logo
Post-Trump purge, can the Kennedy Center save itself? How Mark Morris showed the way

Post-Trump purge, can the Kennedy Center save itself? How Mark Morris showed the way

Washington, D.C. — Like much else in the nation's capital, the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts is in a state of uncertainty. For 53 years, this massive performance complex has served — with bipartisan grace and, at its best, conspicuous American flair — to honor a single U.S. president. But in February the center was appropriated by another president who now also rules as chairman of a board of trustees, all of whom are his appointees.
The takeover resulted in the firing of the center's long-serving president, Deborah Rutter, one of the country's most impressive arts leaders. Over the last decade, she expanded an already vast institution's offerings. The center's new temporary president, Richard Grenell, a former ambassador to Germany, lacks arts management experience.
In the meantime, the new administrators warn that the Kennedy Center is impoverished, that the facility has become shoddy and that some of its programming ill serves the American ideal. Diversity and drag are out, which has led to the disinviting of, among others, the Gay Men's Chorus of Washington, D.C., from performing on the premises. Celebrating Christmas, promises Grenell, is very much in, as will be striving for profit-making programming. One suggestion is commercializing the center to take advantage of its real estate value and prime location on the Potomac.
On a recent afternoon I wandered the Kennedy Center's grand hallways leading to an opera house (home of Washington National Opera), concert hall (home to the National Symphony) and the Eisenhower Theater (suited for drama and dance), all overseen by a super-sized bust of JFK. I visited the galleries and shops and restaurants, the Millennium Stage (where a free chamber music performance was taking place) and checked out a recent addition, the Reach, a $250-million complex of flexible venues, an investment the new administration bemoans.
It was a beautiful spring day, and the Kennedy Center appeared to be well-tended but unusually quiet. Other than a small crowd listening to members of the National Symphony perform chamber music, I felt like I had the building practically to myself. A clerk in one of the gift shops was thrilled to finally have a customer. I was the only one in the galleries. Exhibits still reflected diversity. Rainbow flag Kennedy Center T-shirts remained for sale.
There have been cancellations in protest of the takeover — notably Rhiannon Giddens, the Broadway production of 'Hamilton' and what was to have been the Washington premiere of Gregory Spears' moving opera 'Fellow Travelers,' based on the Lavender Scare, the 1950s federal persecution of gay men and lesbians in government. But Mark Morris' potentially controversial new ballet, 'Moon,' was having its world premiere that evening as planned.
Morris may be America's leading choreographer, but he also can be a fanciful bad boy of dance. Tell him he can't do something and, I've been told, look out. It would be hard to imagine the current Kennedy Center welcoming Morris' manner of dispensing Christmas cheer. His brilliant yuletime hit, 'The Hard Nut,' based on Tchaikovsky's 'The Nutcracker,' has been delighting audiences of all ages for three decades, but it does happen to include a comedic maid in drag.
When the Kennedy Center last fall commissioned Morris to make an evening-length centerpiece for its vast 'Earth to Space: Arts Breaking the Sky' festival, nothing more was intended than to honor JFK's initiative that led, in 1969, to Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin being the first Earthlings to walk on the moon. The festival is an exuberant example of the sweeping events that Rutter created. It includes concerts, opera, dance, film, talks, installations, exhibits, interstellar musical journeys of one oddball sort or another, appearances by astronauts and space-specialist celebrities, not to mention daily screenings of a new film, 'The Moonwalkers,' featuring Tom Hanks.
All of this takes on new meaning, especially if we recall JFK's 1962 speech at Rice University in Houston. In it he defended the enormity of the Apollo 11 mission's expense by noting, 'There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet,' and warned that 'its opportunity for peaceful cooperation may never come again.'
NASA is preparing for a moon landing again in 2027. The temptation, this time, goes beyond scientific curiosity to colonization, mining rare elements and using the moon as a waystation to Mars. The two most zealous space buffs on Earth loom large in Washington, with Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk in a moon race with their respective rocket enterprises, Blue Origin and Space X.
Enter Mark Morris. He had been cagey all along about what he had in mind, other than to include the moon landing and the Golden Record, the disc that astronomer and media personality Carl Sagan made for Voyager 1 and 2. Launched in 1977, these two NASA spacecraft were the first intended to leave our solar system. The recording includes sounds, voices and music of the Earth's peoples, in hopes that it just might reach intelligent life somewhere out there.
'Moon,' which is a series of short dances that lasts just under an hour, begins with an animated display of five-pointed stars in a semicircle on a screen that served as the backdrop for the Eisenhower stage. The stars slyly become the circumference of the U.S. presidential seal. But rather than leading to outrage, an image of JFK appeared beneath the seal, and then one of the moon. The audience laughed and then warmly applauded.
Morris' silvery moon was a place of mystery and wonder. Musical choices were agreeably eccentric. Beyond the Golden Record's greetings in many languages to aliens, Morris turned to gloriously schmaltzy swing, bluegrass and country recordings from the '30s, '40s and '50s. These included Al Bowlly's 'Roll Along, Prairie Moon,' Bill Monroe's 'Blue Moon of Kentucky,' Bonnie Guitar's 'Dark Moon' and Hildegarde's 'Honey-Coloured Moon.' Pianist and organist Colin Fowler, joined by bassist Jordan Frazier, added their contributions from the pit. A few of György Ligeti's startlingly strange solo piano numbers from 'Musica Ricercata' showed up. Dancers rolled by on wheeled stools like little space people to some of Marcel Dupré's eerie '24 Organ Inventions.'
With gorgeously impressionist lighting (by Mike Faba), intriguing outer space projections (by Wendall K. Harrington), elegant costumes (by Isaac Mizrahi) and little toy spacemen scattered about, the Morris 'Moon' became a luxuriant dreamlike escape from Washingtonian reality. Most important of all, his company had never been better, and the dancers themselves provided the real fantasy. Otherworldly movement somehow matched the different music in ways that seem rational but not needing to make sense. Movement, itself, was adventure, around every turn an imaginative new surprise.
To walk into a newly uncertain Kennedy Center can feel fraught. But in his program note, Morris asks us to 'observe and enjoy Moon and Space, without understanding a thing.' The genius of 'Moon,' however, is to remind us that wonder can be around the least expected corners.
Can 'Moon' remind NASA to go to the moon to wonder, not to plunder? Probably not. But it can remind artists that if 'Moon' matters, so still must a Kennedy Center that nourishes and produces such work.
Following the three Kennedy Center performances, 'Moon' will be visible in the next seasons over parts of America, including Southern California, where Morris has a large following and favored status in many venues. (The head of the Broad Stage in Santa Monica came to D.C. for the premiere.) In the meantime, Morris' 'Pepperland' reaches the Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts in Beverly Hills next month and the Music Center Plaza in downtown L.A. is offering daily two-minute afternoon breathing and Morris-choreographed movement 'microbreaks,' meant to help us 'pause, reflect and recharge.'
Kennedy Center, please, before it is too late, pause, reflect and recharge. America needs you. And you, if you decide to understand a thing or two, will need us.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mr. Trump, leave the Smithsonian alone
Mr. Trump, leave the Smithsonian alone

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Mr. Trump, leave the Smithsonian alone

President Trump — who regularly denounces anything he dislikes as 'fake news,' even when it is accurate — is now demanding that Smithsonian Institution museums undergo an overhaul to present a fake version of history that erases America's flaws. This is a dangerous assault on truth, the type of action authoritarian rulers take. It sounds like something out of George Orwell's dystopian novel '1984,' where a totalitarian regime censors the news to distort the present and destroys historical records to rewrite the past to conform to the views of the all-powerful dictator known as Big Brother. Trump, who seems to act as if he wants to be the Big Brother of 2025, has appointed himself America's chief arbiter of what is fit to display in national museums. Like the authoritarian leaders he envies for their unchecked power, Trump has a boundless desire to exercise unchallenged control over every aspect of life in his country. This is why he demands to dictate not just what the Smithsonian displays, but what the news media reports, by filing lawsuits and restricting their access to him; what foreign leaders do, by imposing tariffs on their countries; and what universities teach, by withholding billions of dollars in federal funds. It is also why he has sent National Guard troops into the streets of Washington and Los Angeles to deal with non-existent emergencies, and launched what he calls the largest deportation program in American history against unauthorized immigrants. Republicans who control the House and Senate have disgracefully abdicated their responsibility to act as a check and balance on Trump's power grab. With their complicity, we are now essentially living in an authoritarian democracy — at least until the Democrats control one of those houses. Trump is demanding that the Smithsonian museums present the story of America and the world as he would like to see it, rather than as it really is. The president's version of history portrays the U.S. as exceptional and great. He wants to whitewash flaws such as slavery and discrimination against Black Americans, confiscation of Native American lands in violation of treaty obligations, the unprovoked war against Mexico that conquered what is now the western U.S., the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, the denial of voting rights and other rights to women for much of our history — and more. In an Aug. 12 letter to Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch, administration officials demanded a 'comprehensive internal review' of eight Smithsonian museums by the White House 'to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' The review will cover current and planned museum exhibits, 'with particular attention to those planned for the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence' in 2026. It will also examine 'websites, educational materials, and digital and social media content to assess tone, historical framing, and alignments with American ideals.' The letter is a follow-up to an executive order Trump issued in March denouncing 'a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our nation's history … as inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed.' In the order, Trump said Vice President JD Vance would head an effort to 'remove improper ideology' from all Smithsonian museums, research centers and the National Zoo. What is an 'improper ideology'? Apparently, whatever Trump says it is. The administration's letter calls for the museums to submit material documenting what is in their collections and says that, within 120 days, 'museums should begin implementing content corrections where necessary, replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate and constructive descriptions.' We do not need this kind of Orwellian control by political appointees in government to determine how the Smithsonian museums should explain history, science and art. The museums are staffed by nonpartisan, career subject-matter experts. Trump — who demands an end all diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives — has already shown he wants to distort American history by denying the existence of systemic racism and downplaying the injustice of slavery and its legacy. Yet the National Museum of African American History and Culture is focused on telling the story of how racism has oppressed Black Americans, as well as highlighting the many achievements of Black people in government, education, science, business, entertainment, sports and other fields. It is a national treasure that tells a story all Americans should learn. No president should be able to dictate to the African American museum — or any other museum — what it should exhibit. In addition to politicizing what information is presented by some of the finest museums in the world, Trump's interference in the Smithsonian sets a terrible and costly precedent. Will the museums have to spend millions of dollars redesigning their exhibits every time a new president takes office to meet an ideological purity test? I agree with Trump that America is the greatest nation on Earth. I feel blessed to live here. But America is not and never has been perfect. No nation is. The president has an incredibly long list of vital tasks to perform. Overseeing the exhibits at the Smithsonian museums in not one of them. We do not need a curator-in-chief sitting in the Oval Office.

Conservatives shouldn't be so easily outraged, especially over male cheerleaders
Conservatives shouldn't be so easily outraged, especially over male cheerleaders

Miami Herald

time24 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Conservatives shouldn't be so easily outraged, especially over male cheerleaders

When I was in high school, I had a social studies teacher who was a male cheerleader in college. So when the Minnesota Vikings announced that Louie Conn and Blaize Shiek — two male cheerleaders — were joining their cheerleading roster for the upcoming football season, I didn't give it a thought. But some fellow conservatives had a different response about the Vikings' announcement: outrage. I understand the concern. Some see male NFL cheerleaders as another example where traditional gender roles are being dismantled. These concerns aren't without merit; I support traditional gender roles. But cultural evolution is not the same as cultural destruction. Not every shift in American culture signals moral collapse. Some are signs of a pluralistic society in which individuals can pursue their own interests. Male cheerleaders in the NFL aren't new. According to NBC News, roughly a third of NFL teams have men on their cheerleading rosters including the Philadelphia Eagles, the New England Patriots, the Baltimore Ravens, the Kansas City Chiefs, the New Orleans Saints and the San Francisco 49ers. In 2018, the Los Angeles Rams announced the first-ever male cheerleaders in the NFL. So why the sudden outrage in 2025? Fox News host Tomi Lahren posted on X, 'I'm sorry, but I don't get the outrage over the male cheerleaders. Who cares?' She added that, 'It's not necessary for conservatives to be outraged over absolutely everything.' I agree. There is a cost for treating every cultural shift as a five-alarm fire. Like the boy who cried wolf, there is a risk of losing credibility when people stop listening. We cannot set our hair on fire over every ebb and flow in society. Otherwise, we'll be bald and tired. Social media only amplifies this problem by creating a false sense of urgency around viral campaigns or news items. Sydney Sweeney's blue jeans? John Stamos at Mar-a-Lago? Male cheerleaders in the NFL? The outrage machine is fired up and moral panic sets in. But is this the hill we want to die on? I don't think so. When critics such as Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, argue that '...the NFL continues their war on their fans. This isn't 2020,' the response seems a bit drastic and out of proportion. Most football fans tune in to watch the game and cheer on their team all the way to the end zone. The cheerleaders are fun to watch, but they're not the main attraction. The notion that two male cheerleaders will somehow derail an entire football game isn't serious. This kind of reflexive outrage only fuels the perception that conservatives remain in a constant state of fury and are incapable of distinguishing between real threats to American democracy and small cultural shifts. Some will argue that every cultural shift matters. But there's a difference between defending core principles and policing expressions of individual choice. Instead of wasting energy on outrage, conservatives should focus on what matters. Republicans have control of Congress and the White House, and there's a real opportunity to deliver on things voters care about such as affordability and comprehensive immigration reform. Outrage has its place. When constitutional rights are undermined or in times of government overreach, conservatives should be unapologetically vocal. But male cheerleaders on the Vikings? That's not it. We don't need to be outraged at every turn. Picking and choosing when to hold the line isn't about compromising values, it's about being strategic and knowing when the fight actually matters. Every minute spent outraged about male cheerleaders is a minute lost focusing on championing policies that affect our communities. That's a trade off we can't afford. Mary Anna Mancuso is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. Her email: mmancuso@

Ayo Edebiri to make Broadway debut next year alongside Don Cheadle
Ayo Edebiri to make Broadway debut next year alongside Don Cheadle

Boston Globe

time24 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Ayo Edebiri to make Broadway debut next year alongside Don Cheadle

The upcoming production is directed by Thomas Kail, known for his work with Lin-Manuel Miranda as director of 'Hamilton' and 'In the Heights.' In 2016, he won a Tony Award for best direction of a musical for his work on 'Hamilton.' Advertisement Before her Broadway debut, fans can catch Edebiri on the big screen later this year in a pair of upcoming film roles. The Dorchester native stars in Luca Guadagnino's 'After the Hunt' alongside Julia Roberts and Andrew Garfield, which premieres Aug. 29 at the Venice International Film Festival. The film opens as a limited release Oct. 10 before its wide release Oct. 17, Advertisement She will also appear in ' Meanwhile on the small screen, Ryan Yau can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store