logo
Trump's deranged robot Biden rant was fueled by Jake Tapper's hypocrisy and Karoline Leavitt's lies

Trump's deranged robot Biden rant was fueled by Jake Tapper's hypocrisy and Karoline Leavitt's lies

Yahoo3 days ago

Over the weekend, Donald Trump, the man currently occupying the most powerful office on Earth, in case you needed any reminder, spread a deranged conspiracy theory claiming Joe Biden was executed in 2020 and replaced by a robot clone.
Keep up with the latest in + news and politics.
I saw this post on one of my social feeds, and I didn't believe it, so I checked, and it was sadly true. It's a repost from someone else, but it's still absolutely unbelievable.
This weekend alone, as war escalated in Ukraine and Gaza, Trump's 'big beautiful bill' came under attack in town halls in red districts, and it was reported that ICE had detained a congressional aide a few days ago, this is what the president of the United States wants Americans to focus on, Biden's mental health.
But what he's really doing is changing the subject with some bizarre sci-fi bedtime story ripped from a Reddit thread and soaked in QAnon Kool-Aid. A conspiracy theory only the equally wacko Laura Loomer would appreciate.
This is not just lunacy. It's a deliberate political tactic. Trump peddles this madness to distract from the wreckage of his own presidency. It's a desperate effort to shift the spotlight away from the authoritarian, un-American disasters piling up under his watch. Just last Wednesday, a congressional aide was arrested under the guise of immigration enforcement. Not a cartel leader. Not a violent criminal. A staffer working for Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler. In the congressman's office.
This is what fascism looks like — when ICE in pseudo-MAGA hats pretends it's keeping us safe.
Trump would rather feed the fever dreams of the internet than answer for the fact that the wars he said he'd end on day one are not only still active but more deadly than when he was sworn in. A deadly Israeli strike in Gaza that killed 32 civilians waiting for U.S.-backed food aid and the Ukrainian drone strikes deep in Russia that's been called 'Russia's Pearl Harbor" expose the growing crisis of wars he has utterly failed to mediate, end, or let alone control.
Remember when Trump said he'd end the wars on day one, or something like that? Just another fantastical thing Trump ranted about on Truth Social that bears no resemblance to reality.
And back home, the backlash continues to Trump's House-passed legislation that takes from the poor and gives to the rich. At an Iowa town hall, Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst dismissed constituents' fears over Medicaid cuts in Trump's "big beautiful bill" with a flippant "Well, we all are going to die.'
Just let me say here that I saw this on social media and also double-checked to make sure that it was true. And yes, as unbelievable as it may seem, she really said that.
It gets worse. She later doubled down by posting a sarcastic Instagram video from a graveyard, mocking their concerns and urging them to "embrace my lord and savior, Jesus Christ" for eternal life.
But let's return to Trump's Biden-bot theory. Where on Earth would a sitting president feel emboldened enough to amplify such a fantasy?
Enter CNN's Jake Tapper, whose responsibility during the final years of Biden's presidency was to report the facts about the president's health. Instead, Tapper turned the decline of an aging public servant into a cash grab, selling his 'original sin' as a tell-all book.
In doing so, he is fanning the flames of speculation, offering no clarity to the public, and now wonders why no one trusts journalism. His reward? Tanking ratings and the moral equivalent of tabloid shame.
Trump didn't invent this lie from scratch. He just picked up where irresponsible media and cowardly press secretaries left off. White House mouthpiece Karoline Leavitt, for example, recently called Jill Biden 'complicit' in her husband's condition and smeared Joe Biden — now battling advanced prostate cancer — as mentally incompetent. Her venom is proof that cruelty, not truth, is the White House's guiding principle.
Biden, let's remember, is no longer president. He is a private citizen, suffering through a grave illness with dignity and moral and mental clarity. He is no longer governing. Trump is. And for Trump to weaponize a grotesque fantasy about his predecessor being executed and replaced by a machine, without a shred of humanity or sanity, is beyond disgraceful.
The only person here who seems unwell is the one who can't stop rage-posting conspiracy theories from his golf cart.
When a president openly promotes this idea about his predecessor, we get deeper into dangerous territory now, not just because of the lie itself, but because of what it says about the man spreading it. The world is watching, and while they're laughing, they're also panic-stricken.
We're being governed by someone who is either completely untethered from reality or so manipulative that he's willing to plunge the nation deeper into paranoia to distract from his own failures. All of that sounds too rational. Frankly, there is no rationalizing Trump anymore.
He's mindlessly short-circuiting every norm, every truth, and every shred of American decency left in his path, and we're not even at six months. Over the next four years, let's hope that Trump is replaced somewhere along the way with a robot. We'd most certainly be in more capable hands.
Voices is dedicated to featuring a wide range of inspiring personal stories and impactful opinions from the LGBTQ+ community and its allies. Visit Advocate.com/submit to learn more about submission guidelines. Views expressed in Voices stories are those of the guest writers, columnists, and editors, and do not directly represent the views of The Advocate or our parent company, equalpride.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

USA Today

time21 minutes ago

  • USA Today

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store