Budget change may cost first home buyers thousands
First-home buyers accessing the Kainga Ora-administered First Home Loan will pay a higher fee from 1 July.
The scheme allows borrowers to access loans with a deposit as small as 5 percent, if they earn less than $95,000 as an individual without dependents or $150,000 as a couple or single parent.
These loans do not fall under the banks' loan-to-value rules and borrowers can usually access bank special rates and do not have to pay the low-equity fees and margins that could otherwise apply.
Previously, borrowers had to pay lenders mortgage insurance of 0.5 percent of the loan amount. But from 1 July, that increases to 1.2 percent.
Borrowers can pay it upfront or over the lifetime of their loans.
The change applies to loans submitted after 1 July.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development said the government had agreed to cease its contribution to the mortgage insurance premium as part of the Budget.
"This change is expected to generate savings of $17.9 million per annum from 2025/26 onwards. These savings, along with others identified across the housing portfolio, will be fully reprioritised to support both existing housing services and the delivery of new initiatives within Vote Housing and Urban Development, including investments in social housing, transitional housing, and housing support services."
The ministry said for an average first home loan of $550,000 it would increase the premium paid by the borrower from $2750 to $6600.
"This cost can be paid upfront or added to the loan, which would increase the total borrowing by approximately $3850.
"HUD does not expect that moving to a full cost recovery model will materially affect the uptake of first home loans or households' ability to reach home ownership relative to current settings. The increase in cost is less than 1 percent of the average loan value and is not expected to significantly impact borrowers' ability to service their mortgage, meet deposit requirements, or access lending."
David Cunningham, chief executive at mortgage advice firm Squirrel, said it was a change that was "snuck in".
But he said it would not make a big difference to most borrowers.
"On a $400,000 loan that lifts the LMI from $2000 to $4800. Whilst the $2800 difference seems big, it is just part of the cost of establishing home ownership. Changes to interest rates are a much bigger factor as they impact every year rather than a one-off. With interest rates about 1.5 percent lower than they were a year ago and house prices a bit lower, first-home buyers are in a better position than a year ago, despite this change."
There were just over 5500 First Home Loans approved last year.
Jeremy Andrews, a mortgage adviser at Key Mortgages, said the change had come as a surprise.
"I've done a heck of a lot of Kainga Ora First Home Loans over recent years … a 0.5 percent fee was typically a no brainer even when clients could have been approved with their main banks [with a] low deposit outside the scheme.
"There are still cases where it makes sense as that's a one-off fee rather than typical ongoing margin until clients reach the sweet spot of 20 percent equity.
"It's also ironically the same 1.2 percent margin that BNZ charges their existing 'main bank' clients with between 5 percent under 10 percent deposit. BNZ, like most other banks, charges an ongoing low equity margin every year until clients can prove they have 20 percent deposit - and this might require an updated valuation to do so."
He said a benefit of the First Home Loan scheme was that people could usually be preapproved and it was sometimes possible to get higher cashbacks from banks.
"There are several different lenders who can provide preapproval with Kainga Ora First Home Loans, each with pros and cons such as considering either one or two boarders if applicable, turnaround time differences and varying rates and cashbacks. "
Karen Tatterson, Loan Market mortgage adviser, said the main banks were generally not issuing pre-approvals for low-deposit borrowers not part of the First Home Loan scheme at the moment.
"It means that the only time you can get an approval is if you are under contract on a property or going to auction on a specific property. It does cause a concern for first-home buyers as they cannot go to the market armed with a preapproval and this creates some nervousness for them. The key is good advice and ensuring they speak to an adviser so they know their numbers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
How is 'quiet cracking' affecting NZ's workforce?
You may have heard of quiet quitting, people who do the absolute bare minimum and collect their paycheque at the end of the month, But what about quiet cracking? Quiet cracking, refers to who people remain in their jobs even if they're desperately unhappy in the role. It's a phenomenon that poses a big threat to employee productivity and morale in workplaces throughout the world. Money correspondent Susan Edmunds has been looking at the issue here in New Zealand and spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
NZ Herald
14 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Council seeks recovery of legal fees after $2.4m lawsuit against it dismissed
He sought $2.4m for lost earnings but the claim was not permissible under the ACC Act, which barred people from suing for personal injury, and the judge dismissed the case. A recent court judgement showed the council had sought almost $43,000 from Sheeran to recover legal costs but Judge Andrew Skelton ruled the council was instead entitled to recover costs of about $20,000. Sheeran, who was appealing the dismissal of his original case, sought a stay of execution of the costs order pending the outcome of his appeal, but this was declined. In his ruling, Judge Skelton said the council and its ratepayers would be adversely affected by any stay of execution in that 'the recovery of costs will be delayed, possibly for some time'. 'The council and ratepayers have had to bear the costs of this proceeding since 2023 and are now having to bear the further costs of responding to Mr Sheeran's appeal,' Judge Skelton said. He said Sheeran had 'contributed unnecessarily' to the time and expense of the proceeding. 'In particular, Mr Sheeran was advised by the solicitors for the council and the court that his claim for compensatory damages for personal injury would likely be dismissed or struck out,' he said. 'It was explained to Mr Sheeran that his claim is barred by s 317(1) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001, but he continued to pursue the claim. 'Mr Sheeran also apparently failed to follow my direction that he should obtain legal advice on his claim, including whether his claim should be amended to seek exemplary damages. 'I also explained that he should consider carefully whether he should be pursuing any claim against the council because of the likely cost consequences.' LDR is local body journalism funded by RNZ and NZ on Air. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
Police Blame Job Cuts For Not Following Cabinet's Orders To Improve Asset Management
Phil Pennington Police admit they ate into their ability to manage their costly assets with big back-office job cuts last year. They promised at the time no impact on frontline services from axeing the 170 jobs to save $50 million, amid the government's public sector cuts. Asked by RNZ about them scoring the worst out of 16 agencies Treasury measured, police said the "reduction in corporate roles in 2024 has impacted the resource available for strategic asset management". It came at a time that some key assets, including about 900 of their 5300 Bushmaster rifles, were too old and need replacing. Police were under a 2023 Cabinet directive to improve asset management, when they cut the corporate jobs. The Treasury report said police were five-to-seven years away from fixing the systems as Cabinet demanded, and could not do it without fresh investment. As for the rifles, Treasury said, "Police must procure a vendor to supply product and services to replace, maintain and sustain its fleet of rifles. "Some current weapons are 20+ years old and well outside their life-of-type." Life-of-type usually refers to submarines past their expected lifespan. A rifles tender went out in June that said the "semi-automatic rifle stock includes a portion of aging firearms reaching end of life and needing replacement". Police said they maintained the old rifles well - "A rifle at end of life does not mean that it is no longer functioning or safe." Out of 5300 rifles, about 800 were "beyond end-of-life", and 100 at or near it. Four thousand were current; only 500 were new, police told RNZ. They also defended their overall asset management, saying they were striving to improve it. But they scored the worst out of 16 agencies in a Treasury report in February. Told by the Cabinet in 2023 to do better, 11 agencies did so. But the police instead cut back on staff doing the work, taking out 170 back-office jobs to save $50m amid the public sector cutbacks the government ordered. At the time, they promised the cuts would have no adverse impacts on frontline policing. But they had impact elsewhere. "A reduction in corporate support staff has impacted resources with expertise in resilience, sustainability and portfolio specific asset management," the police reported back in February. They repeated this four times on one page, about five "non-compliances" with what Cabinet ordered in 2023. They estimated they would not have fixes for these till 2030 and 2032 - and even then this was "dependent on securing an uplift in investment and retaining dedicated resource". Again, this line was repeated four times. The next agency with the most number of failures to comply - four - was the Defence Force. Eleven out of the 16 agencies had complied. Police told RNZ: "NZ Police strives to continuously improve asset management towards compliance with the Cabinet circular." "The Commissioner has prioritised operational asset management this financial year." RNZ asked what assurance police could give the public that they would not cut out vital back office roles in future. The Police Association union last August quoted a police employee saying, "We think this will be a scattergun headcount-reduction exercise made in a silo by people who don't understand the work people do, who they do it for, and who also won't personally be affected by the outcome of the 'realignment' exercise." A police spokesperson said the force faces considerable pressure with its capital funding and was constantly making prioritisation decisions. "Police's reduction in corporate roles in 2024 has impacted the resource available for strategic asset management, but recent changes to leadership the Commissioner introduced through his leadership realignment have also brought a range of assets, (including our property portfolio, vehicle fleet, firearms, and other operational assets such as tasers and body armour) together under single leadership and this is enabling improvements in how those assets are managed." RNZ approached Minister Mark Mitchell for comment. Mitchell has heralded putting over a billion dollars into police in the last two Budgets. Most was for the front line, with a slice for a human resources and payroll IT upgrade. The Cabinet directive demanded police have an asset register for "critical assets" listing their condition and risks. They now expect to have set one up by 2032, but "compliance is dependent on securing business case funding". They got the nod late last year to do a business case to replace the old Bushmasters, in a project rated "medium" risk, the document showed. Police told RNZ their rifle stocks included new ones, and others "at end of life, or beyond end of life" at the other end of the spectrum. End-of-lfe was about an asset being fully depreciated. "This is typical of asset management ... This means the asset no longer has a monetary value and can be replaced," said Inspector Jason Ross, acting director of operational capability, in a statement. "Our rifle fleet is regularly and well maintained by our National Armoury and all firearms are operationally and functionally checked before every deployment. Should any issue be identified during these checks, the rifle is removed from service and repaired or replaced." As well as new rifles, they were also looking into maybe getting an outside service to manage the rifles rather than their own armoury. They also want a digital asset tracking tool. "This will enable police to have a rifle fleet that meets current and future operating capability needs," Ross said. It aligned with how they were managing their body armour. The Treasury report covered the quarter to December 2024, but was the latest available. Along with it, the Minister of Finance Nicola Willis and her Associate Chris Bishop warned colleagues that many agencies "remain well below" their expectations on giving Cabinet accurate budget advice about projects on time; fewer than 60 percent were up to scratch. Ministers had a big role in making sure project planning, delivery and asset management got better; they should "understand the state of their agency's asset management performance and ability to manage critical replacement, renewals and maintenance within existing funding". Treasury scored Police middle of the pack of 25 agencies for planning big projects, higher for delivering them on time and on budget. They have $1.2 billion of investments planned, and $2.1b being delivered - the largest project is the $1.8b Public Safety Network. Along with a nod on rifles, Police won the nod to do more planning on public order policing improvements, sparked by the 2022 occupation of Parliament grounds.
