logo
How US pulled India and Pakistan back from all-out war

How US pulled India and Pakistan back from all-out war

Telegraph10-05-2025
In a conflict characterised by a flood of misinformation, Muhammad Saleem knew something was really happening when he saw a missile pass over the roof of his home on Thursday night.
Seconds later, the Indian projectile smashed into a Pakistani air force base in Rawalpindi, exploding in flames and igniting the most dangerous round of fighting yet between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.
At around 3am local time, Indian jets launched missiles at Nur Khan and two more air bases, Murid and Rafiqi, with the defence ministry citing an earlier wave of Pakistani attacks in justification. Footage of blasts lighting up the night surged across Pakistani social media.
On the ground in Rawalpindi, the garrison city that houses the headquarters of the Pakistani armed forces, crowds poured onto the street chanting 'Pakistan Zindabad', or 'victory to Pakistan'.
'I saw the missile from the top of my house,' Mr Saleem, who is in his late 40s, told The Telegraph. 'There were several explosions.'
Like dozens of others, he headed towards the Nur Khan air base, originally built by the RAF and used in the Second World War. 'God is great,' shouted the nervous residents.
With flames still burning, 'we saw a missile had hit the base area', Mr Saleem said.
At a 3.30am press conference, Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, the spokesman for Pakistan's army, accused India of 'pushing the whole region towards a dangerous war with its madness'.
Pakistan's air defences had shot down all but a few Indian missiles which 'sneaked in' but did not cause any damage, he claimed. Nur Khan hosts transport and signals-intelligence-collecting aircraft, rather than fighter jets.
Shaky phone camera footage from a rooftop hundreds of yards away appeared to show something erupting in flames on impact.
Ending his press conference, Mr Chaudhry issued a warning: 'India must now prepare for Pakistan's response.'
After little more than an hour, Pakistani air force jets took off for the launch of Operation 'Bunyam um-Marsoos', a phrase taken from the Koran that translates as 'unbreakable wall of lead'.
With several local Pakistani journalists briefed that the operation was underway before its targets were known, there was a moment when the region felt flung into the air – with where, and how hard it would come down, unclear.
Islamabad issued a notice to airmen announcing the total closure of its airspace from 3.15am until noon on Saturday.
'Targets are acquired and locked,' one popular anonymous X account wrote, promising strikes that would 'send chills down their spines, instilling dread in seven generations'.
The impact, AirlinePilotmax claimed, would 'reshape India's ideological core for decades'.
Then the missiles hit. At 5.52am, state-run Pakistani media reported that the Pakistani Air Force (PAF) had struck air bases in Pathankot, Udhampur and a storage site in the Beas region for the long-range, supersonic Brahmos missile.
An 'eye for an eye', said a statement from Pakistan's military.
In Srinagar, the main city in Indian-controlled Kashmir, residents took shelter from pounding explosions on their lower floors. 'Two loud blasts shook the ground. Dust filled the air. I thought jets had begun bombing the airport,' said Wasim Adhmad.
'We're used to gunfire and mines, but this is something else. It feels like death in the air.'
Later, PTV claimed that an Indian S-400 air defence missile system, worth roughly $1 billion, had also been destroyed – but the report was swiftly denied by New Delhi.
There were a few minutes to take stock; the damage looked more like tit-for-tat than armageddon. Both sides could claim wins. Civilian casualty numbers were not being bandied around.
At 7am, Ishaq Dar, Pakistan's foreign minister, was making conciliatory comments in an interview with Geo News, a local TV channel. 'If they stop, so will we,' he said. Khawaja Asif, the defence minister, denied reports of an urgent meeting of Pakistan's National Command Authority (NCA), which oversees Islamabad's nuclear arsenal.
In New Delhi, there were echoes. India's armed forces had given a 'befitting reply' to Pakistani strikes on schools and health facilities at India's air bases in Kashmir, said Colonel Sophia Qureshi.
'All hostile actions have been effectively countered and responded to appropriately,' added Wing Commander Vyomika Singh.
Outside of Kashmir, the last time India and Pakistan targeted each other's military facilities with this level of ferocity came in the 1971 war, which ended with Islamabad's defeat and the breakaway formation of Bangladesh.
Then, neither side possessed nuclear weapons. It may have been the prospect of an all-out war between two nations capable of destroying entire cities at the push of a button which roused Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, to personally intervene and call for calm.
Under Donald Trump, Washington had largely stood aside as tensions rose. JD Vance, the vice-president, said the conflict was 'fundamentally none of our business'. Mr Trump had called the hostilities little more than 'a shame', adding: 'I get along with both, I know both very well, and I want to see them work it out.'
Indian diplomats told The Telegraph there had not been the familiar descent of US officials on New Delhi and Islamabad, as there had been in previous rounds of fighting.
Mr Rubio spoke with Dr S Jaishankar, India's foreign minister, as well as Mr Dar and Asim Munir, the head of the Pakistani army, who is the most powerful person in the country.
According to a statement from the state department, Mr Rubio offered Mr Munir US assistance in starting 'constructive talks' towards peace. As so often happens, a United States seeking to disentangle itself from foreign conflicts appeared to be pulled back into one.
On Saturday afternoon, Narendra Modi, the Indian prime minister, held a cabinet meeting where he sought to lay down a new red line in the region. Any terror attack on India would be considered an 'act of war' by Pakistan, government sources told the Times of India.
For too long, Mr Modi and many Indians feel, the country has passively put up with massacres on its territory. Islamabad has failed to root out terrorists, they say – indeed at times it has indulged them.
In the Pahalgam attack in Indian-controlled Kashmir last month, gunmen asked victims their religion before executing any Hindus. 'Tell your government. Tell Modi what we did,' one attacker told a woman after shooting her husband in the head at point-blank range.
Mr Modi, a thoroughbred Hindu nationalist, promised to 'pursue [the terrorists] to the end of the earth'. Pakistan's fervent denials of any backing for the attack did not convince him, nor critics suggesting he should loosen repression of the largely Muslim population in Kashmir.
With his speech to cabinet on Saturday, the prime minister both appeared to be drawing a line under the fighting ignited by the Pahalgam attack, and threatening a far more violent encore should it ever be repeated.
It appeared that America's late-night return to pulling strings in foreign conflicts had paid off.
At 5pm local time (8am in Washington), Mr Trump surprised the world by being the first to announce the agreement of a full ceasefire.
The president, who had appeared disinterested, could claim to be a peacemaker. Few doubt such services will be needed again before long.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India confident of meeting fiscal deficit target, despite planned tax cuts
India confident of meeting fiscal deficit target, despite planned tax cuts

Reuters

time6 hours ago

  • Reuters

India confident of meeting fiscal deficit target, despite planned tax cuts

NEW DELHI, Aug 17 (Reuters) - India is confident of meeting its fiscal deficit target of 4.4% for the current fiscal year, according to a government source with knowledge of the matter, despite its plans to cut consumption tax later this year. In the biggest tax overhaul since 2017, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday announced sweeping changes to the complex goods and services tax (GST) regime which will make daily essentials and electronics cheaper. "India's federal and state governments have options to offset any loss of revenue due to lowering of rates," the government source said without providing further details. The source also said it will end the practice of collecting compensation cess by December. The GST compensation cess is an additional levy imposed on certain items to compensate states for any revenue loss incurred due to the implementation. India's finance ministry did not respond to a request for comment sent outside of office hours.

Meet the Afghan girls building robots at home after the Taliban stopped their education
Meet the Afghan girls building robots at home after the Taliban stopped their education

The Independent

time10 hours ago

  • The Independent

Meet the Afghan girls building robots at home after the Taliban stopped their education

In the sweltering heat of Kabul, a group of young women, who have been barred from higher education for the past three years, gather in one of their homes to work on a new project. Calling themselves 'Voices of Hope,' the group's members are former computer science students who refuse to abandon their pursuit of knowledge, despite the Taliban's sweeping ban on female education. They are using the internet and artificial intelligence to reconnect with the subject they once studied at university. In a country where even a walk in the park is off-limits for them, they have created their own community of learners behind closed doors. Their education was interrupted in December 2022, when a Taliban ban forced them to abandon their studies. The young women were all in their second semester of computer science studies at a private Afghan university. Initially, they clung to the hope that public outrage and international pressure might prompt the regime to reverse its decision. Instead, the Taliban, who had seized power in 2021, issued even harsher decrees, further tightening restrictions on women and making their lives even more difficult. Asrar Parsa, the 25-year-old leader of Voices of Hope, told Independent Persian that the university ban caused a wave of despair. But she and 20 of her classmates decided to keep going, turning to online educational resources to continue studying at home. Since then, the team has taken on several projects in their desire to learn, grow and keep their dreams alive. Among their achievements are building two robots from scratch. They cost about 30,000 Afghanis (roughly $430 or £330) to build, paid for by the group members themselves. Under Taliban rule, women are not allowed to go outside without a male guardian. The team has one male member: Asrar's 28-year-old brother, Navid Parsa, a computer science graduate who is their link to the outside world. He runs errands for the group and brings in supplies from the city. The group started off with 20 members. But over time, 14 dropped out due to economic hardship and a growing sense of hopelessness. Asrar explains: 'Our goal was to keep the light of hope alive in our hearts, to stay motivated, and to learn about AI. But most of the team became disheartened and gave up.' However, some chose to stay. 19-year-old Hadiya Ahmadi, says she suffered from depression and anxiety after universities shut down. But working on small projects and learning how to use AI with the support of the group helped her feel better. Over the past two years, the team has used what they learned in their first year of university and supplemented it with online tutorials. They've built two robots and several other devices. One robot can recognise 20 different objects, including humans, and is controlled remotely. The team tested its movement on a kitchen table. It's powered via radio frequency and bluetooth and can be operated through four different apps. Asrar says if developed further, it could be used in search and rescue operations after earthquakes or explosions. The team is also working on building a drone. If successful, they hope it could be used for tasks like collecting rubbish, delivering emergency medicine, or transporting small items across Kabul. For Asrar, Hadiya, and the rest of the group, tinkering with wires and batteries and listening to online lessons is about more than just robotics or AI. In a time when, under Taliban laws, even a woman's voice and face are deemed awrah (something to be hidden), these sessions are a way to cope with the mental and emotional toll of their isolation. Asrar says these gatherings are a way to escape 'the pain and grief brought about by their current situation'. The meetings offer hope, she explains:'When we're together, it feels like not everything is lost. We still have the power to learn and grow.' Hadiya adds that meeting the group two to three times a week has had a positive impact on her mental well-being. They study AI, build robots, and talk about their hopes for the future. She says she feels better now than she did when her university first closed down: 'Seeing the results of our work makes us happy. It makes us feel that our education isn't over yet and we can still try to reach our goals.' They draw inspiration from another Afghan robotics team, known as 'The Afghan Dreamers', which was founded in 2017 and gained widespread attention both at home and abroad. Focused on technology, engineering, and robotics, the team became a symbol of talent and hope in the face of social and political restrictions. After the Taliban returned to power and banned education and employment for women and girls, team members left the country and now continue their work in exile. For Voices of Hope, the Afghan Dreamers serve as an inspiration. But unlike them, Asrar's team has not yet received any support from external organisations. Despite all the obstacles, they hope to one day showcase their work in international exhibitions, and find opportunities to keep chasing their dreams. The Taliban have strictly enforced their ban on education for girls over the age of 12, claiming that they are adhering to 'Sharia law'. These decrees, especially those denying women access to education and jobs, have drawn widespread international condemnation. But Taliban leader Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada has dismissed international pressure as 'pointless.' Over the past four years, Mullah Hibatullah has repeatedly emphasised the importance of 'education within the framework of Sharia and Islamic principles'. However, not once has he addressed the topic of education or employment for women and girls in Afghanistan.

Trump claims Chinese president Xi made him a big promise about the fate of Taiwan
Trump claims Chinese president Xi made him a big promise about the fate of Taiwan

The Independent

time11 hours ago

  • The Independent

Trump claims Chinese president Xi made him a big promise about the fate of Taiwan

Donald Trump has claimed that Chinese president Xi Jinping promised not to invade Taiwan while he remains in the White House, as the US leader positions himself as a global dealmaker on some of the world's most volatile conflicts. Speaking en route to the Alaska summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin on Friday, Mr Trump told Fox News he 'appreciates' Mr Xi's patience. "I will tell you, you know, you have a very similar thing with President Xi of China and Taiwan, but I don't believe there's any way it's going to happen as long as I'm here. We'll see," Mr Trump said during an interview on Fox News' "Special Report' onboard Air Force One. "He told me, 'I will never do it as long as you're president.' President Xi told me that, and I said, 'Well, I appreciate that,' but he also said, 'But I am very patient, and China is very patient." Mr Trump said. The US and its allies have long sought to deter China from taking military action against Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its own and has threatened to seize by force if necessary. Taiwan rejects China's sovereignty claim. The Chinese embassy in Washington on Friday described the topic of Taiwan as "the most important and sensitive issue" in China-US relations, without referring to Mr Trump's statement. "The US government should adhere to the one-China principle and the three US-China joint communique, handle Taiwan-related issues prudently, and earnestly safeguard China-US relations and peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait," embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu said in a statement. Taiwan is yet to respond to Mr Trump's remarks. Mr Trump and Mr Xi held their first confirmed call under the US president's second presidential term in June. Later in April, Mr Trump said that the Chinese president had called him, but did not specify when that call took place. His comments on Taiwan come as he presses Russia and Ukraine towards a peace deal, repeating his campaign promise to end the war 'within 24 hours' of taking office. He has already claimed credit for easing or resolving several other disputes, including tensions between India and Pakistan in May, the Cambodia–Thailand border standoff in July, and flare-ups involving Congo and Rwanda, and Serbia and Kosovo. By citing Mr Xi's assurances alongside his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine, Mr Trump is seeking to cast himself as the central broker of peace in multiple global crises –a narrative he has openly linked to his pursuit of a Nobel Peace Prize.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store