Cut privacy red tape to boost innovation: tech giants
The social media giant's warning to the Productivity Commission comes as chief Mark Zuckerberg and other executives are being sued by shareholders in a $8 billion Facebook privacy case.
The commission is looking at rule changes that seek to boost public confidence in data and technology to make it easier for Australians to benefit from AI, which has been labelled by experts as a danger to society.
In its submission to the inquiry, Meta said it supported attempts to streamline privacy rules and regulations, both in line with domestic and international regulatory frameworks, to reduce compliance costs and increase global competitiveness.
"We are concerned that recent developments are moving Australia's privacy regime to be out of step with international norms, impose obligations on industry that conflict with broader digital policy objectives to promote age appropriate and safe experiences online, and disincentivise industry investment in AI in Australia or in pro-consumer outcomes," it reads.
Australia's proposed social media ban for children under the age of 16 has emerged as a key issue with US tech giants as the Albanese government tries to manage President Donald Trump's deepening trade war.
The "world-leading" laws will come into effect from December, and will capture online platforms including Instagram, Facebook and TikTok.
For Australia to harness the productivity potential of technology and avoid "unintended consequences" any reform to the Privacy Act should give proper attention to policy alignment in areas such as online safety and AI, Meta said.
The giant urged the nation to incorporate "innovation and economic interests" as objectives of privacy rules.
Google said Australia might be left behind other nations in the Indo-Pacific, given governments such as Japan and Singapore have implemented "innovation-friendly" policy to lift their economic competitiveness.
"Businesses, especially those operating at the cutting edge of AI development, may hesitate to commit significant resources if the precise interpretation and application of the rules in Australia remain unclear (and) are overly restrictive," the submissions reads.
Meta has told Australia its privacy reform is "out of step" with international norms and risks discouraging industry investment in AI.
The social media giant's warning to the Productivity Commission comes as chief Mark Zuckerberg and other executives are being sued by shareholders in a $8 billion Facebook privacy case.
The commission is looking at rule changes that seek to boost public confidence in data and technology to make it easier for Australians to benefit from AI, which has been labelled by experts as a danger to society.
In its submission to the inquiry, Meta said it supported attempts to streamline privacy rules and regulations, both in line with domestic and international regulatory frameworks, to reduce compliance costs and increase global competitiveness.
"We are concerned that recent developments are moving Australia's privacy regime to be out of step with international norms, impose obligations on industry that conflict with broader digital policy objectives to promote age appropriate and safe experiences online, and disincentivise industry investment in AI in Australia or in pro-consumer outcomes," it reads.
Australia's proposed social media ban for children under the age of 16 has emerged as a key issue with US tech giants as the Albanese government tries to manage President Donald Trump's deepening trade war.
The "world-leading" laws will come into effect from December, and will capture online platforms including Instagram, Facebook and TikTok.
For Australia to harness the productivity potential of technology and avoid "unintended consequences" any reform to the Privacy Act should give proper attention to policy alignment in areas such as online safety and AI, Meta said.
The giant urged the nation to incorporate "innovation and economic interests" as objectives of privacy rules.
Google said Australia might be left behind other nations in the Indo-Pacific, given governments such as Japan and Singapore have implemented "innovation-friendly" policy to lift their economic competitiveness.
"Businesses, especially those operating at the cutting edge of AI development, may hesitate to commit significant resources if the precise interpretation and application of the rules in Australia remain unclear (and) are overly restrictive," the submissions reads.
Meta has told Australia its privacy reform is "out of step" with international norms and risks discouraging industry investment in AI.
The social media giant's warning to the Productivity Commission comes as chief Mark Zuckerberg and other executives are being sued by shareholders in a $8 billion Facebook privacy case.
The commission is looking at rule changes that seek to boost public confidence in data and technology to make it easier for Australians to benefit from AI, which has been labelled by experts as a danger to society.
In its submission to the inquiry, Meta said it supported attempts to streamline privacy rules and regulations, both in line with domestic and international regulatory frameworks, to reduce compliance costs and increase global competitiveness.
"We are concerned that recent developments are moving Australia's privacy regime to be out of step with international norms, impose obligations on industry that conflict with broader digital policy objectives to promote age appropriate and safe experiences online, and disincentivise industry investment in AI in Australia or in pro-consumer outcomes," it reads.
Australia's proposed social media ban for children under the age of 16 has emerged as a key issue with US tech giants as the Albanese government tries to manage President Donald Trump's deepening trade war.
The "world-leading" laws will come into effect from December, and will capture online platforms including Instagram, Facebook and TikTok.
For Australia to harness the productivity potential of technology and avoid "unintended consequences" any reform to the Privacy Act should give proper attention to policy alignment in areas such as online safety and AI, Meta said.
The giant urged the nation to incorporate "innovation and economic interests" as objectives of privacy rules.
Google said Australia might be left behind other nations in the Indo-Pacific, given governments such as Japan and Singapore have implemented "innovation-friendly" policy to lift their economic competitiveness.
"Businesses, especially those operating at the cutting edge of AI development, may hesitate to commit significant resources if the precise interpretation and application of the rules in Australia remain unclear (and) are overly restrictive," the submissions reads.
Meta has told Australia its privacy reform is "out of step" with international norms and risks discouraging industry investment in AI.
The social media giant's warning to the Productivity Commission comes as chief Mark Zuckerberg and other executives are being sued by shareholders in a $8 billion Facebook privacy case.
The commission is looking at rule changes that seek to boost public confidence in data and technology to make it easier for Australians to benefit from AI, which has been labelled by experts as a danger to society.
In its submission to the inquiry, Meta said it supported attempts to streamline privacy rules and regulations, both in line with domestic and international regulatory frameworks, to reduce compliance costs and increase global competitiveness.
"We are concerned that recent developments are moving Australia's privacy regime to be out of step with international norms, impose obligations on industry that conflict with broader digital policy objectives to promote age appropriate and safe experiences online, and disincentivise industry investment in AI in Australia or in pro-consumer outcomes," it reads.
Australia's proposed social media ban for children under the age of 16 has emerged as a key issue with US tech giants as the Albanese government tries to manage President Donald Trump's deepening trade war.
The "world-leading" laws will come into effect from December, and will capture online platforms including Instagram, Facebook and TikTok.
For Australia to harness the productivity potential of technology and avoid "unintended consequences" any reform to the Privacy Act should give proper attention to policy alignment in areas such as online safety and AI, Meta said.
The giant urged the nation to incorporate "innovation and economic interests" as objectives of privacy rules.
Google said Australia might be left behind other nations in the Indo-Pacific, given governments such as Japan and Singapore have implemented "innovation-friendly" policy to lift their economic competitiveness.
"Businesses, especially those operating at the cutting edge of AI development, may hesitate to commit significant resources if the precise interpretation and application of the rules in Australia remain unclear (and) are overly restrictive," the submissions reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
42 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Inaction on pokies harm is gambling with lives
The pokies article by Peter FitzSimons (' MPs servants to 'predatory' pokies ', July 27) emphasises the most important point of the pokies disaster. It can't be fixed because both sides of politics are so dependent on pokies donations that once in power they realise the pokies lobby is in charge, not them. And fixing that by increasing campaign funding for political parties from the budget means increasing taxes. It's easy for the pokies lobby and its media backers to stoke public outrage when increased taxes are suggested. There even is a term for it, 'state capture'. Whoever wins the election, lobby groups are still in charge. It's relevant more widely, such as the fossil fuel lobby slowing down climate action. It's a pernicious problem and the Herald is to be commended for running an anti-gambling campaign. It's hard to see a solution until someone is brave enough to have a policy calling for higher taxes to tackle some of the bigger problems we face. Maybe braver politicians? Gary Barnes, Mosman Take my advice Senator James Paterson says 'Labor would be judged on the results of proposed consultant cuts' (' Labor's splurge on advice revealed ', July 27). That's rich coming from anyone in the Liberal party. It's not the spending of money on consultants that I mind so much as the pretence practised by the Liberals that ditching public service jobs to do it, while ignoring the alternate costs, is somehow saving money. Equally objectionable is the sneakiness of hiring people – using eye-watering amounts of public funds – to tell you what you want to hear instead of what you should be told, while claiming it's somehow a 'partnership'. Driven by their own 'ideological obsession' of antipathy towards the public service dating as far back as the Howard era, the Liberals were avid practitioners of an identical reverse bias. And while Labor's pot so far seems decidedly tarnished at keeping its promise to negate it, they've got a long way to go to match the blackness of the Liberals' kettle. Adrian Connelly, Springwood The criticism of the Albanese government's use of consultants is misplaced. They have pledged to rebuild the capacity of the public service, laid waste by the previous Coalition. Does anyone really believe this will happen overnight? While there are green shoots, it will take years to restore an objective, expert public service. The damage wrought to good government by the previous Coalition administration, venal in its attempts to politicise the public service, promote mates and create a supine culture (remember robo-debt?), nearly destroyed it. As Labor rebuilds, of course consultants will be needed, especially as this government wants to achieve something. Hopefully, the best can be encouraged into an invigorated public service for the national good. Wayne Duncombe, Lilyfield False piety America likes to think of itself as a God-fearing nation of Christians, yet it puts up with Trump (' America's shame: Despite all the evidence Trump remains shameless ', July 27). There seems to be no shame that their president breaks all those Christian ideals they hold so dear. Their sin is not their lack of shame. It is their hypocrisy. Neville Turbit, Russell Lea Fertility lifeline The importance of IVF to many families cannot be underestimated, but to those with life-threatening genetic conditions it is especially important (' There have been 17 million IVF babies. Rebecca was one of the first ', July 27). For these families IVF can allow the possibility of a mutant gene to be isolated and sidelined and ultimately dismissed from the family line, allowing hope for a more positive future. We can only be grateful for the process. Janice Creenaune, Austinmer So fertility rates are 'nosediving'? Perhaps a truer word has never been used. It's well known that modern perfumes contain hormone disruptors such as phthalates, isn't it? And to say that perfumes are pervasive is an understatement. We live and move in a sea of fake scent. You can't even walk down a bush track without being nasally assaulted by the smell of the person (man or woman) 10 minutes ahead of you, whom you may not actually ever see. It must drive the wildlife, well, wild. Ironically, perfume formulas are designed to make the wearer more attractive, but may in fact result in lower fertility. Pass the nose peg, please. Carolyn Little, Mortdale
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Sussan Ley: Opposition Leader tells Anthony Albanese he needs to ‘walk the walk' on Indigenous issues
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has slammed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's lack of action for Indigenous Australians since the failed Voice to Parliament, saying he has shied away from the issue since the failed referendum. Speaking from Wyndham in the Kimberley on Saturday, Ms Ley said the Prime Minister needed to walk the walk after talking the talk at successive Garma Festivals — one of the largest gatherings for Indigenous Australians in the country. 'It's so disappointing to see this plan that the Prime Minister calls a plan for economic empowerment is failing in these critical areas,' she said. 'Now he had the same announcement at last year's Garma, I believe there was a plan for economic empowerment released. 'This is the fourth year of an Albanese government and we're seeing these critical indicators go backwards, that is not good enough. 'It's not good enough to be there for the photo op, Australians are expecting the follow up.' Ms Ley said key issues facing Indigenous Australians were not being addressed. 'The scale of the challenges in Indigenous Australia are much bigger than the scale of the response that I have heard from Prime Minister Albanese today,' she said. 'We have 19 indicators in Closing the Gap — four of those are going backwards and what really concerns me is that they are indicating a lack of progress, in fact, a retreat in critical areas relating to children and education and youth incarceration.' While Ms Ley attacked Mr Albanese's approach, she elected not to attend the Garma Festival herself, instead sending shadow Attorney-General Julian Leeser and defended her travel to WA. 'This visit to the Kimberley was planned so that soon after the recent Parliamentary sitting, I could come with two of my senior colleagues and listen to the voices of regional Indigenous Australians here in a really important part of Australia,' she said. 'It's vital that we do that, it's what I said I would do when I became leader.' Ms Ley kicked off her tour of WA's north-west on Friday, landing in Kununurra before heading an hour north-west on Saturday morning to Wyndham. Ms Ley said she was looking to reach Indigenous Australians where they were. 'We've seen programs that work, we've seen job initiatives that are doing well, we've also seen things that are failing,' she said. 'We've heard from so many people about what works and what doesn't work and it's important that we look at the detail, that we listen and that we closely examine how we might construct policies in the future to address the sense of disappointment . . . that is here in so many of the communities that we are visiting now.' Ms Ley spent the first two days of her tour in Kununurra and Wyndham, meeting with local Indigenous groups and businesses. Issues ranged from funding challenges being a border town, needing an on-country incarceration system and housing shortages. Not every meeting took as serious a tone however, with Ms Ley proving a popular figure that evening among the akubra-wearing pub patrons, with multiple people asking for selfies with the politician and she attended a Saturday footy game in Kununurra. The trip also comes a week after a public spat blew into the public sphere between State leader Basil Zempilas and WA Federal frontbencher Andrew Hastie over the party's net zero position. Ms Ley said she wasn't concerned. 'I barely looked at those reports,' she told The Sunday Times before her trip. Ms Ley will also visit Broome, meeting with youth services, health programs and Indigenous-led businesses.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests
A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on people's appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union, accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge in July blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day labourer pick up site, agricultural site, etc". The Department of Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff lawyer at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, also welcomed the ruling. "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," he said in a statement.
