
Saudi Arabia And The UAE Are Acquiring Lots Of High-Tech Drones
The UAE's EDGE Group defense conglomerate is reportedly in negotiations with Israel's Elbit Systems defense contractor on a deal for the latter's Hermes 900 drones.
Built for surveillance and reconnaissance and outfitted with advanced sensors and a synthetic-aperture radar, the Hermes 900 has an endurance of at least 30 hours and a maximum flying altitude of 30,000 feet.
Abu Dhabi wants the technology and licensing required to manufacture more of these surveillance aircraft on Emirati soil.
'A central aspect of the Israeli-UAE Hermes 900 agreement is that alongside the purchase of an undisclosed number of drones, it encompasses a phased technology transfer plan leading to eventual domestic production by an EDGE subsidiary,' noted a recent analysis by the Washington Institute.
'The Hermes blueprint thus could allow the UAE to transform itself from importer to manufacturer—which would realize a critical component of its 2025-28 strategic plan to strengthen its defense sector.'
The purported deal is merely the latest in a long line of deals either under discussion or underway between the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and the world's leading drone manufacturers.
In 2022, reports emerged that the UAE received 20 of Turkey's widely exported Bayraktar TB2 armed drones. The deliveries followed reports that Abu Dhabi entered negotiations for an acquisition of as many as 120 TB2s as part of a $2 billion deal and had offered to build a TB2 drone factory on its territory.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan visited Saudi Arabia in July 2023, where he secured a record-breaking arms deal. The kingdom signed a contract with Turkey's Baykar Defense, manufacturer of the popular TB2 drones, for its large and advanced twin-engine Akinci combat drone. While the specifics of the deal, including its overall value, weren't disclosed, the CEO of Baykar nevertheless described it as 'the biggest defense and aviation export contract in the history of the Republic of Turkey.'
As with the UAE, Saudi Arabia is increasingly interested in securing technology transfers and localized production agreements with these landmark arms deals in accordance with its Vision 2030 reform agenda. Consequently, we may see Saudi factories churning out Akinci drones in the future.
Baykar began 2025 by announcing it had delivered two Akincis to the UAE as part of a hitherto undisclosed deal. It's unclear whether Abu Dhabi has reached agreements with Baykar for the localized production of either the TB2 or Akinci. Nevertheless, EDGE has already cooperated with Baykar, notably on a project for integrating its Desert Sting smart micro munition with the Bayraktar TB2.
As part of the package of potential arms deals valued up to $142 billion announced during President Donald Trump's May visit to Saudi Arabia, General Atomics announced talks for selling Riyadh up to 200 MQ-9 Reaper drones.
While talks are in their early stages and Riyadh might not ultimately acquire that number, especially if it does not include a localized production agreement, mere discussion of such a sale would have been almost unthinkable less than a decade ago.
Perhaps many of these deals would have been nearly inconceivable a decade ago.
For one, the UAE hadn't yet established diplomatic relations with Israel under the 2020 Abraham Accords. Furthermore, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh were at odds with Turkey and on opposing sides of numerous proxy conflicts spanning several flashpoint regions. And the United States refused the export of any of its armed drones to the Arab Gulf states, primarily due to its strict adherence to limitations recommended by the Missile Technology Control Regime, which it recently reinterpreted.
While America did sell the UAE MQ-1 Predator drones in the 2010s, they were the Predator XP variant, specifically designed not to carry any munitions. Washington declined Emirati requests for Reaper drones until the Abraham Accords, when the Trump administration approved a landmark deal to sell Abu Dhabi 50 fifth-generation F-35 Lightning II stealth strike fighters and 18 Reaper drones. However, the UAE later suspended that deal in December 2021 out of frustration over American preconditions.
It's unclear whether the UAE might renegotiate a deal for Reapers in the near future, especially in light of the substantial numbers of these advanced drones destroyed in recent U.S. air campaigns against the Houthis in Yemen. In the last U.S. air campaign against the group, the March-April Operaiton Rough Rider, the Houthis shot down seven U.S. Reaper drones, which cost approximately $30 million each, in six weeks. Since they both fought the Houthis in the recent past, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi doubtlessly took note of those losses.
The Gulf states found other sources for their military drones in the 2010s. At that time, China briefly capitalized on Washington's refusal to export certain drones by widely exporting its armed Wing Loong drones to several regional states, including the two neighboring Arab Gulf states. Abu Dhabi and Riyadh acquired a few dozen armed Wing Loong II drones, built by Beijing's state-owned Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group, in the second half of the 2010s. Saudi Arabia has also obtained licenses for building Chinese-designed drones locally.
Ahead of that record-breaking 2023 Akinci deal, Saudi Arabia reached an agreement with Turkey for producing its armed Karayel-SU under license in the kingdom.
All these deals illustrate how Saudi Arabia and the UAE's grand plans for expanding and enhancing their military arsenals with significant numbers of sophisticated drones are underway and could have substantial ramifications for present and future conflicts in their volatile region and possibly beyond.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Israeli people are turning on Netanyahu
Israel's prime minister is not a man who often appears rattled. Benjamin Netanyahu has weathered myriad storms during his years in power, with his succession of coalition governments teetering on the brink many times. On Sunday, he came out fighting once again, appearing at short notice before the international media to defend his plan to expand military operations in Gaza to Gaza City and blaming Hamas for each and every charge that has been laid at Israel's door. Israel's goal, he said, was not to occupy Gaza, but to free Gaza. Israel did not want to prolong the war, but to end it. Confident though Mr Netanyahu may have seemed, the very fact of his appearance on a Sunday afternoon and the point-by-point rebuttals he gave of practically every accusation levelled against Israel, from blocking humanitarian aid into Gaza, to reports of starving children and shooting on people trying to reach food distribution points, were in themselves an acknowledgement that the national and international outcry prompted by his new plan had hit home. He reserved some of his most excoriating comments for those, such as Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, who have undertaken to recognise a Palestinian state, accusing them of falling for a longstanding canard and risking bringing the next war closer. He was also clearly stung by the decision of Germany to suspend deliveries of weapons that could be used in Gaza – Germany's history militating against any move that would hint at any open disapproval of Israel. International condemnation is one thing, however, and was reinforced in no uncertain terms at a session of the UN Security Council, supported by every member bar the United States and Panama. But statements and threatened actions by foreign leaders, even hitherto staunch allies of Israel such as the UK and Germany, may not represent the most serious or effective form of opposition currently confronting the Netanyahu government – or, indeed, the opposition he had in his immediate sights at his press conference. That opposition lies closer to home. The Israeli government's five-point plan to expand operations in Gaza, which was approved last week only after a marathon 10-hour cabinet session, has prompted some of the biggest and most impassioned public protests since the start of Israel's military campaign against Hamas, with thousands descending onto the streets of Tel Aviv and other cities. The central fears are not only for the fate of the remaining hostages held by Hamas, 20 of whom are believed to be still alive, but also of ever more Israeli losses. As we report today, a prominent theme of the latest protests goes beyond the fate of the hostages, extending to Israelis' view of themselves and their country. 'Israelis want peace. Israelis want to get out of Gaza,' said the brother of one hostage. 'This is not in our name.' There were also highly unusual appeals to members of the armed forces not to obey orders if deployed in a new offensive in Gaza. Most telling of all, opposition to expanding the campaign to Gaza City comes from former soldiers and senior military figures, with no less a figure than the Israel Defense Forces chief of staff reported as warning that any attempt to complete a full military takeover of Gaza could well turn into a trap. In other words, it was a risk of an order that was not worth taking. Polls also suggest that a majority of Israelis support an end to hostilities that would allow for the return of the remaining hostages. Instead, it would appear that the very opposite is in prospect, with the five points, which include disarming Hamas and demilitarising the Gaza Strip, only exposing how far operations have fallen short of the original objective of destroying Hamas, despite the number of deaths and the enormous scale of the destruction caused. This evident failure cannot but fuel popular protest against policies that would appear to be more of the same. Much is made of Israel as a democracy in a region where democratic government is a rarity. This is also advanced as a reason why Israel seems at times to be given a relatively easy ride by its allies for policies and actions that would, if committed by any other country, be condemned as repellent. The rationale is that these are decisions that have a democratic mandate. Now, in relation to Gaza, this is less and less evident. The difficulty that Mr Netanyahu had getting his latest plan through his cabinet, the misgivings of the top brass, and the immediate, highly negative response from the streets, could, it must be hoped, combine to force a rethink. Even if Mr Netanyahu can afford to dismiss international opprobrium, for now, the strength of internal dissent is something that could well be set to rise further, and that, if he values his job, he would be wise to heed sooner rather than later.


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu says plan is to free, not occupy Gaza
Hudson Institute senior fellow Rebeccah Heinrichs reacts to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's plans to 'free Gaza' and the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel PM says new plan for Gaza 'best way to end the war'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that his new plan to expand the war and take control of Gaza City was "the best way to end the war", defying growing calls to stop the fighting. Defending his plan in a press conference in Jerusalem, the premier said the new operation would be implemented on "a fairly short timetable because we want to bring the war to an end". More than 22 months into the war, sparked by Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel, the country is gripped by a yawning divide pitting those demanding an end to the conflict and a deal for the release of the hostages against others who want to see the Palestinian militants vanquished once and for all. Criticism both at home and abroad has only intensified after Netanyahu's security cabinet announced plans Friday to expand the conflict and capture Gaza City. But Netanyahu was defiant on Sunday, telling journalists gathered for a rare press conference: "This is the best way to end the war, and the best way to end it speedily." "I don't want to talk about exact timetables, but we're talking in terms of a fairly short timetable because we want to bring the war to an end," he added. The premier said the new operation's aim was "to dismantle the two remaining Hamas strongholds in Gaza City and the central camps", while establishing secure corridors and safe zones to allow civilians to leave the area. "Israel has no choice but to finish the job and complete the defeat of Hamas. Now we've done a great deal. We have about 70 to 75 percent of Gaza under Israeli control, military control," he said. "But we have two remaining strongholds, OK? These are Gaza City and the central camps in Al Mawasi." - 'Just another plan' - The press conference came ahead of a UN Security Council meeting called to discuss the situation in Gaza and the new Israeli plan. It also came a day after thousands of people took to the streets in Tel Aviv to protest the security cabinet's decision. "The new plan is just another plan that is gonna fail, and it could very well be the end of our hostages, and of course, it will take probably more lives of our soldiers," protester Joel Obodov told AFP. The premier has faced regular protests over the course of the war, with many rallies calling for the government to strike a ceasefire and hostage-release deal after past truces saw captives exchanged for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody. Netanyahu, however, has also come under pressure from the far right to go harder on Hamas, with Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich slamming the new plan as half-hearted. "They decided once again to repeat the same approach, embarking on a military operation that does not aim for a decisive resolution," Smotrich said in a video posted online. The far-right members of Netanyahu's cabinet, including Smotrich, have maintained considerable influence in the premier's coalition government throughout the war -- with their support seen as vital to holding at least 61 seats for a parliamentary majority. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, also of the far right, told Kan radio on Sunday: "It is possible to achieve victory. I want all of Gaza, transfer and colonisation. This plan will not endanger the troops." - 'We will win' - Meanwhile, the cabinet's decision to expand the war in Gaza has touched off a wave of criticism across the globe. On Sunday, the UN Security Council met to discuss the latest development. "If these plans are implemented, they will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza, reverberating across the region and causing further forced displacement, killings and destruction," UN Assistant Secretary-General Miroslav Jenca told the Security Council. Foreign powers, including some of Israel's allies, have been pushing for a negotiated truce to secure the hostages' return and help alleviate a humanitarian crisis in the territory following repeated warnings of famine taking hold. Despite the backlash and rumours of dissent from Israeli military top brass, Netanyahu has remained firm. "We will win the war, with or without the support of others," he told the press on Sunday. "Our goal is not to occupy Gaza, but to establish a civilian administration in the Strip that is not affiliated with Hamas or the Palestinian Authority," he said. Out of 251 hostages captured during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the military says are dead. Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,430 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, figures the United Nations says are reliable. According to Gaza's civil defence agency, at least 27 people were killed by Israeli fire across the territory Sunday, including 11 who were waiting near aid distribution centres. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the war, resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. ds-ser/smw