,13,069 people as of the April-June quarter of the financial year 2025-26. The news agency cited Sumeet Mathur, the managing director for Servicenow India Technology and Business Centre, who said that artificial intelligence is expected to create 30 lakh jobs in new technology by 2030. Artificial intelligence is also reshaping the workforce, and will "redefine" over 1.35 crore roles, said the executive, cited in the agency report. "India has a generational opportunity to lead globally by developing AI-ready talent, redesigning workflows, and reorienting business models around continuous innovation," said Sumeet Mathur. After conducting a more than 500-industry-leader survey on AI adoption, the company noted that 13.5% of tech budgets of the IT company are already pledged towards AI adoption, and one-fourth of the firms in India are already in their transformation phase. With data security as one of their top concerns, the Indian companies are highlighting the urgent need for strategic foresight and structured, cross-functional reskilling pathways in the market.
India.com
3 minutes ago
- India.com
One small change and ChatGPT got misled, new report reveals SHOCKING truth, can cause huge damage due to...
(File) Can a minor change in parameters be used to mislead an advanced, powerful AI Chatbot like ChatGPT? Well, a recent research by Mount Sinai and Israel's Rabin Medical Center proved how even advanced artificial intelligence tools can be forced to commit basic human-like errors by simply modifying queries. What did the research reveal? During the study, the researchers made minor modifications to a few classic cases related to medical ethics and asked AI systems, including ChatGPT for answers. What they found was shocking; a majority of times the AI answers were based merely on intuitive understanding of the subject, not facts. The AI answers were based on a trait commonly called 'fast thinking', which is unique to humans. The research found that, if inputs are slightly modified, AI often gives the same answer to queries that it 'habitually' thinks is right, even if the answer is wrong and not fact-based. How researchers 'misled' AI? Various AI models like ChatGPT were asked to solve a modified version of the 'Surgeon's Dilemma'– a medical ethics puzzle which goes something like this ; A young and his father are injured in an accident. The boy is brought to the hospital, where the surgeon says, 'I can't operate on this child, he's my son'. The twist is that the surgeon is boy's mother, but this is overlooked by most because they assume the surgeon must be a man, and AI was trapped in the same fallacy. Interestingly, AI models continued to answer that the mother was the surgeon, even when the researchers told it that it was the father. The experiment demonstrated that AI 'habitually' sticks to old pattern even when new facts are explicitly provided. Why this is alarming? The study proved that AI, while a highly advanced and useful tool, cannot be entrusted to perform tasks where human lives are at stake, at least not in current state. 'AI should be used as an assistant to doctors, not as a substitute. When it comes to ethical, sensitive or serious decisions, human supervision is necessary,' said, Dr. Girish Nadkarni, a senior scientist at Mount Sinai. The groundbreaking research was inspired by Daniel Kahneman's book 'Thinking, Fast and Slow' which delves into the complex process of fast and slow thinking.
