Starmer pays £10bn to surrender UK's vital defence to a honeymoon resort
Not only is Britain finished, we're running out of people to surrender it to. China got Hong Kong. The EU got our waters. But who gets our base at Diego Garcia? Mauritius. I'd love to explain that one to the ghost of Queen Victoria: 'The future of the Royal Navy, your majesty, is now in the hands of a honeymoon resort.'
Vic isn't amused. I'm spitting blood. Like any patriotic Englishman, I'd gladly take a bullet to protect this essential and much-loved base in the Indian Ocean.
Our day of infamy began with a ray of hope. Some Chagossians protested the deal in the High Court; the PM was briefly stopped by a judge (serves the lawyer right: if you live by m'lord, you'll die by m'lord). But the wheels of justice spun into reverse and, at about 3pm, Keir Starmer threw a press conference to announce the sale of the century.
Mauritius gets the islands; we then pay them £10 billion to remain in situ. Keir was first made aware of this exciting offer via an unsolicited email from a man looking to invest the assets of a late Nigerian prince.
To sweeten matters, the PM posed with a general who, in a better age, would be planning a coup behind his back. Field Marshal Sir Hillary Clippety-clop wore a braid so preposterously long and golden one imagined tugging it to open a curtain. The historian David Cannadine called such things 'the cavalcade of impotence': the more Britain diminishes, the more its rulers enjoy dressing up.
Don't think this is a good deal for the UK? MI5 would be interested in having a chat.
'Who is in favour?', asked the PM rhetorically. 'All our allies. Who is against it? Russia, China, Iran and, surprisingly, the leader of the Opposition.' Keir didn't use her name because, according to the latest polls, the vast majority of voters wouldn't recognise it – but the implication was clear. Kemi is aiding our enemies.
Well, the Tories weren't having that. During a fiery Commons statement, Opposition spokesman James Cartlidge called it 'beneath contempt' to accuse the Government's critics of treachery. He went on to label the deal a 'betrayal' and a 'surrender', and to rewrite Labour's theme tune as 'they'll keep the white flag flying here'.
Minister John Healey, a much-pained politician whose every sentence sounds like his last, regretted 'the tone' of Cartlidge's remarks, which is what Labour does. Attacks on their policies are dismissed as populism; passion is evidence of mental decline. Were it not for parliamentary privilege, Cartlidge would have been carted off to jail.
But the claim that the Government simply had to sign this deal because foreign courts demanded it does not hold water – and even Labour MPs were privately criticising it. Courts interpret; the Commons has the final say.
No one forced Starmer's hand. We're simply witnessing the logical consequence of government by a class that is embarrassed by Britain's past greatness and would surrender its territory to anyone who puts in a dubious claim. Today Chagos; tomorrow Gibraltar and the Falklands. Vanuatu can have Cornwall.
The sun had to set on Vicky's empire someday, but I never imagined we'd be paying someone £10 billion to lower the flag.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revealed: Labour-run councils are housing 3 times as many asylum seekers as Reform-controlled areas - so how many are in YOUR authority?
Labour-ran councils are bearing the brunt of Britain's asylum crisis, according to an analysis which piles even more pressure on Keir Starmer. Authorities controlled by Sir Keir's party house more than 26 asylum seekers for every 10,000 residents – almost triple the rate of councils now under Reform's watch, MailOnline can reveal today. Pollsters warn Labour may become victims of Reform's 'humongous strides' unless the 'hot topic' in traditional Red Wall strongholds is addressed. Wary of the threat posed by Nigel Farage 's outfit, which has seized on the public's immigration fears, Sir Keir earlier this month promised to deliver Brits what they had 'asked for time and time again'. The Prime Minister, who warned mass immigration risked turning us into an 'island of strangers', unveiled a package to 'take back control of our borders'. The skills threshold will be hiked and rules on fluency in English toughened under the Government's plan to bring down annual inflows by around 100,000. Basking in Reform's extraordinary dominance in May's local elections, Mr Farage vowed to reject migrants across his party's 10 newly-gained councils. Zia Yusuf, the party chair and a major donor, later promised to use 'every instrument of power' to do so, including the threat of court action. MailOnline analysis, based on Home Office figures, show there are nine asylum seekers for 10,000 residents across those Reform-held councils, including Lincolnshire and County Durham. For comparison, the UK-wide average is 16. The figure for councils under Tory rule is 11.5. Twenty-one of the 218 upper-tier local authorities in MailOnline's audit supported no asylum seekers. The Labour-run councils housing the most asylum seekers, in relation to their population, are Hounslow (72 per 10,000) Halton (70) and Coventry (59). The council housing the most, Hillingdon (94), is run by Tories. Chris Hopkins, political research director at polling firm Savanta, believes immigration is a major hurdle for Sir Keir's Government. He said: 'Immigration and asylum is increasing in salience among the British public, probably is reaching the highs now of sort of 2015/2016 to be honest, having taken a bit of a drop off during the pandemic. 'I'm not going to say the next election is going to be about immigration but it definitely does feel like the hot topic of the moment. 'It presents a problem – not just for the Labour Party – but for any government of any colour because there is a sense in the country that numbers are too high.' Mr Hopkins added: 'There is a sense that Labour's opposition now is Reform UK, not the Conservatives. 'Obviously Reform UK are known, to some extent, as a single issue, anti-immigration party. So Labour have to navigate that ultimately, and need to be seen acting on that. 'I think that there's a danger of them trying to "out Reform" Reform, which isn't going to work for them as it didn't work for Rishi Sunak. 'And I think that Labour potentially risk alienating some of their more Left-wing liberal voters to the Liberal Democrats or Greens if they go down that route. 'A lot could change at the next General Election (to be held no later than August 2029) but the direction of travel at the minute is Reform UK making humongous strides.' Polls suggest that Labour's failure to address sky high immigration could spell further disaster for the party at the ballot box. A recent survey by IPSOS found 68 per cent of the public deem the numbers coming to the UK to seek refugee status or asylum too high. And 33 per cent think they are doing a worse job on immigration than the Tories. Just 17 per cent feel Labour is handling it better. Labour's highest-profile defeat in May's locals was in the Runcorn by-election, where Reform narrowly beat them by six votes. In the run-up to polling day, both parties promised to close a 425-bed hotel in the constituency that was being used by the Home Office to house asylum seekers. Locals in the Cheshire town claimed crime had increased in the area since it started housing asylum seekers in 2020. On a national level, Downing Street's sweeping new plan will increase efforts to stop housing asylum seekers in hotels. It comes as a series of investigations by MailOnline have revealed the 'absurd' reality of asylum claims in Britain, with critics saying that it was proof we've become a 'soft touch'. Fuelled by the small boats crisis plaguing the Channel, a record 108,000 applications were lodged in 2024. Claims from dozens of countries, including Afghanistan and Iran, have doubled over the last 20 years. Last month we revealed that citizens in the US, Australia and even Scandinavia are trying to claim asylum here – despite already residing in wealthy Western countries that are free of major human rights abuses. And a fortnight ago we exposed how Northumberland council in Britain is housing 600 times more asylum seekers now than a decade ago. Home Office policy is to disperse asylum seekers around the country. Officials insist they are not given a choice as to location and the accommodation. Local authorities also do not get a say in how many are housed in their areas, insiders insist. They are given £1,200 for each asylum seeker being housed in their boundaries. A spokesman for the Local Government Association said: 'We are keen to continue to work with government on a more equitable approach across asylum and resettlement. 'One that takes into account wider housing, homelessness and cohesion challenges, with sufficient lead in time for engagement with councils on any new sites.' The Home Office says value for money, community cohesion and the wellbeing of those working and living in asylum accommodation will continue to be at the 'forefront of decision-making'. Although authorities can object, they have little formal power to actually stop asylum seekers being housed in their areas. Newly-elected Reform politicians have vowed to stand up for their communities and fight against their dispersal. Mr Farage said he was opposed to the government 'plonking scores of young men' in counties where his party now has control. He has vowed to 'resist' asylum seekers being housed in the counties where Reform was in control, claiming they were being 'dumped into the north of England, getting everything for free'. 'People hate them,' he told The Telegraph. 'They see a sense of total unfairness that they are working themselves to bits to pay tax for young men who can illegally come into the country and be given everything for free.' Newly-elected County Durham councillor and ex-GB News presenter Darren Grimes said Reform would not 'allow our communities to be a dumping ground for illegal migrants'. And in her victory speech, Reform's new mayor for Greater Lincolnshire Dame Andrea Jenkyns proposed housing them in tents instead, saying 'tents are good enough for France; they should be good enough for you in Britain.' Her comments prompted some rival candidates to walk off the stage in outrage. As well as getting free accomodation, asylum seekers are also entitled to UK taxpayer-funded NHS healthcare, prescriptions, dental care and children under 18 are required to go to school (where they may be able to get free meals). If their accommodation provides meals each person gets £8.86 per week, this rises to £49.18 per week if no meals are provided. Extra money is also provided to pregnant mothers and young children. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We are working to fairly disperse asylum seekers across the country, consulting closely with local authorities to further reduce our reliance on hotels and deliver better value for money for taxpayers, while giving control back to communities through our Plan for Change. 'We've taken immediate action to fix the broken asylum system this government inherited, by increasing asylum decision making by 52 per cent and removing nearly 30,000 people with no right to be here. 'By restoring grip on the system and speeding up decision making, we will end the use of hotels and are forecast to save the taxpayer £4 billion by the end of 2026.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Spending plans for British Council may force it to close in 60 countries, sources say
Ministers have asked the British Council to draw up spending plans that would force it to close in as many as 60 countries, sources have told the Guardian, in the latest sign of the impact of Keir Starmer's decision to slash the aid budget. The council has been asked to draw up two sets of spending plans as part of Wednesday's spending review: one in which its funding would remain the same in cash terms and one in which it would be cut by 2% in cash terms each year. The scenarios are the same as those that have been demanded of the BBC World Service, and would mean the council having to shut completely in large parts of the world. The plans are likely to add to warnings that the government's cuts to overseas aid are at risk of damaging its soft power just as Russia and China are putting more resources into strengthening theirs. Scott McDonald, the council's chief executive, would not comment on the Treasury's demands, but said: 'The British Council plays a vital role in delivering UK soft power around the globe. 'Investment in soft power is imperative to any nation that wishes to be instrumental on the world stage. Over the last three years we have taken £180m of costs out of the organisation through a substantial transformation plan, but the amount of funding we receive from the UK government will have an impact on country closures.' McDonald has previously warned that financial pressures on the council could make it 'disappear' within a decade. The council receives £1bn in revenue each year, but 85% of that comes from selling its English-language services around the world. In 2024-25, it received £163m in a government grant, most of which came from the international aid budget. Earlier this year, the prime minister announced he would slash the aid budget from 0.5% of gross domestic product to 0.3%, freeing up about £6bn in extra spending for defence. The reductions to the aid budget are now being felt in Whitehall, with the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, having imposed what insiders say are swingeing cuts on the Foreign Office. As a result, institutions such as the British Council and BBC World Service are being asked to model major spending reductions. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Those close to the negotiations with the government say the council had asked for an additional £20m in funding per year, not least to help repay a £197m loan to keep it running during the pandemic. That loan, which was made on commercial terms, has now been rolled over for another 18 months, but insiders say the repayments are costing it £14m a year. If it receives no extra cash in the next few years, those close to the talks say, it will have to close in 40 countries. Cuts of 2% in cash terms would require 60 closures. Both of these would be on top of the 20 office closures that it announced in 2021, when it was told to reduce its budget by £185m over five years. The council's financial crisis is causing alarm among politicians and military chiefs, who say its activities boost Britain's national security. Dozens of high-profile figures recently wrote to the prime minister urging him not to cut the council's funding. They included the former home secretary James Cleverly, the former defence secretaries Grant Shapps, Ben Wallace and Michael Fallon, the former foreign secretary David Miliband, and the former military chiefs Richard Dannatt and David Richards. The letter warned: 'As we compete harder for global influence, the need for the British Council's unique contribution to our security is greater than ever. We call upon you to invest in this great national asset and force-multiplier, before it is too late.' Peter Ricketts, the former national security adviser who organised the letter, told the Guardian: 'A lot of defence people will tell you that a small investment in soft power such as the British Council is worth a lot of money on the military side.' A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'Despite the tough fiscal situation, we continue to back the British Council with over £160m in 2025-26.' The spokesperson added that no decisions had yet been taken over its funding for the next few years.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Police told to stop asking for more cash to fight crime and 'do their bit' to repair the economy by Labour minister ahead of Spending Review
Police chiefs demanding more money must make do and 'do their bit' to help repair the economy, a senior minister said today ahead of a spending review in which the NHS and schools are expected to be the winners. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle declined to rule out the prospect of a real-terms squeeze on areas such as policing this week. He used a round of interviews today to say that 'every part of our society is struggling' and police were competing with various other sectors who have Chancellor Rachel Reeves for more money. Reports suggest that the Home Office is one of the departments that will face spending restrains when she sets out her plans in the Commons on Wednesday. Last week, in a letter to the Prime Minister, Sir Mark Rowley, the head of the Metropolitan Police, warned that cuts to police budgets will have 'far-reaching consequences'. Mr Kyle acknowledged that the police were after more money, but speaking on the BBC 's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme he said: 'We also have letters from the universities, we have letters from doctors about the health service, we have letters from campaigners for child poverty writing to us, and other aspects of challenges in Britain at the moment. 'Every part of our society is struggling because of the inheritance that we had as a country and as a Government.' He added: 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit.' But shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the policing budget should be protected using deeper cuts to welfare spending. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle used a round of interviews today to say that 'every part of our society is struggling' and police were competing with various other sectors 'I'm very concerned that police numbers may fall already this current financial year, so before this spending review, we are seeing police numbers falling,' he said. 'Sir Mark Rowley, the Commissioner of the Met, is going to have to shrink the Met's workforce by 1,700, of which 1,500 will be police officers. So we're going to have less police in London, and the same story is going to play out across the country. 'And it looks like, from the reporting, that there are going to be problems in the three years after that as well, with the likelihood of police numbers under Labour going down, whereas in government when I was police minister this time last year, we actually hit record ever numbers of police, but Labour are putting that at risk.' And Lib Dem Treasury spokeswoman Daisy Cooper added said: 'There's already an epidemic of unsolved crime across the country, so its beggars belief that the Government won't rule out cutting vital police funding. 'They must keep their promises on neighbourhood policing and listen to our senior officers by ruling out any real-term cuts to the policing budget. It's the least our local communities deserve.' Mr Kyle pointed to the £1.1 billion extra funding already earmarked for police this year, warning that public services would be expected to 'do their bit' alongside Government as he defended Ms Reeves' stewardship of the country's finances. 'You see a Chancellor that is striving to get investment to the key parts of our country that needs it the most… You will see the priorities of this Government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term,' he told the BBC. 'But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.' The Department of Health is set to be the biggest winner in Ms Reeves' spending review on Wednesday, with the NHS receiving a boost of up to £30 billion at the expense of other public services. Economists have said the expected 2.8 per cent annual increase in its day-to-day budget, which amounts to a rise of about £30 billion by 2028, or £17 billion in real terms, will see other departments squeezed. Day-to-day funding for schools is expected increase by an extra £4.5 billion by 2028-9 compared with the 2025-6 core budget, which was published in the spring statement. In an interview with the Observer, the Chancellor said: 'I want young people to have the opportunity to fulfil their potential, wherever they are from, whatever their background.' Speaking on Sunday, Mr Kyle said the schools system, along with an £86 billion funding package for research and development, would be top priorities as the Government seeks to 'invest in the future.' 'You will see in this spending review that we are investing the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system,' he told Sky News. Mr Kyle said Labour was 'absolutely laser-focused' on delivering manifesto pledges amid questions about how competing commitments will be balanced with little room for manoeuvre amid narrow fiscal headroom. Asked about the Government's plan to build 1.5 million new homes by the end of the Parliament, the minister declined to guarantee Housing Secretary Angela Rayner's department would not face cuts. But he added: 'We made a manifesto commitment. We are absolutely laser-focused on delivering that.' He said the Government was also 'on the way' to delivering 13,000 new police officers, another manifesto pledge. Ms Reeves has acknowledged that she has been forced to turn down requests for funding in a sign of the behind-the-scenes wrangling over her spending review. She blamed the former Conservative government's economic record rather than her self-imposed fiscal rules, which include a promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues.
