logo
Left out of Alaska talks, exhausted Ukrainians fear an unjust peace

Left out of Alaska talks, exhausted Ukrainians fear an unjust peace

Yahoo5 hours ago
They call it "dronocide": new training to deal with what is now the greatest threat to a Ukrainian soldier's life on the battlefield – drones.
These machines saturate the front line and cause the largest number of casualties, according to Ukraine. If Donald Trump can't make Vladimir Putin agree to a ceasefire at their meeting in Alaska on Friday, then this training in eastern Ukraine might be essential to saving lives on the front.
The continuing preparation for battle suggests few in Ukraine are expecting this war to stop any time soon. The training is not especially sophisticated: their defence is a shotgun. The soldiers go through drills to hit fast-moving targets – shooting first from the ground, and then while on the move. Ihor, their experienced instructor, tells the men a shotgun is currently their most effective means to bring down a drone at close range.
Ihor has been fighting on Ukraine's eastern front since 2014, the year Russia illegally annexed Crimea and sent troops into the Donbas region. His call sign is "The Knifer". He also trains troops in hand-to-hand combat.
Ihor's been trying to help stop the Russian advance for the past ten years. He bristles at any suggestion that Ukraine will have to give up territory as part of any "land swap".
"Neither me nor my comrades are ready for this," he tells me. He says they'd rather continue fighting until "we liberate our territories".
That doesn't seem likely, with some Ukrainian front line units now well below strength. One soldier told us renewed efforts to mobilise more troops had been a "disaster". They know they're still outgunned and outnumbered.
Ukrainian troops also admit they're tired and losing ground. It's an undeniable fact. But this training shows they're not giving up.
Oleksii, one of the soldiers honing his skill with a shotgun, says he's already lost his father and friends in the war.
He admits "the war must be stopped one way or another". But as for the suggestion that Ukraine hands over more territory to Russia, he says: "It wouldn't be my suggestion, I don't like this idea."
Ukrainian troops point out that Russia is also taking heavy losses, suffering around 1,000 casualties – dead or injured – every day. Russia's resources are slowly being exhausted too.
The views from the front are reflected in Ukraine's towns and cities. Civilians are also suffering the consequences of this war more directly, not least with the recent ramping up of Russian missile and drone attacks across the country. Last month Russia launched more than 6,000 drones at Ukraine. In July 2024 that figure was much lower - just over 400.
In the streets of the capital Kyiv there's no doubt they want to see an end to the war. "If we don't stop, we will lose even more territory and people," Oleksandr says. He uses the analogy of gambling in a casino: "The more you play, the more you lose."
Volodymyr, another passer-by, is downbeat about the prospect of the talks between Presidents Trump and Putin. He believes Ukraine will probably have to give up more territory in return for a ceasefire. "We don't have the resources," he says. "All our boys are in heaven or in hospital."
President Zelensky has already expressed his frustration that Ukraine's voice will not be heard in Alaska. He's also made clear he won't be surrendering Ukrainian territory. "It's not my private property," he said earlier this week. But some recent polls suggest that more Ukrainians are resigned to the fact that they might have to sacrifice land for peace.
The bottom line though is that few believe Russia really wants peace. Oleksandr Merezhko, an MP and Chairman of Ukraine's Foreign Affairs Committee, thinks the Alaska meeting is just a PR stunt for President Putin.
"Putin doesn't have any desire to reach a compromise," Merezhko says. "He thinks he's winning the war. He is not going to back down."
Merezhko also dismisses President Trump's suggestion that Ukraine will have to "sign something".
"Absolutely not," he says. "I don't believe any agreement which leads to our destruction can be imposed on Ukraine." He says it's both morally and legally wrong to sacrifice people's homes for peace.
But many Ukrainians have already lost their homes and lives. According to the UN, more than 13,000 civilians have been killed in the country, while 3.5 million Ukrainians have been forced to leave their homes.
More than 500 of those displaced people are now living in a temporary village, just outside the capital. Their new homes are metal containers, rather than bricks and mortar. Many are the elderly who fled the fighting in the East. There's a small play area for children who'll probably never see the towns and villages they were born in. Their old homes are now in occupied territory.
The face of 78-year-old Hennadii wells up with tears when he tells me doesn't think he'll ever see the grave of his mother again. He tells me he still misses what he had to leave behind. "I liked fishing there, I had a small plot of land, my grapes and my walnut tree," he says. "And now it doesn't exist."
No one we talk to here expresses much confidence about the talks between Presidents Trump and Putin. "I really hope there will be something good after those talks but I don't have much hope," says Valeria, an 18-year-old student whose family lost their home.
But 78-year-old Valentina is more defiant. Her husband was killed by a Russian missile. "This is our land and our people are dying for it," she says. "How can we give it up? No way."
In Alaska Presidents Trump and Putin will be talking about Ukraine's future - without Ukrainian representation, and over their heads.
Ukraine may gradually be losing this war, but it's not yet been defeated. That makes it harder for anyone else to force through a peace it cannot accept.
Additional reporting by Firle Davies, Anastasiia Levchenko and Mariana Matveichuk
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Putin summit: A look back at when the US purchased Alaska from Russia
Trump-Putin summit: A look back at when the US purchased Alaska from Russia

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump-Putin summit: A look back at when the US purchased Alaska from Russia

Before President Donald Trump sits down with Russian President Vladimir Putin for a highly-anticipated summit in Alaska to discuss Moscow's war on Ukraine, experts emphasize the historical significance of this meeting location, specifically how the United States purchased the land from Russia back in 1867. "I think that what's missing in a lot of our political conversations in the world right now is history, and there's a history behind a lot of what's happening not only in this Russian-American relationship, but also this war," Lee Farrow, history professor and chair of the Department of History and World Cultures at Auburn University at Montgomery, told ABC News. Prior to Alaska becoming the 49th state of the U.S., the territory was under the control of Russia after Czar Peter the Great sent explorer Vitus Bering to the Alaskan coast in 1725, according to the U.S. Department of State's Office of the Historian. Afterward, "Russia had a keen interest in this region, which was rich in natural resources and lightly inhabited," the office of the historian's website said. As the United States was expanding westward in the 1800s and Russia was dealing with a lack of financial resources and military presence in Alaska due to its involvement in the Crimean War, Czar Alexander the Second decided "perhaps it might be a good idea to go ahead and get rid of this faraway colony," Farrow said. "The stars kind of aligned at the right moment for this sale to occur," Farrow told ABC News. Russia officially offered to sell Alaska to the U.S. in 1859, "believing the United States would off-set the designs of Russia's greatest rival in the Pacific, Great Britain," the office of the historian said. But, Russia had to "beg" the U.S. to buy the colony, as the Americans were not initially interested in acquiring the land, Andrei Znamenski, history professor at the University of Memphis, told ABC News. MORE: NATO Secretary General Rutte says Trump-Putin summit is about 'testing Putin' "If we don't do anything, England, which is our enemy, she will come and take it over. So they decided to beg the United States [to] please buy this ice box. Eventually, a few Congress people actually had to be bribed," Znamenski said. After a delay due to the American Civil War, then-Secretary of State William Seward agreed to a renewed proposal to pay $7.2 million in exchange for the land on March 30, 1867, the office of the historian said. The Senate approved the treaty of purchase on April 9, President Andrew Jackson signed it on May 28 and Alaska was "formally transferred to the United States on Oct. 18, 1867," the office of the historian said. After the treaty was signed, people on Capitol Hill argued "whether or not this was a good purchase" or if it "was a wise move at that particular time," with people later referring to the acquisition as "Seward's Folly," Farrow said. This perception changed once discoveries of gold, silver and other natural resources in Alaska were found, Farrow said. "It was actually quite a very good deal for the United States," Farrow said. Only after the increase in discoveries of natural resources, the federal government began to take more interest in the land, with Alaska finally becoming a state on Jan. 3, 1959, Farrow said. MORE: Trump warns Russia of 'severe consequences' if Putin doesn't agree to stop war "Americans turned out to be incredibly lucky by purchasing the so-called ice box, but little did they know that they would be so happy. It turned out to be the greatest investment in terms of territory," Znamenski said. Regardless of what comes out of the meeting between Trump and Putin on Friday, Farrow told ABC News it's crucial for political leaders to remember the historical context when it comes to conflict and relationships between countries, since "it's not just about things that have happened in the last 10 years." "The Russian-American relationship has been so fraught with ups and downs, and there's always a way of looking at the past and focusing on the positive if we're going to try and mediate a war between Russia and Ukraine and actually have any hope of achieving something," Farrow said.

Trump celebrates Social Security's 90th anniversary, claims he's strengthening it
Trump celebrates Social Security's 90th anniversary, claims he's strengthening it

CNN

time23 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump celebrates Social Security's 90th anniversary, claims he's strengthening it

President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Thursday honoring the 90th anniversary of the Social Security Act of 1935. Before doing so, he touted what he sees as the keeping of his promise to preserve and protect the program and to lower taxes for seniors who receive Social Security benefits. Since 1935, Social Security has become the most popular and relied-upon federal safety net program. Roughly 70 million people are currently receiving checks from Social Security, of which the vast majority are retired workers. 'Today, we celebrate that 90th anniversary of one of the most significant pieces of legislation ever signed into law, the Social Security Act of 1935. And we're going to make it stronger, bigger and better. … During the campaign, I made a (pledge) to our seniors that I would always protect Social Security, and under this administration, we're keeping that promise and strengthening Social Security for generations to come,' Trump said. But in citing what he said were his administration's successes, Trump made some false and exaggerated or unverifiable claims. Among them: Trump said that because of his mega tax-and-spending-cuts package, which he signed into law on July 4, 'I allowed no tax on Social Security for our seniors.' And the White House in a separate statement asserted that 'the vast majority of seniors receiving Social Security will no longer pay taxes on that income.' That is not the case. What his package did do was give senior citizens an additional $6,000 deduction on their federal income taxes between 2025 and 2028. Joint filers get twice that amount. But the beefed-up deduction will benefit less than half of older Americans, according to a recent analysis by the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Those who will benefit the most are seniors earning between roughly $80,000 and $130,000. The provision will reduce their taxes by $1,100, on average, or about 1% of their after-tax income, according to the analysis. In praising the accomplishments of Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano, who was standing next to the president for the proclamation signing, Trump said that while the media has reported that the program was going to 'go bust' in less than a decade, 'Not anymore it's not.' But in fact, the program still faces the prospect of not being able to pay 100% of promised benefits by 2034 in the retirement and disability programs if lawmakers don't act to address the pending shortfall, according to the latest annual report from Social Security's trustees. By that point, unless changes to the system are made, payroll tax revenue and other income sources will only be able to cover 81% of scheduled benefits. And with the estimated reduction in tax revenue from Trump's One Big Beautful Bill Act, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that the insolvency date will now be a year or two earlier. There are several longstanding reasons for the funding shortfall, including demographics and other spending and tax legislation passed under Republican and Democratic administrations. But, to close that gap, lawmakers (as they've known for years) will need to come up with a package of fixes that may include raising more in Social Security taxes, raising the retirement age, changing the formula to reduce the amount of initial benefits a person receives at retirement, and changing how benefits are annually adjusted for cost of living, according to CRFB. Trump praised Bisignano's efforts to improve Social Security services by asserting that the agency has shortened call wait times, reduced the disability claims backlog and promoted seniors' online account access. The commissioner, who said Thursday his aim is to make the Social Security Administration a 'digital first' agency and by the end of next year have 200 million Americans signed up to online Social Security accounts, has promised to improve customer service, particularly over the telephone and through artificial intelligence, and to push more people to the program's website. Bisignano has touted improved metrics, but the agency has reduced the number of performance indicators it posts publicly, making comparisons difficult. Based on the statistics that are currently available, they show that less than half of calls (47.1%) are answered within two hours. And the Social Security Administration also recently proposed a change that potentially could make it harder for seniors to interact with the agency – including changing how they verify their identity. In response to concerns by advocacy groups like AARP, the agency has amended its proposal. Sen. Elizabeth Warren last month asked the Social Security's inspector general to audit the agency's customer service efforts in the wake of its shedding roughly 7,000 employees and implementing a new AI tool on its national 800 number.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store