
Residents can comment on Envision Evanston, which would increase density, before it heads to City Council
Envision Evanston, a proposal for a comprehensive 20-year plan with goals for housing, business, transportation and more, is now in the final stretch of consideration from the city, leading up to a deadline of mid-August.
The City Council is scheduled to discuss the plan at Special City Council meetings on June 24 and July 21 at 7 p.m., which the public is welcome to attend, according to the city's spokesperson, Cynthia Vargas.
The plan stalled in January after receiving pushback from residents concerned about the city's zoning and land use plans. Critics said the plan would allow too much density, in all of Evanston as well as downtown.
The comprehensive plan is still in a draft phase, and is susceptible to additional edits by the City Council.
Eighth Ward City Councilmember and former chair of the Land Use Commission Matt Rodgers told Pioneer Press while the current version of the plan is a vast improvement over the first draft he saw when he chaired the commission, he still has reservations about missing or incomplete information.
'I would not vote 'yes' on the plan as it is, but with some tweaks and clarifications, I can see a path forward,' Rodgers said.
With a 7-1 recommendation from the Land Use Commission, Envision Evanston 2045 is now headed to the Evanston City Council for consideration before the August deadline.
The June 24 and July 21 Special City Council meetings, which will welcome input, are in addition to the Regular City Council meetings, Vargas said. All take place at 909 Davis Street, Evanston. The City Council has yet to determine what those additional meetings will look like, Vargas said.
According to Rodgers, the Special City Council meetings will not include town hall style meetings in which residents can ask questions of city staff and City Council about the Envision Evanston proposal.
'We've talked about creating special rules for our meetings to allow for longer public comment, but I don't know if those rules will allow for Council responses to citizen questions or not,' Rodgers said.
Meanwhile, the City Council will need to make a decision before its August deadline to comply with state and local laws. 'If the City Council does not take action within that timeframe, another public hearing must be held, which can be with either the City Council or the Land Use Commission,' Vargas said.
Some Councilmembers are using their ward meetings to discuss Envision Evanston, with those discussions already being held for the 1st, 4th and 7th Wards, Rodgers said. The 8th Ward will have its meeting on July 10, with plans in the works to have councilmembers from the 3rd and 9th Ward join. Rodgers said he and 6th Ward City Councilmember Tom Suffredin are considering a combined 6th/8th Ward virtual meeting.
'Some of these are Zoom discussions, and a couple are using the world cafe model with the League of Women Voters as moderators, so there will be different opportunities to gain public input,' Rodgers said.
Separate from the comprehensive plan is a plan to update the city's zoning code. Both were meant to be approved by the City Council as a package with one guiding the other, but those plans were derailed after pushback from residents who wanted the city's zoning code to continue to allow single-family homes and prohibit duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes (two-, three- and four-flats) from being built on certain blocks.
'In my informal conversations with some other members of Council, there is an appetite to have town halls once we get into the Zoning Ordinance and the details,' Rodgers said.
Throughout the drafts and public meetings regarding Envision Evanston, it has been mired in controversy. Opponents have organized public comment sessions against the city's planned densification that could change the cityscape downtown and in their own neighborhoods, and advocates have insisted that more businesses and housing in Evanston will make the city more affordable and energy efficient.
Those points of view have been expressed in conversations about a proposed 31-story apartment building in downtown Evanston, which would be the tallest residential building in Cook County outside of Chicago, and in the selection process of a pick for a vacancy on the city's Land Use Commission.
Mayor Daniel Biss, a proponent of Envision Evanston, released a statement after the Land Use Commission gave its recommendation on the final draft of the comprehensive plan.
'I'm appreciative of the Land Use Commission members for investing a tremendous amount of time and care into this process. I'm excited that the comprehensive plan now comes to Council, and I know that all Councilmembers are looking forward to digging in and doing their part to deliver a terrific plan for the whole community.'
Rodgers emphasized his concerns with the draft in its current state.
'There are still some issues that are not included in this draft which I feel would be important in the City's vision for the next 20 years. Council should provide input on the top-line items — density, parking, sustainability, public spaces, etc.— and if necessary, ask LUC [Land Use Commission] to address issues that are not clear, or lacking,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Union launches dueling ballot measures, escalating fight over LA's tourism worker wage hike
The hospitality union that won a major increase in the minimum wage for Los Angeles hotel and airport workers is escalating its fight with a hotel and airline industry group, which recently launched a campaign to repeal the wage hike. Unite Here Local 11, which represents hotel and restaurant workers, filed paperwork Monday for a pair of ballot proposals. One would raise the minimum wage for all workers in the city to $30 by July 2028. The other would force a public vote on the construction of large hotels or major hotel expansions. That measure would also require a public vote on the development or expansion of "event centers," such as sports stadiums, concert halls or the city's Convention Center. Union officials described the proposed ballot measures as a response to an effort launched last month by a group of airlines and hotel businesses to overturn a city ordinance hiking the minimum wage of hotel and airport workers in Los Angeles to $30 an hour by 2028 by forcing a citywide vote on the measure. Unite Here Local 11 co-President Kurt Petersen said the wage proposal addresses criticism from business groups that the tourism industry had been singled out for wage increases. "We agree that all workers should make more," Petersen said. "We are hopeful since (airlines and hotels) think that only giving a living wage to one group is unfair, that they will immediately endorse it." Petersen said the second proposal would give voters a direct say in major hotel and event center projects subsidized by the city, as well as those that could take up valuable real estate that otherwise could be used to develop housing. The proposal would require that major development projects - including the creation of new hotels with 80 or more rooms, or 80-room expansions to existing hotels - seek voter approval before receiving construction permits. The development of event spaces with more than 50,000 square feet or with a seating capacity of 1,000 seats would similarly require voter approval, as would any development projects that receive a city subsidy, such as a gift of land or tax rebates. Petersen had previously said it was hypocritical for business leaders to fight wage increases at the same time they were pressing the City Council to spend tens of millions of dollars preparing for a renovation of the Los Angeles Convention Center, a decision made in April. The council voted last month to approve the airport and hotel worker wage hikes, which were championed by Unite Here Local 11 and Service Employees International Union-United Service Workers West. The unions billed the proposal as an "Olympic wage," one that would ensure that their members can keep up with the rising cost of food and rent. They also argued that corporations should not be the only ones to benefit financially from the Olympic Games, scheduled to be held in L.A. in 2028. Soon after, a coalition of businesses, known as the L.A. Alliance for Tourism, Jobs and Progress, filed paperwork to halt the law and put the issue on the ballot instead, hoping to persuade voters to repeal the ordinance. The alliance has argued for several weeks that the wage hike will hurt the industry, forcing businesses to lay off workers and thwarting the development of new hotels. On Monday, the group described the plan to require public votes on hotel and convention center projects as "one union killing other union jobs." "The initiative being proposed will kill the Convention Center project that union workers would otherwise have and the tourism industry would benefit from," the alliance said in a statement. "The union can play its games, but we remain focused on protecting L.A. residents from lasting, widespread job loss." One business leader separately voiced alarm about the hotel union's citywide minimum wage wage proposal, warning it would cause companies to pull out of L.A. and relocate to neighboring cities, counties and states. "People will lose their jobs. Businesses will close," said Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Association, which is based in the San Fernando Valley. "The city will become a barren land of empty storefronts and empty office buildings as employers go elsewhere." An official at the city's tourism department declined comment on the event center proposal, saying he had not yet read it. To successfully place the measure on the ballot in an upcoming election, the union and other backers would need to collect about 140,000 signatures within 120 days, organizers said. The hotel minimum wage, approved by the council in 2014, currently stands at $20.32 per hour. The minimum wage for private-sector employees at Los Angeles International Airport is $25.23 per hour, once those workers' $5.95 hourly healthcare payment is included. For nearly everyone else in L.A., the hourly minimum wage is $17.28, which is 78 cents higher than the state's. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.


Chicago Tribune
3 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Landmarking advances for Pilsen's St. Adalbert Catholic Church, Polish advocates left frustrated
A late compromise helped landmark status for Pilsen's St. Adalbert Catholic Church finally move ahead Tuesday, a decisive step in a fierce preservation battle. The City Council's Zoning Committee unanimously approved a plan to give the shuttered church a landmark designation, teeing up a final vote Wednesday. But the Polish parishioners who long sought the preservation status left City Hall infuriated by what they described as a last-second 'backroom deal' that sets up the sale of the Archdiocese of Chicago land to a nondenominational church. 'It's what our ancestors sacrificed for. We're talking about poor farmers,' said Julie Sawicki, president of the Society of St. Adalbert group fighting for the church to reopen as a Catholic sacred space. 'You think that they did all that so that one day this could be just treated like a real estate broker, like bargaining chips? No, this was intended for perpetuity.' Previous landmarking proposals included each building on the 2-acre plot, highlighted by the Renaissance Revival church. On Tuesday, Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez, 25th, presented a substitute plan that only granted the church building the landmark status, but left out the former rectory, convent and school. That narrowed preservation plan came with the support of Preservation Chicago, a leading local preservation advocate. It also won approval from the Archdiocese, which closed St. Adalbert's in 2019 and has since fought the landmarking push. The Archdiocese has argued it must sell the St. Adalbert complex to avoid costly upkeep costs and fund the active St. Paul Parish nearby, a transaction potentially harmed by landmarking. Aldermen also had to deal with a deadline: If they did not vote on the Commission on Chicago Landmarks' preservation recommendation this month, the entire complex would have been automatically landmarked. Archdiocesan leaders feared that sweeping designation would prevent a planned sale of the property to People Church, a nondenominational Christian ministry that currently holds services at Roberto Clemente Community Academy. 'We have worked transparently with all stakeholders throughout this process and are grateful to those in city leadership who support limited landmarking,' the Archdiocese wrote in a statement before the vote. The towering church building — currently covered in scaffolding the Archdiocese says is needed to prevent ongoing decay — is the 'crown jewel' of the property, Preservation Chicago Executive Director Ward Miller said after the vote. The new status will preserve the exterior of the building, but allow for changes to be made for its new owners inside and on other parts of the property, he said. 'We're very pleased that we came to a compromise here. The most important of the buildings has been landmarked,' Miller said. Sigcho-Lopez defended the more-tailored designation as a 'win for the community' that came after public meetings and open conversations. He previously pushed for the broader landmark designation last year, but lost when his Zoning Committee colleagues decided to delay consideration in a 10-to-4 September vote. 'We did justice to what we heard from the community, a landmark designation that protects the use of the building,' Sigcho-Lopez said. 'That is a fair compromise.' Sigcho-Lopez said he has not yet heard how People Church plans to develop the land, and People Church did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday afternoon. The alderman acknowledged the frustration of the dogged former parishioners who want St. Adalbert's to reopen as a Catholic church. 'I don't have jurisdiction over that,' he said. But many of the Polish former St. Adalbert's parishioners pinned blame on the Pilsen alderman for failing to preserve the entire church complex. After the vote, Sawicki criticized Sigcho-Lopez for not effectively working with other aldermen and said advocates backing the full-property preservation were not made aware of the compromise. 'This was not done with community input,' she said. The Society of St. Adalbert group has long fought for St. Adalbert's to reopen as a Catholic sacred space funded by the use of the church complex's many buildings, including as a potential retreat center. In their bid to save the church, activists have attended raucous and insult-ridden City Hall hearings, stormed into other parishes in protest and even, in the case of one 73-year-old woman, been arrested for trespassing while opposing the removal of stained glass windows and art. The fight continued Tuesday, when dozens again donned the red and white of the Polish flag and filled the seats inside City Council chambers. Sawicki criticized the Archdiocese for deciding to sell instead of using St. Adalbert's to grow its Catholic ranks. The church complex could still be used to respond to a coming wave of Catholic tourism tied to the May election of Pope Leo XVI, of Dolton, she said. 'It's ridiculous, it's short-sighted, it's misguided,' Sawicki said. 'They are dumping millions of dollars into shutting churches, merging them. Why don't you use that brain power and money instead to figure out ways of bringing people back.' The group supports landmarking moving forward tomorrow because the church building will otherwise not be protected, but it now plans to push separately for the landmarking of the other buildings, Sawicki said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mayor of Green Cove Springs suddenly resigns, successor to be appointed Tuesday night
Green Cove Springs is getting a new mayor. The city announced Tuesday that Mayor and City Councilmember Thomas Smith had resigned, effective immediately. In the announcement, the city said Smith's 'evolving work-related obligations have made it no longer possible for him to continue fulfilling the duties of public office," referring to his outside work. In his communication to the city manager, GCS said Mayor Smith expressed his gratitude for the time he was able to serve his neighbors, calling it an 'incredible honor.' Smith was first elected to the Council in April 2022. City Council will choose a new mayor and vice mayor during its regularly scheduled City Council meeting at 6 P.M. tonight. The position of vice mayor is currently held by Councilmember Edward Gaw. A special election will also be held in the future to fill the newly vacated City Council seat. Details on the election for Seat 4 are expected in the near future. 'The City thanks Thomas Smith for his dedication and service to Green Cove Springs and wishes him well in his future endeavors.' >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks]